Nvidia CEO: You won't lose your job to AI—you'll 'lose your job to somebody who uses AI'
You probably don't need to worry about a robot taking your job, says Nvidia CEO and co-founder Jensen Huang.
You should, however, expect your job status to be threatened by people who understand artificial intelligence better than you do, Huang said at the Milken Institute's Global Conference 2025 on May 6.
"Every job will be affected, and immediately. It is unquestionable," said Huang, 62, whose $3.3 trillion company designs some of the computer chips that power popular AI tools. "You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI."
There aren't any job postings on Indeed that AI can do completely on its own, CEO Chris Hyams told CNBC Make It on March 31. But two-thirds of roles on the platform include tasks that AI can perform reasonably well, said Hyams.
Humans who can train AI systems to do so are becoming more desirable for employers, said Huang: "There are about 30 million people in the world who know how to program and use this technology to its extreme. The instrument we invented, we know how to use, but the other 7-and-a-half billion people don't."Not every CEO in the AI industry fully agrees with Huang. The tech could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within the next one-to-five years, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told Axios on Wednesday.
"Cancer is cured, the economy grows at 10% a year, the budget is balanced — and 20% of people don't have jobs," Amodei predicted, adding that he sees AI evolving from assisting many entry-level jobs to automating their responsibilities entirely.
One potential end result, he said: CEOs will simply stop listing as many new jobs for hire.
Companies like Shopify, Duolingo and Fiverr are already encouraging — or mandating — that some, or all, of their employees incorporate AI into their work. At Shopify, managers are encouraged to exhaust those tools before asking for more headcount, according to a company-wide memo from CEO Tobi Lutke.
Huang, for his part, has said that AI will lead to at least some job creation, particularly in fields like software engineering and computer programming.
"What used to be human-coded softwares running on CPUs are now machine learning generated softwares running on GPUs," he said at The Hill and Valley Forum in April. "Every single layer of the tooling of it ... is being invented right now and it creates tons of jobs at the next layer ... A whole bunch of new trade jobs have to be created."
Huang has frequently touted AI's current ability to help workers do their jobs more efficiently. He personally uses chatbots like Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT to write his first drafts, he said on a January 7 episode of Wharton organizational psychologist Adam Grant's "ReThinking" podcast.
You can also use these tools for more complex projects, he noted at the conference.
"If you don't know how to program a computer, you just tell the AI, 'I don't know how to program [computers]. How do I program them?' And the AI will tell you exactly how to [do so]," he said. "You could draw a schematic and show it to it. You could draw a picture and ask it what to do."
His recommendation: Get comfortable with AI, especially if you're a student. Billionaire entrepreneur and investor Mark Cuban similarly advises students to learn how to use AI tools.
"When I talk to kids today and they ask me what I would do if I were 12 today, my answer is always the same, read books and learn how to use [artificial intelligence] in every way, shape and form you can," Cuban, 66, wrote in a February 17 post on social media platform BlueSky.
Since 2019, Cuban has committed millions of dollars to hosting free AI bootcamps for high school students in low-income U.S. areas. His programs aim to help develop "under-appreciated" talent who can ultimately help boost the country's global competitiveness, he told the Wall Street Journal in October 2020.
At the conference, Huang expressed a complementary viewpoint. "You could argue that artificial intelligence is probably our best way to increase the GDP," he said. "Don't be that person who ignores this technology ... Take advantage of AI."
