Morgan Wallen Fans May Have Chosen Their Next Favorites From His New Album
Weeks after the full-length arrived, it's still ruling multiple tallies, and while the spotlight remains on tunes like "What I Want" with Tate McRae, fans have chosen several other cuts as their favorites. Several album tracks from I'm the Problem are climbing to new peaks across numerous Billboard rosters at the moment while others slip downward.
Neither "TN" nor "Dark Till Daylight" have been selected as singles from I'm the Problem – at least not yet – but as consumption continues to grow, while many other non-singles begin to fade, Wallen and his team may want to take notice.
Between the two, "TN" is the better performer, but only slightly. This week, it ascends to new peaks on both the Hot Country Songs and Country Streaming Songs charts, inching up to Nos. 13 and 12, respectively.
Just three weeks into its tenure on those rankings, "Dark Till Daylight" isn't far behind, also earning new best showings. The track hits No. 15 on the Hot Country Songs list and No. 13 on the Country Streaming Songs chart.
Both "TN" and "Dark Till Daylight" also appear on the Hot 100, Streaming Songs chart, and Billboard Global 200. While "TN" rises across all five tallies on which it's found, "Dark Till Daylight" is descending on both the Streaming Songs list and Billboard Global 200. It does, however, manage to hold at its all-time high of No. 49 on the Hot 100.
Wallen fills, in some cases, a dozen or more spots on several of those lists. The tracks featured on I'm the Problem are performing spectacularly on the Hot 100 and Billboard Global 200, and his name is scattered across all of the country-only rankings, including in a few spots with much older tracks from past projects. I'm the Problem continues to dominate the Billboard 200, while the songs from its 37-tune tracklist rack up millions of streams.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Teens Are Telling Everyone to ‘SDIYBT' on TikTok — & It Means Something Totally Unhinged
Teens love finding new and creative ways to insult people — and for those of us who can barely keep up with anything they're saying, it can get confusing. Especially the newest slang term: 'SDIYBT.' This long acronym is (like most teen slang) silly and a little weird. Brace yourselves, fam, we're about to dive in! The latest trend taking over TikTok comes from none other than SpongeBob SquarePants. SDIYBT stands for, 'Start digging in your butt, twin.' Yes, seriously. More from SheKnows Michelle Obama Is Basically Giving Us All a Master Class in Parenting Gen Z According to Know Your Meme, the catchphrase (along with variations like 'digging in yo butt' and the acronym SDIYBT) went viral after someone posted an edited clip of a scene from the episode 'Welcome to the Chum Bucket.' In the scene, Plankton asked a robot that looks like SpongeBob and has SpongeBob's brain to make him a Krabby Patty. The robot responds, 'Start digging in your butt, twin,' making Plankton mad. The sound went viral on TikTok, with people using the sound to make videos and even covering popular songs and switching out the lyrics to 'start digging in your butt, twin.' This isn't the first time teens have taken old media and made new slang terms from it. Like when they say everything 'rhymes with Grug,' which was taken from the movie The Croods, when Grug tried to rhyme things with his name, but it never actually rhymed. Hence, the meme! Also, teens love using acronyms to make it easier to post on TikTok (and hide from their parents). Like 'SYBAU,' which means 'shut your b—- a—up.' Hey, at least digging in your butt is a little nicer than that! If you still can't quite wrap your head around this term, that's OK. I'm sure they'll move onto something else pretty quickly next week, anyway (especially if all the adults in their lives start saying it).Best of SheKnows These Raw & Beautiful Breastfeeding Photos Show There's No 'Right' Way to Nurse 'But I Hate School': What To Do When Your Teen Dreads Going Back Rugged Meets Romantic in These 'Quiet Western' Names: All the Charm, None of the Grit Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
'Weapons' Ending Explained: Why Did 17 Kids from the Same Classroom All Leave Their Homes at 2:17 a.m.?
