logo
Shannon Sharpe's silence under fire as July 9 court hearing looms in sexual assault case

Shannon Sharpe's silence under fire as July 9 court hearing looms in sexual assault case

Time of India06-07-2025
Sharpe silent ahead of July 9 court hearing (Image via Getty)
NFL Hall of Famer Shannon Sharpe is facing a crucial legal moment as a July 9, 2025, court hearing in Clark County, Nevada will address motions related to his legal team in the ongoing civil sexual assault lawsuit filed against him more than two months ago.
Despite promises of a counterclaim and widespread attention over a reported $10 million settlement offer, Sharpe has not yet formally responded to the complaint. With the NFL preseason approaching and his ESPN return still in question, the hearing marks the first major development in a case that has simmered quietly after dominating headlines during the draft season.
Hearing to resolve counsel motions as filing delay raises questions
The court docket confirms that the hearing—originally scheduled for June 30—will now take place at 10:00 a.m.
on July 9, focused on three motions to associate new legal counsel. This signals internal activity within Sharpe's legal camp, but no formal answer to the civil complaint or counterclaim has been filed as of July 6. The legal deadline to respond is typically within 30 days, though informal extensions are often granted between attorneys.
Sharpe's lawyer, Lanny Davis, had stated in an early press briefing: 'Shannon will file a counterclaim against the plaintiff.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Concentrated Siberian Ginseng Extract 2oz
Superior Ginseng
Undo
However, that pledge has yet to materialize in court. The Clark County civil court system shows attorney-related filings but no documentation addressing the plaintiff's core allegations.
PR firestorm, ESPN leave, and the road ahead
When the lawsuit was first filed, Davis publicly revealed that Sharpe had offered 'at least $10 million' to settle the case, a disclosure that backfired and fueled several days of intense media scrutiny. The public relations strategy was widely seen as ill-advised, especially since the case has since remained dormant in terms of legal response.
Also read:
NFL star Patrick Mahomes' wife Brittany is quietly dropping bombshells as her WAG fame explodes online
Shortly after the news broke, Sharpe stepped away from his role at ESPN, stating he would return by the start of the NFL preseason. With the Hall of Fame Game scheduled for July 31, Sharpe's professional future hangs in the balance. What unfolds during the July 9 hearing could determine both the pace of the lawsuit and whether his high-profile media comeback stays on track.
For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the
India vs England Test match
here.
Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hypocrisy? Nancy Mace calls for death penalty for child rapists; X Community Notes reveal she said it moments after voting against Epstein files release
Hypocrisy? Nancy Mace calls for death penalty for child rapists; X Community Notes reveal she said it moments after voting against Epstein files release

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Hypocrisy? Nancy Mace calls for death penalty for child rapists; X Community Notes reveal she said it moments after voting against Epstein files release

Just minutes after voting against a Democratic-led effort to release the long-awaited Jeffrey Epstein files, Congresswoman Nancy Mace took to social media with a bold statement: 'All child r*pists should get the death penalty,' according to Axios, as noted by X community notes on her post. Her post has since drawn intense backlash, with critics accusing her and fellow Republicans of protecting abusers. Mace's post came shortly after the House voted 211–210 to block a procedural move that would have triggered debate on forcing the justice department to release the Epstein documents within 30 days, according to the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives All 211 votes against the motion came from Republicans. Just one Republican crossing over would have tipped the outcome. Although Mace is not on the House Rules Committee, she was among the 211 GOP members who voted against the move to bring the matter to the floor, leaving many on social media questioning her sincerity. Procedural or political? Democrats had sought to advance the amendment, first introduced by Representative Ro Khanna, via a procedural manoeuvre. The attempt followed the Rules Committee's decision to strike down the amendment the previous evening. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cách giao dịch ETH/USD mà không cần nắm giữ Ether IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Representative Mary Gay Scanlon introduced the motion on Tuesday to force a vote, but it failed narrowly. The measure would have forced the release of files related to the Epstein case, which is still a hot topic for both Republicans and Democrats, especially among supporters of US President Donald Trump. Many in the MAGA movement have long demanded more transparency about Epstein's network and connections. Even outspoken Republican figures such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, who have previously voiced support for releasing the Epstein files, voted against the motion. Mace defends her vote In a follow-up post on X, Mace attempted to clarify her position, saying the vote in question was being misrepresented. 'There was no vote on the Epstein files today... despite Democrats best efforts to trick the FAKE NEWS and YOU into thinking otherwise,' she wrote. She argued that the vote was simply a routine procedural action known as the 'Previous Question' (PQ), not about Epstein or any specific issue. 'If it fails, the minority takes over. In today's GOP-led Congress, Democrats have no shot at defeating the PQ. So they played games – knowing it would fail – and then falsely claimed Republicans voted against releasing the Epstein files,' Mace posted. She continued, 'Don't fall for it. A TOTAL and COMPLETE LIE. This was a routine, party-line procedural vote. Nothing more. In fact, a PQ hasn't failed since the 1980s.' However, another X Community Note said, 'Misleading. GOP twice blocked efforts to get Epstein files released,' citing Politico.

