Simultaneous elections could lead to 1.5% point rise in GDP growth, Parliamentary panel told
In a joint presentation, Singh and Prachi Mishra, director of Isaac Centre for Public Policy at Ashoka University, said the uptick in growth would amount to ₹4.5 lakh crore in FY24 figures, according to people familiar with the matter. This would be almost half the total health budget or a third of the education budget, they pointed out.
But the two economists also cautioned that the fiscal deficit may rise by 1.3 percentage points due to higher post-election spending.
In their presentation, based on a study published in June 2024, Singh and Mishra referred to the election cycles in India and how simultaneous polls continued till 1967 before some assemblies and Lok Sabha faced different schedules..
When national and state elections were held together in India, including when over 40 per cent of the assemblies went to polls the same year along with the Lok Sabha, they said their studies indicated the capital-to-current spending ratio is 5.4 percentage points higher than after simultaneous elections, indicating a shift towards productive and return-generating investments.
The investment ratio against the gross fixed capital formation also goes up by 0.5 percentage point, reflecting greater investment activity, especially private and foreign, the presentation said.
Singh and Mishra added that frequent elections disrupt economic activity due to uncertainty, adversely impacting manufacturing, construction, tourism and healthcare, with migrant workers frequently returning home and affecting productivity.
Noting that migrants comprise nearly one-third of India's population, they said multiple elections impose financial burden on them, weakening their use of their voting rights.
School enrolment also goes down by 0.5 percentage point around non-simultaneous elections due to the deployment of teachers on election duty and schools being converted into polling booths, they said.
They argued that the diversion of police for frequent electoral duties leads to a growth in crime during non-simultaneous elections due to a longer duration of deployment.
(With PTI inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
SIR process routine, Oppn spreading confusion: Bihar Minister Nitish Mishra
Bihar Minister and BJP leader Nitish Mishra on Monday dismissed the controversy around the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) process, accusing some political parties of deliberately spreading misinformation and confusion among the public. Addressing a press conference in Patna, Mishra said, 'The SIR process is a routine administrative procedure. The Election Commission of India (ECI), a constitutional authority, has been conducting elections in the country since Independence. Its impartiality is recognised not just in India, but globally.' He further clarified that names removed from the electoral roll are publicly displayed, and anyone whose name has been mistakenly excluded has the full right to file an objection and get it corrected. 'The draft publication of the voter list was made available, and citizens were given an opportunity to file objections. Interestingly, no political party raised any objections by the deadline of August 14,' he added. Mishra emphasised that under the Election Commission's rules, political parties and individuals must use proper channels to register complaints instead of inciting panic or misinformation. He also showcased the voter list from his own constituency to demonstrate transparency in the process. 'Names that have been removed — including those who are no longer alive — are being published in panchayat buildings and block offices,' he stated. Taking a jibe at Tejashwi Yadav, Mishra remarked, 'He's now crying foul over missing names, but in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, despite being on the voter list, he didn't even cast his vote. He should remember that.' On the 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' led by Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav, Mishra questioned its purpose: 'What problem will this yatra solve? They should ask themselves that.' Responding to the opposition's claim that the Constitution is under threat, Mishra hit back, saying: 'This is the same Rahul Gandhi who tore up an ordinance passed by his own party's government in 2013. Those who lack accurate knowledge now claim the Constitution is in danger. They're simply trying to mislead people.' When asked whether BJP voters' names had also been removed, Mishra confirmed that some deletions had occurred in his own constituency as well, and said, 'Yes, names have been removed — including some of those who have passed away or against whom complaints were received.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Justice delayed: Fast-track special courts still aren't fast enough
Many existing courts struggle with severe staffing shortages, procedural inefficiencies, and inadequate infrastructure premium Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article Fast-track special courts (FTSCs) were established to speed up trials in rape and child sexual-abuse cases. Yet, these very courts, meant to accelerate justice, are themselves moving at a slow pace, according to the data recently presented in the Lok Sabha by Union Law and Justice Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. The numbers for Delhi are especially troubling: The place currently has 16 FTSCs, and of the 6,278 cases instituted since inception, only 2,718 were disposed of by June this year. Cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act take, on average, over 1,700 days (nearly five years)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Impeachment move against CEC Gyanesh Kumar would lack numbers
As the Opposition's high-velocity allegations of 'vote theft' get louder, political sources indicated on August 18 that the INDIA bloc parties are contemplating moving an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. Also Read: INDIA bloc mulls impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar amid Rahul Gandhi's 'Vote Chori' row The move, if put into motion, would mark an isolated but formidable test of India's safeguards around the Chief Election Commission, one of the country's leading constitutional bodies, whose mettle has been tried and tested not just in this country but around the world. Constitutionally, the CEC can only be removed from office through the process of impeachment requiring two-thirds majority of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha or on grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity. The CEC cannot be removed from office except on the grounds and in the way Supreme Court judges are removed. The CEC has a tenure of up to six years or up to the age of 65, whichever is earlier. In real terms though, any impeachment would become a numbers game and under the circumstances, there is little doubt that the NDA government will move solidly behind the CEC. Says former CEC TS Krishnamurthy, without getting embroiled in the pros and cons: 'If there is a constitutional provision, let the opposition employ it.' Asked whether it could, potentially, damage the office and the institution of the Election Commission, he declined to offer a view, saying "only time will tell whether it is the correct thing to do.'' The controversy gathered steam after Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi accused the Election Commission of presiding over 'vote theft" in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. He claimed large-scale irregularities in Karnataka's Mahadevapura constituency, citing duplicate entries, fake addresses, bulk voters, invalid photographs and misuse of voter forms. CEC Gyanesh Kumar hit back strongly on August 17, dismissing the accusations as an 'insult" to the Constitution of India. He asked Gandhi either to provide a signed affidavit with evidence or apologise for the remarks. Rahul Gandhi refused, alleging bias and pointing out that no such demand was made when BJP MP Anurag Thakur levelled similar charges. 'The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, the poll body does not ask for an affidavit from him," Rahul Gandhi said. As the NDA-INDIA battle of words escalated, Congress MP Syed Naseer Hussain was quoted by the ANI as saying that the party was prepared to use 'all democratic tools," including the option of an impeachment motion. Legally, the two election commissioners can be removed by the President on the recommendation of the CEC. In 2009, CEC N Gopalaswami sent a recommendation to the then President Pratibha Patil to remove election commissioner Navin Chawla due to his partisan behaviour in favour of a particular political party. The President held that such a recommendation is not binding on her and rejected the proposal. Commenting that the system of appointment of election commissioners is defective, former CEC SY Quraishi said the process should be revamped to ensure the neutrality and independence of the Election Commission of India. He told LiveLaw in an interview in 2022 'that the most powerful Commission in the world has the most defective system of appointment.' Also Read: Bihar Voter List Row: People joining SIR enthusiastically, says CEC Gyanesh Kumar, as INDIA bloc cries foul While conceding that he too was a beneficiary of the same system, Quraishi said that wider consultation was needed for such appointments, including parliamentary oversight, stressing the urgent need for a collegium. The Election Commission was a single-member body when it was set up in 1950. This system lasted until 1989 with the CEC as the lone member. After the Election Commission Amendment Act 1989, it became a multi-member body. Since October 1989, it has retained the three-member format it is in today.
