World's Largest Power Station Could Provide Energy for Half of US Homes
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Grand Inga Hydropower Project is moving forward after years of delays in a bid to solve southern Africa's electricity and water scarcity.
Delivery of the project, which would be the largest power station in the world if completed, was accelerated after officials convened in Zimbabwe on July 3.
Newsweek contacted the organization responsible for the delivery, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), for more information on the progress via email.
Why It Matters
The Grand Inga Hydropower Project, with a potential capacity of up to 70 gigawatts, is designed as the centerpiece of Africa's Mission 300 initiative, which seeks to connect 300 million Africans to clean energy by 2030. The average household in the U.S. uses just under 11,000 kilowatt-hours a year, meaning that if Grand Inga reaches its projected scale, it could generate enough electricity to power nearly half of all homes in the U.S., though it will be used solely for homes in Africa.
What To Know
The Grand Inga Dam in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) would be a series of seven hydroelectric power stations at Inga Falls in the Congo River.
SADC ministers responsible for energy and water agreed to push forward with the Grand Inga Hydropower Plan and the Congo River Water Transfer Concept at a meeting in Harare, Zimbabwe, on July 3.
On June 3, the World Bank Board of Executive Directors approved a $250 million creditas the first phase of a previously announced $1 billion long-term commitment to support preparation and local development efforts for Inga 3, DRC's largest power project to date.
The Inga electricity production site along the Congo River on December 16, 2013.
The Inga electricity production site along the Congo River on December 16, 2013.
Getty Images
Constructed in the 1970s and 1980s, the Inga I and II provided a foundation, yet both function at about 80 percent capacity. Grand Inga, which would be the third structure at the site, has attracted multiple rounds of international interest, but progress has repeatedly stalled because of high costs, governance concerns and the withdrawal of major partners, such as China's state-owned Three Gorges Corporation.
The projected $80 billion cost of completing the Grand Inga plan remains a huge barrier for the DRC, which is one of the world's poorest countries.
South Africa, Nigeria, Guinea and Angola have expressed formal interest in purchasing power from Grand Inga, tying the project to transnational energy security.
The Grand Inga initiative is part of the Mission 300 program, which aims to supply electricity to 300 million Africans by 2030. World Bank President Ajay Banga called the wider project "a crucial component" for economic growth and development across the continent and predicted that it could draw as much as $85 billion in private investment.
What People Are Saying
Bob Mabiala, head of the ADPI-DRC, told the World Bank on June 3: "The electricity generation potential at the Inga site is one of the largest in the world. The development of Inga 3's hydropower will be transformative for DRC. By increasing access to clean, renewable, and affordable energy for Congolese households and industries, it will serve as a motor for inclusive growth and jobs."
Albert Zeufack, World Bank division director, in a press release on June 3: "By supporting DRC's vision for Inga through this program and complementary investments in governance, education, and infrastructure, the World Bank Group, together with partners, can significantly contribute to converting DRC's natural resources into economic growth, jobs, and human development for the Congolese people."
What Happens Next
SADC ministers are expected to present progress updates on the Grand Inga and Congo River Water Transfer initiatives at the next SADC Council of Ministers meeting in Madagascar, scheduled for August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Changes Direction With Working Class
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. After months of steep decline, Donald Trump's approval rating among working-class voters appears to be stabilizing — and even slightly rebounding — according to new polling data. The latest YouGov/Economist survey, conducted July 16–18, shows the president's approval among working-class Americans rising to 38 percent, with 55 percent disapproving, for a net rating of minus 17. That marks a modest improvement from June, when Trump's net approval had plunged to minus 26 (33 percent approve, 59 percent disapprove), the lowest of his second term. That is compared to May when Trump stood at 40 percent approval and 52 percent disapproval (net -12), indicating that while support remains well below early-year levels, July's figures may signal a shift in direction after months of erosion. But the poll also shows that Trump's recent bump in popularity may be short-lived. Why It Matters Working-class voters were pivotal to Donald Trump's victories in both 2016 and 2024, forming the backbone of his political coalition. President Donald Trump speaks during a reception for Republican members of Congress in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, July 22, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks during a reception for Republican members of Congress in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, July 22, 2025, in Washington. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Public Mood Remains Sour on Economy and Direction of Country Despite the slight improvement in Trump's approval, polling shows that pessimism among working-class Americans remains widespread. Just 30 percent say the country is headed in the right direction, while 59 percent say it's on the wrong track. Although that's a slight improvement from June (28 percent right direction, 62 percent wrong), it continues a months-long trend of deep discontent. In May, 32 percent said the country was headed in the right direction, compared to 54 percent who disagreed. Perceptions of the economy remain overwhelmingly negative. In July, 43 percent of working-class Americans said they approve of how the economy is being handled, while 55 percent disapprove — a slightly better split than in June (37 percent approve, 54 percent disapprove) and identical to May's numbers. But when asked how they view the trajectory of the economy, only 19 percent said things are getting better, 19 percent said things are staying the same, and 53 percent said the economy is getting worse. That perception has held steady over recent months: In June, 17 percent said the economy was improving, and in May that figure stood at 24 percent. More than half of respondents each month said