Post to Coast: New York Post plans a California newspaper
Adding another title to Rupert Murdoch 's media empire, The California Post is setting out to cover politics, local news, business, entertainment and sports in the nation's most populous state, while drawing and building on the venerable New York paper's national coverage. Plans for the Los Angeles-based paper call for a print edition seven days a week plus a website, social media accounts and video and audio pieces.
'There is no doubt that the Post will play a crucial role in engaging and enlightening readers, who are starved of serious reporting and puckish wit,' Robert Thomson, chief executive of Post corporate parent News Corp., said in a statement. In typically brash and punchy Post fashion, he portrayed California as plagued by 'jaundiced, jaded journalism."
It enters at a bumpy moment for its industry
However bold its intentions, the venture is being launched into a turbulent atmosphere for the news business, particularly for print papers. More than 3,200 of them have closed nationwide since 2005, according to figures kept by Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. The online world spawned new information sources and influencers, changed news consumers' tastes and habits and upended the advertising market on which newspapers relied.
'While it's true the media landscape is challenging, The New York Post has been finding success through its unique voice, editorial lens and quality coverage. That same formula is tailor-made for California,' said the New York Post Media Group. It includes the Post and some other media properties.
California, with a population of nearly 40 million, still has hundreds of newspapers, including dailies in and around Los Angeles and other major cities. But the nation's second-most-populous city hasn't had a dedicated tabloid focused on regional issues in recent memory, according to Danny Bakewell, president of the Los Angeles Press Club.
'It's really an untested market here,' said Bakewell, who is editor-in-chief of the Los Angeles Sentinel, a weekly focused on the city's Black population. 'L.A. is always ready for good-quality news reporting, and particularly in this moment when so many other papers are shrinking and disappearing, it could be a really unique opportunity.'
The Post is a unique beast
There is no U.S. newspaper quite like the 224-year-old New York Post. It was founded by no less a luminary than Alexander Hamilton, the country's first treasury secretary, an author of the Federalist Papers, the victim of a duel at the hands of the vice president and the inspiration for the Broadway smash 'Hamilton.' Murdoch, News Corp.'s founder and now its chairman emeritus, bought the Post in 1976, sold it a dozen years later, then repurchased it in 1993.
The Post is known for its relentless and skewering approach to reporting, its facility with sensational or racy subject matter, its Page Six gossip column, and the paper's huge and often memorable front-page headlines — see, for example, 1983's 'Headless Body in Topless Bar.'
At the same time, the Post is a player in both local and national politics. It routinely pushes, from the right, on 'wokeness' and other culture-war pressure points, and it has broken such political stories as the Hunter Biden laptop saga. The Post has an avid reader in President Donald Trump, who gave its 'Pod Force One' podcast an interview as recently as last month.
In recent years, the Post's website and such related sites as PageSix.com have built a large and far-flung digital audience, 90% of it outside the New York media market, according to the company.
With the Los Angeles readership second only to New York's, The California Post "is the next manifestation of our national brand,' Editor-in-Chief Keith Poole said in a statement. He'll also be involved in overseeing the California paper with its editor-in-chief, Nick Papps, who has worked with News Corp.'s Australian outlets for decades, including a stint as an L.A.-based correspondent.
The company didn't specify how many journalists The California Post will have.
