
Libya's troubled GNU is not going just yet, further clashes are likely
Tripoli's Government of National Unity (GNU), led by Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, is under immense strain, but it would be premature to consider it finished. Despite mounting unrest, the GNU remains entrenched, deploying every tool at its disposal—from subtle propaganda and financial incentives to leveraging armed militias—to maintain control.
The turmoil of mid-May may have dealt the most serious blow yet to what many see as Libya's most corrupt and dysfunctional government since the fall of Gaddafi. This post-Gaddafi regime—born from NATO's 2011 intervention, the largest war coalition of the modern era—was sold as a mission of liberation, security, and prosperity, but instead plunged the country into more than a decade of chaos, lawlessness, and foreign interference unlike anything seen since Libya's independence over 70 years ago.
Late in the afternoon of May 12, reports began circulating that Abdulghani Al-Kikli—better known as 'Ghneiwa'—had been killed by the 444th Brigade at a military barracks in southern Tripoli. He had reportedly been lured to his death under the guise of a reconciliation meeting, intended to ease tensions that had been simmering around the capital for weeks. News of his death spread rapidly across social media and independent outlets, while government-linked media remained silent for two days before issuing vague, distorted reports. The government made no official comment until after fighting had already erupted across Tripoli's streets.
A short time after Ghneiwa's death was confirmed, fighting erupted across the capital. It was concentrated initially on the densely populated southern district of Abu Salim, where he had operated with near-total impunity for years. His grip on the area long predated his 2021 appointment as head of the government-sanctioned Stability Support Apparatus (SSA) by then Prime Minister Fayez al-Sarraj. By midnight on 12 May, the clashes had spread across nearly every major neighbourhood of Tripoli—from Sarraj in the west to the outskirts of Tajura in the east, including the city center.
When a fragile truce finally brought calm to Tripoli, unofficial figures reported eight civilian deaths, over a hundred injuries, and widespread destruction of both public and private property across the city. For all the chaos, it appeared the GNU had once again survived, emerging from one of the most threatening confrontations in its four-year history of lurching from one crisis to the next. However that proved to be a mirage.
On 16 May, fed up with militia infighting, collapsing services, and a host of grievances, protesters poured into the streets of Tripoli in a rare public outburst—united by a single demand: Dbeibah and his government must go. Under mounting pressure and fear, three ministers resigned, while the Tobruk-based House of Representatives (HoR) Parliament announced it would begin the process of replacing both the prime minister and his GNU administration. Meanwhile, the Tripoli-based High Council of State accused Dbeibah of losing public trust and openly called for his resignation.
Dbeibah's 18 May televised address was widely derided. Framing the violence as an effort to rid the capital of militias, the prime minister attempted to deflect blame. But many reminded him that he had empowered Ghneiwa himself—appointing him as head of the Stability Support Apparatus (SSA) and granting his militia $132 million in 2022 alone. Rather than calm tensions, Dbeibah's words sparked ridicule and disbelief. Accusations that demonstrators were paid agitators only deepened public anger.
The rare wave of public demonstrations has largely subsided, settling into a quieter pattern of weekly protests held every Friday night—for now, at least. Several factors contributed to the lull, including the Eid al-Adha holidays and a rush to banks amid an unusual window of cash availability. Meanwhile, the House of Representatives (HoR) proceeded with hearings for 14 self-nominated candidates—all men—vying to replace Dbeibah as prime minister. But the process has since stalled, with little expectation that any of the contenders will be chosen. Concerns over a lack of UN and international recognition appear to have convinced the chamber to pause its plans—for the time being.
In the background, the UN mission in Libya quietly released an advisory report prepared by its hand-picked committee, outlining four potential roadmaps to end the country's drawn-out transitional phase and pave the way for elections. All four proposals converge on one key recommendation: the GNU must be replaced by a new government tasked solely with organizing national elections within a fresh 24-month transitional period—arguably too long for a country in crisis, but perhaps the most realistic option under current conditions.
UN envoy Hanna Tetteh is expected to brief the Security Council on 24 June, likely seeking its endorsement of the advisory committee's recommendations—without committing to any single option. The approach would give her the flexibility to shape a roadmap she deems most viable. Meanwhile, the GNU may be weakened, but it's far from finished. Dbeibah, backed by well-armed Misrata militias, is unlikely to step aside quietly—raising the spectre of a new, potentially more destructive round of conflict in an already battered Tripoli.
Dbeibah and the GNU aren't going anywhere anytime soon. The militias still hold sway in the capital, public funds will continue to be squandered, and the prospect of a new government remains distant at best. As one Western diplomat, speaking anonymously, put it bluntly: 'No one wants to be seen as endorsing a failed state—but no one's willing to fix it either.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Libyan Express
03-08-2025
- Libyan Express
Have the Muslim Brotherhood succeeded in Libya?
