
How Telangana's Caste Census Offers a Blueprint for the Centre
As the Centre signals a shift in its stance by announcing its intent to include caste data in the upcoming national Census, the spotlight turns to Telangana, which has already completed one of India's most detailed caste surveys to date.
The Telangana 2024 Social, Educational, Employment, Economic Caste Survey (SEEEPC)—often referred to as the state's caste census—wrapped up in February 2025. Covering nearly 98% of the population, the survey recorded data on over 3.5 crore people across 245 sub-castes, gathering information in 74 categories, including education, employment, income, discrimination, and social mobility.
Over 1 lakh enumerators conducted door-to-door data collection across 33 districts and 94,000+ blocks in just two months—making SEEEPC a data-driven marvel and, arguably, the most extensive caste data effort since the Mandal Commission in 1980.
Why a Caste Census Matters
The rationale behind a caste census is simple yet powerful: to identify social disparities and craft policies based on evidence rather than assumption. Consider this:
Every CEO or MD of a NIFTY 50 company belongs to an upper caste.
Nearly all 12,000 manual scavengers are Dalits.
95% of India's billion-dollar startup founders come from upper castes.
Meanwhile, 95% of gig workers at the bottom rung are from Dalit, backward, or minority communities.
Are these patterns a result of structural discrimination, lack of access, or poverty? A caste census can help answer this question with data.
Learning from Telangana
Unlike traditional enumerations, Telangana's SEEEPC survey focused on three key dimensions:
Population Share – the numerical strength of caste groups. Participation Share – their access to education, jobs, and income. Representation Share – their presence in politics, business, media, and other spheres of influence.
This multi-dimensional approach offers a holistic view of where caste groups stand—not just in terms of numbers but in life outcomes and opportunities.
Moreover, the design of the survey was deeply rooted in local context. Issues like inter-caste marriage, social discrimination, and access to public spaces were examined. Experts argue that such nuances can't be captured by a top-down bureaucratic approach; they require input from sociologists, local communities, historians, and civil society—something Telangana's model emphasized.
Beyond Headcounts: What a Caste Census Can Reveal
Critics often reduce caste census debates to reservation politics. But experts caution that this misses the point. A caste census is a scientific, empirical exercise to understand the depth and scope of inequality. It is not a reservation policy in itself.
In fact, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that caste-based policies must be backed by rigorous data and expert analysis, not just historical classifications. Thus, a credible caste census becomes foundational for informed policymaking.
Some argue that poverty, not caste, is the real barrier. Even Prime Minister Modi has made this claim. But Telangana's findings challenge this narrative—showing that caste remains a stronger determinant of life outcomes than economic status at birth.
A Welcome Shift
The Modi government's unexpected announcement to conduct a caste census represents a significant policy pivot—one that reflects the growing political consensus around the need for data-backed governance. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi has championed this cause, calling caste data the "X-ray" of Indian society.
As the Centre moves forward, Telangana's experience offers vital lessons: involve communities, design carefully, and focus on outcomes—not just numbers.
In a country deeply divided by caste, the solution may lie in confronting the data, not avoiding it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
With double engine sarkar, AP's development is galloping: Bandi
Tirupati: 'With the double engine Sarkar, Andhra Pradesh State is witnessing rapid development overcoming its crisis,' stated Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar. Speaking at a meeting held on the completion of 11 years of the Narendra Modi-led government, here on Wednesday, the Union Minister claimed that Andhra Pradesh is now receiving maximum financial support from the Centre because the same alliance NDA is ruling both at the State and Centre. Giving detailed account on the liberal support from the Centre, he said about Rs 54,000 crore, including Rs 22,000 crore through bonds, Rs 15,000 crore from World Bank, Rs 12,000 crore from HUDCO and Rs 5,000 crore from German Bank were sanctioned for Amaravati. PM Modi during his recent visit to Vizag, initiated Rs 2 lakh crore development initiatives State-wide, he added. Similarly, Modi also initiated Rs 15,000 crore worth development works under Amaravati reconstruction programme. Regarding Vizag steel plant, Rs 11,444 crore were sanctioned to help the steel plant overcome its losses and achieve normal functioning, he informed. Sanjay said after the Modi government came to power for the third time, the Centre released Rs 12,157 crore under Polavaram project advance funds. Further, under the national industrial corridor development programme (NICDP), Rs 28,602 crore plan was approved to set up 12 industrial estates in Vorvakal and Kopparthi areas. Air services commenced in Kurnool airport and also in Kadapa under Udan scheme covering 17 new air routes in the State. He also said that road facilities are being improved in a big way in the State with Rs 14,000 crore including Bengaluru - Kadapa - Vijayawada express highway and Anantapur – Pendurthi - Anakapalli national highway extension construction works, which were recently inaugurated by PM Modi. The Union Minister said the State got a record-level development in railways with the Centre allocating Rs 9,417 crore in 2024-2025 budget, which is 11 times higher than the Rs 886 crore provided by the Congress government in 2009-2014. Bandi Sanjay planted saplings in police parade grounds after receiving a guard of honour from the district police. Party leaders Bhanu Prakash Reddy, Samanchi Srinivas, Munisubrahmanyam, Gundala Gopinath, P Chandra Sekhar and others were present.


