How OTT platforms skirted warnings against ‘pornographic' content; now ALTT, Ullu, Hulchul among 25 banned
It cited the removal of over 100 web series from the platform Ullu.
'While the platform removes or edits the web series for a temporary period, it either re-uploads or publishes the unedited version after a certain period, thereby attempting to circumvent the warnings,' said sources in the union ministry for information and broadcasting.
Also read | Govt bans ULLU, ALTBalaji, 23 other OTT platforms
Among earlier interventions was the takedown of the series 'House Arrest' by Ullu in May this year.
Before this, in February, an advisory was issued to OTT platform 'to adhere to Code of Ethics prescribed under IT Rules 2021 and laws related to obscenity in India', sources said.
'Five platforms which were blocked earlier in March 2024 started publishing obscene content on new website domains,' the source added.
Also last year, in September, the 25 platforms now banned 'continued to publish obscene, in some cases pornographic content" and 'ignored warnings'.
Action was also taken by the Digital Publisher Content Grievances Council (DPCGC), a self-regulatory body headed by a former judge of the Supreme Court, of which 40 OTT platforms, including ALTT and Ullu, are members. It had found some of the scenes in an ALTT series to be 'totally distasteful and bizarre, where sex and nudity was shown without any contextual justification just to augment viewership'.
About Ullu and ALTT, in particular, the National Commission on Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) had approached the government in July and August 2024, it is learnt.
The government has thus banned 26 websites and 14 mobile apps belonging to the 25 OTT platforms.
The banned platforms include:
Big Shots
Desiflix
Boomex
NeonX VIP
Navarasa Lite
Gulab
Kangan
Bull
ShowHit
Jalva
Wow Entertainment
Look Entertainment
Hitprime
Fugi
Feneo
ShowX
Sol Talkies
Adda TV
HotX VIP
MoodX
Triflicks
Mojflix
Hulchul
ALTT
Ullu
The ministry found their content included sexual innuendos 'and in some cases long portions of sexually explicit scenes, thereby being pornographic in nature', HT has learnt.
The ban now has come under a number of laws, including the IT Act and the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.
The matter had reached even the Supreme Court earlier this year in a public-interest plea, and notices were issued to Netflix, Amazon Prime, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, too, besides Ullu, ALTT and others.
But eventually the court said the issue had to be dealt with by the executive or the legislature. "It's not our domain, you do something," the court told the government.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
World's most cursed song, linked to over 100 deaths, banned for 62 years, singer died due to..., name is...
Music often reflects emotions—joy, love, heartbreak—but in 1933, Hungarian composer Rezso Seress wrote a song so sorrowful, it was said to drive listeners to their deaths. The piece, titled Gloomy Sunday, was born from Seress's own heartbreak after his girlfriend left him. The lyrics were drenched in despair, painting life as unbearable and death as the only comfort. The song's grief-stricken tone and crushing sadness soon gave it a chilling reputation. Stories began circulating that those who listened to it felt an overwhelming urge to end their lives. How many lives did this song allegedly claim? Initially, record companies refused to release it. But in 1935, Gloomy Sunday finally reached the public. Almost immediately, Hungary saw a disturbing rise in suicides. Reports told of the song being found on repeat near victims, or mentioned in their farewell letters. First, around 17 deaths were linked to it. Soon, the figure climbed close to 100. By 1941, the government decided the song was too dangerous and banned it outright. Did the ban change anything? The ban lasted for 62 years and was finally lifted in 2003. But by then, the song's legacy had already been written in tragedy. Even Seress's former lover was said to have taken her life after hearing it. In a haunting twist, Rezso Seress himself died on a Sunday—the very day immortalised in his composition. In January 1968, he jumped from a window in Budapest. Surviving the fall, he later ended his life in a hospital by strangling himself with a wire. A song that outlived its creator Despite its dark past, Gloomy Sunday continued to fascinate artists. More than 100 singers recorded it in 28 languages. The most famous version came from Billie Holiday, whose English rendition was also banned for years. In 1999, the tale of the song inspired the film Gloomy Sunday, released in Hungary and Germany, cementing its place as one of music history's most unsettling legends.
