India-Pakistan escalating tension could reverberate globally, affecting South Africa
Experts believe there are major economic implications globally and for South Africa as tensions continue to grow between India and Pakistan.
Image: FAROOQ NAEEM / AFP
Analysts are warning that the economic ramifications of rising military tensions between India and Pakistan could extend far beyond South Asia, impacting nations like South Africa that count India among their top trading partners.
Earlier this week, India's Ministry of Defence announced the launch of Operation Sindoor, targeting nine alleged terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
This military action was framed by Indian authorities as a direct response to the tragic deaths of 26 civilians in Pahalgam, Kashmir, attributed to alleged terrorist attacks on 22 April. In retaliation, the Indian military has reported increased firing from Pakistan on its northern and western borders.
Given the deep interdependencies forged through trade and partnerships, particularly within BRICS—a coalition that includes both countries—these escalating tensions are raising eyebrows among economic experts in South Africa.
According to the India Brand Equity Foundation, India imported an impressive $10.54 billion's worth of goods from South Africa in 2023-24 alone, with significant commodities such as precious stones and mineral fuels leading the charge.
Professor Emeritus of International Law at Unisa, André Thomashausen, said that India and Pakistan, after the defeat of Pakistan in the 1971 border war, signed the Shimla Treaty to manage their dispute about the autonomy for the Kashmir and Jammu territories.
'The treaty is now revoked, and the dependence of Pakistan on the waters of the Indus River is escalating the conflict, after India decided to constrain the water flows to Pakistan. China and Russia are trying to prevent an all-out war which could turn nuclear, given the imbalance of military strength,' he said.
Thomashausen added that mediation was made difficult whilst the BJP party led by Prime Minister Modi needed to win the forthcoming elections in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where anti-Pakistan sentiments fetch the most votes.
'If mediation fails, further severe blows to the world economy can be expected, with countries exporting to India, like South Africa, suffering most.'
University of KwaZulu-Natal academic and political analyst Siyabonga Ntombela said that escalating tensions between India and Pakistan could have significant global implications.
'Both nations are nuclear powers; if not resolved, we might have spillovers like in the Gaza-Israel war. A deterioration in their relations risks regional instability in South Asia, which could disrupt trade routes and global supply chains,' he said.
Ntombela added that for BRICS, such conflict could strain unity within the bloc and divert focus from economic cooperation to security concerns.
'Therefore, South Africa, as a BRICS member, might face diplomatic pressure to take a stance or mediate. Also, South Africa's economic and political ties with India could be affected if the situation escalates, especially in trade and multilateral engagements.'
UKZN political science lecturer Zakhele Ndlovu said that this was a very concerning and worrying development.
'One hopes it does not spiral out of control. The world is already witnessing two major conflicts: the war between Russia and Ukraine and then the conflict in the Middle East. One hopes cooler heads will prevail. BRICS can't afford to have two of its members involved in wars.'
Ndlovu added that the concerning part is that India and Pakistan are nuclear powers, and any escalation risks putting the whole world in danger. 'India and Pakistan have fought two or three wars over the contested region of Kashmir. Obviously, this is going to have an adverse effect on the global economy.'
Professor Waldo Krugell, economist at North-West University, said that in practical terms we trade with India but it is a smaller part of our trade mix and unlikely to be disrupted by conflict in Kashmir.
'In 2023 exports to India amounted to $10.6bn, mostly gold and coal briquettes with some manganese, scrap iron, apples and pears. Our imports were $7.64bn, mostly refined petroleum, cars, trucks, packaged medicine, cell phones and rice,' Krugell said.
'Usually, conflict of any kind strengthens the dollar, but I don't think these economies are that integrated into global markets that it would matter much. Things could escalate if China gets involved, but it is also unlikely.'