Young Libyans remove the sign of the Justice and Construction Party (JCP), affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, following rising public opposition to Islamist political factions Over a decade after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan branch of the Muslim Brotherhood finds itself facing unprecedented isolation. Once poised to shape Libya's post-revolutionary future, the group has been steadily marginalised — electorally, politically, and socially. From Exile to Political Entry The roots of the Brotherhood in Libya trace back to the late 1940s, when members fleeing persecution in Egypt sought refuge in eastern Libya. Over the decades, the movement grew cautiously, operating in secrecy during the Gaddafi era and relying on external networks for survival. Following the 2011 uprising, the Brotherhood seized the moment. In March 2012, it launched the Justice and Construction Party (JCP), claiming a formal separation between its religious mission and political work. However, many observers noted that the party remained under the effective influence of the Brotherhood's leadership, mirroring the Egyptian model. Despite losing to the National Forces Alliance (NFA) in the 2012 elections, the JCP gained influence in the General National Congress (GNC) through aligned independents, positioning itself at the centre of Libya's fragile transition. From Power to Backlash The tide turned quickly. In the 2014 parliamentary elections, the JCP secured only around 30 seats out of 200. Rather than accepting the result, elements linked to the Brotherhood supported Operation Libya Dawn, a military campaign that seized control of Tripoli and contributed to Libya's political bifurcation. This marked the beginning of Libya's second civil war. With competing governments emerging in the east and west, and a rise in militia influence, the Brotherhood's role became increasingly contested — and, in the eyes of many, discredited. The movement was seen not as a force for unity, but as one of several groups prioritising influence over national reconciliation. Electoral Decline and Diminishing Influence Subsequent elections underscored a steep decline in public support. In areas once thought to be Islamist strongholds — such as Derna, Abu Salim, and even Misrata — Brotherhood-affiliated candidates struggled to make inroads. The results reflected growing disillusionment with ideologically driven politics and the failure to deliver stability or effective governance. Moreover, the Brotherhood's lack of service delivery infrastructure, in contrast to Islamist movements elsewhere, undermined its grassroots credibility. Unlike in Tunisia or Egypt, Libya's Brotherhood never developed significant charitable or educational wings to embed itself socially. A Crisis of Legitimacy By 2020, internal dissent became more visible. Members in cities like Misrata and Zawiya resigned en masse, citing frustration with the movement's political trajectory and internal rigidity. The regional environment added further pressure. After the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the changing posture of key international players, the Libyan branch found itself increasingly isolated. With international backers shifting focus and a domestic audience growing wary, the Brotherhood faced a legitimacy crisis. The Rebrand: 'Revival and Renewal' In May 2021, the Brotherhood issued a public statement announcing its transformation into the Revival and Renewal Association, positioning itself as a civil society actor focused on social development and national unity. The rebrand, however, raised more questions than it answered. While distancing itself from the transnational Brotherhood in name, the group retained its original logo and much of its ideological language. The announcement, released on Facebook under the Brotherhood's official page, retained Quranic citations and a discourse consistent with its historic messaging. Analysts have largely viewed the shift as a tactical move rather than a strategic rethink — an attempt to shed a politically burdensome identity without engaging in real structural or ideological change. A Pattern of Tactical Adaptation? The Libyan Brotherhood's rebranding follows a familiar pattern observed across the region. Faced with declining support and rising scrutiny, Islamist groups have often attempted to repackage their image through cosmetic adjustments while maintaining core beliefs and goals. In the case of Libya, the language of 'moderation', 'renewal', and 'civil engagement' echoes a broader Islamist lexicon. Terms such as 'Islamic constants', 'revival', and 'identity' remain embedded in the group's discourse, suggesting continued adherence to a political Islam framework — albeit in more subtle terms. Critics argue that the Brotherhood's repositioning does not reflect a genuine break from its past, but rather a strategic retreat aimed at surviving a hostile political environment. Conclusion More than a decade since the 2011 revolution, the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood has lost much of the influence it once wielded. Its political vehicle, the Justice and Construction Party, is largely sidelined. Its social base has eroded. And its rebranding efforts, while signalling adaptability, have done little to restore public trust. For many Libyans, the Brotherhood symbolises a chapter of missed opportunities, divisive politics, and unfulfilled promises. Whether as a political party or a civil association, its challenge now is not simply to change names — but to prove that it can meaningfully contribute to a pluralistic, democratic Libya. Until then, its legacy remains one of ambition unmet — and success, at best, incomplete.


