
BJP's Bihar playbook: Invisible RSS hand powers Modi's might
As Bihar inches closer to assembly elections, the BJP is scripting an all-encompassing narrative—one that stretches beyond electoral arithmetic and seeks to reconfigure the very grammar of the state's politics. It's a calibrated blend of nationalism, social justice, Hindutva and development, all wrapped in the charisma and authority of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.Yet beneath this grand narrative lies a disciplined ideological machinery: the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), whose invisible hand continues to shape the BJP's game in one of India's most politically complex states.advertisementThe emotional pivot of the campaign is nationalism, turbocharged by Operation Sindoor, India's military retaliation to the Pahalgam terror attack. The BJP has draped this operation in the colours of patriotism and turned it into a rallying cry for unity and strength.In Patna, on May 29, the streets turned saffron and steel. Cultural performances, replicas of BrahMos missiles, chants of 'Bharat Mata Ki Jai', and a curated spectacle of military pride set the stage for a seven-km-long roadshow by Modi.
The following day, in Bikramganj in Rohtas district, the prime minister addressed a packed rally. His words, as always, were a blend of conviction and choreography. 'This is not the era of war,' Modi declared, pausing just long enough before adding, 'but this is also not the era of terrorism. Zero tolerance against terrorism is the guarantee for a better world.'advertisementThe audience erupted. Modi wasn't just talking national security—he was imprinting himself as the architect of India's decisive will. And he knew exactly where he was standing. Bihar is the new social laboratory for BJP, where it will test how its socialist deviation will react to the Hindutva and nationalism push.Modi has visited Bihar twice in a month. In his playbook, followed over the past decade, he increases his footfall in poll-bound states while local units of the BJP and the Sangh mobilise the narrative around nationalism, development and Hindutva and the prime minister's appeal as a decisive leader.Nationalism is just one spoke in the BJP's electoral wheel. A more strategic, and in some ways surprising, manoeuvre has been its decision to embrace the demand for a national caste census. For years, the BJP had steered cautiously around the issue, mindful of its upper-caste base and wary of letting the Mandal-era anxieties creep back.But Bihar's electoral terrain leaves no room for hesitation. By formally backing caste enumeration within the upcoming census, the BJP has signalled its intent to reclaim the narrative of social justice from caste-based parties, such as the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), Janata Dal (United), and the likes of Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), Vikassheel Insaan Party and Hindustani Awam Morcha (Secular).advertisementThis pivot is not ideological backtracking—it's tactical evolution. Party leaders frame the census move as 'data for dignity'. The idea is to address longstanding demands of representation and welfare, while positioning the BJP as a party that listens and adapts. What's more, this shift allows the party to blur the rigid backward vs forward caste binary that has long defined Bihar politics.In the BJP's new storyline, caste is acknowledged, but harmonised under a larger umbrella: national progress and Hindu unity. In previous elections, caste-based outfits tried to push back the BJP as a party of upper castes, who resist social justice and reservations. Now, in Bihar, the BJP will build the narrative that it's a party of all Hindus.That broader ideological integration is being quietly orchestrated by the RSS, which has intensified its grassroots work across Bihar. Shakhas have grown in number. Pracharaks are embedded deep in rural districts, especially in caste-sensitive regions like Mithila, Magadh and Seemanchal. The Sangh's volunteers are engaging in nuanced caste dialogues, mapping booth-level dynamics and subtly pushing a narrative of 'samrasta'—harmony among Hindus of all castes.advertisementUnlike earlier times, when Hindutva was more loudly proclaimed, the current model is calibrated, understated, yet expansive. The Sangh doesn't want Hindutva to be merely identified with a party. It wants it to be seen as a broader social and cultural movement, one that survives political realignments.The Maharashtra model is instructive here. When Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena—once the most vocal proponent of Hindutva—broke ranks and joined hands with the Congress and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the RSS didn't flinch. 