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
The Beat Report: The theatre vs OTT debate actually isn't a debate at all
NEW DELHI : In The Beat Report, Mint's journalists bring you unique perspectives on their beats, breaking down new trends and developments, and sharing behind-the-scenes stories from their reporting. Subscribe to the newsletter here to get it in your inbox. Dear reader, I am Lata Jha, the media and entertainment correspondent for Mint. Earlier in July, I dragged myself out of bed at 7am on a Saturday to make it to an early morning show of Brad Pitt's sports drama F1. I know nothing about motor racing or fast cars, but had heard so much about the film that I had to watch it (even if it meant going for the first show of the day). I am someone who's at the movies every single week. Yet, I can say one thing with certainty: I don't remember the last time I saw a theatre this packed and a crowd this enthralled. Imagine that for an English-language film that wasn't even dubbed for Indian audiences! It's not like F1 won't be available on streaming or rental platforms soon, or that multiplexes suddenly decided to be kind and price tickets lower than usual. The truth is, there will always be an option to watch a film outside of the cinema, and let's be real, going to the movies is an incredibly expensive, time-consuming affair. If some films still click in theatres, it's the film speaking for itself, right? Which, honestly, makes the whole debate about movie theatres vs. streaming platforms feel a bit pointless. The bigger question we should be asking is: Why aren't there enough films that make going to the theatre genuinely worth it? The numbers tell a story The problem for Bollywood is stark. Ormax, the media consulting firm, reckons that 2024 was a pretty good year for the Indian box office, with just a minor 3% drop in collections. But for Hindi cinema, collections dropped a lot more: 13%. And nearly one-third of this came from dubbed South Indian films! Look at only original Hindi films, and the decline was 37%. Ouch. Without a doubt, costly multiplex tickets and only a handful of "tentpole" movies continue to hurt Bollywood. No wonder, the first half of 2025 saw a meagre 10-20% revenue increase over the same period last year, my recent reporting for Mint has shown. Some films did light up the box office, like Vicky Kaushal's Chhaava, Ajay Devgn's Raid 2, and comedy drama Bhool Chuk Maaf. Still, trade insiders are flagging far-weaker-than-expected returns for big-star titles like Sikandar, Housefull 5, and Kesari Chapter 2. This really highlights the urgent need for a more consistent stream of theatrical hits. What this all boils down to is that the box office is operating in an extreme and polarized way post-covid. Hits are soaring to unprecedented heights, while flops aren't even lasting beyond their opening weekends. (I covered this in detail in my story here.) What's at play then? Are audiences getting super-selective about theatres? Or are they avoiding any particular genres? Do theatres stand a chance if producers delay OTT releases? Why does a film like F1 work, despite high prices and an imminent OTT release? Do stars even matter, looking at Saiyaara's roaring success with two newcomers? Anyone involved in the business will tell you there's no real formula for coming up with a film that can make the tedious trip to the theatre seem worth it. But some inspiration can come from south Indian cinema, where not only are prices capped (in Tamil Nadu and now Karnataka), but even small-budget films consistently do well. It's important for films to speak the emotional language of its viewers, and deliver content that is culturally rooted and authentic to local sensibilities, a lesson that Mumbai-based filmmakers have taken long to learn. Bollywood, which largely operates in close-knit privileged cliques, has little patience to either nurture writers who want to tell newer, earthy stories or (in the words of a studio executive I met recently) 'have an understanding of life beyond Juhu and Bandra". Niche and elite themes rarely entice the average viewer or family enough for them to buy a cinema ticket. Single-screen owners also point out the other big issue: a complete absence of awareness among viewers, as many studios focus marketing campaigns on big metros or digital media. Tier-2 and tier-3 audiences remain oblivious to film releases. All in all, I feel filmmakers, particularly in the Mumbai industry, must think on their feet and come up with better reasons for audiences to brave traffic, pay for expensive tickets and popcorn, and come to theatres. And of course, you'll agree, a cola-popcorn combo that doesn't cost a kidney wouldn't hurt! That's it for today. Here's a selection of related stories that you can read over the weekend to dig deeper into the trends shaping the film industry in 2025:
Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC pauses retrial order in Pataudi property dispute
The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily halted a Madhya Pradesh high court order that would have restarted a decades-old legal fight over property worth about ₹15,000 crore, claimed by actor Saif Ali Khan, his mother Sharmila Tagore, and sisters Soha and Saba Ali Khan. The 2019 ruling by the top court had clarified that Muslim personal law governs the succession of private property, meaning the Nawab's property should be divided among all legal heirs.. (Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO) The property once belonged to Nawab Hamidullah Khan, the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal, who had three daughters — Abida, Sajida, and Rabia. Sajida married Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi, becoming the Nawab Begum of Bhopal. When Abida migrated to Pakistan, Sajida inherited the parental property. After Sajida's death, it passed to her son Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, and from him to his children, including Saif. In 2000, a trial court declared the Pataudi family the rightful owners, relying on a 1962 Government of India certificate naming Sajida Sultan as sole successor to all the Nawab's properties. In June this year, the Madhya Pradesh high court however overturned that trial court ruling, saying it was based on a 1997 Allahabad high court decision that the Supreme Court later overruled in 2019. The 2019 ruling by the top court had clarified that Muslim personal law governs the succession of private property, meaning the Nawab's property should be divided among all legal heirs. Although the high court accepted this principle, it did not distribute the property. Instead, it sent the case back to the trial court for a fresh trial, allowing new evidence and directing that a verdict be given within a year. The high court order judgment was taken in appeal in the top court, not by Saif's family but by two other heirs, Omar Ali and Rashid Ali, who are related to the Nawab through his nephew. They argued that since the Supreme Court held that Muslim law applies in this case, there was no need for another trial. A retrial after 52 years of litigation (cases began in 1971–72) would only delay justice, lamented their petition while adding that the Civil Procedure Code does not permit a remand when the issue is purely a legal question requiring no fresh evidence. They further stressed that neither side had requested new evidence, so the high court's remand to the trial court for a fresh adjudication was unnecessary. On Friday, a bench of justices PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar agreed to hear the challenge, issued notices to the Centre, Madhya Pradesh government, Saif Ali Khan's family, and other heirs, and ordered an interim stay on the high court's ruling. The matter will be heard again on September 9. Two partition suits over the Nawab's property have been ongoing since the early 1970s. Apart from the Pataudi family, at least 16 other heirs are claiming a share. The 1962 succession certificate remains a key point of contention. Saif's family relies on it, while the others argue it cannot override Muslim inheritance law. For now, the stay means the 2000 trial court decision in favour of the Pataudis remains in effect.
