logo
US producer prices unexpectedly fall in April

US producer prices unexpectedly fall in April

Reuters15-05-2025
WASHINGTON, May 15 (Reuters) - U.S. producer prices unexpectedly fell in April as the cost of services declined by the most since 2009, pulled down by ebbing demand for air travel and hotel accommodation.
The producer price index for final demand dropped 0.5% last month after an upwardly revised unchanged reading in March, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said on Thursday.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the PPI rising 0.2% after a previously reported 0.4% drop in March. In the 12 months through April, the PPI increased 2.4% after climbing 3.4% in March.
President Donald Trump's protectionist trade policy, immigration crackdown as well as references to Canada as the 51th state and a desire to acquire Greenland have contributed to a sharp drop in tourist travel, hurting airline ticket sales, hotel and motel bookings.
Wholesale services prices dropped 0.7%, the largest
decline since the government started tracking the series in December 2009, after rising 0.4% in March.
A 1.6% decrease in trade services, which measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers, accounted for more than two-thirds of drop in services. Prices for hotel and motel rooms dropped 3.1% after easing 0.5% in March. Portfolio management fees plunged 6.9%, while airline fares fell 1.5%.
Portfolio management fees, hotel and motel accommodation and airline fares are among the components that go into the calculation of the core Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, one of the inflation measures tracked by the Federal Reserve for its 2% target.
Last month's tame reading could see economists downgrade their core PCE inflation estimates for April, which are currently around a 0.2% increase. The core PCE price index was unchanged in March and rose 2.6% year-on-year.
Financial markets expect the U.S. central bank to resume cutting interest rates in September, though some economists believe policymakers could wait until December.
While the United States and China moved to de-escalate their trade war over the weekend, tariffs remain higher than before President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January.
Washington agreed to slash duties on Chinese goods to 30% for the next 90 days while Beijing will reduce tariffs on U.S. goods imported into China to 10% from 125%.
A 10% blanket duty on almost all goods imported into the U.S. remained in place as did sectoral tariffs.
Economists expect inflation will still rise this year, though not as sharply as they had estimated before the 90-day truce. They expected the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, excluding the volatile food and energy components, to peak at around 3.6% this year, down from 4.0% previously.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump just may pull off his own Nixon-goes-to-China coup
Trump just may pull off his own Nixon-goes-to-China coup

Telegraph

time17 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump just may pull off his own Nixon-goes-to-China coup

President Donald Trump is on the cusp of a diplomatic breakthrough to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine. After his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff travelled to Moscow on August 6, Trump expressed optimism about a trilateral summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky to facilitate a ceasefire. Trump's grand bargain announcement is his trademark, but will it succeed? The early signals suggest that Trump faces an uphill struggle. Although Russia claimed that Witkoff's visit was 'constructive,' even Trump was forced to admit that it produced no major breakthroughs. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov expressed openness to a Putin-Trump bilateral meeting but did not endorse Witkoff's proposal to include Zelensky in the discussions. While Russia refrained from large-scale drone and missile strikes on Kyiv this week, its summer offensive is firmly underway. Russian troops are incrementally advancing in northeastern Sumy and on the Donetsk battlegrounds of Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka. The best-case near-term scenario remains a temporary aerial ceasefire. Yet even this de-escalation could play into Russia's hands. In recent days, Ukrainian drones have disrupted air travel in Moscow, ignited a fire around Volgograd railway station and damaged a key oil refinery in Krasnodar Krai. A respite of the economic disruptions caused from these strikes would be beneficial for Russia as it mitigates the consequences of US secondary tariffs and sanctions. Despite these long odds and the possibility of near-term public humiliations, Trump remains devoted to ending the Ukraine war. There are many reasons for his unswerving focus on Ukraine. Trump's rhetoric frames his commitment in humanitarian terms as he wants to stop the senseless killing of thousands of young people every week. Trump also wants to end a war that believes his predecessor Joe Biden enabled and cement his legacy as a peace president. Aside from these sentimental and egoistic reasons, Trump also has a geostrategic rationale for ending the war in Ukraine. The Trump administration wants to redirect its focus on winning the spiralling geopolitical confrontation against China. It sees peace in Europe as a prerequisite for that reorientation and regards Russia as a potentially useful partner in the US's containment efforts against China. Due in part to the US's diverted focus, Trump has been forced to tread carefully in his trade war with China. Trump has eased export restrictions on technologically sophisticated US chips to China and exercised uncharacteristic efforts to avoid provoking Beijing. The cancellation of Taiwanese President Lai Ching-Te's transit through New York underscored Trump's focus on avoiding a repeat of the tariff-induced escalations of the early spring. Trump's closest allies have tried to spin these concessions as shows of strength against China. AI advisor David Sacks argues that easing export restrictions will make China more dependent on US chips and blunt its competitive edge. Nonetheless, the perception lingers that Trump is trying to appease China and appears more eager than President Xi Jinping to have an in-person meeting on a comprehensive trade deal. The Trump administration is convinced that ending the Ukraine war will give the US the bandwidth to pursue a more confrontational stance towards China. Secretary of State Marco Rubio depicted the Ukraine conflict as a US-Russia proxy war and Under Secretary of Defence Elbridge Colby believes that this proxy war is undermining US efforts to thwart Chinese hegemony in the Indo-Pacific region. Getting Europe to purchase US weapons for Ukraine frees up financial capacity to tackle the Chinese threat and ending the Ukraine war will allow US defence-industrial supply chains to follow suit. As the US sharpens its decade-and-a-half-long defensive pivot to Asia, Trump sees Russia as a potential long-term partner. The case for a 'reverse Kissinger' courtship of Russia based on Moscow's latent frustrations with economic overdependence on China and the surrender of great power status that accompanies to it. While Russia hails its no-limits partnership with China in multilateral forums, it chafes at Beijing's efforts to capitalise on its diminished influence in the South Caucasus and Central Asia. The Kremlin is attuned to Trump's vision and actively seeks to exploit it. Russian Direct Investment Fund chief Kirill Dmitriev's proposals for Arctic cooperation with the US and enticing promotions of Russian rare earth metals align with Trump's world-view. The geo-strategic vision that underpins Trump's pursuit of peace in Ukraine is not without its logical fallacies. While most Russians still see themselves as European, Russian foreign policy is firmly enmeshed with the collective non-West. This makes diluting Russia's partnership with China and courting the US a difficult proposition. The perception that Trump is willing to reward Russian aggression in Ukraine could embolden China, even if US containment efforts towards Beijing intensify after a peace deal.