'Ideological alignment is not the same as ideological ownership,' a senior Sangh functionary noted. And when the alliance shifted, so did the loyalties on the ground.What followed in Maharashtra was telling: the Sangh quietly realigned ground-level loyalties, undercut the Thackeray-led Sena, and reinforced the BJP's base with surgical precision. In Bihar, a similar template is being pursued. The goal is to promote a subtle but overarching Hindutva, one that integrates with social justice rather than clashes with it, and one that builds lasting loyalty beyond the election cycle.Complementing this ideological work is the legislative push that the BJP hopes will activate its core base—amendments to the Waqf laws. Framed as a step to democratise and bring transparency to the management of Waqf properties, the BJP claims it will benefit poor Muslims who have long been excluded from institutional control. Critics call it divisive. But in Bihar's political soil, where identity and property are intertwined, the BJP's messaging finds fertile ground: fairness over appeasement, accountability over entitlement.advertisementAnd then, there is development—still the most resonant theme in Modi's repertoire. Every speech, every rally, every government press release has invoked the 'double-engine sarkar'. Bihar, says Modi, has potential but needs 'infrastructure with intent'. During his recent visit, he inaugurated the new terminal at Patna airport, laid the foundation for the Bihta civil enclave, and flagged off infrastructure projects connecting AIIMS and Danapur. All this was not just ribbon-cutting; it was branding. Modi as 'Vikas Purush', as Bihar's promise.The party knows, however, that projecting development alone is not enough in a state where unemployment and rural distress still linger. Which is why every infrastructure headline is paired with outreach narratives: that central schemes like PM Awas, Ujjwala and Ayushman Bharat have changed lives. That these are not just policies but personal guarantees delivered by Modi. The BJP's messaging aims to blur the line between state and Centre, between ideology and delivery.advertisementInterestingly, the BJP may go into the Bihar polls without projecting a chief ministerial face, much like it did in Maharashtra. There, the absence of a declared chief minister helped the party sidestep factionalism and keep the campaign Modi-centric. In Bihar, the move is even more strategic—it helps the BJP escape anti-incumbency linked to chief minister Nitish Kumar, whose popularity has waned even among traditional supporters. Without tying itself to Nitish's record, the BJP retains flexibility: it can criticise his failures while promising continuity where necessary.This decision also dovetails with the Sangh's longer-term view. The RSS isn't just focused on winning an election—it is focused on embedding ideological permanence, especially in a state as politically fluid as Bihar. With the BJP keeping the chief ministerial post open and the Sangh engineering caste recalibration on the ground, the idea is to institutionalise a cultural order.What emerges, then, is a campaign that is less about a single masterstroke and more about a grand orchestration—a symphony of nationalism, cultural consolidation, data-led social justice, and Brand Modi. The BJP is not merely contesting an election in Bihar; it is attempting to rewrite the coordinates of how politics is done in the state.Whether this strategy culminates in a clear electoral mandate will be decided in the final arithmetic of the ballot. But the BJP's ambition is larger than a simple win. It wants to leave behind a political structure in Bihar that speaks its language—long after the ballots have been counted.Subscribe to India Today MagazineMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Wire
29 minutes ago
- The Wire
Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Law Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma Rekha Sharma 4 minutes ago The Supreme Court's swift move to initiate contempt proceedings against journalist Ajay Shukla for a critical YouTube video contrasts sharply with the way BJP MP Nishikant Dubey was handled. Nishikant Dubey (left) and Ajay Shukla in the background. In the foreground is the Supreme Court. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now On May 30, a Supreme Court bench headed by the Chief Justice of India initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against Ajay Shukla, a Chandigarh-based journalist, for posting a video on YouTube allegedly containing scathing and scandalous remarks against some senior judges of the Supreme Court. The bench observed that though the Constitution guarantees to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression, this is subject to reasonable restrictions and that such a right does not permit someone to defame a judge or bring into disrepute the institution of the judiciary. Having said so, the court directed that the offending video be taken down forthwith. It also asked the Attorney General and the Solicitor General to assist the court on the next date of hearing. Though the video is no longer available, it is widely believed that contain some allegedly objectionable remarks against Justice Surya Kant, who is next in line for the Chief Justiceship, and Justice Bela M. Trivedi, who retired mid-May. It may be stated, at the very outset, that