,
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
15 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
AMD takes aim at Nvidia's AI hardware dominance with Brium acquisition
AMD's latest acquisition could help reduce Nvidia's market dominance when it comes to AI hardware. Semiconductor giant AMD on Wednesday announced it acquired AI software optimization startup Brium. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Brium is a startup that appears to be in stealth mode. The startup builds machine learning applications to enable AI inference, the process a trained AI model uses to draw conclusions from new data, across a variety of different hardware options, according to a blog post on Brium's bare-bones website. Cutting through that jargon a bit, Brium can help retrofit AI software to work with different AI hardware than it might have been designed for originally. In a press release, AMD said its acquisition of Brium will help its commitment to 'building a high-performance, open AI software ecosystem that empowers developers and drives innovation.' While AMD is saying that this acquisition helps create a more open AI ecosystem, which isn't wrong, it seems clear that it's also meant to help AMD overcome one of its biggest roadblocks: a large percentage of AI software is being designed for Nvidia hardware and chips. Brium's sole blog post, which came out in November 2024, talked about the industry's reliance on Nvidia and called out AMD specifically. Techcrunch event Save now through June 4 for TechCrunch Sessions: AI Save $300 on your ticket to TC Sessions: AI—and get 50% off a second. Hear from leaders at OpenAI, Anthropic, Khosla Ventures, and more during a full day of expert insights, hands-on workshops, and high-impact networking. These low-rate deals disappear when the doors open on June 5. Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI Secure your spot at TC Sessions: AI and show 1,200+ decision-makers what you've built — without the big spend. Available through May 9 or while tables last. Berkeley, CA | REGISTER NOW 'In recent years, the hardware industry has made strides towards providing viable alternatives to Nvidia hardware for server-side inference,' the blog post reads. 'Solutions such as AMD's Instinct GPUs offer strong performance characteristics, but it remains a challenge to harness that performance in practice as workloads are typically tuned extensively with Nvidia GPUs in mind. At Brium, we intend to enable efficient [model] inference across a range of hardware architectures.' This is AMD's fourth strategic acquisition in the past two years toward the company's goal of fostering an open-source AI ecosystem, according to the press release. The company previously acquired Silo AI (in July 2024), (October 2023), and Mipsology (August 2023). TechCrunch has reached out to AMD for more information.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI-driven search ad spending set to surge to $26 billion by 2029, data shows
By Jaspreet Singh (Reuters) -Spending on AI-powered search advertising is poised to surge to nearly $26 billion by 2029 from just over $1 billion this year in the U.S., driven by rapid adoption of the technology and more sophisticated user targeting, data from Emarketer showed on Wednesday. Companies that rely on traditional keyword-based search ads could experience revenue declines due to the growing popularity of AI search ads, which offer greater convenience and engagement for users, according to the research firm. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Search giants such as Alphabet-owned Google and Microsoft's Bing have added AI capabilities to better compete with chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Perplexity AI, which provide users with direct information without requiring to click through multiple results. Apple is exploring the integration of AI-driven search capabilities into its Safari browser, potentially moving away from its longstanding partnership with Google. The report has come as concerns grew about users increasingly turning to the chatbots for conversational search and AI-powered search results could upend business models of some companies. Online education firm Chegg said in May that it would lay off about 248 employees as it looks to cut costs and streamline operations because students are using AI-powered tools including ChatGPT over traditional edtech platforms. QUOTE "Publishers and other sites are feeling the pain from AI search. As they lose out on traffic, we're seeing publishers lean into subscriptions and paid AI licensing deals to bolster revenue," Emarketer analyst Minda Smiley said. GRAPHIC CONTEXT AI search ad spending is expected to constitute nearly 1% of total search ad spending this year and 13.6% by 2029 in the U.S., according to Emarketer. Sectors such as financial services, technology, telecom, and healthcare are embracing AI as they are seeing clear advantages in using the technology to enhance their ad strategies, while the retail industry's adoption is slow, the report said. Google recently announced the expansion of its AI-powered search capabilities into the consumer packaged goods sector through enhancements in Google Shopping. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Will AI Really Take Your Job? Experts Reveal The True Outlook Today
Experts break down what AI job loss really means — and why reinvention, not just replacement, is the ... More future of work. Last month in a CNN interview with Anderson Cooper, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic — the AI company behind Claude — issued a warning that landed like a thunderclap in Silicon Valley and beyond. In what sounded almost like an apocalyptic future for workers around the globe, the 42-year billionaire predicted that within five years, AI could automate away up to 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs. It was a jarring prediction, even for an industry accustomed to provocative soundbites. The quote quickly ricocheted across news outlets, igniting headlines and debates about the economic future of billions. CNN, notably, cast the comments in a more skeptical light, asking whether dire forecasts about AI are becoming self-fulfilling. Others, like Axios, highlighted the fear among young professionals who are just beginning to understand how automation might shadow their careers. 'This is coming faster than people think,' Amodei noted in his interview with Cooper, echoing concerns that have been quietly escalating across the AI industry in recent times. For recent graduates, entry-level workers and companies just beginning to embrace automation, the warning felt less like a forecast and more like a countdown. But is it true? Experts across telecom, software and enterprise architecture suggest a more nuanced reality. Yes, AI is changing work — faster than ever before. But this isn't just a story of job loss. It's also about reinvention, overcorrection and the uniquely human skills machines still struggle to replicate. 