Perspective: The politics of tariffs, T-shirts and dolls
Democratic strategist James Carville is a reliable quote machine, and he didn't disappoint on last week's town hall hosted by Chris Cuomo on NewsNation.
'I have on six items of clothes: shoes, socks, jeans, skivvies, T-shirt, and sweatshirt. You know how many of these were made in America? None. None,' Carville said. 'And I don't want to live in a country that makes T-shirts. I can buy them from somewhere else.'
Asked for clarification by fellow guest Bill O'Reilly, Carville dug in: 'We make airplanes, we make movies. We drill oil, we make all kinds of things. We don't need to make T-shirts.'
It was one of the more provocative exchanges to occur throughout the tariff debate, on par with Donald Trump saying that children 'might have two dolls instead of 30 dolls' because of higher priced toys.
Whether you're pro-tariffs or anti-tariffs or even a tariff agnostic, there's plenty to chew on here, starting with, what was Carville thinking?
'Buy American' has long been a patriotic motto, going back to the Buy American Act of 1933, which directed the federal government to give preference to domestic goods.
Yes, the world is now flat, as Thomas Friedman told us, but if someone down the street is making T-shirts and selling them for $20, there's a whole wide world of reasons to buy them from your neighbors rather than have the $5 ones shipped from overseas. As Democratic leaders try to brand the GOP as the 'party of oligarchs' it was a surprisingly oligarchish thing for Carville to say.
How many dolls is enough?
Amid all the dire predictions about how much Christmas is going to cost this year — the worst being the guy who told The Wall Street Journal 'there will be no Christmas,' as if he never heard of Whoville — can Trump opponents at least concede that no American child needs 30 toys, let alone 30 dolls?
Outside of the tariff debate, we are long overdue for a discussion of the Dollar Store-ization of America where everything is devalued when it only costs a dollar or two. And the cheaper stuff is, the more likely we are to throw it away, which is why, as journalist Alexander Clapp writes in his new book 'Waste Wars,' American trash is being shipped off to other countries.
'By the early 2000s, Americans' biggest export to China was the stuff Americans tossed away,' Clapp writes. China put a stop to it in 2018, but for three previous decades, 'China had been the recipient of half the plastic placed into a recycling bin anywhere on Earth.'
What we don't throw away or stuff in self-storage units, we enthusiastically donate to Goodwill and other thrift shops, where, I am convinced, there is an ample supply of dolls and other plastic toys to supply Christmases through the next century.
All of which is to say, there are many trickle-down conversations to be had about tariffs and their effect on global commerce. You can want to Make America Great Again and also not want to turn the planet into a dumping ground of plastic waste, and also believe that Christmas doesn't come from the Dollar General.
And, for the record, what's the right number of toys that a child should have? According to one study, per Today.com, four. (That's similar to advice I found when researching the best number of Christmas gifts a few years ago: many parents say three or four.)
The child psychologist John Rosemond has said, '... if you want a child to play more independently and imaginatively, simply get rid of 90% of the child's toys, keeping those that were in production before 1955.'
Quote of the Week
'It's like having the news reported by the Ghost of Christmas yet to come — you're not seeing the things that will be, you're seeing the things that might be.' — Author and podcaster Andrew Klavan on the Megyn Kelly Show, talking about negative news coverage of President Donald Trump.
Recommended Reading
Sarah Jane Weaver thoughtfully responds to an AI-generated photo of Donald Trump dressed as the pope that was shared by the White House:
'Many are saying the AI-generated photograph was a joke — and should not be taken seriously. (The late) Pope Francis, himself, I am sure, found time to laugh. Still, he also understood what should be reverenced."
The Lessons of 3 Images — 2 From a Pope, 1 From a President
Utah businessman Jeremy Barker makes the case for tariffs:
'Yes, tariffs may raise prices in the short term. But they also encourage smarter, more local production — something the pandemic proved we urgently need. When global trade stalled in 2020, companies relying on distant suppliers faced shortages and slowdowns."
Why I Love Tariffs — And Why Utah Should, Too
Naomi Schaefer Riley recently read a memoir by the actor Rob Lowe, who wrote about the experience of growing up with divorced parents. She connects his experience to the struggles of many young men today.
'If we want to understand why so many young men are so at sea trying to figure out their place in the world and how they should relate to the opposite sex, it is worth understanding what they miss when they grow up separated from their fathers.'