The mysterious 'Weapons,' Zach Cregger's viral follow-up to 2022's 'Barbarian,' is in theaters now Weapons is the movie of the moment for horror fans. Zach Cregger's highly anticipated follow-up to 2022's Barbarian has effectively kicked off scary-movie season for lovers of the genre everywhere, promising a wild ride through its genius marketing. As promised from eerie preview footage — not to mention the very convincing — the story follows a small town turned upside down after the unexplained phenomenon of 17 children, all from the same third-grade class, waking up and running out of their homes one Tuesday night at exactly 2:17 a.m. Only one, a boy named Alex Lilly (Cary Christopher), stays behind. Imagery of the children all running with their arms outstretched through dark, dimly lit suburbia has become the 2020s-era "Blair Witch victim standing in the corner" for many horror fans, and has stoked the flames of the question: What happened to these kids? 'It's a twisty, turny movie," director Cregger, 44, teased of Weapons, which he also wrote, at CinemaCon 2025 in April, per Variety. "It's a movie that unravels and reinvents itself as it goes." Here's everything to know about the end of Weapons. Warning: spoilers ahead! What is behind the kids' disappearance? Weapons opens with a voiceover from a female student at Maybrook Elementary School explaining the "true story" that happened two years prior, before going into the aftermath. The story then jumps among several characters' points of view, beginning with the affected class's teacher, Justine Gandy (Julia Garner), followed by concerned parent Archer Graff (Josh Brolin), whose son Matthew is missing, and ending with the lone remaining student, Alex. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories. Eventually, the audience learns that Alex's parents have welcomed his mom's sick aunt, "Gladys" (Amy Madigan), into their home for a temporary stay — only for Gladys to immediately pull some witchcraft that possesses first Alex's parents and then Ms. Gandy's third-grade class. Afterward, several characters see materializations of Gladys around town in different, clownish-makeup-covered images, including Justine on the ceiling above her bed and a homeless drug addict/thief named James (Austin Abrams) in the woods near his tent. Who is Gladys, and why is she terrorizing Maybrook's kids? Gladys is described by Alex's mother (Callie Schuttera) as a great-aunt who is staying with her and her husband (Whitmer Thomas) for a while due to a serious illness. After Gladys puts a spell on Mr. and Mrs. Lilly while Alex is at school one day, she forces them to self-mutilate in front of Alex — then threatens to kill them if he tells anyone what is happening at home. Once Gladys realizes the paralysis of Alex's parents doesn't sustain her life force quite enough, she promises to leave Alex's home for good as long as he brings her an object from each of his classmates, so she can concoct a mixture that brings them all to his home — which eventually ends up happening at 2:17 a.m. one night. One of the later sequences, from Alex's point of view, shows the kids all barreling into his home and right down into the basement, where Alex feeds them soup over the next several weeks as Gladys is implied to feed off their health. What happens to Justine? Does she get possessed? Survive? Poor Justine is not only the immediate object of the Maybrook Elementary School parents' ire — to the point where the principal, Andrew Marcus (Benedict Wong), forces her to take a leave of absence — but she also takes to binge drinking and gets attacked by a jealous wife (June Diane Raphael) for hooking up with old flame Paul (Alden Ehrenreich), after he lied about being single. But she and Archer are soon digging into the case of the missing kids on their own as Paul and his fellow police officers aren't working up to scratch, in Justine and Archer's eyes. And while Archer and Justine face the wrath of Gladys near the end of the film — mainly, through possession of both Paul and James — they both come away with their lives. What happens to Gladys? In a particularly satisfying end to Gladys' sinister agenda, Alex holes himself up in the guest bathroom his aunt has been using as his possessed parents attempt to rip down the door. With some quick thinking, Alex manages to use a bewitched stick Gladys has been using to control her "weapons" — wrapping some of Gladys' hair from the bathroom floor around it and snapping it in half to kick off the insane climax of the film. Immediately, the 17 children in Alex's basement flee the home, jumping through glass windows and anything else standing in their way and chasing Gladys through the community. They eventually catch up with her ... and the rest of the scene plays out not entirely unlike how a lion might tear apart a (rabid?) wildebeest. What happens to the possessed adults and kids? While many characters don't make it — including Paul, James and Marcus, who also kills his partner Terry (Clayton Farris) in a particularly chilling manner — all the kids do, albeit with major trauma. According to the child narrator, though, some of her affected schoolmates have already regained their ability to talk as of a year after the incident that shook Maybrook. Alex's parents, however, have been institutionalized, while he goes to live with an aunt who is described as being much nicer than her predecessor. Weapons is in theaters now. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
More couples are using AI to write their wedding vows. They just might not admit it.
