
Will Trump's trade war widen Southeast Asia's wealth gap? – DW – 08/11/2025
Many in Southeast Asia breathed a sigh of relief after the Donald Trump administration partially walked back its tariff threats.
While Washington still imposed a series of trade penalties, Southeast Asian states managed to secure far lower levies than many other parts of the world.
Cambodia, for example, secured a 19% rate, down from 49% which was previously threatened by the US president. According to Cambodia's chief trade negotiator, Sun Chanthol, the 49% tariffs would have "collapsed" the country's vital garment industry.
The sector employs around 800,000 workers, most of them women born in rural areas.
Vietnam, which has one of the largest trade surpluses with the US, saw its tariffs reduced to 20% from the 46% import penalty threatened by President Trump in April.
Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines also negotiated 19% levies. Singapore was given the baseline 10%. Myanmar and Laos, however, were not so lucky — they face levies of 40%, and are among the hardest hit nations globally.
Still, most government in Southeast Asia see the outcome of the last-minute trade negotiations as a diplomatic victory.
In states with large garment sectors, there is even some schadenfreude that key competitor India was last week hit with 50% tariffs on some goods, a blow that has reportedly already pushed some manufacturers to consider relocating to Southeast Asia.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Analysts warn, however, that the full impact of the revised rates on ordinary households will only become clear in the months ahead.
As part of the tariff negotiations, most Southeast Asian countries agreed to cut their taxes on US imports to nearly zero, a move that will "definitely help the wealthy with some luxury imports," Zachary Abuza, professor at the National War College in Washington, told DW.
For the most part, though, the benefits for the rich are unlikely to outweigh the broader risks for the poor.
"Trump's policy will certainly have negative impacts on people in Southeast Asia, including the poor," Budy Resosudarmo, a developmental and environmental economist at the Australian National University, told DW.
Southeast Asia has seen decades of strong economic growth, but concerns have long simmered over how fairly this wealth is distributed.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The latest US tariffs could affect the wealth gap in several ways — for example, they might trigger a downturn in labor intensive sectors, such as garment manufacturing.
This, in turn, could push more capital into technology industries, which employ fewer workers, according to Wannaphong Durongkaveroj, associate professor of economics at Thailand's Ramkhamhaeng University.
If this shift happens quickly and smoothly, the damage will be limited, he told DW. If not, the lower-skilled parts of the economy that employ a majority of workers will be doubly impacted.
At the same time, there is no guarantee that the technology sector will avoid the tariffs.
Last week, Trump announced 100% penalties on imported semiconductor chips — except for companies that had already committed to manufacturing in the US or were in the process of doing so.
This is a particular concern for Malaysia, which exported around $14 billion (over €12 billion) worth of semiconductors to the US last year. Its semiconductor industry employs about 80,000 people.
While Kuala Lumpur said its chips are exempt from the 19% reciprocal tariff, it remains unclear if US exemptions will be applied consistently.
There might also be higher unemployment or suppressed wage growth if there's a spike in imports to Southeast Asian states from countries seeking non-US markets, Hwok-Aun Lee, senior fellow with the Regional Economic Studies Programme at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, told DW.
Even before Trump returned to the White House in January, there were concerns in Southeast Asia that China was dumping surplus goods on the region, reducing demand for local goods.
China's global exports rose 7.2% in July from the same month last year, but shipments to Southeast Asia jumped 16.6%, while exports to the US fell by more than a fifth, according to official Chinese data.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The immediate effect of this influx will be on wages, Lee warned, adding that "this could have longer-term implications, such as slower wealth accumulation among workers and increased wealth inequality in society."
An even bigger worry is the US plan to impose 40% tariffs on exports it deems "transshipment."
This refers to goods that are shipped from the origin country to an intermediate location, only to be relabeled or tweaked and exported again to the final destination.
Specifically, the US will be looking at goods originating from China that are exported via Southeast Asian countries to the US.
The reported last week that the White House will release rules on what qualifies as transshipment "in a few weeks."
Many lower-end manufacturing jobs in Southeast Asia involve importing raw materials from China, making only slight modifications or assembly, and then exporting the finished product to the US.
