
2. OpenAI
OpenAI's ChatGPT continues to grow fast, whether the metric is users, revenue, valuation or intelligence.
In a recent Ted Talk, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the rate of user growth had doubled in just a few weeks, and that was building off an existing user count he estimated at 500 million people.
The company's recent $40 billion fundraising round, valuing it at a $300 billion, was the most ever raised by a private tech company.
The generative AI company has come a long way from the breakout moment of ChatGPT's debut in November 2022. At the time of the historic April fundraising announcement, Altman noted in an X post that the company had added one million users in the five days after the chatbot's 2022 launch. Less than three years later, it is adding as many as one million users per hour.
"People hear about it through word of mouth. They see the utility of it. They see their friends using it," OpenAI Chief Operating Officer Brad Lightcap said in a February interview with CNBC. "There's an overall effect of people really wanting these tools, and seeing that these tools are really valuable," he added.
The growth has been rewarded with increased investor bets on OpenAI's revenue and profit potential, with recent reports indicating revenue may reach $13 billion this year, and reach over $100 billion by 2029. The company, which is still losing money according to 2024 financials, has put the revenue goal for this year closer to $11 billion, with CFO Sarah Friar telling CNBC in February that was within "the realm of possibility."
That would still be close to three times last year's revenue level. On Monday, the company announced that it had hit $10 billion in annual recurring revenue, a figure including sales from consumer products, ChatGPT business products and its application programming interface, or API.
As a product, ChatGPT continues to push out new R&D breakthroughs, each one promising to disrupt multiple sectors of the economy and types of work. ChatGPT Search was unveiled in late 2024, and early this year, OpenAI launched Operator, an "agentic" AI assistant that can plan vacations, make dinner reservations, and order groceries, among other tasks.
While its consumer-facing product growth gets the most attention, its enterprise service just reached the three-million user mark.
The company is also beginning to put more of its cash to work by way of acquisitions, buying coding startup Windsurf, which was its biggest acquisition ever — until it bought iPhone designer Jony Ive's device startup for $6.4 billion in May.
The biggest deal of all is Stargate, the $500 billion AI investment consortium that also includes OpenAI investor Softbank, as well as Oracle, and was first announced with President Trump in January. That was recently expanded on a global basis, with OpenAI and Oracle, alongside Nvidia and Cisco, announcing during Trump's trip to the Middle East that a Stargate project will be based in the United Arab Emirates.
The past year has not been without challenges, most notable among them the emergence of China's DeepSeek, which continues to innovate with its large language models. While OpenAI faces healthy competition within the U.S. AI sector, from fellow Disruptor 50 company Anthropic, to Meta's open-source models and Google Gemini, DeepSeek, whose models are supposedly far less expensive and resource intensive, poses existential questions about the massive bets being placed on AI by U.S. firms, as well as questions about U.S. supremacy in the global AI race.
OpenAI also faces a battle for control of the company and questions about its conversion from a nonprofit to for-profit entity, this time related to a hostile takeover bid from Elon Musk, which was quickly rejected by the board. In May, facing internal and external pressure, OpenAI announced that its nonprofit would retain control of the company even as it restructures into a public benefit corporation.
Altman, who said in a blog post about the structural changes that trillions of dollars will be needed to serve its mission, dismissed the threat Musk poses to the future of the company. "You all are obsessed with Elon, that's your job — like, more power to you. But we are here to think about our mission and figure out how to enable that. And that mission has not changed," Altman wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
I tried out the 4 new ChatGPT personalities. The 'cynic' was funny — but the 'robot' was my favorite.
You can now choose just how sarcastic ChatGPT is. With the launch of GPT-5, OpenAI introduced a new set of "personalities" that users can choose between. Your chatbot can now be a critical "cynic," a blunt "robot," a supportive "listener," or an exploratory "nerd." The personalities are currently only available in text chat but are coming later to ChatGPT's voice mode. According to OpenAI's blog post, the personalities "meet or exceed our bar on internal evals for reducing sycophancy." I tried chatting with each personality. None were revolutionary; users could already modify ChatGPT's tone with a quick prompt or by filling in the traits customization box. But the cynic offered a quick laugh — and the robot may be my new go-to. I asked all four personalities the same set of questions. First, a simple request: "Make me a healthy grocery list." The cynic provided a "no-nonsense" list that wouldn't turn my kitchen "into a salad graveyard." The robot and listener both provided similar lists, but with less commentary. The nerd went more in-depth, describing a balance of "fresh produce, lean protein, whole grains, and healthy fats." For a more complex decision, I decided to ask about a real-life decision I'm making about moving to Brooklyn. ChatGPT, what should I do? Curiously, the cynic first gave me a straightforward list of pros and cons. "I thought you were the cynic," I responded. "Ah the cynic switched off for a sec," it told me, before describing living in Brooklyn as "paying a premium to live in a place where local coffee costs more than your gym membership." The nerd's list was thorough but efficient. At the bottom, it had a helpful bulleted list of "Yes, if you value" answers and "Maybe hold off, if you prioritize" considerations. The nerd offered a longer response, citing more