The 'Manosphere' Can't Give Boys What They Need the Most
Endnotes
I have been trying to ignore the Bill Belichick-Jordon Hudson story for months, but it finally boiled over to the point where ignoring it wasn't an option anymore. Hence, this op-ed entitled 'We Are Living in a Sea of Cringe.'
After it was published, a reader took me to task for the last line, which reads 'Andy Reid has never looked so good.'
He said I should have written 'LaVell Edwards has never looked so good,' and that's a fair point. The legendary BYU coach should have been a contender along with my second choice, which had been Notre Dame's Lou Holtz.
So here's your chance to edit the editor. What would you have written when trying to compare Bill Belichick with any other coach? What was the best ending to that column, in your book?
Let me know at Jgraham@deseretnews.com or send me a DM on X, @grahamtoday. And don't forget that Sunday is Mother's Day.
As always, thank you for reading and being part of the Right to the Point community.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump isn't trying to ‘erase history' at Smithsonian — he's reversing a destructive woke takeover
Liberals were up in arms this week after President Trump said he wanted a review of the Smithsonian Institute — saying their displays were too negative, and too focused on slavery. But Trump isn't trying to 'erase history,' he's looking to reverse a woke movement that has indeed rewritten the American story to highlight suffering rather than providing a balanced picture of our past. Trump's criticism that the Smithsonian is overly focused on slavery is not unreasonable: In nearly every exhibit, critical race theory in general, or slavery specifically, makes an appearance. For instance, its new Benjamin Franklin exhibit on his innovations includes a whole section on slavery — with assumptions, but no proof, that slaves assisted Franklin in his electrical innovations. Even if they hadn't, the curators argue that without their work around the house, Franklin couldn't have spent the time on his experiments! 'Franklin held people enslaved during the time he pursued his electrical experiments. Their labor in his household helped make time that he could use to study electricity. Family, friends, and visitors directly participated in electrical experiments. The records are few and unclear, but enslaved people may also have directly assisted his research.' Another example of the obsession with slavery comes from the National Portrait Gallery; nearly every early Founding Father's description includes a statement on slavery. For example, the description for Thomas Jefferson includes the statement: 'Although Jefferson once called slavery 'an abominable crime,' he consistently enslaved African Americans, including his late wife Martha's half-sister, Sally Hemings, with whom he had several children.' The overemphasis on the history of slavery is a fairly recent development, an offshoot of the Black Lives Matter movement. In 2019, Lonnie G. Bunch III took over as the Secretary of the Smithsonian. Prior to that, Bunch was the founding director of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, which is nearly exclusively focused on the legacy of slavery, with exhibits such as In Slavery's Wake, Slavery and Freedom, and Make Good the Promise, which deal with the history of slavery. Also in 2019, the Smithsonian collaborated with the New York Times on its 1619 Project, which falsely claims that the United States started, not with the Declaration of Independence or Revolutionary War, but when the first slave ship arrived. As curator Mary Elliot remarked at the time: 'This is a shared history, everyone inherited the legacies of slavery.' But America's history is more than just about slavery, and not everyone inherited this legacy — after all, America is also a nation of immigrants who came after the Civil War. In the Smithsonian 2020 annual report, more obsession with slavery comes into view. The Smithsonian is on a mission to have a completely searchable digital museum called 'The Searchable Museum Initiative.' One may think it would begin with digitization of some our greatest moments in history, such as the landing on the moon, the passing of the US Constitution, or even its great Natural History collections. You would be wrong; the digitization began 'with the museum's Slavery and Freedom exhibition.' The annual report claims that 'The Searchable Museum will provide rich, interactive, digital experiences that match the immersive experience of a visit to the physical museum' — unfortunately, likely as biased as a visit to the museum themselves. The problem with modern museums is not just about the obsession with slavery; it's also about dishonestly painting all of American history as evil and full of horrors — with little or no redeeming qualities. For instance, in the Smithsonian's American Indian Museum in NYC, George Washington hardly gets a mention, but his silhouette is used in a description of him as a 'town destroyer' — supposedly a nickname that Native Americans still use to describe our first President. And yet there's no mention in either of the American Indian Museums — in NYC or DC — about slavery practiced by Native Americans, both before Europeans' arrival and afterward. For example, the Cherokee owned slaves. In 1835, 15,000 Cherokee owned 1,592 African slaves; by the Civil War onset, 17,000 Cherokee owned 4,000 African slaves. While museums should provide an honest account of history, they should not be afraid to showcase and celebrate American achievement, which includes ending slavery. At present, however, museums seem more interested in pushing a woke, revisionist history of the United States. With two new Smithsonian museums in development, the National Museum of the American Latino and the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum, we can expect more of the same — unless we take action against woke propaganda now. Elizabeth Weiss is a professor emeritus of anthropology at San José State University and author of 'On the Warpath: My Battles with Indians, Pretendians, and Woke Warriors.'
