&w=3840&q=100)
New DLG provisioning norms: Fintech bodies hope for relief from RBI
Lenders have been directed to make the necessary provisions by September 30. Fintech bodies are hopeful of gathering sufficient data on this segment by then, which could potentially influence the regulator's decision.
The RBI has mandated finance companies to make full provisions on loans sourced through LSPs, regardless of the DLGs provided by these entities to the lenders. This is likely to have an impact on origination of such loans as it reduces the attractiveness of the portfolio for the finance companies.
'The RBI has communicated to some lenders that regulated entities should not offset DLG when it comes to provisioning. We have, in turn, suggested that the (DLG) model has been working now and there will be double-provisioning if it (DLG) is not considered. This means that an LSP provisions a separate 5 per cent and if the RE (regulated entity) also separately provisions (for expected credit loss), then efficient utilisation of capital would not take place,' said Jatinder Handoo, chief executive officer (CEO), Unified Fintech Forum.
'We will go back to the regulator with some data and information since this is a consultative process. Although it's a little difficult since this is a DLG portfolio, which I am not very sure is even marked in the credit bureau separately. We will request our members to give us data in terms of portfolio, customers, geographies, ticket size, and gender segregation,' he said.
DLG is a contractual arrangement between the lender and an LSP, under which the latter guarantees to compensate the bank for losses due to default up to a certain percentage of the loan portfolio of the bank.
As per RBI guidelines, lenders have to ensure that the total amount of DLG cover on any outstanding portfolio shall not exceed 5 per cent of the total amount disbursed out of that loan portfolio at any given time. In case of implicit guarantee arrangements, the DLG provider shall not bear performance risk of more than the equivalent amount of 5 per cent of the underlying loan portfolio. As a result, RBI guidelines say, provisioning shall be the responsibility of the RE as per the extant asset classification and provisioning norms, irrespective of any DLG cover available at the portfolio level.
Additionally, the fintech bodies, in their meeting with RBI last month, have also apprised the regulator of the practical difficulties the industry is facing after the new digital lending guidelines came in.
As per new norms, digital lenders, especially LSPs, have to show different options to a borrower and allow them to make an informed choice when they visit a marketplace or LSP's website. This, the industry said, will impact the customer experience.
'We are for transparency and openness of the system; this may be necessary. However, LSPs partner with multiple REs, with each having a different credit policy, such as restrictive or flexible. REs will have to complete soft underwriting of the customers and only then extend an offer,' Handoo said, adding that if a customer says they want a loan from lender A, and the person has five lenders as options, they expect surety and timely disbursement of the loan. However, they may not know whether their credit profile is appealing to a particular RE, in that case timeliness and customer user experience get impacted.
In the meeting, the fintech industry bodies urged the RBI to allow non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) to offer credit lines through the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) after the facility was extended to small finance banks (SFBs) earlier this year. Industry sources said the regulator may not yet be open to including NBFCs, given that SFBs only recently got access to the feature.
The RBI was also briefed on how the fintech sector has improved compliance practices over the past few quarters, following earlier scrutiny by the regulator.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Finance Ministry says no proposal to impose fee on UPI transactions
There is no plan currently to impose a fee on Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions, the finance ministry informed the Lok Sabha on Monday, days after comments by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra sparked concerns that these payments may cease to be free for individuals. 'Presently, there is no such proposal to impose transaction charges on UPI,' Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in response to a written question in the Lower House of Parliament asking if the government or the central bank proposed to charge a fee on UPI transactions. Speaking at the Financial Express BFSI Summit in Mumbai on July 25, Sanjay Malhotra had said that UPI being free had 'borne good fruits'. However, for any service to be sustainable, its costs had to be met. 'The important thing is that the UPI, or any other payment system for that matter, is accessible, cheap, secure, and sustainable…and it will be sustainable only if someone bears the costs. So as long as it's the government or someone else — that's not so important — the important thing is that costs of any service should be paid, whether collectively or by the user.' The central bank chief clarified his comments a couple of weeks later on August 6 at the post monetary policy press conference, asserting he had not said that UPI cannot remain free forever. 'I never said that it cannot remain free forever. My sense is that it is not free even now. Someone is paying for it. The government is subsidising it. But somewhere the costs are being paid. The question really is who pays for it. That is the other question. But I never said that the users will have to pay,' Malhotra had said earlier this month. Speculation has been rife for some time now that UPI payments may be slapped with a per transaction fee called the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR). Usually in the range of 1-3 per cent, the MDR is levied on merchants by banks that process debit and credit card payments. Since January 2020, there has been no MDR on RuPay debit cards and UPI transactions to promote the adoption of digital payments across the country. In lieu of the lack of MDR, the government has been subsidising payments of up to Rs 2,000 made to small merchants through its 'Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low-value BHIM-UPI transactions (P2M)'. The incentive offered is capped at 0.15 per cent of the transaction value. Large merchants are not covered under this scheme. In his answer in the Lok Sabha on Monday, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary also said that under the incentive scheme, the government