US dollar hits three-year low after Trump intensifies attack on Fed chair Powell
Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets, and the world economy.
The US dollar has sunk to a three-year low as the exodus from US assets gathers pace.
Traders are anxious after Donald Trump launched another blistering attack on America's top central banker yesterday, calling Jerome Powell 'Mr. Too Late' and 'a major loser', as the US president intensified his calls for US interest rate cuts.
This has pushed the dollar down against a basket of currencies to its lowest level since March 2022. The US dollar index over the last decade Photograph: LSEG
Against the yen, the dollar has hit a seven month low, trading at ¥140 for the first time since last September.
Last week, Trump posted that 'Powell's termination cannot come fast enough'.
Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, says Trump's attacks on Powell are leading to a lack of confidence in the markets:
Their relationship has long been contentious. Despite appointing Powell in 2017, Trump has since expressed regret, criticising Powell for 'bad decisions' and being 'always too late and wrong.'
Powell has countered by warning that Trump's tariffs could spur higher inflation and slower growth, contradicting Trump's claims of his policies' economic benefits.
Yesterday (when European markets were closed), there were further losses on Wall Street, where the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost another 2.5%, or almost 1,000 points.
Investors are also disappointed at the lack of progress in trade talks, following the hefty tariffs announced by Trump earlier this month.
This is creating a worrying situation, in which the dollar, the US stock markets and US government bond prices are all falling. Typically in a crisis, US government debt and the dollar would rally as traders sought out a safe haven.
'The market reaction is arguably more about broader investor concerns that less credible US policy-making may erode the exorbitant privilege that has allowed the US to run high twin deficits than it is about the specific risk of political influence over the Fed's rates policy,' explains Jim Reid, market strategist at Deutsche Bank.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) will give its verdict on the economic consequences of the US trade war later today, when it releases the latest forecasts in its World Economic Outlook.
Central bank governors, finance ministers, and other economic leaders are heading to Washington for the annual IMF-World Bank Spring Meetings. The agenda 9am BST: ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters
2pm BST: International Monetary Fund releases its latest World Economic Outlook.
3pm BST: European Union Consumer Confidence report
3.15pm: IMF releases its Global Financial Stability Report Share Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Japan's Minister of Finance Katsunobu Kato said today he aims to build on close discussions pertaining to currencies when he meets his US counterpart Scott Bessent in Washington this week, Bloomberg reports.
Kato told a press conference today:
'Treasury Secretary Bessent and I are in close contact on currencies, and I would like to take this opportunity to hold further discussions during my visit.
Kato was scheduled to depart for Washington today, where he'll represent Japan at a series of meetings including Group of 20 and International Monetary Fund gatherings. He said the timing for a meeting with Bessent is still under discussion. Share
The weakness of the dollar has pushed the pound up to its highest level against the US currency in seven months.
Sterling climbed to $1.3423 in early trading, up around half a cent, to its highest level since last September. Share Pippa Crerar
Rachel Reeves will fly to Washington this week to argue for global free trade in the face of Donald Trump's punitive tariffs, amid continued international economic turbulence.
The UK chancellor will use the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund, which is attended by top finance ministers and central bankers, to make the case that free trade is in both British and global interests.
One senior official said:
'We're facing a new economic reality, but we're a heavily trading country, with the value of our exports the equivalent of 60% of GDP, so it's always in our own interests to promote free trade.'
Reeves will urge the Trump administration to cut punitive tariffs on UK car and steel exports and step up negotiations for a trade deal when she meets the US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, for the first time, allies said. He is seen as one of the less hardline US voices on trade. Reeves to make case for free global trade at Washington IMF talks Share
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets, and the world economy.
The US dollar has sunk to a three-year low as the exodus from US assets gathers pace.
Traders are anxious after Donald Trump launched another blistering attack on America's top central banker yesterday, calling Jerome Powell 'Mr. Too Late' and 'a major loser', as the US president intensified his calls for US interest rate cuts.