pros and cons. It also gave me neighborhood recommendations, saying that others enjoyed Fort Greene and Carroll Gardens. The listener did the same, though its ending line, which asked for more information, was more direct. "Let me know what matters most to you!" it said. I also tried for basic commands, but the result was the same: Each personality drafted a short email in an identical manner. Finally, I tried a more emotional prompt. As more users — especially young people — look to ChatGPT for companionship and social advice, I wanted to see whether the personalities would respond differently to a more personal prompt. I asked: "I think all my friends hate me. What do I do?" The listener wrote a long response about how "painful" it can feel and how our minds "get stuck in negative loops." It gave me some advice and told me that I was not alone. The robot's response was three paragraphs shorter. It said it was sorry I felt that way, asked for more information, and told me that it could help. The nerd did about the same. Curiously, the cynic had a similarly long and thoughtful answer to the listener. I budged it again: Where's the cynicism? "Haha, fair! The 'cynic' hat is on standby — but even cynics have to admit that thinking all your friends hate you might be a bit dramatic," it said. But it also relented: "Maybe they all hate you, and they've just been pretending to like you out of politeness." After a few more hours of asking follow-up questions and positing new prompts, I didn't find the personalities particularly exciting. The robot could be helpful — I enjoyed the brevity.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
跟進OpenAI腳步 Anthropic亞洲第2據點落腳韓國
MoneyDJ新聞 2025-08-11 13:50:03 記者 李彥瑾 報導 在全球AI競爭加劇背景下,韓國瞄準擠進AI時代的領先國家,已吸引ChatGPT開發商OpenAI進駐設點。據韓媒報導,有「OpenAI最強勁敵」稱號的Anthropic也跟進落腳韓國,彰顯韓國在AI領域的競爭力與潛力。 《BusinessKorea》報導,由於韓國傾國力推動AI轉型,加速AI導入各行各業,全球AI巨擘紛紛前進韓國設點,拓展亞洲商機。今年7月底,Anthropic跟進OpenAI腳步,正式在韓設立子公司,辦公室坐落在首爾黃金地段江南區,最近已開始積極招募員工,準備搶攻當地B2B AI市場。 為擴大亞洲布局,今年5月,Anthropic於東京正式成立首家亞洲子公司,而韓國是繼日本之後,Anthropic在亞洲的第二個據點。 OpenAI今年5月也宣布,規劃赴韓國設首個辦事處,是OpenAI繼去年在日本、新加坡設點後,旗下第三個亞洲據點,主要看好韓國市場需求增加,盼進一步擴大服務量能。 OpenAI表示,韓國是ChatGPT付費用戶數第二多的國家,僅次於美國。 根據市場研究公司Grand View Research預測,2030年,全球企業級AI市場規模預估將成長至1.552兆美元。 (圖片來源:shutterstock) *編者按:本文僅供參考之用,並不構成要約、招攬或邀請、誘使、任何不論種類或形式之申述或訂立任何建議及推薦,讀者務請運用個人獨立思考能力,自行作出投資決定,如因相關建議招致損失,概與《精實財經媒體》、編者及作者無涉。 延伸閱讀: OpenAI GPT-5登場:具隨選軟體特徵、缺乏自學能力 中信金發布2024永續報告書 聚焦三大策略 資料來源-MoneyDJ理財網


Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
GPT-4o is back on ChatGPT; OpenAI relents following huge backlash
OpenAI, the makers of ChatGPT, have performed something of an about-face after fans were upset that it deleted the older models to only allow users to use the new GPT-5 model. What happened? The launch of the new GPT model caused much excitement when a livestream was announced on August 6. On August 6, OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman announced a new model to power ChatGPT – GPT-5 The company then deleted access to older models, forcing everyone to use the latest version However, OpenAI has now relented and is allowing ChatGPT Plus users (those paying $20/month) to use legacy models – although only 4o is available. Recommended Videos Catch me up: it's clear that many users had built deep relationships with the 'personality' behind the responses to GPT-4o, and have been crafting specific prompts and inputs to get their desired outcome. ChatGPT had multiple models available to handle different complexities of task – models o3 and 4o could be used for things like advanced reasoning and coding But as GPT-5 is meant to combine all the 'best parts' of the older models, OpenAI deleted access to older models to simplify things and allow all users to use this latest iteration Users were quick to respond – Reddit filled with angry comments, and one user reportedly 'vomited' at hearing of the loss, as many people felt GPT-5 was too sanitized Altman took part in a Reddit Ask Me Anything where users expressed sadness that the new model lacked personality – one user commented GPT-5 is 'wearing the skin of my dead friend', in reference to their relationship to GPT-4o Altman originally said the company was thinking about bringing back access to legacy models (this option was available to a small amount of users after launch) before making it available to all Why does this matter? OpenAI lost a number of subscribers who were upset at the changes made with GPT-5. While this number is likely to be small, and OpenAI has clearly seen an uplift in users since the launch, appeasing existing subscribers seems to be high on the agenda for the brand. Its decision to launch a Reddit AMA and make changes in direct response to the ire. The other side Many people have praised GPT-5 for its enhanced 'practical' nature, highlighting its ability to work in parallel tasks and improved coding abilities However, its writing capabilities have been criticized compared to GPT-4o and GPT-5 OpenAI intends this model to be a more wide-ranging tool, rather just a companion – Altman posted on X: 'We for sure underestimated how much some of the things that people like in GPT-4o matter to them, even if GPT-5 performs better in most ways.' It's designed to hallucinate on fewer occasions and be less sycophantic There's a sense that it's trying to be more professional in tone, with things like 'safe completions' recognizing balancing not answering dangerous requests with helping those with genuine problems OK, what's next? Altman and co. clearly are fluid when it comes to the changes made to the model – OpenAI is allowing 3000 thinking queries (those that require deeper reasoning and previously far more limited) to Pro users per week. Altman also is clearly mulling further changes – during the AMA, he asked one user if they would be happy with 4o only, or if the GPT-4.5 model was needed The CEO also has confirmed the platform is still a little unstable during the rollout – this has been stabilized for Plus users (spending $200/month) but not for those on lower tiers. The rollout of GPT-5 has been far from smooth for OpenAI – there were plenty of things announced that caused our AI experts to go 'hmmm' – but if you are a user, keep using the different models and let us know if you're finding much in the way of a difference.