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
28 minutes ago
- eNCA
US judge sides with Meta in AI training copyright case
WASHINGTON - A US judge on Wednesday handed Meta a victory over authors who accused the tech giant of violating copyright law by training Llama artificial intelligence on their creations without permission. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco ruled that Meta's use of the works to train its AI model was "transformative" enough to constitute "fair use" under copyright law, in the second such courtroom triumph for AI firms this week. However, it came with a caveat that the authors could have pitched a winning argument that by training powerful generative AI with copyrighted works, tech firms are creating a tool that could let a sea of users compete with them in the literary marketplace. "No matter how transformative (generative AI) training may be, it's hard to imagine that it can be fair use to use copyrighted books to develop a tool to make billions or trillions of dollars while enabling the creation of a potentially endless stream of competing works that could significantly harm the market for those books," Chhabria said in his ruling. Tremendous amounts of data are needed to train large language models powering generative AI. Musicians, book authors, visual artists and news publications have sued various AI companies that used their data without permission or payment. AI companies generally defend their practices by claiming fair use, arguing that training AI on large datasets fundamentally transforms the original content and is necessary for innovation. "We appreciate today's decision from the court," a Meta spokesperson said in response to an AFP inquiry. "Open-source AI models are powering transformative innovations, productivity and creativity for individuals and companies, and fair use of copyright material is a vital legal framework for building this transformative technology." In the case before Chhabria, a group of authors sued Meta for downloading pirated copies of their works and using them to train the open-source Llama generative AI, according to court documents. Books involved in the suit include Sarah Silverman's comic memoir "The Bedwetter" and Junot Diaz's Pulitzer Prize–winning novel "The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao," the documents showed. "This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful," the judge stated. "It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one." - Market harming? - A different federal judge in San Franciso on Monday sided with AI firm Anthropic regarding training its models on copyrighted books without authors' permission. District Court Judge William Alsup ruled that the company's training of its Claude AI models with books bought or pirated was allowed under the "fair use" doctrine in the US Copyright Act. "Use of the books at issue to train Claude and its precursors was exceedingly transformative and was a fair use," Alsup wrote in his decision. "The technology at issue was among the most transformative many of us will see in our lifetimes," Alsup added in his decision, comparing AI training to how humans learn by reading books. The ruling stems from a class-action lawsuit filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson, who accused Anthropic of illegally copying their books to train chatbot Claude, the company's ChatGPT rival. Alsup rejected Anthropic's bid for blanket protection, ruling that the company's practice of downloading millions of pirated books to build a permanent digital library was not justified by fair use protections. gc/jgc
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Trump's hasty war on Iran risks dragging US into another endless conflict
Trump has fallen for Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just as hard as he fell for Russia's President Vladimir Putin and the die is cast. This satellite picture taken on June 22, 2025, shows a close-up view of craters after US strikes on Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), northeast of the city of Qom. Picture: Satellite image 2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP He didn't take two weeks to make up his mind whether or not to bomb Iran, only two days. US President Donald Trump is not a patient man. But he has just started another American 'forever war' in the Middle East, so he will have plenty of time to work on his self-control. Let's start with the immediate issue. Assume for a moment that Iran was really working to build nuclear weapons, allegedly to destroy Israel. Did the US bombing of the Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan nuclear enrichment sites really blast down through 90m of rock and permanently eliminate any skulduggery the Iranians were up to there? Wrong question. If there really was a large stock of highly enriched uranium stored under all that rock, the Iranians have had a week to divide it up into dozens or hundreds of packets and hide it at safe sites all over the country. What would