This has pushed the dollar down against a basket of currencies to its lowest level since March 2022. The US dollar index over the last decade Photograph: LSEG
Against the yen, the dollar has hit a seven month low, trading at ¥140 for the first time since last September.
Last week, Trump posted that 'Powell's termination cannot come fast enough'.
Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, says Trump's attacks on Powell are leading to a lack of confidence in the markets:
Their relationship has long been contentious. Despite appointing Powell in 2017, Trump has since expressed regret, criticising Powell for 'bad decisions' and being 'always too late and wrong.'
Powell has countered by warning that Trump's tariffs could spur higher inflation and slower growth, contradicting Trump's claims of his policies' economic benefits.
Yesterday (when European markets were closed), there were further losses on Wall Street, where the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost another 2.5%, or almost 1,000 points.
Investors are also disappointed at the lack of progress in trade talks, following the hefty tariffs announced by Trump earlier this month.
This is creating a worrying situation, in which the dollar, the US stock markets and US government bond prices are all falling. Typically in a crisis, US government debt and the dollar would rally as traders sought out a safe haven.
'The market reaction is arguably more about broader investor concerns that less credible US policy-making may erode the exorbitant privilege that has allowed the US to run high twin deficits than it is about the specific risk of political influence over the Fed's rates policy,' explains Jim Reid, market strategist at Deutsche Bank.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) will give its verdict on the economic consequences of the US trade war later today, when it releases the latest forecasts in its World Economic Outlook.
Central bank governors, finance ministers, and other economic leaders are heading to Washington for the annual IMF-World Bank Spring Meetings. The agenda 9am BST: ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters
2pm BST: International Monetary Fund releases its latest World Economic Outlook.
3pm BST: European Union Consumer Confidence report
3.15pm: IMF releases its Global Financial Stability Report Share
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Tottenham's whopping cost to sack Ange Postecoglou ahead of imminent decision
Ange Postecoglou's future at Tottenham remains unclear despite the Australian having led the club to their first major trophy for 17 years, with Daniel Levy expected to make a decision this week It will cost Tottenham around £4million to sack Ange Postecoglou, having already handed the Australian a £2m bonus. Postecoglou led Spurs to their first major trophy for 17 years by winning the Europa League last month. It was also their first piece of European silverware since 1984. But it did come at a cost, with Spurs finishing 17th in the Premier League table, the club's lowest finish since being relegated from the top-flight in 1977. Postecoglou did have to deal with a succession of injury crises, but it was still a dreadful campaign on the domestic front for his side. That has seen the Australian's position as manager come under threat. A decision is expected to be made this week on his future in North London. It comes as Spurs continue major changes behind the scenes, with long-serving executive director Donna-Maria Cullen leaving the club as Vinai Venkatesham prepares to arrive as CEO. For now, the focus will remain on Postecoglou, though sacking him would likely prove to be an unpopular move among players and fans. It will also likely seriously hit the club's bank account. According to the Daily Telegraph, Postecoglou would be due £4m in compensation if he was sacked. That fee was agreed ahead of his appointment two years ago, with another two years to run on his contract. The payout would be on top of the £2m bonus already handed to him for winning the Europa League. Postecoglou has returned to England from his end-of-season holiday and is awaiting the verdict on his future. The total cost of replacing him could also balloon above the £10m mark should Spurs look to bring in a replacement who is already in a job. Postecoglou has seen trusted assistant Ryan Mason depart to take over as West Brom boss. But the Australian himself has insisted he is preparing to remain in his post for the start of the new season. He admitted that he felt it was ' weird ' to see the media openly discussing a potential sacking. "I'll be honest, I've been finding it really weird talking about my future when we've done something unprecedented," Postecoglou said after the final day thrashing at the hands of Brighton. "I've had to answer the questions because no one else at the club is kind of in the position to do so, I guess. But I can't answer that question about me and my future, and part of me is kind of thinking, well, why have I been asked that question? But it is what it is. "And I've got no doubt, though, that this could be a real sort of defining moment for this club because wherever I've been, I've kind of made an impact where I've brought success to a club that hasn't had for a while. "You just have to look at those clubs' trajectory even after I've left, they're still competing for things. I really think this is a moment in time where this club can really push on and be a real contender for honours on a yearly basis."