"It's still my feelings and my words and my thoughts." Last month, Evy and Bijan got married in front of 140 of their nearest and dearest. To give the ceremony a more sentimental touch, the couple came up with their own vows. 'Everyone loved our vows and mentioned that it was their favorite part of the wedding,' Evy, who asked to keep her last name private, tells Yahoo. Guests could never have guessed that ChatGPT helped write them. 'We use ChatGPT for everything. We're both pro-AI, if you will,' the newlywed says about using the popular AI chatbot. But it wasn't until a week before the wedding that they decided to use ChatGPT to write their deepest declarations of love and commitment to each other. The idea came to them when they were working on a different part of the ceremony with Evy's brother, who served as the wedding officiant. 'We were writing out the statements that he'd read as the officiant, and I was like, 'Let's go to ChatGPT. We have some ideas, but let's see what it has to say,'' she recalls. 'In that process, I thought, I'm probably going to use it to write my vows, and I think that gave my fiancé the green light to do the same.' She says she and Bijan were on the same page about turning to AI and felt confident that it wouldn't take away from the authenticity of their vows. Not everybody feels that way. It's a divisive topic, according to a 2025 survey by the wedding planning website Zola, which found that couples were pretty evenly split over whether or not to get inspiration from AI when writing vows (51% are OK with it, 49% aren't). The reality is that many are doing it anyway, whether they'd admit to it or not. AI now pronounce you husband and wife The role of AI in wedding events and planning has become prominent. Zola reports that 90% of newly married couples are open to using it to manage budgets, find wedding inspiration and create schedules, and 74% are happy to use AI to help craft wedding toasts and speeches. Meanwhile, the 2025 Global Wedding Market Report by Think Splendid, a wedding consulting firm, states that 38% of those surveyed used AI tools for speeches and their own vows. Steven Greitzer, the founder and CEO of Provenance, a company that's designed to help couples, officiants, guests and wedding planners create scripts and speeches with AI, attests to its popularity. The service's Vow Builder tool uses specific prompts to get personalized information about a couple's relationship and turn those responses into vows. Greitzer emphasizes that the process is only possible with human input. 'It is entirely using what you give us, using your truth, your personality and your personal stories,' he tells Yahoo. Using AI tools can make vows feel more polished and less stressful, Greitzer adds. 'Speech writing is a very technical task; it's a skill set,' he notes. 'So if we can help with the technical elements of writing while still helping to make sure that the love that you wish to convey comes out more articulately, then what a gift to give. Even if you are a practiced public speaker or writer, this is still a daunting and intimidating moment — perhaps the most important speech you ever deliver in your life — that you really want to nail.' The words can then be edited, revised and further personalized as needed. That's what Evy did with the suggestions ChatGPT provided her. 'I had been taking notes whenever I had a thought about my partner. I plugged that into ChatGPT, with prompts [we] came up with,' she says. 'It was just being corny at first, and I wanted it to feel more real.' She asked the bot to show her different options for tone and gravitated toward the version that was reflective and poetic. 'I still did a good amount of editing after. ChatGPT is never perfect, and it's not a substitute for what is from my heart, but I love that it can come back with a more cohesive version of what I had written,' says Evy. 'I didn't end up using any of the versions that it gave me, but I took words and sentences of it. … I probably spent just as much time as I would writing [the vows] myself.' To tech or not to tech? Evy isn't ashamed to have used ChatGPT for her vows, though she does recognize why people might be. 'It is kind of creepy to use AI to write your vows,' she admits. 'But I'm just using the tools at hand and choosing to see the bright spots in it rather than the dystopian view, which is totally there.' Close friends and family members are aware of how AI was part of her writing process, but she didn't offer that information to everyone. 'There are sometimes prejudgments around AI and how it's used.' Conversations about AI's role in wedding speeches and vows reflect that. 'If a computer makes the words you speak at a wedding, what you're going to get is recycled clichés. You'll lose the humanity, the moments that make us feel love,' a wedding officiant told the New York Times in 2023. A recent Reddit discussion on the topic garnered similarly negative comments from users. 'Just don't do it. Something that is supposed to come from the heart and show the human condition seems horribly wrong to get spit out of some ChatGPT hole,' read one comment. 'Sickening. Think for yourselves,' wrote another user. 'The stigma is really interesting,' says Greitzer, who has heard the perspective that using this sort of assistance is cheating. 'There's still pride in feeling like you wrote this yourself, and perhaps that is a reason why people are not actively sharing [that they've used AI].' Kendra Lynece, a wedding photographer based in Grand Rapids, Mich., has seen firsthand how many people are getting an assist from AI. 'I've absolutely seen couples use ChatGPT to write their vows the day of their wedding. I'm talking literal hours before walking down the aisle,' she tells Yahoo. 'One groom typed his vows on his phone while still in sweatpants, pacing in the bridal suite hallway. A bride once asked her maid of honor to help make hers sound deep and romantic by feeding her bullet points into ChatGPT.' She doesn't see it as a bad thing. 'From my view behind the lens, it's added a fascinating modern twist to wedding prep, and even with the help of AI, those moments still feel raw, heartfelt and real,' says Lynece. Evy felt that way about her own vows. 'I was reading some of the sentences that ChatGPT was writing, trying to speak them out loud to see how they'd sound coming out of my mouth and I was crying,' she says. 'It's still my feelings and my words and my thoughts about [my husband]. They make me cry.' Her groom's own AI-assisted sentiments didn't disappoint either. 'I loved his vows. They were amazing,' she says. She adds: 'Even though they were aided by AI, [the vows] were so true to us; they came from the heart and were genuine all the same.' Solve the daily Crossword