Explained: The dwarfism controversy at Lamine Yamal's 18th birthday party
Explained: The dwarfism controversy at Lamine Yamal's 18th birthday party

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Explained: The dwarfism controversy at Lamine Yamal's 18th birthday party

TL;DR Lamine Yamal threw a flashy, mafia-themed 18th birthday party, and things got messy when it came out that he had hired people with dwarfism as part of the entertainment. Disability rights groups weren't having it and called it out as degrading. Now there's a government investigation, legal threats, and a whole lot of media heat. Meanwhile, the performers say they were treated fine. As Yamal heads into Barça's pre-season, he's got more than just football to focus on. What happened? Barcelona's rising star Lamine Yamal is in hot water after footage leaked from his big 18th birthday bash. The party, held at a luxe mansion near Barcelona, had everything: A-listers, top DJs, and apparently, dwarf entertainers. Phones were supposed to be banned inside, but once the performers were spotted outside, it all went public. That's when things escalated. Disability advocacy groups quickly voiced outrage, saying the whole thing was offensive and demeaning. What is the public reaction? One of Spain's main disability rights groups, ADEE (Association for People with Achondroplasia and Other Skeletal Dysplasias), slammed the whole setup and filed a formal complaint. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Blind husband regains his sight, but doesn't tell his wife and he realizes he's been lied to for years. Novelodge Undo They say hiring people with dwarfism for entertainment like this breaks Spanish law, which is about dignity and not making a spectacle out of people's disabilities. Spain's Ministry of Social Rights backed that up and asked prosecutors to look into whether Yamal's party broke the rules. The message was clear: fame doesn't give you a free pass. Carolina Puente, who heads ADEE, was especially vocal. She's worried that this kind of thing sends the wrong message, especially coming from someone so young and influential. According to her, it's not just a bad look, it could be illegal. If the law was broken, fines could go up to €1 million. That's a hefty price tag for a birthday party. And then there's another twist. Claudia Calvo, a former Miss Teenager Spain, said she was approached about attending the party, but only if she met certain 'physical standards.' She turned it down and later posted about it, adding more fuel to the fire. Why this matters? Lamine Yamal isn't just some kid throwing a party. He's a breakout star and role model for a whole generation. When someone with that kind of influence does something that might reinforce old, harmful stereotypes, it doesn't go unnoticed. People look up to him, which means everything he does carries more weight, especially something like this. From a legal standpoint, this could actually be a big deal. It might become a major test case for how Spain enforces its disability rights laws when it comes to private events. It's not just about what's technically legal, it's about what society is willing to accept in 2025. Then there's the tricky part, navigating between respect and exploitation. Supporters of Yamal argue the performers were there by choice, they were paid, and they were treated respectfully. But critics say it doesn't matter if there was no bad intent. Hiring people just for how they look, especially when it's tied to their disability, can still be humiliating, even if everyone's smiling. What happens next? Right now, things are in the hands of Spain's legal system. The Ministry of Social Rights has officially asked prosecutors to dig deeper and decide if this broke the anti-discrimination law. Meanwhile, ADEE is pushing ahead with plans to sue. If things don't go Yamal's way, he could be facing up to a million euros in fines. So far, though, it's radio silence from Yamal. No public statement, no apology, nothing from his camp or FC Barcelona either. And the longer that silence lasts, the more people are starting to wonder what it says. There's growing concern that this whole situation reflects a bigger issue, a disconnect between celebrity lifestyles and the social standards that are rapidly evolving, especially around how entertainers with disabilities are treated. Bottom line What started as a private celebration quickly turned into a public controversy. Lamine Yamal's birthday party is now under serious legal and social scrutiny, and the stakes are bigger than just bad PR. This isn't just about one night, it's about what kind of culture we're building around fame, identity, and respect. Whether Yamal responds or not, this conversation is far from over.