you do if you knew somebody was coming to bomb you in a few days? Then there's this business about how highly enriched Iran's uranium is. About 90% is weapons-grade and Iran had already enriched a lot of uranium to 60%, so the American B-2s have to start bombing right now. ALSO READ: Oil prices plunge as Trump announces shaky ceasefire between Iran and Israel No time to lose. No time even to think. Nonsense. The gun-type atomic bomb just fires one chunk of enriched uranium at another chunk and so long as the two chunks add up to a critical mass the bomb explodes. That critical mass can be quite small if the uranium is highly enriched, but it will still work at 60% although the package will be heavier and bulkier. There was no deadline. That type of nuclear weapon is so simple and fool-proof that there is no real need to 'test' it, but how was Iran going to deliver it? A ballistic missile, presumably, because drones and cruise missiles can't handle the weight or the range, but few of Iran's ballistic missiles get through Israel's missile defences. However, for the sake of argument, imagine that one of Iran's putative nine or 10 nuclear missiles does make it through and destroys an Israeli town or city. We are piling improbable on top of implausible here, but what would Israel do then? Israel would probably respond by levelling Iran, which it is more than capable of doing. It has the full triad of nuclear weapons, at least 100 of them but up to 400, of all sizes up to thermonuclear. Israel can sterilise the whole of Iran if it chooses. None of these stories we are told makes much sense, so let's try a different approach. What did the 18 US intelligence agencies tell the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, about Iran's nuclear weapons in March? ALSO READ: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond? They told her Iran was not building nuclear weapons. Indeed, they explained Tehran only created a nuclear weapons programme after Saddam Hussein's Iraq invaded Iran with US help in the 1980s. After Saddam was overthrown in 2003, it became clear that there had never been any Iraqi nuclear weapons, it was all a bluff. Thereupon Iran closed its own nuclear weapons programme down and has never resumed it since. It's all just history now. Trump has fallen for Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just as hard as he fell for Russia's President Vladimir Putin and the die is cast. It is likely to be a long, ugly war, conducted mostly by aircraft and missiles at first, but there will be boots on the ground if it goes on long enough. An anti-clerical revolution in Iran could take the country down another road, but if the regime survives, the war could last for many years. Persia was the rival superpower in Roman times and 1 000 years later it was the other superpower in Ottoman times. It's not a superpower any more, but then neither is the US. NOW READ: Iran vs Israel: Principled peace is the only way forward
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Freedom Charter at 70: tapestry of hope
Ladies from various community groups at Kliptown. Image: Supplied AS SOUTH Africa, this Thursday marks the 70th anniversary of the Freedom Charter, adopted on June 26, 1955, in a defiant gathering in Kliptown, Soweto, it is timely to interrogate its legacy not with nostalgic reverence but with the sharp lens of critique. The Freedom Charter was born of a radical imagination. The activists gathered there dared to envision a non-racial, non-sexist, democratic, prosperous, and egalitarian country. It remains the cornerstone of our nation's constitutional democracy and its rights-based ethos. Yet, this document, hailed as a beacon of liberation, casts a long shadow over a society fractured by enduring inequalities, where the widening gap between rich and poor mocks the charter's lofty promises. To reflect on this milestone is to confront the paradox of a nation that celebrates its democratic triumphs, while wrestling with the reality of unfulfilled aspirations. The Freedom Charter was no mere political manifesto. It was a subversive act of collective dreaming, woven from the aspirations of the African National Congress (ANC), South African Indian Congress (SAIC), Coloured People's Congress, and Congress of Democrats. South Africans of Indian descent, in whose veins ran a century of resistance against colonial indignities from indenture to segregation, were integral to this tapestry. Activists like Swaminathan Gounden, a worker from Durban's industrial heart of Jacobs, embodied the courage of the marginalised. At great peril, Gounden slipped through the apartheid state's surveillance to attend the Kliptown gathering, a journey fraught with the risk of arrest or worse. The Congress of the People was organised by the National Action Council, a multi-racial organisation that later became known as the Congress Alliance. It was held in Kliptown on June 26, 1955, to lay out the vision of the South African people. Swaminathan Gounden was one of the Natal delegates who