Libyan Express
13-07-2025
- Libyan Express
Diplomatic turbulence in Benghazi won't derail EU–Libya ties
The EU delegation, known as Team Europe, held talks with the Government of National Unity in Tripoli on 8 July. A planned meeting in Benghazi did not go ahead due to protocol-related issues. Photo via X The European Union has sought to move past last week's diplomatic dispute in Benghazi, where a senior EU delegation was expelled shortly after arrival, reiterating its continued commitment to working with all relevant Libyan authorities on shared challenges — particularly irregular migration. The delegation — which included EU Commissioner for Home Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner and interior ministers from Italy, Greece, and Malta — was turned back upon landing at Benina Airport on Tuesday, 8 July. It had intended to hold meetings with officials in eastern Libya to discuss the recent surge in migrant crossings to Europe. Before travelling to Benghazi, the delegation met with Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dabaiba and other members of the internationally recognised Government of National Unity (GNU) in Tripoli. Commissioner Brunner described those discussions as 'productive,' noting on social media that the visit reaffirmed a joint commitment to combat migrant smuggling and laid the foundations for broader cooperation. However, authorities in Benghazi — aligned with Prime Minister Osama Hammad — declared Brunner persona non grata and ordered the entire delegation to leave the country. The scheduled meetings were cancelled. EU: Incident was a 'protocol issue' European Commission officials have described the Benghazi episode as a 'protocol issue,' while avoiding further comment on the details. A spokesperson told The Brussels Times that the EU would continue its engagement across Libya and keep communication channels open with all key stakeholders. 'We are not here to assign blame or retell events,' the spokesperson added. 'What matters is that cooperation continues where it's needed most — on migration, stability, and regional security.' One Libya policy remains unchanged Despite the tensions, the European Union reaffirmed its long-standing 'One Libya' policy, under which it maintains engagement with authorities throughout the country while recognising the GNU in Tripoli as the result of the UN-led political process. A spokesperson for the European External Action Service (EEAS) said the EU's position has not changed, confirming that the bloc works with a wide range of actors to address shared priorities. Media reports suggest that the breakdown in the Benghazi visit may have stemmed from concerns raised by EU Ambassador to Libya Nicola Orlando, who was reportedly reluctant to engage directly with senior officials from Hammad's government. Irregular migration on the rise The expulsion comes amid growing EU concerns over the increasing number of irregular migrants departing from Libya. According to recent data, more than 7,300 migrants have arrived in 2025 on the Greek islands of Crete and Gavdos — up from around 5,000 in 2024. Both islands lack sufficient reception facilities, prompting the issue to be raised at the recent European Council summit. In response, the Greek government announced a temporary three-month suspension of asylum procedures for migrants arriving by sea from North Africa, particularly Libya. The European Commission has said it will review the measure once national legislation has been finalised and enters into force. This echoes a similar move in 2020, when Greece suspended asylum claims following a border crisis with Turkey — a measure that drew criticism from rights groups and legal scholars. Questions over EU funding and rights safeguards The Benghazi incident has reignited debate over the EU's migration cooperation with Libya and its oversight mechanisms. A 2023 report by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) criticised the EU's €5 billion Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF) for insufficient focus on root causes of migration and inadequate monitoring of human rights conditions in recipient countries, including Libya. The same year, a joint investigation by Lighthouse Reports revealed that Frontex, the EU's border agency, had shared the coordinates of migrant boats in distress with a vessel reportedly operated by an armed group in eastern Libya — raising serious ethical and legal concerns. Despite these challenges, EU officials have reiterated their intention to maintain engagement with all sides in Libya, stressing the need for a comprehensive, coordinated approach to migration governance and regional security.


Libyan Express
26-06-2025
- Libyan Express
Libya and Turkey sign offshore energy deal
BY Libyan Express Jun 26, 2025 - 06:13 NOC and TPAO ink exploration agreement as tensions rise in eastern Mediterranean Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO), paving the way for offshore oil and gas exploration in Libyan waters. The agreement was formalised in Istanbul by NOC Chairman Masoud Suleiman and TPAO Director Ahmet Türkoğlu. According to a statement issued by the NOC, Turkish Petroleum will undertake extensive geological and geophysical studies across four offshore areas deemed to have strong exploration potential. As part of the MoU, a two-dimensional seismic survey will be conducted, covering an estimated 10,000 kilometres. The data collected will then be processed in detail, with the entire programme expected to be completed within nine months. The deal comes at a time of renewed maritime tensions between Libya and Greece. Just days earlier, Libya's Tripoli-based Government of National Unity (GNU) summoned the Greek ambassador, Nikolaos Garilidis, to protest what it described as Athens' 'unilateral actions' in contested maritime zones. The move followed an announcement by Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis that naval vessels would be deployed to international waters off the Libyan coast. He described the operation as a 'precautionary measure' aimed at monitoring irregular migration, and claimed it would be carried out 'in coordination with Libyan authorities and other European forces'. 'Smugglers will not dictate who enters our country,' Mitsotakis stated. Both the GNU and Libya's rival eastern-based administration have issued strong objections to Greece's recent international tenders for hydrocarbon exploration south of Crete, arguing that parts of the designated areas fall within Libya's undelimited maritime jurisdiction and sovereign rights. The agreement between the NOC and TPAO is likely to add further complexity to already fraught regional maritime relations, particularly in the eastern Mediterranean, where longstanding disputes over energy rights and territorial waters persist. The views expressed in Op-Ed pieces are those of the author and do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of Libyan Express. How to submit an Op-Ed: Libyan Express accepts opinion articles on a wide range of topics. Submissions may be sent to oped@ Please include 'Op-Ed' in the subject line.