The new distribution math: UFC's shift from PPV culture to Paramount+ bundling
UFC
grew familiar with
PPV
economics under the cable-and-satellite model. The UFC's major events generated revenue by selling individual shows at premium prices, often $60 to $80 per event, on top of existing distribution fees paid by networks. ESPN amplified UFC's visibility via integrated studio segments, weigh-in coverage, and highlights across SportsCenter and other properties, solidifying the UFC's place in mainstream sports media. This era helped elevate both brand awareness and PPV volumes.
Now, with ESPN's contract expiring at the end of 2025, the UFC has secured a new seven-year, $7.7 billion US rights deal with
Paramount Global
. Under this framework, all events, including numbered cards and Fight Nights, will be available on Paramount+, while select marquee cards will simulcast live on CBS. The deal's headline figure dwarfs the previous agreement; however, the shift in delivery models critically transforms how revenue is structured and how audiences engage.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Also read:
Dana White gives major update on proposed UFC fight at the White House
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Subscription bundling vs. event-by-event PPV
In the traditional PPV world, consumers pay per event, often motivated by star power and marquee matchups. That model creates spikes in revenue tied to each big card but places purchasing decisions squarely in viewers' hands every time, a dynamic that can hurt overall event uptake, especially for casual fans. Under ESPN, the UFC's PPV model relied on both the promotion's marketing muscle and ESPN's promotional ecosystem to drive sales.
The Paramount+ model moves to subscription-based bundling: UFC events become part of a broader content package. Consumers with subscriptions pay a flat monthly or annual fee, removing per-event friction but also potentially dampening per-card revenue excitement. The success now depends on subscriber growth and retention, whether enough viewers subscribe to Paramount+ primarily for UFC content, or maintain subscriptions long-term. Viewers get more inclusive access, potentially increasing casual viewership, but the promotional juggernaut that ESPN offered, a constant highlight of UFC content in daily programming, is diminishing.
Bundling benefits, and risks for viewers and fighters
For fans, the all-access model may appear advantageous. Paying for a single service that delivers multiple UFC events removes the pinch of paying $60–$80 per card. It supports binge consumption and discovery, a casual viewer might sample a fight night without extra cost, encouraging engagement. Meanwhile, broadcaster bundling aligns with evolving consumer behavior, favoring flat-rate, multi-content experiences.
Live Events
But for fighters and promoters, this shift may reduce per-event revenue spikes that PPV models deliver. Under PPV, UFC created direct event revenue and often shared PPV points with high-profile fighters, meaning big-name cards could yield substantial payouts. In the new structure, those spikes may flatten into distributed revenue across subscription tiers. Unless UFC negotiates more favorable revenue-sharing structures or views Paramount+ subscriptions as functionally equivalent to PPV volume on aggregate, fighter compensation dynamics could change. Whether Paramount+ pricing and subscriber growth can replicate, or exceed, total PPV revenue is uncertain, although the $7.7B rights deal provides a baseline.
Also read:
Paramount acquires UFC rights for $7.7 billion to boost streaming
Distribution reach and exposure
Paramount+ currently has approximately 77–78 million global subscribers. CBS remains the most-watched broadcast network in the US, dominating primetime ratings. This offers UFC both streaming reach and network visibility for select events. In contrast, ESPN's daily cable viewership and social-media promotions created constant exposure for the UFC. The shift may trade high-volume, event-by-event marketing for concentrated promotions around major cards on CBS.
Although UFC may no longer receive heavy exposure as a daily feature across ESPN platforms, it gains access to Paramount+ subscribers and broadcast reach for marquee cards through CBS. Audience habits are rapidly shifting toward streaming: Nielsen reports that streaming has, for the first time, eclipsed combined broadcast and cable viewing in viewership. The model aligns with broader industry movement toward direct-to-consumer (DTC) distribution.
The broader industry context
The UFC's new arrangement mirrors a broader sports-media trend: marquee content migrating from PPV or cable-based packages to streaming-first distribution. This migration reflects shifting economics in content consumption, where maximal reach is nested in bundled offerings rather than per-item price spikes. The
NFL
, NBA, and other leagues are exploring or embracing similar models, often through exclusive streaming rights deals or app-based packages.
For fans accustomed to choosing individual fight nights, this new paradigm emphasizes subscription maintenance over per-event purchase. Conversely, fans who paid only for select PPV events might now consider shelling out monthly for bundled access. Whether the shift encourages more consistent viewership or loses engagement due to 'subscription fatigue' will be closely watched.