Chicago Tribune
7 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Will County Board member Jacqueline Traynere charged with computer tampering
Will County Board member Jacqueline Traynere faces three counts of computer tampering, according to a complaint filed this week in Will County Circuit Court. Traynere, a Bolingbrook Democrat, allegedly accessed the email account of board member Judy Ogalla, a Monee Republican, in March 2024 without Ogalla's authorization, according to the charges. The misdemeanor charges filed by special prosecutor William Elward state Traynere forwarded emails from Ogalla's account to herself and others. Ogalla, who was the Will County Board chairman at the time, said that Traynere knowingly accessed her email and knew it was unethical. Ogalla questioned whether Traynere had opened her email more than once. She said she doesn't know what all Traynere saw. 'Was she in my email other times and I just didn't know?' Ogalla said. 'She shouldn't have done it.' An email exchanged between board member Steve Balich, a Homer Glen Republican, and Ogalla regarding the controversial 143rd Street road widening project had been forwarded to the county executive, who replied to the email, Balich said during a July 2024 news conference with other County Board Republicans. Reached Wednesday, Traynere said she was unaware of the charges. Traynere said she had been testing out a rumor that all County Board members were given the same password when they were issued new devices. At the time the incident occurred, Traynere said she contacted Ogalla to explain what happened and believed it amounted to nothing. She said it was a simple mistake to see if it were true that all board members had the same password and she was exposing a problem with the system. A summons was issued for Traynere to appear in court Sept. 9. Traynere said Wednesday she believes the charges are political. Traynere has been on the Will County Board since 2008 and is the past Democratic Leader. She chairs the Public Works and Transportation Committee. Her term expires in 2026. Already, Sheldon Watts and Tyler Giacalone have announced they are running for the two seats that are up for election next year to represent District 11. Earlier this year, Traynere was issued a traffic citation stemming from an accident with a minor on a bicycle. That case was dismissed May 15, according to her lawyer and Will County Court documents.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas House advances GOP-friendly map after weeks of Dem resistance
The Texas state House passed a new set of GOP-friendly congressional lines in a key preliminary vote on Wednesday, putting the party one step closer toward adopting a new map that sparked a redistricting arms race across the country. The lower chamber approved the new maps on party lines, 88-52, in the first of two key votes. The final passage of the map in the House is expected to take place later on Wednesday. Its likely passage marks a key victory for Republicans, who were called into a second special session by Gov. Greg Abbott (R) after efforts to pass their House map stalled during their first 30-day session when Democrats fled the state in protest. The state Senate will next need to pass the map before it heads to Abbott's desk for his signature. Republicans faced pressure from the White House earlier this year to do mid-decade redistricting as the party braces for a challenging political environment next year. The president's party traditionally faces headwinds during midterm cycles. President Trump on Tuesday urged Texas Republicans to move swiftly and pass the new congressional lines. Redistricting, which was not initially included on Abbott's call for a special session, was later added. Republicans sought to quickly pass a new map during their first special session, but Democrats fled the state to block the GOP from having a quorum — or the minimum number of lawmakers needed in order to do business. Texas Democrats rallied in California, New York, Illinois and Massachusetts, drawing national attention over the issue and drawing criticism from Republicans who argued Democrats were being hypocritical about gerrymandering given several of those states also have gerrymandered maps. The redistricting battle prompted California to move forward with introducing their own set of gerrymandered congressional lines in an effort to neutralize expected gains out of Texas with their anticipated new map. A number of red and blue states could also see new House maps, too, including Florida, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri and New York. 2024 Election Coverage Earlier this week, Democrats returned to Texas during the second special session, where the passage of a new House map was all but inevitable. Democratic-aligned and civil rights groups are already getting ready to challenge Texas' maps, while Republicans are seeking to stop California from passing a new House map through a ballot initiative in November. Republicans currently hold 25 House seats in the Lone Star State, while Democrats hold 12, with one seat vacant after the late Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Texas) died in March. The new map would give the GOP the opportunity to increase their congressional delegation to 30.