attended the Congress under the leadership of Archie Gumede. Image: Swaminathan Gounden Collection His return to Faulks shoe factory was met with swift retribution - dismissal for daring to dream of a world where 'the people shall govern.' Such sacrifices were not isolated. Among the apartheid regime's repressive responses was the 1956 Treason Trial, preceded by lightning arrests that ensnared 156 activists, including Chief Albert Luthuli, Nelson Mandela, and Indian African stalwarts like Monty Naicker, MP Naicker and Kay Moonsamy. The trial, intended to smother dissent, instead amplified the Charter's rousing call, exposing the moral bankruptcy of a system that equated the fight for social and economic justice with treason. Since 1994, South Africa has drawn on the Freedom Charter's lofty promises, enshrining its principles in the 1996 Constitution - a document lauded for its progressive ideals such as an independent judiciary, a vibrant civil society, freedom of faith, and the dismantling of racial hierarchies. Indian Africans, once relegated to the margins in the obscene racial pecking order, have carved spaces in the nation's political and economic fabric. Census data points to the fact that people of Indian origin have been net economic beneficiaries of the democratic state on a scale second only to those of European descent. Yet, this narrative of progress is haunted by a brutal truth - South Africa is among the world's most unequal societies, its Gini coefficient a statistical indictment of a dream deferred. Delegates from Natal at Kliptown for the signing of the Freedom Charter. Image: Supplied The opulence of Zimbali's villas stands in sharp contrast with the squalor of Cato Crest's shacks. Unemployment, officially upwards of 32%, ravages black youth especially, while land reform and wealth redistribution, which were central demands of the Freedom Charter, are caught in bureaucratic red tape and elite capture. The ANC, once the standard-bearer of liberation, is being suffocated by corruption. Its moral authority has been eroded by governance failures that have left the 'born-free' generation grappling in large part with economic despair. Should today's youth honour the sacrifices of Goonam, Gounden, Luthuli, and that golden generation? Young peoples' discontent has been channelled into movements like #FeesMustFall, which echo the Freedom Charter's demand for accessible education. Yet, others, burdened by the immediacy of survival, dismiss the Freedom Charter as a relic, its promises hollowed out by a post-apartheid state that has traded revolutionary zeal for compromises with traditional and new elites. Struggle veterans, Judge Thumba Pillay, from left, Kay Moonsamy, and Swaminathan Gounden at the Passive Resistance Monument marking the occasion of the 60 anniversary of the Freedom Charter. Image: Kiru Naidoo Social media is a vocal outlet for their disillusionment, with hashtags demonising political and economic grandees. This generational rupture threatens to sever the connective tissue between the struggle's heroes and a youth population that feels betrayed by the very democracy they inherit. The state has failed to translate constitutional rights into tangible material benefits. There has instead been an inordinate focus on the burgeoning (and unsustainable) social welfare system as a breathing valve to hold the poor at bay. Judge Albie Sachs with delegates from the South African Indian Congress SAIC at Kliptown. Image: 1860 Heritage Centre To read the Freedom Charter in 2025 is to ponder a text that is both prophetic and accusatory. It prophesied a South Africa free from apartheid's straitjacket, a vision partially realised in the nation's democratic stability. In a world convulsed by war from Ukraine's battlefields to Gaza's ruins to the Congo and Sudan, South Africa's upholding of the rule of law and constitutionalism is no small feat. Yet, the Freedom Charter also chastises with its words, translating into a mirror reflecting the nation's failure to bridge the gulf between rich and poor. The struggles and sacrifices of those who fought for freedom compel us to ask - what does it mean to honour a struggle when its fruits are so unevenly distributed? Hope lies not in blind optimism but in the radical act of reimagining the Freedom Charter's possibilities. South Africa's people must reclaim the courage of Kliptown - its defiance, its unity, and its insistence on justice to forge a future where the people truly govern. Selvan Naidoo Image: File Kiru Naidoo Image: File Selvan Naidoo and Kiru Naidoo are co-authors with Paul David and Ranjith Choonilall of The Indian Africans, published by Micromega and available at * The Gandhi-Luthuli Documentation Centre at the University of KwaZulu-Natal will host a commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the Freedom Charter with the launch of veteran activist Saro Naicker's biography, Love for Learning, at 6pm today (June 26) on the Westville campus. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. THE POST