Implications for UFC's financial model
The new deal represents a marquee annual figure, over $1 billion per year, solidifying the UFC's valuation as a global sports brand. It secures multi-year revenue certainty and aggregates the rights fees into one major partnership. For corporate leadership and fighters, that predictability offers benefits, but may require new compensation formulas. If previously lucrative PPV points disappear, blockbuster paydays may shift to salaries, bonuses, or share of subscription jump spikes tied to all-content releases.
Crucially, UFC's leadership, led by Dana White, had sufficient leverage to command premium pricing even as they migrated platforms. But this transition tests a fundamental understanding: are consumers willing to adopt subscriptions rather than pay per fight, and will the model be more profitable in aggregate?
Also read:
UFC -Paramount+ $7.7 Billion Deal in U.S.: What's included and will fans face higher costs for live sports
Long story short
The UFC's move from ESPN to
Paramount
Global marks more than a rights transfer, it signifies a tectonic shift in how live combat sports are packaged and delivered. UFC is trading the PPV model, with its episodic revenue bursts, for a bundling model that favors subscriber scale and platform integration. Viewers may benefit from reduced per-event friction and increased accessibility. Fighters and promoters must recalibrate revenue expectations and value creation models. Meanwhile, UFC's success under Paramount+ will largely depend on its ability to drive subscriptions and maintain engagement without the constant promotional funnel ESPN provided.
This new distribution math reflects the evolving media landscape: a world where continuous content access takes precedence over event-by-event spending, marking the UFC's latest chapter in adapting to streaming-era economics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can vertical SaaS transform niche industries with artificial intelligence
Some of the most interesting startup pitches I see these days do not promise to change the world. They promise to change a workflow, with artificial intelligence solving a critical problem of a particular industry. A messy, outdated, painful process that is too niche for large software giants to notice. That is the magic of vertical SaaS powered by artificial intelligence. Also, these businesses need very little venture capital to reach escape velocity, also known as breakeven at scale. Hence, the guerrilla way of venture building. As a seed investor, I believe this category is quietly reshaping how industries function, one focused solution at a time. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency For those unfamiliar, vertical SaaS refers to software products or platforms built specifically for a single industry or use case. Examples include a debt collection solution used by banks and NBFCs to improve recovery and compliance, a sustainability reporting tool built for textile manufacturers to track emissions and meet ESG norms, or a customer conversation platform that uses artificial intelligence to assist call centre agents in real time. Their value lies in deep domain knowledge, built to navigate the unique rules, workflows, and challenges of each industry. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo As venture capitalists, we are not just chasing trends, we are also looking for signals. And in the case of vertical SaaS, the signals are strong. These startups tend to have longer-lasting customer relationships, stronger margins, and much clearer paths to profitability. Their clients rarely churn because once an industry-specific tool is integrated into daily operations, replacing it is painful. That creates stickiness, and stickiness builds enduring companies. But what is really interesting is the timing. Several things are coming together to make this moment ripe for vertical SaaS. Cloud infrastructure is now robust and affordable, allowing startups to build faster and scale without massive upfront investment. Even traditional businesses, from clinics to small factories, are now open to digitisation, especially when the solutions speak directly to their problems. Live Events At the same time, artificial intelligence, often viewed as a general-purpose technology, is supercharging these vertical solutions. A chatbot trained on dermatology data with over one thousand patient conversations can outperform any generic artificial intelligence model in a clinical setting. That is the power of specificity, and it is what makes artificial intelligence in vertical SaaS truly transformative. I often get asked why not just invest in broader platforms that can scale across industries. The answer lies in focus. Startups that go deep into one sector understand their customers better. Their messaging is clearer. Their sales cycles are shorter. They do not have to educate the market on the value of software. They show how their product solves a known, painful problem. That is a huge advantage, especially in emerging markets where trust and usability are everything. We are seeing this play out across India and other developing economies. From supply chain platforms for agri-exporters to legal tech tools for small law firms, entrepreneurs are spotting inefficiencies that have long been ignored. These are not glamorous problems, but they are real, and solving them creates real value. In many cases, these startups are not even competing with other software. They are replacing pen and paper, Excel sheets, and WhatsApp groups. That is an enormous opportunity. Of course, capital plays a crucial role, but it is not just about writing cheques. At the early stage, vertical SaaS startups often need guidance on how to sell, how to price, and how to build for scale without losing their niche. As