NBC News
12 minutes ago
- NBC News
As feud escalates, Trump implies government could cut contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies
President Donald Trump has escalated his sudden rupture with Elon Musk by implying the government could sever ties with the tech titan's businesses. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Thursday afternoon. Trump's post comes in the midst of a stunning exchange between Musk and Trump that erupted Thursday when the president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was disappointed with Musk's criticism ofthe Republican policy bill that is making its way through Congress. Musk then launched into a tire on X, where he posted throughout early Thursday a variety of critiques of Trump, the bill and other Republican politicians. In response to another Trump post, Musk said the president was lying. Various estimates have put forward of just how much Musk's firms, primarily SpaceX and Tesla, benefit from government contracts and subsidies. The Washington Post has put the figure at $38 billion. The value of government support to SpaceX, which includes Musk's high-profile space-launch ventures in addition to its Starlink satellite subsidiary — is worth $22 billion alone according to comments made by SpaceX chief Gwynne Shotwell. Tesla has benefited from approximately $11.4 billion in regulatory credits aimed at boosting electric-vehicle purchases, though that figure also includes state subsidies. Reuters has reported that the true figure is classified due to the nature of many of the contracts Musk's firms are under. Shares in Tesla, which had already fallen 8% Thursday as the tit-for-tat escalated on social media, declined as much as 12% following Trump's post.
The National
13 minutes ago
- The National
Increased UK defence spending only makes war more likely
For any country, reviewing defence in the modern age is a valuable exercise. The UK's new strategic defence review fails to get to grips with those challenges, and perpetuates a view of security as being solely about the aggressive projection of military power. We do face direct threats that we need to acknowledge, not least from the brutal Putin regime. A military-only response risks seeing the whole world 'tooling up' for conflict, creating a tinderbox situation, and also misses the other action we can take which we know improves human security and makes conflict less likely. READ MORE: BBC Debate Night branded 'farce' as formal complaint made over 'bias' Strong international cooperation and a commitment to the international rule of law are critical to improving security, yet the UK continues to arm war criminal regimes instead of pursuing justice against them. Alliances must be fostered with countries we trust, and the threat of far-right regimes must be acknowledged. Yet the UK continues to treat the Trump regime as though it's a reliable ally, while it threatens democratic countries like Greenland and Canada. Food and water security, and so much else that international development invests in, also provide the basis for a more secure world. Yet the UK has followed the lead of the Trump White House by slashing development aid. The climate emergency is barely mentioned in the review, and where it does come up it's mostly about access to Arctic waters rather than the profound threat it poses to human and environmental security around the world. And of course the UK's continued attachment to nuclear weapons continues unabated. Reconsidering the vastly expensive replacement of Trident doesn't even merit a line. In truth, Trident poses a greater threat to the people of Scotland than it does to anyone else. Its record of accidents and poor maintenance goes back a long way, and its presence makes the west coast of Scotland a key target in any potential conflict. The hundreds of billions of pounds spent on these weapons could be far better spent on international development, climate action, or emerging issues like cybersecurity or biosecurity which can't be addressed by just hiking military spending. There's so much that's needed aside from military responses that can actually reduce the threats we face instead of funnelling even more funds towards nuclear weapons. Let's also remember that these are weapons which cannot discriminate between military and civilian targets, and whose use in any circumstances would surely be the biggest war crime in human history. Such a decision made now will lock us into a more dangerous world, for decades to come. And that decision would be at the expense of action that could be taken to promote peace, and make progress towards a world that's safer because it's fairer, greener, and more just. As for the claims about jobs, this truly is a red herring. Spend tens of billions on pretty much anything and you'll create jobs, and in truth there are far better ways to build an economy that works for people than making a '10 times more lethal' army. A defence review that really engages with the changing world we live in is something I'd really like to see. This simply isn't it.