Scroll.in
28 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Illegal immigrants' can be pushed back even if their names are in NRC, claims Assam CM
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Wednesday claimed that alleged 'illegal immigrants' can be 'pushed back' to Bangladesh even if their names are in the National Register of Citizens. 'If we are reasonably sure they are an illegal immigrant, we will push them back immediately,' the chief minister added. Assam published a National Register of Citizens in August 2019 with the aim of separating Indian citizens from undocumented immigrants living in the state. Residents had to prove that they or their ancestors had entered Assam before midnight on March 24, 1971, in order for them to be included in the list. More than 19 lakh persons, or 5.77% of the applicants, were left out of the final list. The NRC has not been notified by the Union government following objections by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led state government and Assamese nationalist groups, leading to questions about the validity of the register. In a social media post, Sarma said that the state had pushed back 19 'illegal immigrants' on Tuesday and will push back nine more on Wednesday. 'Many names were manipulatively and cleverly included in the NRC [National Register for Citizens],' he said. 'The way the NRC process was conducted has raised serious doubts and concerns.' The chief minister added that the presence of a name in the register alone was not 'enough to determine that someone is not an illegal immigrant'. Regardless of whether someone's name is listed in the NRC or not, if the administration determines someone to be an illegal infiltrator, they will be pushed back from Assam. #AssamFirst — Himanta Biswa Sarma (@himantabiswa) June 11, 2025 This statement came four days after the Sarma claimed that the persons declared foreigners were being 'pushed back' to Bangladesh under a legal framework. On June 7, the chief minister said that the Supreme Court, while hearing the challenges to Section 6A of the 1955 Citizenship Act, had said that 'there is no legal requirement for the Assam government to always approach the judiciary in order to identify foreigners'. 'There exists an old law called the 'Immigrants Expulsion Order',' Sarma said. 'The Supreme Court has stated that this law is still in force. According to this law, the DC [district collector] has the authority to issue an order and permit immediate pushback.' In October, the Supreme Court had upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the 1955 Citizenship Act. Section 6A was introduced as a special provision under the Act when the Assam Accord was signed between the Union government and leaders of the Assam Movement in 1985. It allows foreigners who came to Assam between January 1, 1966, and March 25, 1971, to seek Indian citizenship. Indigenous groups in Assam have alleged that this provision in the Act had legalised infiltration by migrants from Bangladesh. On Monday, Sarma said that the Assam government had 'pushed back' 303 'foreigners' and will continue to do so under the 1950 Immigrants Expulsion from Assam Act. The deportations On May 31, the chief minister confirmed that Assam was 'pushing back' to Bangladesh persons who have been declared foreigners by the state's Foreigners Tribunals. Foreigners Tribunals in Assam are quasi-judicial bodies that adjudicate on matters of citizenship. However, the tribunals have been accused of arbitrariness and bias, and of declaring people foreigners on the basis of minor spelling mistakes, a lack of documents or lapses in memory. Sarma's May 31 statement had come against the backdrop of an increase in detentions of declared foreigners in Assam since May 23. Families say they have no information on their relatives' whereabouts. Some of them have identified their missing relatives in videos from Bangladesh, alleging they were forcibly sent across the border. Sarma had claimed that the process of pushing back foreigners was being taken as per the directives issued by the Supreme Court in February. On February 4, the court directed the state government to start the process of deporting foreign nationals being held in the state's detention centres immediately.