had paid out around Rs 8,730 crore during the last four years. Chaudhary's answer in the Lok Sabha is the latest instance of the finance ministry rejecting talk of UPI transactions possibly being charged a fee. As recently as June, the ministry had said such talk was 'completely false, baseless, and misleading'. While individuals may not have to pay a fee for making transactions via UPI, banks have already begun to ask payment firms for money. According to media reports, starting August 1, ICICI Bank started charging payment aggregators such as Razorpay, PayU, and Pine Labs a fee of 0.02-0.04 per cent per transaction – up to a limit of Rs 6-10 per transaction – although these aggregators will not have to pay the fee if a UPI transaction is settled directly into an ICICI Bank account held by a merchant. YES Bank and Axis Bank are said to be among the private banks who also charge payment aggregators a similar fee. Over the years, the sheer number of UPI transactions has risen sharply, with latest data showing 19.47 billion UPI transactions worth Rs 25.08 lakh crore were conducted in July. Compared to the same month last year, the transaction volume and value was up 35 per cent and 22 per cent, respectively.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
BM Finance Fundas: Same day or within hours, cheque clearance process to be overhauled
RBI In a bid to speed up the cheque processing time from the current T+1 settlement period,has announced that starting October 1, 2025, cheque handling will move away from the existing batch clearing method to continuous clearing with settlement on will be implemented in 2 phases. 'It has been decided to transition CTS to continuous clearing and settlement on realisation in two 1 shall be implemented on October 4, 2025 and Phase 2 on January 3, 2026,' the directive banks use the CTS, or Cheque Truncation system to process cheques. This system eliminates the need to physically transfer paper cheques between banks, which can take a lot of time. Instead, on the same day, it captures an electronic image along with other important details of the cheque and sends it to the drawee bank, the one responsible for paying the amount specified on the return cycle is completed the next day, after which the settlement takes place. Once the settlement process is done, the customer receives their funds. In other words, all this takes place within a day or two after the cheque is will be a single presentation session from 10 am to 4 pm, but the confirmation session will run from 10 am to 7 pm. This is an internal process for banks to handle and confirm cheques.'Cheques received by the branches shall be scanned and sent to the clearing house by the banks immediately and continuously during the presentation session', the circular added. The clearing house will release the cheque images to drawee banks on a continuous they get the cheque image, the drawee banks will then be required to process the cheques continually and in real-time. They also will have to let the clearing house know if the cheque was honoured or dishonored immediatelyafter processing. So for every cheque presented, the drawee bank will either provide a positive confirmation for honoured cheques, or negative confirmation for dishonoured ones.'Each cheque will contain the 'Item Expiry Time' which indicates the latest time by which confirmation for the presented instrument needs to be provided by the drawee bank', it added. During phase 1, this time has been set at 7 explained in the directive, 'During phase 1 (From October 4 to January 2, 2026), drawee banks shall be required to confirm (positively / negatively) cheques presented on them latest by end of confirmation session (i.e. 7:00 PM)'.It also adds that in the absence of any confirmation, the cheque will be 'deemed to have been approved and included for settlement'.During phase 2, 'settlement will be arrived every hour till the end of confirmation session, based on the positive confirmations received from drawee banks and cheques considered deemed approved', adds the January 2026, the item expiry time of cheques will also change from 7 pm to T+3 hours. This means that any cheque that has been presented for clearing at 11 am and 12 noon on a given day, will have to be confirmed eitherpositively or negatively by 3 pm i.e. 3 hours from 12 noon If the drawee bank does not provide confirmation for any cheque within these 3 hours, they will be deemed to have been positively confirmed for settlement.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Mutual fund overseas assets fall 5.6% to $8.3 billion in FY25, says RBI
Indian mutual funds' overseas assets dropped 5.6 per cent to $ 8.3 billion in FY25, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday. At the end of FY24, Indian mutual funds held assets of over $ 8.81 billion in foreign assets, as per the central bank's annual survey of foreign assets and liabilities of mutual funds. "Overseas assets of MFs declined 5.6 per cent and stood at $ 8.3 billion in March 2025, due to lower holdings of foreign equity securities," the RBI said. There was a 3.9 per cent drop in equity securities held abroad by MFs at market value in the US at ₹ 44,500 crore, while the same in Ireland and Taiwan also witnessed declines. Over 95 per cent of the overseas equity investment of the MFs were concentrated in the US, Luxembourg, and Ireland, the RBI said. It can be noted that FY25 witnessed volatilities in the global markets because of continuing geopolitical tensions amid tensions between Ukraine-Russia and in Israel, while change of guard in the US and the newer way of looking at trade policies by President Donald Trump also led to some nervousness among investors. The flows into MFs' equity schemes surged nearly 25 per cent to ₹ 29.45 lakh crore in FY25, indicating stronger preference among investors to punt on the domestic markets. The RBI survey revealed that the foreign liabilities of MFs increased 19.9 per cent in FY25 to $ 30.5 billion at market value, due to the rise in units issued to non-residents. People in the UAE were the biggest holders in Indian MFs' schemes at ₹52,549 crore, while Australia had the highest growth at over 40 per cent in the liabilities of domestic MFs. Non-residents of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), and Singapore held the largest share in MF units, both in terms of face value as well as at market value, the RBI said. Foreign liabilities of asset management companies increased 16.8 per cent to $ 7.5 billion in March 2025, on the back of higher inward direct investments, while the overseas assets of AMCs increased marginally from their previous year's level and were largely held in Guernsey, Singapore, and Mauritius.