the dignity, majesty and honour of the Supreme Court, or for that matter any court of justice must be protected at all cost by every person including by the Supreme Court itself. That said, fair criticism of a judicial decision and the conduct of a judge – provided it is done in good faith and on accurate facts – also needs to be equally protected. In this background, while no one can question the right and the prerogative of the Supreme Court to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Shukla, the action taken has given rise to certain questions. Not very long ago, highly objectionable and vicious remarks were made by Nishikant Dubey, a Lok Sabha member of the ruling party, against the then CJI, Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Dubey held him singularly responsible for all the alleged 'civil wars' in the country. He also alleged that the Supreme Court was taking the country towards anarchy. These remarks were not only highly toxic and outrageous, they had the potential to rock the very foundation of our judicial system and erode the people's faith in the judiciary and almost bordered on 'blasphemy'. And yet, even though the fountain head of the judiciary was personally targeted, it neither caused any stir nor a ripple. There was a sphinx like silence. No judge deemed it fit to issue any suo motu criminal contempt notice against the errant MP. It was the Supreme Court Bar Association which raised its voice, and urged the Attorney General to grant consent for initiating contempt proceedings against Dubey. The AG neither on his own nor on the request of the Bar Association has till date given or declined to give his consent. This, despite the fact that he as the first law officer of the country, has a duty to uphold the dignity and majesty of the court of which he is an integral part. It ultimately fell on the lot of Justice Khanna himself to give a befitting response to the likes of Dubey. Though the bench headed by him dismissed a petition which sought contempt action against the MP, he gave a very measured and dignified response to him. Holding that the comments were highly irresponsible and reflected a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court and its judges, he wrote that the courts are not so fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. He further observed, 'We do not believe that the confidence and the credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such statements'. Kudos to Justice Sanjiv Khanna for such a befitting response. Going by media reports, Justice Bela Trivedi has not been given a farewell by the Supreme Court Bar Association. The CJI is reported to have expressed his disapproval over the decision of the Bar Association, and so has Justice A.G. Masih, who said that tradition must be followed. It is for the first time in the history of the Supreme Court that such a tradition has been broken. The bar, it is said, is the judge of the judges. It is not for nothing that Justice Bela Trivedi has been denied the honour of a farewell by the bar. The question is why did things come to such a pass? It should set both bench and bar thinking. Undoubtedly, a long standing tradition has been broken but, then, judgeship is not a blank cheque. It comes with responsibility. The bar not only helps judges make the justice delivery system work, it also acts as a watchdog. The bar has, by its action, sent a loud and clear message. It is time for judges to remember that they too are under watch. They may, in a given case, fail to grasp some suspected hidden meaning of a column written in English by an Oxford educated professor and leave the job of deciphering it to some police officer, and that too not from a particular state. But if they fail to take action against a minister who made a highly objectionable statement in simple and understandable Hindi, it does raise eyebrows. It is in such matters that the bar has to play its role. And, if it does play its role, there should be no protest. Rekha Sharma is a former judge of the Delhi high court. This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Central Hall | Governors Increasingly Acting like Political Agents as Constitutional Morality Erodes 'Same Sex Marriage Not Legalised But Couples Can Very Well Form A Family': Madras HC Indian Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla-led Mission to International Space Station Pushed to June 10 'Highly Irresponsible': BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Faces Supreme Court Wrath Why the Process of 44 MLAs 'Forming the Government' in Manipur Is Not Straightforward US Supreme Court Rules $1.29 Bn Lawsuit Against ISRO-Owned Antrix to Proceed Modi-Shah Face Dilemma As Their Stormtroopers Cross All Limits of Propriety The Arrest and Trial of Professor Azaan M Free Speech on Eggshells: What the Ali Khan Mahmudabad Case Signals for All of Us About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.


Deccan Herald
35 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Stampede politics, surrender barb, and a billionaire break-up!