venture capitalists, we bring not only capital but also access. Access to pilot customers, to advisors from within the industry, and to talent that understands both technology and the specific sector. I have seen companies unlock growth just by getting introduced to the right distribution channel or hiring someone who has worked on the client side of the industry. What is also heartening is how founders in this space tend to operate. Many come from the industries they are trying to fix. They have seen the gaps firsthand, often as bankers, engineers, teachers, or logistics operators. They decided to build solutions because nobody else was solving the problems they encountered daily. That lived experience brings empathy, and it reflects in the product. The interface is more intuitive. The features are more relevant. The onboarding feels less like software and more like a helping hand. There is also something to be said about the resilience of vertical SaaS models. Most operate on a subscription basis, creating predictable revenue. Contracts are often annual, if not multi-year. This gives startups the stability to reinvest in product development and customer success, both of which matter a lot more when you are solving for depth rather than breadth. It also gives investors like us the confidence that the business can withstand market swings better than many flashier counterparts. After investing in several such companies at the pre-seed stage and witnessing their journeys first-hand, we have seen a clear pattern emerge. In categories like debt recovery, construction management and artificial intelligence-enabled sales platforms, it is possible to reach ₹300 crore in topline within the first five years when founders are solving a deep, industry-specific pain point and distribution is cracked early. With strong product-market fit, the path to ₹500–1000 crore revenue becomes a question of execution, not potential. None of this is to say that vertical SaaS is easy. Going deep into one sector means founders must be patient. The total addressable market might look small at first glance. But once the product proves itself, expansion into adjacent segments or into new geographies with similar market structures becomes a natural next step. And that is when growth really takes off. Looking ahead, I believe the next decade will see vertical SaaS companies emerge not just as profitable businesses but as quiet disruptors within industries that desperately need modernisation. Whether it is farming, education, construction, or logistics, sectors that are often overlooked in technology conversations will be transformed by software built not for the general market but for the people who wake up every day to real, operational problems. As investors, we are excited to partner with these founders. The ones who know that transformation does not always begin with scale. Sometimes, it starts with a small fix to a big problem. And from there, everything changes. Author is Founder and Managing Partner of Zeropearl VC .
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anand James sees Muthoot Finance shares rallying to Rs 3,000 after breakout on Q1 beat
Anand James , Chief Market Strategist at Geojit Investments , expects Muthoot Finance to climb to Rs 3,000 after a strong Q1 performance and a breakout from its two-month sideways trend. He advises keeping downside markers at Rs 2,675 or Rs 2,635, aligning with the 20-day SMA, to manage risk while riding the uptrend. Edited excerpts from a chat: by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Nifty managed to break a 6-week losing streak to end over 1% higher. How would you trade the market on Monday when the market would react to the outcome of the Alaska meeting? Directional moving indicators are still in favour of more downsides with 24000 and 23560 as potential downside supports attracting prices lower. That said, the last week saw several attempts to push higher, giving us reversal hopes. Apparently, none of those moves managed to successfully close above the 24670-720 band, the near-term congestion resistance; they did manage to bring the parabolic sar under the price, lending a positive bias. More importantly, the broader market has shown even better signs of resilience, having had the highest number of Nifty 500 constituents closing above the 10-day SMA since 24th July. Incidentally, Nifty had tumbled from the 25200 region on that day. This would be the objective we would be aiming for, should we clear above 24720 on Monday. Nifty PSU Bank index outperformed Nifty Bank by a wide margin. Will this preference for PSU banks sustain in the week ahead as well? The recent rally in the index was largely fueled by strong performance from SBI, even as private sector banks lagged. Notably, the PSU Bank index has broken above both daily and weekly Supertrend indicators, forming a bullish Marubozu candle on the weekly chart. This breakout above a declining trendline suggests a positive momentum shift. Live Events However, the index is nearing a key resistance at the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level of 7090, which could trigger some profit booking in the short term. Derivative data also hints at caution, with 43% of near out-of-the-money call options showing signs of short buildup—indicating limited bullish sentiment among traders for now. Despite this, the broader outlook remains optimistic. The average RSI of major PSU bank stocks hovers around 53, suggesting fair valuations and room for further upside. While a pullback near resistance is possible, bulls are expected to regroup and push the index higher in the coming sessions. HBL Engineering shares were among the top gainers in the Nifty 500 pack and ended about 29% higher. Is there more steam left in the rally? A new record peak makes for an exciting