The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
A different approach to the caste census
The story so far: The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs, chaired by Prime Minister Modi, has decided to conduct caste enumeration in the upcoming Census. As per Article 246 of the Constitution, the Census is a Union subject listed in the 7th schedule. The caste census must be viewed beyond binaries of 'for or against' to envision a more transformative idea — as a foundational tool for what might be called a social management approach to governance. What were the findings from State-level caste censuses? The Bihar caste survey (2023) found that Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Economically Backward Classes (EBCs) together make up over 63% of the population, with EBCs alone at 36.01%. Scheduled Castes (SC) account for 19.65%, and Scheduled Tribes (SC) for 1.68%. The general category comprises only 15.52%. Additionally, over 34% of Bihar's families live on less than ₹200 per day, with nearly 44% of SC households below that line. In Telangana's 2025 survey, Backward Classes (BCs) constituted 56.33% of the population, with BC Muslims forming a substantial 10.08%. These numbers reveal a stark reality: India's marginalised communities form the majority but are significantly underrepresented in education, employment, and governance. Data shared by the Union Minister of State for Education in Parliament reveals that only 4% of professors and 6% of associate professors in 45 Central Universities are OBCs, while 85% are from the general category. This imbalance exists despite the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers' Cadre) Act, 2019. Yet, the policy response is hindered by the absence of reliable data. India hasn't conducted a full caste census since 1931. The 2011 Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) was marred by data inconsistencies and its findings were withheld. Without up-to-date caste data, affirmative action and development policies remain speculative. What is a social management approach? Top-down welfare models in India have failed to adequately address layered inequities of caste, gender, and class. A social management approach does the opposite: it starts with data, targets need-based interventions, and treats caste as a developmental variable rather than a stigma. If we know who needs what, and how need is shaped by historical disadvantage, we can design policies with greater equity and efficiency. Caste data becomes a lens to understand inequity structurally, rather than as isolated cases. Tamil Nadu offers a model, using data from the Backward Classes Commission to adjust policies on reservations, scholarships, and governance. Karnataka's caste survey is being used to recalibrate reservation policies in education and jobs. A national caste census would enable such models at scale. It could inform disaggregated budgeting, where funds are allocated, not just based on geography or income but on caste-based gaps in healthcare, infrastructure, and education. It could enable diversity audits in institutions, showing who occupies power and who doesn't. It could also track how schemes like PM Awas Yojana or Skill India are reaching caste groups, ensuring that the most marginalised aren't left out. Are there global precedents? Critics argue that a caste census deepens social divides and undermines national unity. However, the reality is that caste endures not because it is counted, but because it shapes how opportunity, and wealth are distributed. Ignoring caste does not erase it. It merely obscures structural inequality behind ignorance. A caste census does not create casteism; it reveals it. Other democracies don't shy away from identity-based data. The U.S. collects race and ethnicity data every 10 years and uses it for civil rights enforcement. South Africa and Brazil do the same by tracking race and language categories. If these nations can use such data to address inequity, so must India, home to the most enduring and hierarchical caste system in the world. What about transparency? The value of a caste census extends beyond policymaking. It is also a vital instrument of democratic accountability. Disaggregated data enables civil society, the media, and citizens to know whether public resources are being equitably shared. A publicly accessible caste census would empower citizens to demand transparency. It could expose intra-caste inequalities and where welfare benefits are monopolised by elite sub-groups, leaving the truly disadvantaged behind. Ultimately, the caste census is not about counting caste. It is about recognising injustice and correcting it. Thus, a caste census rooted in social management would be linked to a wider agenda of social emancipation. This includes constitutional literacy, land rights, housing, labour protections, and justice for Dalit, Bahujan, and Adivasi women who face intersectional exploitation. A caste census done right could offer India a data-driven democratic transformation. Prof. Sony Kunjappan is the Head, Department of Studies in Social Management, Central University of Gujarat. Amal Chandra is an author, policy analyst, and columnist