'Any industrial or technology revolution results in job loss. This has happened many times over,' said Andy Thurai, Field CTO at Cisco, in an interview with me. 'What's different this time is the speed. The AI hype cycle is moving much faster than anything we've seen before.' Dima Gutzeit, founder and CEO of LeapXpert, echoed this sentiment in an interview. 'We're entering a high-speed workforce transformation,' he said. 'What's different this time? The pace. Automation used to take decades — now it's happening in quarters.' In other words, AI isn't fundamentally new. But the compressed timeline between research breakthroughs and enterprise deployment has never been this short. Cloud-native architectures and API-first models have made it easier to scale new tools organization-wide in months, not years. The fear of missing out — or FOMO — is also pushing organizations, many of which aren't even ready for such a pivot, to integrate AI into their workflows. Essentially, too many things are happening so fast in the AI space that it feels almost inevitable that it could cause disruptions larger than the scale that was seen when mobile popped onto the scene in the early 2000s. However, there's more to this revolution than FOMO-ladened messages of doom. And as Allison Morrow noted in her poignant analysis on CNN Business, the narrative about a 'white-collar bloodbath' is likely another part of the AI hype machine. Klarna made headlines in 2024 when it replaced 700 customer support agents with an AI chatbot. But it quietly brought back some of those roles in early 2025, realizing customers preferred human support to AI. Why? Because the bots weren't flawless, as industry experts continue to warn. Many companies are trimming senior teams and hoping AI-enhanced mid-level hires can close the gap. But just like in Klarna's case, it's not always working. 'The results have been mixed so far,' said Thurai. 'The pendulum always swings wide. Companies get seduced by cost savings and forget about institutional memory and strategic insight.' The math doesn't always check out. Generative AI tools still struggle with hallucinations, context retention and compliance guardrails. And in industries like finance and healthcare, these flaws aren't just bugs — they're liabilities. Another big concern across sectors isn't whether jobs will be lost, but about who gets to keep them. 'A skilled digital worker can be replaced by someone with less expertise but greater AI proficiency,' Thurai said. In other words, AI adoption across organizations is creating a new kind of talent gap; one not defined by degrees, but by fluency in these AI tools, which are evolving faster than education systems can keep up. But Thurai also noted that augmenting certain human roles with AI is 'a perceived cost savings that could backfire.' It's, therefore, necessary for business leaders to keep in mind that diving into the AI ocean two feet first could be catastrophic in the end rather than beneficial. Organizations need the right dose of innovation and caution. Yes, there are likely routines that could be automated right away, but businesses must also stop to count the potential costs of such automation. As Gutzeit noted, 'automation without strategy is dangerous.' He added that this is especially true for regulated industries where 'AI needs a human firewall.' Nowhere is this more evident than in telecom. Arnd Baranowski, founder and CEO of Oculeus, explains that while AI has become essential to fraud detection, it still needs human judgment. 'AI allows telecom providers to analyze massive volumes of traffic well beyond human capacity. But when fraudsters adopt unpredictable new methods, only humans can anticipate the shift. That requires imagination — and that's something AI lacks.' The risk of over-reliance is real. 'Telcos that downsize their fraud prevention teams too aggressively risk becoming less capable of stopping fraud altogether,' Baranowski warned. This hybrid approach — AI as analyst, human as strategist — is becoming the new normal across industries. According to Gutzeit, while AI is indeed replacing and redefining routine, entry-level roles, with two-thirds of companies expecting to add AI-related roles, it opens the door to higher-value, human-centric work. 'Smart companies are building AI-augmented teams that are more productive, more consistent, and more client-focused. And they're not stopping at tools — they're investing in people who know how to orchestrate AI to elevate results,' he said. For Artin Avanes, head of core data platform at Snowflake, AI is not a net destroyer of jobs. He likens today's moment to Snowflake's own rise. 'We disrupted traditional business intelligence teams. Suddenly, business users could do analytics without IT. Some roles disappeared. But most evolved,' Avanes said. 'The same thing is happening now. AI won't erase people. It will change what they do.' His concern is less about job loss and more about organizational readiness. 'The biggest bottleneck to AI adoption isn't talent. It's infrastructure. You need secure, compliant access to the right data. Without that, no AI agent — no matter how smart — can work.' Thurai believes many of the more dramatic claims from AI vendors serve a strategic purpose. 'Obviously, the AI providers — Anthropic, OpenAI, consultants — have to say extreme things to gain attention and instill FOMO,' he said. 'But there are people like IBM's CEO with a more realistic picture of the future.' Yes, AI will cause job losses. But it will also create roles — including data scientists, prompt engineers, AI governance experts — that didn't exist five years ago. In a clap back at Amodei, American billionaire and investor Mark Cuban wrote on social platform Bluesky that 'someone needs to remind the CEO that at one point there were more than 2 million secretaries. There were also separate employees to do in-office dictation. They were the original white-collar displacements.' Cuban further noted that 'new companies with new jobs will emerge,' adding that 'people have to stop whining and start preparing.' Still, the math is sobering: those new roles won't fully replace the sheer volume of jobs displaced. There is no perfect one-to-one exchange. Which is why, even amid the hype, preparation matters more than ever. Maybe not. But the person who knows how to use it might. The big message from the experts is for global workers to move beyond the realm of FOMO into really understanding how to leverage AI tools for improved efficiency. As Avanes put it: 'AI isn't here to optimize systems. It's here to free people to focus on what matters. The question is whether we'll let it.' For Gutzeit, this an urgent call to reskill the global workforce. 'The traditional career ladder is being cut off at the bottom. If we don't reskill aggressively, we risk locking out an entire generation from meaningful career starts,' he said.