case of joining the rally with eyes on Rs 858 as the nearest objective. However, four days of pushing above the upper Bollinger band certainly call for some speed bumps ahead. New entrants should see if their risk appetite allows for a stop loss near Rs 730 or Rs 680. Muthoot Finance shares also ended 10% up on Friday following target price upgrades on Q1 beat. What would be your target on the stock? We are eyeing Rs 3,000 on the stock, having broken out from the sideways band that has been prevailing since early June. Our downside marker would be near Rs 2,675 or Rs 2,635, which is near its 20-day SMA. Give us your top ideas for the week ahead. CHALET (CMP: 933) View: Buy Target: 955 Stoploss: 918 The stock has rebounded from a key horizontal support near 850, which also aligns with the 200-day Simple Moving Average (DSMA), suggesting a potential trend reversal. Technically, the MACD has crossed above its signal line, and the RSI has moved above its 14-day average—both indicators pointing to strengthening bullish momentum. Additionally, the stock has recently broken above the 20-day and 50-day SMAs, reinforcing the positive outlook. Based on this setup, the stock is expected to move toward the 955 level in the near term. Traders holding long positions should consider placing a stop-loss below 918 to safeguard against downside risk. ASTERDM (CMP: 605) View: Buy Target: 622 - 650 Stoploss: 584 The stock has recently bounced back from a key horizontal support level at 574, which also coincides with the 200-day Simple Moving Average (DSMA), signalling a potential reversal. On the daily chart, the MACD has crossed above its signal line, and the stock has also moved above the 20-day and 50-day DSMAs—strengthening the bullish outlook. These technical developments suggest upward momentum, and we anticipate the stock to move toward the 622 and 650 levels over the next few weeks. Long positions should be safeguarded with a stop-loss placed below 584 to manage downside risk. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Former Australian captain and coach Bob Simpson passes away at 89
Melbourne [Australia], August 16 (ANI): Former Australian captain and coach Bob Simpson passed away at the age of 89 in Sydney, Cricket Australia (CA) reported on Saturday. In a post on X, CA said, 'RIP to a true cricket legend. A Test cricketer, captain, coach and national selector – Bob Simpson was a mighty figure in Australian cricket, giving everything to our game. Cricket Australia extends our thoughts and sympathies to Bob's family and friends." RIP to a true cricket legend.A Test cricketer, captain, coach and national selector – Bob Simpson was a mighty figure in Australian cricket, giving everything to our game. Cricket Australia extends our thoughts and sympathies to Bob's family and friends. — Cricket Australia (@CricketAus) August 16, 2025 Simpson was a key figure in Australia's rise to the top of the cricketing world in the 1990s, and his impact lasted long after he left as a head coach in 1996. Simpson became the full-time coach for Aussies when the Allan Border-led side was facing a massive decline in fortunes and was in the middle of a winless run that stretched out for three years, as per It was the Simpson-Border duo which instilled their mindset in the upcoming crop of Aussie stars such as Steve Waugh, David Boon, Dean Jones and Craig McDermott. Simpson's commitment to training as a coach, in batting and in fielding helped Aussies eventually mark a turnaround and become one of the best sides in the game. One of the biggest highlights of his coaching tenure was winning the 1987 Cricket World Cup hosted by India and Pakistan, defeating arch-rivals England in a closely-contested final by seven runs at Kolkata's Eden Gardens. Then, later in 1989, Aussies produced another miracle. In 1989, they arrived on England's shores as 'possibly one of the worst sides to ever tour England". The Simpson-Border magic continued on the tour, as they won the six-match series by 4-0 to regain the Ashes. It would serve as a starting point of the Aussies' domination at the marquee series as they won the next eight of them in a row till England brought back the urn home with an iconic series win at their home. They brought back home the coveted Frank Worrell Trophy 20 years later. During his days as a player from 1957 to 1978, he represented Australia in 62 Tests, scoring 4,869 runs at an average of 46.81, with 10 centuries and 27 fifties in 111 innings and a best score of 311. He also took 71 wickets with the best figures of 5/57. He led Australia in 39 Tests, winning 12, losing 12, drawing also played two ODIs, scoring 36 runs and taking two chairperson Mike Baird hailed Simpson as one of 'the greats" of Australian cricket.'Simpson was one of the greats of Australian cricket, and this is a sad day for anyone fortunate to have watched him play or who benefited from his wisdom," said Baird as quoted by a brilliant opening batter, incredible slips fielder and handy spin bowler, Bob was a mainstay of a very strong Australian team in the 1960s, and he became a leader across the game as Australian and New South Wales captain and as a coach."'Bob's decision to come out of retirement to successfully lead the Australian team during the advent of World Series Cricket in 1977 was a wonderful service to the game, and his coaching set the foundation for a golden generation for Australian cricket."'On behalf of Cricket Australia, I would like to express my warmest condolences to Bob's family, friends, teammates and all those touched by his vast contribution to cricket."Simpson's contribution will be honoured during the third T20 against South Africa at Cairns on Saturday with a minute of silence and players sporting black armbands. (ANI) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