___
Associated Press writer Jake Offenhartz contributed from Los Angeles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
India's Modi shares ‘good call' with ‘my friend' Putin after Trump tariffs
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday shared that he held a 'very good and detailed conversation with my friend President Putin,' as President Trump has ramped up tariff threats this week against New Delhi for Russian oil purchases. Modi, in a post on X, also said he thanked the Russian president for the latest updates on the Ukraine war. 'We also reviewed the progress in our bilateral agenda, and reaffirmed our commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. I look forward to hosting President Putin in India later this year,' the Indian leader said. Trump on Wednesday announced he would increase tariffs on India by 25 percent over its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total tariffs he has imposed on New Delhi to 50 percent. The 25 percent increase is on top of a 25 percent 'reciprocal' tariff Trump announced on India last week, which was set to take effect Thursday. India has remained defiant, souring U.S. relations with a key bulwark against China, as well as close personal relations between Trump and Modi. 'They're buying Russian oil, they're fueling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy,' Trump said of India during a Tuesday interview with CNBC. India has volleyed back with claims of American hypocrisy; past U.S. administrations encouraged the India-Russia energy trade to help stabilize global markets, and both the U.S. and Europe continue to spend billions on Russian energy and commodities. India also says Russian energy is crucial to ensuring a stable domestic supply. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' an Indian foreign ministry spokesperson said in a statement Monday, responding to Trump's tariff threats. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' it added. The increased tariffs on India would take effect late this month. However, Trump has also threatened broader 'secondary tariffs' on countries that trade with Russia. A senior U.S. official said this week that additional sanctions were expected Friday, even as Trump has raised the idea of a direct meeting with Putin, if he's willing to stop the war. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, returned from talks with Putin in Moscow this week with the framework of a ceasefire proposal, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. As of mid-week, Rubio said Russia and Ukraine remained too far apart for a meeting. However, both U.S. and Russian officials have suggested an in-person summit could occur as soon as next week. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday said Russia appeared more likely to agree to a ceasefire than previously. 'Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire — the pressure is working,' Zelensky said during an address. 'But the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details — neither us, nor the United States.'
The Intercept
5 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Trump Is Putting Confederate Statues Back Up. Here's Why They Must Fall Again.
The statue of Confederate Albert Pike, toppled overnight by protesters outside of Judiciary Square one street over from D.C. Police Headquarters, on June 20, 2020, in Washington. Photo: mpi34/MediaPunch/IPx via AP Images The Trump administration announced this week that it would be restoring two Confederate monuments in Washington. One, a statue of Confederate general and likely Ku Klux Klan member Albert Pike was torn down by protesters with ropes and chains during the 2020 George Floyd uprisings. The other, the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery, originally commissioned by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, was removed on the recommendation of an independent commission in 2022. At a moment of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement mass round-ups, thoroughgoing assaults on civil rights and welfare, and an ongoing U.S.-funded genocide in Gaza, the return of Confederate statues may seem a minor insult atop grave injuries. The struggles to keep our neighbors safe, to protect imperiled people are without question more urgent. The monuments, however, are more than a symbolic, base-baiting distraction. They are part of the architecture of President Donald Trump's re-whitening of America. They must fall again. Monuments to racism license racist violence. White supremacists, for their part, know this well. When hundreds of far-right extremists marched in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, chanting 'Jews will not replace us,' they saw the removal of Confederate statues as a material challenge to white power. Affirming a renewed Trumpian era of unconstrained white supremacist organizing, the deadly Unite the Right rally had been called under the banner of protecting the city's statue of Robert E. Lee, which had been ordered for removal. Trump infamously used the statue protest to launder white supremacist violence. 'Many of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee,' the president said. 'The press has treated them absolutely unfairly,' he said of the neo-Nazi rally attendees. It is for good reason that Black liberation movements have taken aim at statues of Confederate generals, slavers, and colonialists across the globe for decades. These monuments not only symbolically but also physically inscribe white supremacy into the nations' infrastructure. As the Southern Poverty Law Center reported, 'Nearly 20 percent of the country's 2,300 original Confederate memorials were erected on courthouse lawns, the majority of these between the years 1900 and 1920 — the height of Jim Crow.' Counties with the highest number of Confederate memorials also had the highest instances of lynchings. Read Our Complete Coverage 'The law of white supremacy and the statue were right next to each other, creating an infrastructure,' Nicholas Mirzoeff, professor of visual culture at New York University, told me in a 2023 interview. 