conditions were worsening. Personal Finances and Inflation Are Still Sore Spots The souring sentiment comes as inflation ticked up nationally: annual inflation rose to 2.7 percent in June, up from 2.4 percent in May, according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Meanwhile, Americans now face an average tariff rate of 18.7 percent, the highest since 1933, according to the Yale Budget Lab — a direct result of Trump's expansive tariff policies. Amid increasing inflation, working-class voters report worsening personal finances. In July, just 10 percent said they were better off financially than a year ago, while 47 percent said they were worse off and 38 percent reported no change. These numbers have remained largely consistent since May. Inflation continues to weigh heavily: In July, 61 percent of working-class respondents said inflation was getting worse, with only 26 percent saying it had improved. Those numbers have only slightly shifted since May, when 35 percent said inflation was improving and 55 percent said it was worsening. Immigration and Epstein Controversy Pose New Challenges One of the few areas where Trump has seen relative strength is immigration. In July, 47 percent of working-class voters said they approve of his handling of immigration, while 45 percent disapprove — a sharp improvement from June, when he had a 39 percent approval to 55 percent disapproval split. May's numbers were evenly divided at 45 percent. Throughout his second term, Trump has ramped up immigration enforcement, launching mass deportation operations, intensifying raids in sanctuary cities, and reopening thousands of previously closed deportation cases. At the same time, illegal border crossings dropped to a historic low last month, as his administration secured billions in new funding for border security and expanded enforcement measures. The administration has also significantly increased detention capacity, allocating $45 billion to expand ICE facilities and build large-scale temporary camps — including a controversial tent compound in Florida known as "Alligator Alcatraz." This aggressive stance on immigration was key to Trump's victory in 2024 among working class voters. Exit polling showed that immigration was frequently among their top three issues—with strong trust in Trump's approach over his opponent's. However, a brewing controversy over the Epstein files could derail some of the recent progress Trump has made with working-class Americans. An overwhelming 77 percent of working-class voters say the government should release all documents relating to the Epstein case, and 68 percent believe there is a government cover-up underway. Just 6 percent believe there is no cover-up. Only 24 percent approve of Trump's handling of the Epstein investigation, while 48 percent disapprove — a potential liability as the issue gains more attention.
Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Seniors Are Not Happy With Their Social Security Checks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. American seniors are growing increasingly frustrated with their Social Security benefits, as a new report finds that nearly two-thirds of retirees are dissatisfied with the amount they receive. While the average Social Security check has reached just in excess of $2,000 this year, a survey conducted by The Senior Citizen's League (TSCL) of 1,920 respondents over age 62 shows only 10 percent saying they were satisfied with their amount. Meanwhile, 63 percent reported being dissatisfied, and 27 percent said they were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. "Rapidly increasing costs are cutting into everyone's budget, including those of seniors," Chris Motola, financial analyst at told Newsweek. "Part of the problem is the near-disappearance of pensions for private sector employees, which means seniors are increasingly reliant on Social Security to fund their retirement expenses." Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Newsweek Illustration/Canva/Getty That reliance is significant. The report found that nearly 73 percent of seniors depend on Social Security for more than half their income. More than a third—39 percent—rely on it as their sole source of retirement income. Nineteen percent depend on it for at least three-quarters of their income, while 15 percent receive half to three-quarters of their income from the program. Behind this dissatisfaction lies a deeper economic issue. According to TSCL, Social Security benefits have lost about 20 percent of their buying power since 2010 due to cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that have failed to keep pace with actual inflation—particularly in categories like housing and transportation, where prices have risen more sharply than the overall inflation rate for more than a decade. The COLA is a long-standing feature of Social Security, intended to preserve the purchasing power of benefits by adjusting payments in line with inflation. It is calculated using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which tracks spending patterns among working Americans. The Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys price fluctuations for around 80,000 products quarterly and compiles the results into an index. Each year, the COLA is based on the average CPI-W from the third quarter of the current year compared to the same period the previous year. If there's an increase, it is rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent to determine the COLA. For 2025, this formula resulted in a 2.5 percent increase in benefits. However, TSCL argues that these annual adjustments "often fail to keep up with inflation as seniors experience it." "In particular, housing and transportation costs have increased faster than inflation over the last 15 years, which is especially difficult for seniors who rent their homes or live in areas with low walkability," the report reads. Colin Ruggiero, co-founder of which helps Americans with disabilities file their Social Security applications, told Newsweek that "even though the dollar amount of benefits has increased on paper, what those dollars can buy has eroded. "For someone on a fixed income, every dollar counts. When you can't stretch your check as far as you could a decade ago it reinforces the belief that Social Security is falling short of its promise." Many seniors share that belief. According to the report, only 20 percent of retirees feel that inflation has not outpaced the COLA, while 80 percent believe actual inflation in 2024 was higher than the 2.5 percent adjustment. "Given the mismatch in their perceptions of inflation and inflation as reported by the CPI-W, it's unsurprising that seniors are worried about the value of their Social Security checks," TSCL said.
