logo
Perspective: The politics of tariffs, T-shirts and dolls

Perspective: The politics of tariffs, T-shirts and dolls

Yahoo08-05-2025

This article was first published in the Right to the Point newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each week.
Democratic strategist James Carville is a reliable quote machine, and he didn't disappoint on last week's town hall hosted by Chris Cuomo on NewsNation.
'I have on six items of clothes: shoes, socks, jeans, skivvies, T-shirt, and sweatshirt. You know how many of these were made in America? None. None,' Carville said. 'And I don't want to live in a country that makes T-shirts. I can buy them from somewhere else.'
Asked for clarification by fellow guest Bill O'Reilly, Carville dug in: 'We make airplanes, we make movies. We drill oil, we make all kinds of things. We don't need to make T-shirts.'
It was one of the more provocative exchanges to occur throughout the tariff debate, on par with Donald Trump saying that children 'might have two dolls instead of 30 dolls' because of higher priced toys.
Whether you're pro-tariffs or anti-tariffs or even a tariff agnostic, there's plenty to chew on here, starting with, what was Carville thinking?
'Buy American' has long been a patriotic motto, going back to the Buy American Act of 1933, which directed the federal government to give preference to domestic goods.
Yes, the world is now flat, as Thomas Friedman told us, but if someone down the street is making T-shirts and selling them for $20, there's a whole wide world of reasons to buy them from your neighbors rather than have the $5 ones shipped from overseas. As Democratic leaders try to brand the GOP as the 'party of oligarchs' it was a surprisingly oligarchish thing for Carville to say.
How many dolls is enough?
Amid all the dire predictions about how much Christmas is going to cost this year — the worst being the guy who told The Wall Street Journal 'there will be no Christmas,' as if he never heard of Whoville — can Trump opponents at least concede that no American child needs 30 toys, let alone 30 dolls?
Outside of the tariff debate, we are long overdue for a discussion of the Dollar Store-ization of America where everything is devalued when it only costs a dollar or two. And the cheaper stuff is, the more likely we are to throw it away, which is why, as journalist Alexander Clapp writes in his new book 'Waste Wars,' American trash is being shipped off to other countries.
'By the early 2000s, Americans' biggest export to China was the stuff Americans tossed away,' Clapp writes. China put a stop to it in 2018, but for three previous decades, 'China had been the recipient of half the plastic placed into a recycling bin anywhere on Earth.'
What we don't throw away or stuff in self-storage units, we enthusiastically donate to Goodwill and other thrift shops, where, I am convinced, there is an ample supply of dolls and other plastic toys to supply Christmases through the next century.
All of which is to say, there are many trickle-down conversations to be had about tariffs and their effect on global commerce. You can want to Make America Great Again and also not want to turn the planet into a dumping ground of plastic waste, and also believe that Christmas doesn't come from the Dollar General.
And, for the record, what's the right number of toys that a child should have? According to one study, per Today.com, four. (That's similar to advice I found when researching the best number of Christmas gifts a few years ago: many parents say three or four.)
The child psychologist John Rosemond has said, '... if you want a child to play more independently and imaginatively, simply get rid of 90% of the child's toys, keeping those that were in production before 1955.'
Quote of the Week
'It's like having the news reported by the Ghost of Christmas yet to come — you're not seeing the things that will be, you're seeing the things that might be.' — Author and podcaster Andrew Klavan on the Megyn Kelly Show, talking about negative news coverage of President Donald Trump.
Recommended Reading
Sarah Jane Weaver thoughtfully responds to an AI-generated photo of Donald Trump dressed as the pope that was shared by the White House:
'Many are saying the AI-generated photograph was a joke — and should not be taken seriously. (The late) Pope Francis, himself, I am sure, found time to laugh. Still, he also understood what should be reverenced."
The Lessons of 3 Images — 2 From a Pope, 1 From a President
Utah businessman Jeremy Barker makes the case for tariffs:
'Yes, tariffs may raise prices in the short term. But they also encourage smarter, more local production — something the pandemic proved we urgently need. When global trade stalled in 2020, companies relying on distant suppliers faced shortages and slowdowns."
Why I Love Tariffs — And Why Utah Should, Too
Naomi Schaefer Riley recently read a memoir by the actor Rob Lowe, who wrote about the experience of growing up with divorced parents. She connects his experience to the struggles of many young men today.
'If we want to understand why so many young men are so at sea trying to figure out their place in the world and how they should relate to the opposite sex, it is worth understanding what they miss when they grow up separated from their fathers.'
The 'Manosphere' Can't Give Boys What They Need the Most
Endnotes
I have been trying to ignore the Bill Belichick-Jordon Hudson story for months, but it finally boiled over to the point where ignoring it wasn't an option anymore. Hence, this op-ed entitled 'We Are Living in a Sea of Cringe.'
After it was published, a reader took me to task for the last line, which reads 'Andy Reid has never looked so good.'
He said I should have written 'LaVell Edwards has never looked so good,' and that's a fair point. The legendary BYU coach should have been a contender along with my second choice, which had been Notre Dame's Lou Holtz.
So here's your chance to edit the editor. What would you have written when trying to compare Bill Belichick with any other coach? What was the best ending to that column, in your book?
Let me know at Jgraham@deseretnews.com or send me a DM on X, @grahamtoday. And don't forget that Sunday is Mother's Day.
As always, thank you for reading and being part of the Right to the Point community.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