Hello Readers! The week that went by was a tumultuous one in political circles. A victory parade turned into tragedy with political mudslinging taking precedence thereafter, a 'surrender-' barb opened up a Pandora's box while a Bharat Mata picture in Kerala's Raj Bhavan ruffled a few feathers. The week also saw the break-up of two-most influential personalities in the world of business and trade. Here's a quick recap of the week's action in DH Political Theatre.. Stampede did not take much time for ecstasy to turn into agony as Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB) maiden Indian Premier League (IPL) triumph and the resultant celebrations turned haywire last week with 11 lives lost due to a stampede near the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru. But what followed after the stampede was sheer innuendo and political mudslinging which would put everyone into shame. While BJP, which is the principal opposition party in Karnataka, flayed the ruling Congress for giving the nod to victory celebrations at such a short notice despite being warned against the same by the police, the ruling party allowed the situation to go from bad to worse by suspending top police BJP flayed the Congress for turning the event into a virtual 'photoshoot' with most of their barbs aimed at Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy D K Shivakumar. Videos and photos showing family members of Congress leaders posing with RCB cricketers on the grand steps of the Vidhana Soudha added more fuel to the fire. Regional imbalance questions also popped up as to whether the government would have accorded a similar reception to a Ranji-Trophy-winning state team instead of arranging a grand welcome with pomp and splendor for a city-based franchise club , that too in front of the Vidhana Soudha. Though the government did do some knee-jerk action by ordering a CID probe and detaining four people, including RCB's marketing manager, the damage is beyond control. The suspension of top police officials including the city pole commissioner who netizens claim have been made a scapegoat, has drawn flak from many circles. As cricket fans became cannon fodder, questions like what was the need to organise an event at such a short notice despite police warning and measures about better crowd-control management will remain open to debate for far across the Vindhyas, a political slugfest broke out between the ruling BJP and opposition Congress after Rahul Gandhi alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'surrendered' following a call from US President Donald Trump during the India-Pakistan military conflict."A call came from Trump and Narendra ji immediately surrendered - history is a witness, this is the character of BJP-RSS, they always bow down," Rahul posted on taking potshots at the PM, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha also recalled the bravery of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1971 when she held her fort despite the US sending its Seventh Fleet. The Raebareli MP also went on say that India, under Indira Gandhi's astute leadership, held on its conviction and did not yield to US pressure at that was quick to pounce upon the 'surrender barb' and flayed Rahul saying his comments were an insult to the armed forces. While alleging that Rahul's comments undermined the success of Operation Sindoor, it also said that it makes one suspect if he is a "paid agent" of China and Pakistan. The saffron party also went on to add that it was the Nehru-Gandhi family which surrendered Indian interests. Governor vs since Arif Mohammed Khan was shunted out of Kerala Raj Bhavan, the equation between the state government and the governor had been reasonably good. But it looks as though the face off between the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government and the Governor is set to resume. In a latest twist, a political row erupted after Kerala's agriculture minister P Prasad boycotted a sapling plantation function at the governor's house on World Environment Day, apparently for using a photo of Bharat Mata carrying a saffron flag. The minister's contention was that gubernatorial offices should not be used as a platform to promote religious causes, in an apparent reference to the portrait, which is mostly used in RSS 'shakhas'.Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar refused to budge though and defending it by saying that the picture of Bharat Mata could not be removed as 'we can't not do away with the ideals for which we're living'. Though the function was moved out from the central hall of Raj Bhavan to the Durbar Hall inside the state secretariat, the damage had been done by that time as the LDF government stuck to its stand of boycotting the function unless the portrait was removed. The latest row happened close on the heels of another controversy over a programme of RSS ideologue S Gurumurthy on 'Operation Sindoor' being held at the Raj Bhavan, with both Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Opposition parties chiding Arlekar for what they called attempts to 'saffronise' the Raj Bhavan. It looks as though there is no end in sight to the Governor vs Govt face off in the left-ruled Kerala. Out of context!.'Misinterpreted', 'taken out of context' --- these are certain euphemisms that politicians usually use when they are in trouble after making controversial comments. It looks as though Tamil film icon Kamal Haasan, who nurtures political ambitions, is the latest to follow the trend. The 'Ulaganayagan' is in the eye of a storm following his comments that Kannada was born out of Tamil during an event to promote his film Thug Life, which he made in the presence of Kannada star Shiva Rajkumar. He faced heavy backlash from all quarters, with even Karnataka High Court pulling up the 70-year-old and asking him to apologise. But Kamal remained defiant and said that though there was no dispute or debate over the rich legacy of Kannada language, he would not apologise as