Popular culture brought us the word gaslight. What is it and what are the keys to a healthy relationship?
"When you sat there and talked at her, it was gaslighting 101," expert John Aiken told groom Tim on season 12 of Married At First Sight.
"You deflected. You blamed her for everything. You said she broke your trust.
"You said that you were the most honest of the two of you and, ultimately, you made her feel like she was going crazy.
TikTok psychologists use the term, as do others who post on the platform.
You'll hear it used in film and scripted television.
And if you go back far enough in time, you'll find that popular culture brought us the word.
Robin Stern is a licensed psychoanalyst and the author of The Gaslight Effect: How to Spot and Survive the Hidden Manipulation Others Use to Control Your Life.
"The term 'gaslight' comes from the 1938 play 'Gas Light' and the subsequent films, most famously the 1944 Hollywood version," Dr Stern said.
"In the story, a husband systematically manipulates his wife into questioning her own sanity – one tactic involves dimming the gaslights in their home and denying it's happening when she notices.
"It was a chilling portrayal of psychological control."
Dr Stern says the word went on to become a common term in the lexicon.
"Over time, 'gaslighting' evolved from a specific plot device to a widely used term for a form of emotional abuse in which someone causes another to doubt their perceptions, memories, or sense of reality," she said.
"The popularisation of the term speaks to how many people recognised aspects of their own experiences in the story."
But Dr Stern says the word is often misapplied.
"Gaslighting is not just a conflict or lie — it's a sustained pattern of manipulation that erodes your trust in yourself.
"When we overuse the term, we risk losing the depth and seriousness of what true gaslighting entails."
Dr Stern says disagreements and even lying aren't necessarily gaslighting.
"For gaslighting to be present, there must be an ongoing attempt to destabilise another person's reality," she said.
"For instance, if someone forgets a conversation, that's not gaslighting.
"But if they repeatedly deny conversations that did happen — or accuse you of imagining them to make you feel unstable — that's when it crosses the line."
The short answer is yes.
"Gaslighting has become a troubling feature of modern political life," Dr Stern says.
"Leaders or institutions may deny facts, contradict previous statements, or manipulate language to sow doubt and confusion.
"Political gaslighting erodes trust in institutions, the media, and even in one's own judgement.
"It's especially dangerous because it can shape entire narratives, influence public opinion, and silence dissent."
Dr Stern says gaslighting is a behaviour, not a clinical diagnosis.
"It can be a tactic within personality disorders like narcissistic personality disorder or part of coercive control in abusive relationships," she said.
"I believe what matters is recognising the dynamics and damage of gaslighting, regardless of whether it has a clinical label.
"Naming it gives people language to make sense of their experience, and that's powerful in itself.
Kayla Steele is a postdoctoral research fellow and clinical psychologist at the UNSW School of Psychology, based at the Black Dog Institute.
"Experiencing gaslighting often leads to a person experiencing significant emotional and psychological distress," Dr Steele says.
"This is in part due to the erosion of trust that occurs, both within the relationship and within a person's sense of self and their ability to discern what is real and what is not."
Dr Steele says people gaslight "to gain control or influence over other people and their experiences, perceptions and reality."
She's outlined the following ways to identify gaslighting in an intimate relationship.
Dr Steele says gaslighting can unfold in stages.
"The stages of gaslighting generally involve initially feeling idealised by your partner, followed by a period of devaluation that can leave you feeling confused," Dr Steele says.
"This may then cause you to doubt your own perception of reality, which can lead to the other person taking control of the situation or the relationship and the person being gaslit feeling helpless, dependent and powerless."
Dr Steele encourages people to seek out help when recovering from being gaslit.
"Talk to someone you trust about your concerns, such as your partner, a friend, family member or health professional such as a psychologist, therapist, or relationship counsellor," Dr Steele says.
"When leaving an unhealthy relationship, it is important to prioritise strengthening our sense of self, including our self-worth, our trust in ourselves and our perception of reality, and to seek support from trusted friends and family.
"Establishing healthy relationships with others can provide a safe landing place where we can have our concerns listened to and our emotions and experiences validated.
"[It] can also help us rebuild our sense of self and our capacity to trust."
Dr Steele says a healthy relationship has some key characteristics that include:
Yes, it can.
Dr Steele says it can be unintentional "if it is an unconscious denial of reality and not a conscious behaviour used to manipulate or control the other."
Dr Stern has some great advice if you think that's you.