Trump calls for resignation of Intel chief a day after 100% chip tariff threat
Trump calls for resignation of Intel chief a day after 100% chip tariff threat

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump calls for resignation of Intel chief a day after 100% chip tariff threat

Donald Trump has called on Intel's chief executive to resign, alleging Lip-Bu Tan had ties to the Chinese Communist party, sending the stock of the US chipmaker falling. 'The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately,' Trump posted on Truth Social about Tan. 'There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Shares in Intel dropped more than 3% in early trading. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump's post. Trump's comments came a day after he threatened a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors and chips, which could favor Intel as a US-based semiconductor firm. Trump did exclude Taiwan Semiconductor and Apple, companies that have said they plan to increase their investments in US manufacturing. Apple chief Tim Cook announced from the White House that the company would invest $100bn in US chip fabrication. Trump's criticism of Intel, which has lagged chipmakers such as Nvidia in producing graphics-processing chips suitable for AI applications, comes after Arkansas senator Tom Cotton wrote a letter to company chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the CCP and the People's Liberation Army, the party's military arm. Cotton, a Republican, asked Intel's board if Tan had divested his interests and questioned if Tan's previous leadership of Cadence Design Systems, a company that last month said it had sold products to China's National University of Defense Technology, a violation of US export controls. Cotton said Tan controlled dozens of Chinese companies, at least eight of which had ties to the People's Liberation Army. In a statement, the company said: 'Intel and Mr Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the US defense ecosystem. We appreciate Senator Cotton's focus on these shared priorities. We look forward to addressing these matters with the senator.' Tan, 65, is regarded as an industry veteran in technology and venture capital. He was tapped to lead the once-dominant personal computing and laptop chipmaker in March as part of a turnaround effort. Intel's market valuation is about $89bn, compared with $4.4tn for rival Nvidia. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Tan, 65, has said he wants to sell off Intel assets that are not core to the company's revitalization, cut jobs and to delay or cancel projects to reduce operating expenses. Intel has received about $8bn from the Chips and Science Act for US investments, the Biden-era legislation framed as a national security imperative to reduce US dependence on foreign chip production. A number of foreign-based chipmakers have recently announced they are boosting US chip production , including Taiwan's TSMC and South Korea's Samsung. Beneficiaries of the Chips act besides Intel include TSMC, Micron Technology, Samsung, GlobalFoundries and Texas Instruments. But the $1bn grants are dwarfed by more than $400bn in pledged private-sector investments. The Trump administration wants Congress to scrap the Chips Act, arguing that tariffs are a more effective incentive for companies to build fabrication plants on US soil, pointing to TSMC's decision to expand its chipmaking capacity from three to six plants in Arizona.