Hamilton Spectator

time18 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

EDMONTON - Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said Friday that the move signals a 'renewed commitment to open and fair trade' with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. Alberta's liquor stores are privately owned but must order stock through the provincial government. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Other premiers also announced bans on U.S. liquor along with other proposed penalties. Nally said in a statement that the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines 'sets the stage for more constructive negotiations' ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The agreement, known as CUSMA, was negotiated during the first Trump administration and is up for a mandatory review in 2026. 'Prime Minister Mark Carney has made a clear effort to reset the relationship with the U.S. administration, and Alberta's government supports this approach,' Nally said. 'We are focused on highlighting Alberta's role as a responsible and collaborative trading partner and will continue working alongside other provinces to advocate for a tariff-free relationship.' The minister said Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. In April, the province paused its policy around procurement from U.S. companies in what Nally called 'the spirit of diplomacy.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Impressive five-bedroom Edwardian home in Cheam listed for £1.25million
Impressive five-bedroom Edwardian home in Cheam listed for £1.25million

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Impressive five-bedroom Edwardian home in Cheam listed for £1.25million

An impressive five-bedroom Edwardian semi-detached home located in Cheam's Landseer Conservation Area has been listed for offers over £1.25 million. The property, situated on Derby Road in Sutton, is described as a 'character residence' by estate agents Watson Homes, and offers over 2,000 sq ft of space. The period property, which dates back to the Edwardian era, is said to have a range of original features. These include a cast iron fireplace, stained leaded light windows, and a feature staircase. Original features include cast iron fireplace, stained glass, and staircase (Image: Watson Homes - Cheam Village) The home has two reception rooms, one of which is an extended dining room that leads into a conservatory. The kitchen is fitted with wooden wall units, a movable island, and an American-style fridge/freezer, alongside integrated "AEG" oven/grill and "Bosch" dishwasher. Spacious kitchen with island and conservatory opens to 90ft garden (Image: Watson Homes - Cheam Village) The house also has a utility area and a downstairs shower room. The five bedrooms are spread across the upper floors, with the fifth being a bright and airy room that offers flexible living space. Flexible fifth bedroom and insulated cabin ideal for home working (Image: Watson Homes - Cheam Village) The property's bathroom is fitted with a luxury suite, including a freestanding bath tub with chrome mixer tap and shower attachment. Bathroom features luxury suite with freestanding bath and chrome fixtures (Image: Watson Homes - Cheam Village) The house has off-street parking, an electric vehicle charger point, and a pretty topiary hedge and decorative footpath. The rear garden, which is approximately 90ft long, is described as a 'lovely' space with a decorative patio area, sandstone paved footpath, well stocked flowerbeds, fruit trees, and an abundance of plants. The garden also features a detached cabin with an insulated ceiling and floor, power supply, and double glazed windows. Rear garden boasts cabin, fruit trees, and sandstone patio retreat (Image: Watson Homes - Cheam Village) The property is within walking distance of Cheam train station and West Sutton, providing good transport links into Victoria, London Bridge, Wimbledon, and St Pancras. The area is also well-served by bus routes, making it a convenient location for school children and commuters. Cheam Village, with its quaint coffee shops, is also nearby, while Sutton offers larger department stores, banking, and eateries. The area is noted for its high standard of local schools, including Homefield, St Dunstan's, Sutton High, Sutton Grammar, Nonsuch, and The Avenue. The home is listed as a freehold property with an EPC Rating of D. Anyone interested in viewing the property can contact Watson Homes.

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store