"Recognising that you've engaged in gaslighting behaviour is a meaningful and courageous first step," Dr Stern says.
"Take time to reflect on what was driving those actions — were you trying to control the narrative, avoid responsibility, cover up a lie, or simply struggling to manage something difficult?
"Understanding your motives is essential to making meaningful change.
"Take accountability for the harm you may have caused, but also recognise that those you've hurt may need space, time, or clear boundaries.
"Real transformation begins with ownership, empathy, and a sustained commitment to doing better.
"Just as important is developing emotional skills — learning to regulate your feelings, communicate honestly, and sit with discomfort without resorting to control.
"Building those internal strategies is not only possible, but essential for healthier, more respectful relationships moving forward."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
PM says he does not want Putin ‘rewarded' after Trump meet
Anthony Albanese says he does not want to see Vladimir Putin 'rewarded' after the Russian President met with Donald Trump this weekend discuss Ukraine. While both leaders hailed the talks as 'productive' and 'constructive', they emerged from their 'Pursuing Peace' summit in Alaska with little but pledges to keep talking. Though, in a big win for Mr Putin, he got a red-carpet welcome and photographed handshakes with the US President while the war in Ukraine raged on. The Prime Minister on Sunday said it was a 'good thing' that parties were talking. 'It is a good thing that President Trump is an advocate for peace,' Mr Albanese told reporters in Perth. 'What we want to see is that the sovereignty of Ukraine be protected and that the illegal and immoral invasion conducted by Mr Putin and Russia are not very rewarded.' He added that standing up for international rule of law was important, too. 'It's also important because of the precedent that Russia's invasion sets of a powerful nation invading a much smaller nation and engaging in the brutality, which we have seen at great cost to the Ukrainian people, but also at a great cost to Russian soldiers who've lost their lives as well,' Mr Albanese said. Ukrainian Ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko also warned not taking a firm line with Mr Putin would embolden him. 'Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 – they grabbed Crimea, they invaded eastern parts of Ukraine and started the war,' Mr Myroshnychenko told Sky News. 'They got inspired and emboldened by the weak reaction to what they had done and invaded Ukraine again eight years later, with a goal of subjugating the entire nation, occupying Kyiv and the entire territory of Ukraine.' He said his country 'wants to achieve peace more than anybody else because Ukrainians get killed, our country is getting destroyed'. Mr Myroshnychenko also said Australia has 'skin in the game because this is going to shape the security and stability of the Indo-Pacific'. 'Because if Russia can end up even technically controlling 20 per cent of Ukrainian territory, it will be a blueprint for any other authoritarian leader here in the region to follow the same path and just do the same thing,' he said, in a nod to China. Mr Trump met Mr Putin without Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, raising eyebrows in Kyiv and across Europe. Mr Zelenskyy will meet with Mr Trump in Washington on Monday. Ahead of their meeting, the Ukrainian leader said that 'Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing'. 'This complicates the situation,' he said. 'If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades. 'But together we are working for peace and security. 'Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war.' Ukraine has lost nearly 400,000 troops since Russia invaded in February, 2022, according to research from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The think tank put the death toll at just under 1 million for Russia.

ABC News
13 hours ago
- ABC News
In letter to Putin, US first lady asks him to consider the children in push to end war
Melania Trump has taken the unique step of crafting a letter that calls for peace in Ukraine and had her husband President Donald Trump hand-deliver it to Vladimir Putin during their meeting in Alaska. The letter did not specifically name Ukraine, which Putin's forces invaded in 2022, but implored him to think of children and "an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology". Nor did the American first lady discuss the fighting, other than to say to Mr Putin that he could "single-handedly restore" the "melodic laughter" of children who have been caught in the conflict. "In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone — you serve humanity itself," she wrote on White House stationery. A copy of the letter was first obtained by Fox News Digital and later posted on social media by supporters of the US president, including Attorney General Pam Bondi. The first lady said that Mr Putin could help the children with the stroke of a pen. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy conveyed his gratitude to the first lady on his call with Mr Trump on Saturday, Ukraine's foreign minister Andrii Sybiha said. Previously Moscow had said it was protecting vulnerable children from the war zone. However, the United Nations Human Rights Office said Russia had inflicted suffering on millions of Ukrainian children and violated their rights since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Mr Putin for war crimes, accusing him of personal responsibility for the abductions of children from Ukraine. Reuters/AP