demanded by Kannada outfits. But to calm down the issue, Haasan came up with a 'classic' justification, saying that his comments on Tamil and Kannada while talking about his association with thespian Dr Rajkumar's family have been 'misunderstood' and 'taken out of context.''It pains me that my statement at the Thug Life audio launch spoken out of gent affection for the legendary Dr Rajkumar's family, especially Shiva Rajkumar been misunderstood and taken out of context. My words were intended only convey that we are all one and from the same family and not to diminish Kannada any way,' Kamal said, in a belated attempt to douse the fire. After all, actors too can turn into good politicians, right?Billionaire break-up!.Across the globe, the week ended on high drama with dirty linen being washed in public by US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The public feud between the two most influential figures in the United States reached a crescendo, with Trump suggesting that he may terminate US government contracts and subsidies given to Musk's companies after the latter blasted Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as fiscally reckless and a "disgusting abomination."When Trump met privately with White House officials, there was little to suggest that the US president was close to a public spat with Musk, the billionaire businessman who helped him win a second term in office. But things took a diabolic twist as Trump called Musk volatile and the latter retaliated through a barrage of posts on his own social media platform 'X'.As the public feud between the two billionaires escalates over the tax and spending bill, the Musk-Trump break-up also sent Tesla's stock price plunging while keyboard warriors went berserk with a wave of memes and viral one-liners across the world of concludes the (political) entertainment for this week folks! We will be back next week with more. Till then, stay tuned to Stage Left,DH Newsletters Team
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'Combat terror, eliminate Jaish': Bilawal Bhutto delegation gets a reality check in US
US Congressman Brad Sherman gave a reality check to the Pakistani delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, insisting that the country should 'do all it can' to eliminate terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammad from the region read more Pakistan's bid to spread its false propaganda in Washington failed horribly after a US lawmaker called out the country's support for a globally recognised terrorist organisation, Jaish-e-Mohammad. On Thursday, American Congressman Brad Sherman delivered stern advice to the Pakistani delegation led by former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari that the country should 'do all it can' to eliminate the terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammad. Sherman also told Bhutto's team that Pakistan should ensure the protection of religious minorities in the country. Interestingly, the remarks from the US lawmaker came months after Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir made provocative remarks, expressing his support for the so-called 'Two-Nation Theory,' days after which India witnessed the Pahalgam terror attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sherman took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to reveal that he emphasised to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combating terrorism and, in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed. The American lawmaker pointed out that it was the JeM that was behind the murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002. For years, the people of #Sindh have faced political repression through enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings. Since its founding in 2011, Pakistan's own Human Rights Commission has documented over 8,000 cases of enforced disappearances, many of which have never been… — Congressman Brad Sherman (@BradSherman) June 6, 2025 Sherman shares the plight of the Pearl family In his post, the US lawmaker noted that he told the Pakistani delegation that it is important to combat terror groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed and shared the plight of the Pearl family. 'I emphasised to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combatting terrorism, and in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed, who murdered my constituent Daniel Pearl in 2002,' the Congressman said. 'Pearl's family continues to live in my district, and Pakistan should do all it can to eliminate this vile group and combat terrorism in the region,' he added. Daniel was kidnapped by terrorists in Pakistan in January 2002, while he was on his way to what he had expected would be an interview with Pakistani religious cleric Mubarak Ali Gilani in Karachi. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Congressman from California also raised concerns about the lives of minorities in Pakistan. 'Christians, Hindus and Ahmadiyya Muslims living in Pakistan must be allowed to practice their faith and participate in the democratic system without fear of violence, persecution, discrimination, or an unequal justice system,' he said in the post. During the meeting, Sherman also called for the release of Dr Shakil Afridi, who continues to languish in prison for helping the United States kill Osama bin Laden . 'Freeing Dr Afridi represents an important step in bringing closure for victims of 9/11,' he said. Dr Afridi is a Pakistani physician who helped the CIA run a polio vaccination programme in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The campaign eventually helped in the collection of the DNA sample of the Bin Laden family. Afridi was eventually arrested by Pakistani authorities shortly after the American raid on Bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad in May 2011. In 2012, a Pakistani court eventually sentenced him to 33 years in prison. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD