Bankers' association pushes formal economy to the fore
Speaking at the iBusiness Forum seminar hosted on Tuesday by the Manager Group, Mr Payong said this approach would help drive economic mechanisms and boost Thai people's income over the next 5-7 years.
Last week, the Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry, and Banking (JSCCIB) held discussions with the Bank of Thailand (BoT) on economic support through public policy, as heightened uncertainties -- particularly due to the US tariffs -- are expected to impact both business and household sectors in various ways.
The private sector council proposed that the use of public policy to support the economy should primarily focus on the formal economy and Thai labour. Typically the formal economy covers both taxpayers and non-taxpayers.
According to Mr Payong, the current economic situation, impacted by US tariffs, presents an opportunity for both the public and private sectors to initiate meaningful reforms in economic and business practices.
During global crises in the past, many countries leveraged the situation to reform their economies and enhance their post-crisis potential.
For instance, during the global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, global GDP growth fell sharply -- dropping to 2.1% in 2008 and contracting by 1.3% in 2009 -- down from growth rates of 4.5% in 2006 and 4.4% in 2007.
In the aftermath, global GDP rebounded, reaching 4.5% in 2010 and 3.3% in 2011.
Similarly, during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, global GDP contracted by 2.9%. In response, many countries, including Southeast Asian nations, undertook significant economic reforms, leading to improved growth potential post-pandemic.
"Thailand, however, has not yet capitalised on such crises as opportunities for meaningful economic reform. Now is an opportune moment to implement reforms in preparation for future recovery," Mr Payong said.
He noted that reforms should focus on Thailand's export and manufacturing sectors, both of which are vulnerable to US tariffs, as well as long-standing structural issues.
Technological development is another critical area, which is essential for improving national productivity and upskilling the Thai workforce.
In 2024, Thailand ranked 39th globally in digital and technological skills, trailing Singapore (2nd), Indonesia (20th) and Malaysia (36th). ChatGPT adoption per internet user in Thailand stands at 6%, compared to 17% in the Philippines, 14% in Malaysia, 9% in Vietnam and 7% in Indonesia.
Mr Payong also stressed the need for increased investment in research and development (R&D) to boost productivity and GDP per capita. Currently, Thailand's R&D investment is less than 20% of GDP, he noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
3 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Blended finance for climate action
It takes policy support, commitment and also money to tackle climate change. For the latter, Thailand needs around 5-7 trillion baht in climate finance to achieve its carbon neutrality and net-zero emissions by 2050 and 2065, respectively. However, that's a target the country is still a long way away from. Relatively speaking, only 1.7 trillion baht has been spent on climate mitigation efforts between 2018 and May 2025. The picture for climate adaptation funding is much bleaker at only 148 billion baht. This serious gap in funding was the major talking point during the launch of the 2025 Climate Finance Tracker last month by Climate Finance Network Thailand (CFNT). Across two panel discussions and two keynote addresses (comprising leading voices from the Thai government, Bank of Thailand, the World Bank, and leading financial and academic institutions), the message was clear: more climate finance is needed, and the mechanisms to raise it must appeal to more investors. Why is there such a big difference in climate mitigation and adaptation funding? The answer is the private sector. A CFNT presentation on the climate finance landscape shows that it is the biggest contributor to climate mitigation finance, at over half of the 1.7 trillion-baht amount, surpassing contributions from the government and state-owned enterprises. However, adaptation finance is almost solely done by the government, as there is less of a commercial reason to do so. While funding for mitigation efforts still needs to be increased, it shows the strength of blended finance in action -- namely, the critical role of private investments that support government efforts. So what more can be done to spur more activity, for both mitigation and adaptation outcomes? Blended finance in a nutshell According to the OECD, blended finance refers to "the strategic use of development finance for the mobilisation of additional finance towards sustainable development", with the additional finance largely referring to funding from commercial sources. When looking through the lens of climate finance, blended finance can help to strategically meld funding from the public sector (like the government), multilateral development finance institutions (MDFIs), and philanthropic organisations with private capital to spur investments in climate activities, especially in developing countries where such financing can be considered 'risky'. This risk aspect is important to understand how blended finance works. Commercial and private investors typically deem investments into climate mitigation -- and even more so, adaptation -- activities to be financially unviable and something that would not generate returns. So, blended finance puts the burden of risk on governments, MDFIs, and philanthropies to make climate financing more viable and enticing to the private sector (for example, corporations or commercial financial institutions). It can also be seen as a form of concessional capital, whereby such mechanisms can facilitate private funding under terms more favourable than existing market conditions. The adaptation finance shortfall Blended finance isn't new. Yet, as noted earlier, much of its activity has been in the climate mitigation space. There are typically more commercial reasons for private investors to fund climate mitigation. For instance, to help manage supply chain disruption risks caused by climate change, and, in some markets (especially more advanced ones), it is necessary to adhere to state-mandated emissions regulations. There are also reputational reasons in terms of enhancing a brand's image or attracting consumers and investors who are more environmentally conscious. Here, the "carrot" and "stick" are clear. However, for climate adaptation, only the "stick" is really present, coming in the