IND vs ENG 3rd Test: Ravindra Jadeja once again goes the distance
IND vs ENG 3rd Test: Ravindra Jadeja once again goes the distance

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

IND vs ENG 3rd Test: Ravindra Jadeja once again goes the distance

Ravindra Jadeja hits out during day five of the third test match between England and India at Lord's in London (Photo by) London : During the Edgbaston Test, Ravindra Jadeja was asked if he felt let down when selectors didn't consider him for captaincy once other senior players like Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli and Ravichandran Ashwin had retired from the Test format. Jadeja smiled and replied, 'Let that be. That ship has sailed.' Having played 83 Tests, Ravindra Jadeja is the most experienced cricketer in the Indian team right now. He has mostly flown under the radar, but on Monday at Lord's, Jadeja stood tall and produced the most defining performance of his career away from home.' His unbeaten 61 off 181 balls is a knock that needs to be measured beyond the runs and time spent at the crease. It was about putting his hand up and announcing to the dressing room that he is in control. Jadeja has looked different on this tour of England. For a long time, he has been the quintessential carefree and happy-go-lucky player in the team. On this tour, he has been an elder brother to the younger team members who are trying to establish their Test careers. He comes early to practice sessions and goes through lengthier drills. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo That he has been at the ground, going through nets sessions, before the team's arrival on important batting days talks about the drive left in him. He wants to be the statesman in the team. India vs England: India fall short at Lord's, England lead series 2-1 Jadeja has also been working a lot with Kuldeep Yadav in the nets. The two have been hanging out together as well. Jadeja empathises with Kuldeep. 'I have been in his position as well. I understand it can be difficult. But sometimes you try to balance the team in such a way that it doesn't make space for everyone. But he is one kind of bowler who can help us take 20 wickets. I am sure if he gets an opportunity, he will be ready,' Jadeja had said at Edgbaston before quickly adding, 'We don't talk cricket when we go out.' Jadeja has had that kind of effect on the team. Captain Shubman Gill was effusive in his praise for Jadeja. 'He is one of India's most valuable players. The experience and the skill set that he brings with his bowling, batting and fielding makes him someone who is very rare and hard to find,' Gill remarked after the day's play on Monday. 'It was just tremendous to watch the kind of composure he showed today. I think batting with the lower order and the tail has been one of the things that we spoke about in the previous two matches. The lower order and the tail haven't been contributing as much. But the character and courage that they showed was tremendous,' Gill added. Much has been spoken of Ben Stokes and his allround skills. On the final day of the third Test, Jadeja wasn't going to let Stokes get away. There is a reason why Jadeja is at the top of the rankings as a Test allrounder. It required Jadeja's stomach for a fight to withstand Stokes' unrelenting spell of pace bowling. Poll Do you think Ravindra Jadeja should have been considered for captaincy after senior players retired? Yes, he deserves recognition No, the selectors made the right choice Every time Jadeja is picked by selectors, the perception around him is that he is more of a utility player, especially on overseas tours. The team still describes him as someone who can chip in and strengthen the batting, besides holding an end up with the ball. On this tour, he has brought consistency with the bat as well. He has notched up four half centuries on the trot, with each one being of significance. At 36, Jadeja may not have many years left in him. He keeps reminding the young boys around him in the team that he has retired from just one format. It could be that he has come out of the shadows of his contemporaries, who were bigger names. But he has certainly become the man in this team of boys. And he has done that with his usual smile and laughter. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store