Switzerland facing 39% US tariff as president leaves Washington empty-handed
Switzerland facing 39% US tariff as president leaves Washington empty-handed

Reuters

time20 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Switzerland facing 39% US tariff as president leaves Washington empty-handed

WASHINGTON/ZURICH, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter left Washington empty-handed on Wednesday after a hastily arranged trip to avert a crippling 39% tariff on the country's exports to the United States, its biggest market, three sources familiar with the matter said. Keller-Sutter said she had a "very good meeting" with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, but one of the sources said she did not meet with U.S. President Donald Trump or any of his top trade officials. The Swiss president had been seeking a tariff rate of 10%, which U.S. officials rejected, the source said, adding that most countries are facing much higher tariff rates and reducing the U.S. trade deficit remained Trump's goal. Washington is potentially seeking more energy and defense exports to Switzerland, according to a Swiss source familiar with the discussions. In return, the Swiss are looking for lower duties on goods sold into the U.S., a leading buyer of Swiss watches, machinery and chocolate. Trump announced a tariff rate of 31% for Switzerland in April as part of a broad push to reorder global trade, but increased the threatened tariff to 39% last week. "We had a very good meeting today. We had a very friendly and open exchange," Keller-Sutter told reporters after the meeting at the State Department in Washington. She did not answer a question about what further offers Switzerland would make. The higher tariff is due to take effect on Thursday. On social media, Keller-Sutter later wrote that she and Rubio had discussed bilateral cooperation, the tariff situation and international issues. The Swiss delegation was preparing to leave Washington without a deal on Wednesday, a source close to the Swiss delegation said, with the country's cabinet due to hold a meeting on Thursday or Friday. "We came over with the intention of presenting new ideas to the American administration to resolve the tariffs matter, which we have done," the source said. "We are ready for negotiations to continue." Switzerland was stunned by Trump's decision last week to apply the steep rate - among the highest announced since he launched his global trade reset - which threatens to inflict major damage on its export-orientated economy. Keller-Sutter and Business Minister Guy Parmelin flew to Washington on Tuesday for last-minute negotiations aimed at reducing the tariffs before they go into effect on Thursday. Additional talks are possible, even after the higher rate takes effect, the first source said. Parmelin had already raised the possibility of Switzerland buying U.S. liquefied natural gas to help secure a better deal. Under a deal the EU struck with Washington last month to secure a 15% tariff rate, Brussels agreed to buy $750 billion worth of LNG, oil, and nuclear energy products over the next three years. While the EU made no formal pledge to buy more U.S. arms, it did indicate to U.S. negotiators that U.S. suppliers would benefit from an increase in defence spending in line with higher NATO commitments agreed under pressure from Trump. Both concessions, along with a pledge to invest more in the U.S., were seen as important in clinching a deal, said a person familiar with the U.S.-EU negotiations. Switzerland already purchases some military hardware from the U.S. and has placed a 6-billion-franc ($7.43-billion) order to buy Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab F-35A Lightning II fighter jets. While the Swiss government is focused on sweetening its offer to Washington and says it is not planning countermeasures against the U.S. tariffs, some Swiss politicians have called for the F-35 deal to be scrapped over the trade dispute. Earlier on Wednesday, Keller-Sutter and her team met with Swiss business leaders including Roche (ROG.S), opens new tab Chairman Severin Schwan as well as Alfred Gantner and Marcel Erni, founders of Swiss private equity firm Partners Group (PGHN.S), opens new tab. The group, which also included Daniel Jaeggi, president of global energy and commodity firm Mercuria, spoke about the tariffs situation, the government said, without giving further details. Further meetings are planned with executives from other Swiss companies present in the United States. Business associations warn that tens of thousands of Swiss jobs are at risk if the 39% tariffs are implemented. Swiss cheese producers, for example, are bracing for a steep drop in sales in the United States, which bought 11% of cheese exports like Gruyere and Emmentaler last year. "The taxes are enormous," said Anthony Margot, a fifth-generation cheese maturer. "We can't replace a market like the United States overnight." The blue chip Swiss Market Index was down 1% in early afternoon trading on Wednesday. Following talks with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Switzerland had agreed a draft statement with the United States in early July that was reported to include a 10% tariff rate. Trump's U-turn on Friday, however, followed what some U.S. officials said was a fraught telephone call with Keller-Sutter. Swiss sources said the call was not a success, but denied there was a falling out between the two leaders. Keller-Sutter did not meet with Greer, Bessent or Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick during her visit this week, the first source told Reuters. ($1 = 0.8080 Swiss francs)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store