
Why India Has Vowed To Protect Its Farmers In The Face Of Tariff Threats
US President Donald Trump on Thursday slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods after prolonged talks that got bogged down over access to India's labour-intensive agricultural sector, which New Delhi has pledged to protect.
Why Is India Opposing The Products US Is Lobbying For?
The United States is pressing India to open its markets to a wide range of American products, including dairy, poultry, corn, soybeans, rice, wheat, ethanol, fruits and nuts. While India is willing to provide greater access for US dry fruits and apples, it is holding back on corn, soybeans, wheat, and dairy products.
A key reason for this resistance is that most US corn and soybeans are genetically modified (GM), and India does not permit the import of GM food crops.
GM crops are widely perceived in India as harmful to human health and the environment, and several groups affiliated with Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are opposing their introduction. The commercial cultivation of a high-yielding GM mustard variety that India developed itself is currently not allowed due to an ongoing legal battle.
Like GM crops, dairy is also a highly sensitive issue, as it provides a livelihood for millions of farmers, including many who are landless or smallholders. The dairy industry helps sustain farmers even during erratic monsoon seasons, which can cause significant fluctuations in crop production.
In India, where a large proportion of the population is vegetarian, food choices are strongly influenced by cultural and dietary preferences. Indian consumers are particularly concerned that cattle in the US are often fed animal by-products - a practice that conflicts with Indian food habits.
Why Are Agricultural Imports Politically Charged?
India is self-sufficient in most farm goods, with the exception of vegetable oils. After liberalising cooking oil imports over three decades ago, the country now has to import nearly two-thirds of its supply to meet demand. India does not want to repeat this mistake with other basic foods, which account for nearly half of its consumer price index.
Though agriculture makes up just 16 per cent of India's nearly $3.9 trillion economy, it is the lifeblood for nearly half the country's 1.4 billion people. Four years ago, this powerful voting bloc forced Modi's government into a rare retreat on a set of controversial farm laws.
Some in power fear a flood of cheaper US imports would bring down local prices and hand opposition parties an opportunity to sharpen its attack on the government. New Delhi is also worried that a trade deal with the U.S. could also force it to open its agricultural sector to other countries.
How Does Farming In India And The US Differ?
The vast disparity in the scale of farming makes it difficult for Indian farmers to compete with their US counterparts.
The average Indian farm is a 1.08 hectares (2.67 acres), compared to 187 hectares in the US For dairy farmers, the difference is even more dramatic - a small herd of two or three animals versus hundreds or more in the US.
Many Indian farmers also rely on traditional, unmechanised techniques, while American agriculture has developed into a highly efficient, tech-driven industry.
Why Is India Hesitant To Use US Ethanol In Its Biofuel Programme?
One of India's key goals with its Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) programme is to reduce energy imports and support domestic farmers by using sugarcane and corn for biofuel production.
Indian companies have invested heavily in new distilleries, and farmers have expanded corn cultivation to meet the rising demand. India recently achieved its ambitious target of a 20 per cent ethanol blend in petrol.
With state assembly elections approaching in Bihar - a major corn-producing state in the east - allowing U.S. ethanol imports would lower local corn prices. This would probably anger farmers and turn them against the BJP ahead of the election and also undermine the growing distillery sector.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court relists case where it took judge off criminal cases after 13 Allahabad HC judges protest
Following an unprecedented protest by several judges of the Allahabad High Court, the Supreme Court on Friday will rehear the matter in which it had barred a judge of the Allahabad High Court from hearing criminal cases till his retirement. At least 13 judges of the Allahabad High Court on Thursday sought a full court reference to discuss the SC observations and directions against their colleague, a sitting judge of the HC. It is learnt that one judge moved a letter seeking a full court discussion while 12 of his colleagues signed it. The top court had criticised the HC judge for permitting criminal prosecution in what it said was essentially a civil dispute. The matter will be reheard by a bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, which had also passed the August 4 order barring the judge. Sources said there was a view among some of the SC judges that the court could have gone easier in the matter as against the HC judge, and this was conveyed to the CJI. In its August 4 order, the SC asked the Allahabad HC Chief Justice to 'make the concerned judge sit in a division bench with a seasoned senior judge of the high court. We further direct that the concerned judge shall not be assigned any criminal determination till he demits office. If at all at some point in time, he is to be made to sit as a single judge, he shall not be assigned any criminal determination.' The case involved a dispute between a yarn supplier and a cloth manufacturer. Lalita Textile Concern had supplied thread worth Rs 52,34,385 to Shikhar Chemicals, of which Rs 47,75,000 was paid and the rest remained unpaid since August 2019. The owner of Lalita Textile alleged he did not receive payment despite multiple attempts. He moved a magistrate court, which took cognisance of the complaint, and issued summons for the offence punishable under Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the IPC. This was challenged before the high court, which dismissed the same. The case then came to the Supreme Court. It said in its verdict: 'With all due deference and humility at our command, we are constrained to observe that the impugned order is one of the worst and most erroneous orders that we have come across in our respective tenures as judges of this court.' The top court added, 'The judge concerned has not only cut a sorry figure for himself but has made a mockery of justice. We are at our wits' end to understand what is wrong with the Indian judiciary at the level of high court. At times, we are left wondering whether such orders are passed on some extraneous considerations or it is sheer ignorance of law. Whatever it be, passing of such absurd and erroneous orders is something unpardonable.' The SC set aside the high court order and remanded the matter to the high court for considering it afresh. The court asked the Chief Justice of the Allahabad HC to assign the matter to any other HC judge.


India.com
6 minutes ago
- India.com
Israel To Britain To Ukraine – Why 19 Countries Want To Buy This Deadly Missile
Washington: The United States has signed a defence agreement worth $3.5 billion with 19 countries for the supply of AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM). This is the largest single deal for the missile so far. Israel, Ukraine and the United Kingdom are among the buyers. The agreement comes at a time of heightened global tensions, particularly in the Middle East, and with existing AMRAAM stockpiles running low. The AMRAAM can be fitted to every American fighter jet. It also works with most aircraft used by allied nations. The missile is designed to strike targets beyond visual range. It is also deployed in the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS), which can engage threats from the ground. The NASAMS was developed by Norway's Kongsberg and Raytheon. It currently protects the United States and is in service in more than a dozen countries. Ukraine has been using it in the war for the past three years. The missile has seen combat in multiple major conflicts. The U.S. military has used it to shoot down Houthi drones, block drone attacks in Syria and Iraq and protect Israel from Iranian strikes. It can operate in bad weather and engage at any time of day. It travels at a speed of 1,372 metres per second. Recently, the United States approved the supply of AMRAAM missiles to Egypt for the first time. Until now, Egypt's F-16s had relied on less capable AIM-7 Sparrow and AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles. The surge in demand has created a need to boost production. Thousands of AMRAAM missiles have been built and around 5,000 have undergone testing. But their heavy use in recent years has depleted reserves. The United States is now investing heavily to speed up manufacturing, with current operations in Ukraine and the Middle East steadily draining missile stocks.


Deccan Herald
6 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Trump tariff effect: Gem & jewellery exporters stare at severe losses
India's competitors like Turkey, Vietnam, and Thailand enjoy significantly lower tariffs of 15%, 20%, and 19% respectively, thereby making Indian products relatively less competitive in the US market.