ABC News
13 hours ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump may have been outplayed in Alaska, but let's remember Valdimir Putin is the problem
There is a hypothetical alternative version of the 12-minute joint press conference between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump where the leaders announced they had in fact reached an agreement and it was one that bargained away parts of a country not permitted entry to the negotiating room. It was what Volodymyr Zelenskyy had feared and what made the world nervous as Putin was welcomed to US soil with a red carpet and a ride in the presidential limousine. In the end, Trump didn't gain much of anything at the Alaska summit and while he didn't make that deal himself, he does appear to have now picked a side. Because what has been leaked and learned since is that Vladimir Putin issued somewhat of an offer to Zelenskyy. It's one that would see Russia take the Donbass. In one iteration of the suggestion from Putin circulating in US press, the Russian president reportedly offered a "written promise not to attack Ukraine or any European country again". He has broken similar promises in the past. As he has done in the past, Zelenskyy reportedly rejected the offer and, in the face of it, reiterated his terms for peace. Unsurprisingly, the two men are a long way apart. But Trump now appears to be leaning on Zelenskyy to make a deal with Putin even if the terms haven't improved at all. The New York Times is reporting Trump told European leaders he now "supports a plan to end the war in Ukraine by ceding unconquered territory to the Russian invaders". It puts Zelenskyy in an impossible position and sends him back into the belly of Trump's White House under a tonne of pressure. The Ukrainian president will travel to Washington on Monday, local time, and while theoretically, he'll be on friendly territory, it really wasn't last time. In February, Zelenskyy was subjected to an explosive public confrontation at the hands of both Trump and Vice-President JD Vance. At that time, there was a sense Ukraine had lost the US, that the Western alliance backing the war-torn nation was not just on shaky ground, but that it was rupturing before our eyes. Earlier that month, Trump stood in front of the press and called Zelenskyy "a dictator". Now Zelenskyy must return to the bastion of American power and sit down to discuss ending the war in his country with the men who just went to Alaska and lost strategic ground to Putin themselves. Zelenskyy's mission is as hard as ever. He must keep favour with Washington while handling an impatient Trump who wants any kind of a peace and a Nobel Peace Prize to go with it. It is hard to see how anything changes. Zelenskyy wants the war to end in a just way and, even if he was personally willing to compromise, any ceding of territory would violate the Ukrainian constitution. Trump just wants to be able to say the war is over and that it was his doing. But Vladimir Putin, he is playing a different game. It suits him to carry on. Andrew Weiss, Russia expert and vice-president of studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Putin was "creating a destroyed Ukraine". "A Ukraine that will be so battered that it will be very hard for Ukraine to, for example, create a military deterrent going forward against future waves of Russian aggression. It will be a very costly proposition for Western countries to keep Ukraine afloat," he said. "The Russian logic here is 'I Vladimir Putin have maximalist goals, but if I can't achieve them, I'm prepared to impose such a cost on Ukraine and its Western partners that it almost becomes not worth it to them to continue their support'. So it's kind of a heads, I win, tails, you lose situation." Any negotiations don't just need to convince Putin of the terms of any peace agreement, but also that there is a problem with the status quo at all. He does not have the same goals as the other players in his game and the longer the various iterations of meetings and summits and phone calls go on, the more his military grinds Ukraine down and the more territory it occupies. Putin doesn't care if Trump is nice to him, he has seen it all before, as my colleague John Lyons wrote about this week. What he cares about is his power, his dreams of a reunited empire and the money he needs to bankroll it. It was little more than a week ago that Trump was talking about heavier sanctions for Russia and extending secondary tariffs to its oil customers. He pulled the lever with India, but Russia has other customers who escaped. That is the type of leverage that could actually hurt Putin. And yet out of the Alaska summit, the Russians seem less worried about losing an income stream and more delighted in what others might be available to them if US-Russia relations continue to improve. "There's only one thing Russia respects and that is leverage. They don't do things to be nice. And the United States policy, since the beginning of this administration, has actually reduced the leverage that was built up," Weiss said. In one afternoon on a subarctic air base, Trump gave up on his ambitions for a rapid ceasefire, freed Russia from the threat of further sanctions and, once again, brought Putin in from the diplomatic cold. Perhaps all these compromises will turn out to be a strategic master stroke, but what's more likely is Trump's desire to do a deal made him vulnerable to the former KGB agent who really doesn't negotiate. Raising the fundamental question of can you even strike a deal with Vladimir Putin, in particular one that he would honour, Weiss said "I think that is a very dubious proposition".