If Washington adopts a broad definition, analysts warn, entire industries could be wiped out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
25 minutes ago
- DW
Putin-Trump Ukraine summit: What's in the cards? – DW – 08/12/2025
Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump will meet in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine war. What do they expect to get out of the summit? Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump have agreed to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the war in Ukraine. The meeting was announced shortly before Trump's ceasefire ultimatum was set to expire. Although experts doubt the summit will deliver any major breakthroughs, some factors could force Putin to agree to a ceasefire. The upcoming meeting is the first time both leaders are coming together since US President Trump's reelection. In mid-July, Trump said he was disappointed with Putin over Russia's bombing of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, but also said that he was "not done with him yet." The White House and Kremlin announced the meeting after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff visited Putin in the Kremlin on August 6, though it is unclear what exactly will be discussed in Alaska. We do know that the talks will focus on Ukraine, but the country itself will not be represented at the meeting. Washington and Moscow are not planning for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend the summit. All experts DW interviewed about the upcoming summit expect it will primarily benefit the Russian president. "Putin has always been keen to ensure that he and the US president — whoever holds that office — decide the fate of the world, and that corresponding images are broadcast around the world," Russia's former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov told DW. Russian exiled opposition politician Dmitry Gudkov told DW the Alaska meeting would provide a unique opportunity for Putin to shake hands with one of the leaders of the West. "The mere fact that Putin has the chance to meet Trump is already a huge plus" for the Russian president, Gudkov said. "Trump is basically legitimizing a war criminal and allowing Putin to participate in negotiations with the West." If it weren't for Trump, Gudkov said, no Western leader would be negotiating with Putin. It became clear in late July that Trump was annoyed by Putin's unwillingness to end the fighting in Ukraine. Trump declared that he was no longer interested in talks with Putin and gave him an ultimatum of 50 days to find a peaceful solution to the Ukraine war, which he later shortened to just ten days. Experts told DW they believe that the realization that Trump is losing patience may have prompted the Kremlin to agree to the upcoming talks. Kirill Rogov, a political analyst who heads the Russian-language online media outlet which publishes analyses by Russian scientists, says a number of factors may compel Putin to seek an end to the Ukraine war. Rogov points to the weakened Russian economy, the sluggish advance of Russian forces in Ukraine and secondary US sanctions that could harm Russia. "Putin also hopes to extract the highest possible price for his approval at this moment. By the end of the year, Putin could be in an even worse position if it turns out that the Russian offensive has had little effect and the battlefield situation remains unchanged," Rogov said. Further US sanctions could also cause Russia to lose India as a buyer of its crude oil, and force it to prepare for yet another offensive in Ukraine for the third year in a row. Last week US news outlet published a report citing anonymous sources indicating that the Kremlin had realized that Steve Witkoff's Russia visit represented the last opportunity to reach an agreement with Trump. said the Kremlin may now offer an airspace ceasefire by way of a concession. Gudkov, however, believes this approach, coordinated with the Trump administration, would primarily benefit Moscow rather than Kyiv. Gudkov said Ukraine has carried out "effective" counterattacks against Russia, which resulted in the temporary closure of Russian airports on numerous occasions. He said Ukraine had also struck weapons depots, military equipment and oil refineries in Russia. This, he added, was important from a psychological point of view, making Russians understand the war is raging close to home, not far away, solely playing out on their televisions. "If these [Ukrainian] air strikes stop, Putin will calmly continue his advance on land, where he has the advantage," Gudkov told DW. Yet Russian President Putin may not face any serious consequences, even if both leaders fail to make any significant progress during the upcoming Alaska talks, says political analyst Rogov. "Putin can count on Trump to be lenient with him because Trump's attitude toward Putin has always been special," Rogov told DW. "Trump always avoids situations where direct pressure is exerted on Putin. And every time pressure seems inevitable, Trump declares that a new opportunity to reach an agreement has risen and therefore no real pressure is needed." He cites talks between Putin and Trump against the backdrop of the expired ceasefire ultimatum as one such example. Gudkov believes that there are no real means left to put pressure on Russia. For example, despite sanctions, hundreds of tankers continue to transport Russian oil across the world's oceans. Gudkov thinks a quick ceasefire is more likely to result from domestic factors that could put pressure on the Kremlin rather than external factors. The longer the war lasts, Gudkov says, the harder it will be for Putin to sell it as a Russian victory. "At some point, Russians won't care whether Ukraine is in NATO or how this war ends — they will only care about it ending," Gudkov said.


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Ukraine Says Fighting 'Difficult' After Reports Of Russia's Rapid Gains
Ukraine said Tuesday it was engaged in "difficult" battles with Russian forces after Moscow had made rapid advances in a narrow but important section of the front line in the country's east. The gains came just days before US President Donald Trump was to meet Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska for talks on the war, the first meeting between a sitting US and Russian leader since 2021. The Ukrainian army said it was engaged in "heavy" battles with Russian forces attempting to penetrate its defences. "The situation is difficult and dynamic," it said in a statement. A map published by Ukrainian battlefield monitor DeepState, which has close ties with Ukraine's military, showed Russia had advanced around 10 kilometres (six miles) over around two days, deep into a narrow section of the eastern front line. The corridor -- now apparently under Russian control -- threatens the town of Dobropillia, a mining hub that civilians are fleeing and that has come under Russian drone attacks. It also further isolates the destroyed town of Kostiantynivka, one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based observatory, said Russia was sending small sabotage groups forwards. It said it was "premature" to call the Russian advances in around Dobropillia "an operational-level breakthrough". The military's Operational-Tactical Group Donetsk, which oversees parts of the front in the industrial region, also said Russia was probing Ukrainian lines with small sabotage groups, describing battles as "complex, unpleasant and dynamic". Trump has described his summit with Putin on Friday as a chance to check the Russian leader's ideas for ending the war. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky warned ahead of the talks that Moscow was laying the groundwork for further attacks, after Trump said on Monday that both sides would have to swap territory for peace. European leaders have meanwhile sought to ensure respect for Kyiv's interests. "We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations," Zelensky said in a statement on social media. Russia, which invaded Ukraine in 2022, has made costly but incremental gains across the sprawling front in recent months and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions while still fighting to control them. Ukrainian police meanwhile said that Russian attacks in the past hours had killed three people and wounded 12 others, including a child.


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Middle East: 'Unimaginable' suffering in Gaza, say ministers – DW – 08/12/2025
An international coalition of foreign ministers has condemned the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, calling for Israel to allow vital aid into the besieged enclave. DW has more.A group of 24 foreign ministers have once again condemned the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip and called for immediate action to combat hunger and starvation. "The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels," read a statement signed by the foreign ministers of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. "Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicized," the ministers stressed. The statement, which was also signed by European Union figures, criticized "restrictive new registration requirements" which it said were preventing international NGOs from distributing aid. "We call on the government of Israel to provide authorization for all international NGO aid shipments and to unblock essential humanitarian actors from operating," it read. The signatories called for a "ceasefire that can end the war, for hostages to be released and aid to enter Gaza by land unhindered." Hello and welcome to DW's coverage of developments in the Middle East on Tuesday, August 12. A group of 24 foreign ministers from around the world have called for urgent action as the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip continues to deteriorate as a result of Israeli restrictions on aid. Meanwhile, Israel's ambassador to Germany says diplomatic ties with Berlin strained after a curb on weapons exports.