'It makes sense to respond, as protestors found obvious after the murder of George Floyd, by taking down Confederate and other racist statues, not just to remove racist iconography but to disrupt that infrastructure with a view to replacing it.' As Mirzoeff noted, psychiatrist and decolonization theorist Frantz Fanon called colonial regimes a 'world of statues.' As Fanon put it, 'The statue of the general who carried out the conquest' is part of 'a world which is sure of itself, which crushes with its stones the backs flayed by whips: this is the colonial world.' The removal of statues is not a symbol of decolonization, but an act of it. The conservative claim that monument removal constitutes an assault on the historical record is so tired and weak that it deserves little of our attention. Suffice it to say that Trump's administration has done more to defund and decimate historical research and education than any in recent memory. What's important here is that the work of towering statues in town squares, presented without context, do not offer insight into history but freeze historical norms in place. This is precisely Trump's revanchist aim. The same week Trump's administration announced the monument restorations in D.C., the president raged on social media about his desire to take federal control of the city, invoking racist dogwhistles about youth crime. The battle with the capital is relevant to the statue issue. Nearly half of D.C. residents are Black and the city's mayor, Muriel Bowser, is Black. Most of the city's statues are, like most of the nation's statues, white men; this is the vision of control Trump and his followers want to entrench. The last time D.C.'s home rule was revoked was by Congress in 1874, in a backlash to a previous congressional decision to grant the local vote to Black men in 1867. Home rule was only restored in 1973. Obliterating Black History Confederate statues themselves were acts of historical erasure, mostly constructed decades after the end of the Civil War, either during post-Reconstruction Jim Crow in the 1920s and 1930s, and again in a second wave of Confederate statue construction in a backlash to civil rights gains in the 1950s and 1960s. Precisely when Black struggle threatened the permanence of white supremacy, supporters of Confederate ideology scrambled to affirm white supremacy to be as solid as marble. Meanwhile, actual historical records of the work of Black leaders in the Reconstruction era were regularly destroyed. As W. E. B. Du Bois wrote in 1935, 'When recently a student tried to write on education in Florida, he found that the official records of the excellent administration of the colored Superintendent of Education, Gibbs, who virtually established the Florida public school, had been destroyed. Alabama has tried to obliterate all printed records of Reconstruction.' Today's Republicans are doing the same: restoring Confederate statues to erase the traces of the vast 2020 rebellions and what they represented, and taking an ax to historical research and education that reflects the truth of America's foundational and continued white supremacist violence, and the struggles against it. Du Bois's description of the post-Reconstruction 'propaganda of history' against Black people since emancipation serves as an apt description of today's work of white backlash: 'one of most stupendous efforts the world ever saw to discredit human beings, an effort involving universities, history, science, social life and religion.' The currently empty plinth in D.C. where Pike's statue once stood offers a richer lesson in U.S. history than a renewed, restored monument ever could. It tells a history of white domination and resistance to it — but it is precisely that history of resistance and attempted breaks from white supremacy that Trump's administration seeks to erase. The protesters who felled Pike graffitied and burned the bronze figure; the restored statue will bear no marks of their action.
Los Angeles Times
5 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. media mogul Byron Allen sells 10 TV stations to Gray Media
Media mogul Byron Allen has reached a deal to sell 10 television stations for $171 million to Atlanta-based Gray Media. Gray and Allen Media Group announced the agreement Friday. Allen's stations in Huntsville, Ala., Montgomery, Ala., Ft. Wayne, Ind., Lafayette, La., and Paducah, Ky., were part of the transaction. The stations each have affiliations with one of the Big Four broadcast networks: ABC, Fox, NBC and CBS. The move furthers Allen's retrenchment after a $1-billion buying spree in recent years. Allen had a goal of becoming the largest independent television operator in the U.S. But the build-up — which came during an increasingly challenging period for broadcast TV — left the Los Angeles-based company burdened with debt. This spring, Allen Media Group hired investment banking firm Moelis & Co. to sell his network-affiliate television stations. Allen Media Group, which was founded by Allen in 1993, continues to own television channels, entertainment studios and the Weather Channel. The Los Angeles entrepreneur and former stand-up comedian had been steadily expanding his empire for more than a decade. With the purchase of Allen's stations, Gray moves into three new television markets: Tupelo, Miss.; Terre Haute, Ind.; and West Lafayette, Ind. Gray owns a second station in several of the other locations. The company said in a statement that the combination, known in the industry as a 'duopoly,' will allow it to provide 'expanded local news, local weather, and local sports programming.' The deal, which requires the approval of the Federal Communications Commission, should be complete by year's end, the companies said.