Newsweek
16 hours ago
- Newsweek
Social Security: Young Americans May Lose $110,000 to Keep Program Afloat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Social Security, a foundational program for U.S. retirees and disabled Americans, has come under renewed scrutiny as funding shortfalls loom. A new report by the Cato Institute warned that today's young workers might lose up to $110,000 in lifetime earnings to keep the program afloat. Why It Matters With the Social Security Trust Fund projected to reach insolvency in the next decade, younger workers now face the possibility of significant financial sacrifices to maintain the system for current and future beneficiaries. More than 60 million Americans receive benefits every month. And according to Justice in Aging, Social Security lifts more than 22 million people out of poverty, including over 16 million older adults and almost 1 million children. he Social Security Administration office in Brownsville. he Social Security Administration office in Brownsville. Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images What To Know Social Security faces a potential crisis as its trust fund is predicted to be depleted by the mid-2030s, according to recent projections. The primary driver is an aging population, particularly as Baby Boomers retire and a shrinking base of younger workers are paying into the program. As a result, the Social Security Administration would only be able to pay about 80 percent of scheduled benefits unless funding solutions are enacted. The Cato Institute reported that keeping Social Security solvent in its current form would require today's young workers—those just entering the labor market—to contribute significantly more over the course of their careers. If changes are not made, these workers could see a reduction equivalent to $110,000 of their lifetime earnings due to higher taxes and/or reduced benefits, according to the Cato Institute. That figure is based on the latest report from the Social Security Trustees, which said Congress would need to hike the payroll tax rate immediately and permanently by 3.65 percentage points, from 12.4 to 16.05 percent, to close the program's $25 trillion funding gap and continue to send out scheduled payments. "That means less discretionary income in each paycheck, which could have ripple effects on their day-to-day finances and long-term savings," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9 innings podcast, told Newsweek. "A tax increase would be a hit to growth as less discretionary spending means less in corporate earnings." According to the Cato Institute, this cut would be equivalent to giving up 20 months of pay at the worker's average monthly wage. "There are endless variables affecting Social Security, but in the end, the math does not lie," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "To keep the program going, there will be adjustments in the current payroll taxes, income caps, and full retirement age. We could see a return of the Retirement Earnings Test and may even see means testing for the highest income retirees." This could cause outrage across the general public, which has generally favored targeting higher earners rather than taking away from future retirees' payments. A University of Maryland Program for Public Consultation survey showed that 53 percent of American adults considered it acceptable to reduce Social Security benefits exclusively for the Top 40 percent of income earners. This targeted reduction would address approximately 23 percent of the program's projected funding shortfall. There was also bipartisan support for raising the retirement age, which could close an additional 15 percent of the funding gap. What People Are Saying Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "Younger workers, especially the youngest of the Millennials and all of Gen Z and beyond, should expect Social Security to look different for them than it does now. Adjustments to Social Security are rarely popular, but in the past Congress has been willing to act in the face of dire circumstances, such as in 1983 when the Full Retirement Age was extended." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9 innings podcast, told Newsweek: "While such an increase would extend the solvency of Social Security by about 75 years, it's not a complete solution. The real fix would likely require both raising the payroll tax and removing the income cap. But let's be honest—that kind of proposal is a tough sell politically. Running on a platform to raise taxes rarely gains traction, even when it's tied to securing the future of Social Security." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "There's been an assumption made by Americans for decades now, and that is regardless of warnings and political posturing, Social Security will always be there to provide for retirees. The reality is there's a tremendous shortfall coming in the next decade, and if Congress doesn't act, beneficiaries will see their monthly payments dramatically reduced." What Happens Next With Social Security's financial future uncertain, Congress and the public are set to debate possible reforms, including benefit reductions for higher earners, payroll tax increases, and changes to the retirement age. The conversation will likely intensify as insolvency draws nearer in the next decade, with any enacted policy changes affecting both current retirees and younger generations entering the workforce. No official policy changes have yet been passed, but the heightened awareness and survey support for targeted reform suggest continued bipartisan attention to the problem in upcoming legislative sessions. "There are obviously different solutions to the shortfall that don't involve raising that percentage, but it does present a grim prediction for the American workforce if Congress doesn't act on a more efficient solution," Beene said.