form of climate impacts clearly causing harm to societal health and well-being. While there are economic losses projected -- of a not-so-insignificant amount of up to 1 trillion baht, according to Unescap estimates -- this is seen as abstract and includes factors well beyond just commercial activities. This is why financing for adaptation pales in comparison to mitigation. But what sort of blended finance mechanisms can spark more private sector interest in adaptation funding? Here are a few: Guarantees This mechanism utilises capital from public or philanthropic sources to absorb some of the risk associated with climate-related investments. For private investors, such guarantees can reduce the potential for loss and encourage them to take part in projects that address climate change. Examples include first-loss guarantees, whereby the guarantor absorbs the initial losses, making the project more appealing to other investors. There are also partial credit guarantees, which can cover some of the potential losses to reduce overall private investor risk. Meanwhile, green guarantees refer to specific guarantee types that focus on climate-related projects, often used to support the issuance of green bonds. Grants Essentially, these are funds given without any expectation of returns. They often come from MDFIs (such as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank) and philanthropies, and are typically used to jumpstart projects. They are usually supplemented with research and capacity development via technical assistance. Preferably, this assistance should be provided for the entire duration of the project being funded, from the initial planning stages to ensuring that it can be operated and monitored in the long run. Subordinated debts A financing mechanism where the lender agrees to be repaid after other, senior creditors in case of a default. The subordinate debt, in this context, is considered "junior" to other, senior debt, meaning it is repaid only after senior debt holders are fully paid. Still some way to go Blended finance can help alleviate the concerns of private investors while also allowing different types of investors with different risk appetites to work together for a common goal. That's not to say it isn't growing; the World Bank stated that private sector investment in blended finance for climate action grew by 200% in 2023. However, more needs to be done, and time's running out -- we need to address critical areas of climate adaptation before it's too late. Currently, many promising climate adaptation projects in Thailand (such as sustainable water infrastructure, urban resilience, and sustainable agriculture) are conceived and carried out by government officials, civil society and philanthropic organisations, or even local communities. Yet, the barriers to improving the projects' effectiveness and scaling them up include the lack of technical skills -- especially when creating and maintaining monitoring systems to measure and report outcomes. These groups also require better financial knowledge, namely when securing loans and managing climate adaptation finances. This is a gap that can be capably filled by Thailand's well-developed and sophisticated private sector and private financial institutions, yet their involvement has been close to non-existent. Hence, adaptation finance should be viewed as not expenses, but as worthwhile investments, as its purpose is to help avoid or reduce climate change's social and economic impacts. The effects of climate change do not discriminate. At the end of the day, they will come for all of us.
Bangkok Post
3 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Why is North Korea courting Russian tourists?
Hoping to replenish state coffers with much-needed foreign exchange reserves and offset the sharp post-Covid decline in Chinese tour groups, the Hermit Kingdom has set its sights on inquisitive holiday-makers from an ideologically aligned Russia. On July 27, Russian budget carrier Nordwind Airlines launched the first non-stop civilian flight from Moscow to Pyongyang in 77 years with more than 400 passengers allegedly on board. The inaugural monthly air route between both nations' capitals came on the heels of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un personally unveiling a newly developed, state-of-the-art beach resort in the Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Area at the end of June -- only to prohibit overseas arrivals a week thereafter. Curiously enough, this blanket entry ban applied to all outsiders except Russians -- 15 of whom spent a week in Pyongyang and Wonsan doing the bidding of a pro-Kremlin police state. As a reciprocal gesture of goodwill for the roughly 14,000 North Korean troops dispatched just under a year ago to fend off Ukraine's Kursk offensive on top of Pyongyang supplying up to 40% of Moscow's total ammunition for the "special military operation" since August 2023, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov encouraged leisure seekers from Russia to visit the luxury seaside complex during his trip there in mid-July. For the deeply insecure and paranoid Kim dynasty, however, tourism promotion remains something of a double-edged sword. While bespoke tour packages peddled by state-owned travel agencies help the North Korean regime, there is a real danger of importing ideas and virtues that run counter to the militant self-sufficiency -- known as Juche -- which the reclusive East Asian country swears by. Westerners, in this regard, are looked upon as particularly inconvenient guests, not least because the noisy, rough-and-tumble democracies they hail from happen to be an anathema to the hereditary handover of power and the fabled "Paektu bloodline" that characterises North Korea. Arguably, the most notable and high-profile cultural clash to have arisen from these conflicting governance models was the incarceration of American college student Otto Warmbier by North Korean law enforcement authorities in January 2016. The then 21-year-old undergraduate was detained en route back to the United States and handed a draconian 15-year prison sentence for stealing a propaganda poster from a cordoned off section of his Pyongyang hotel. Despite the Trump administration securing his premature release and repatriation just 17 months later, an already paralysed and barely conscious Warmbier perished within days of returning home due to torture-induced brain damage. For the sake of averting such PR disasters, the North Korean government likely concluded that hosting Russian visitors is a much safer bet given their conformist nature and disinclination to deviate from officially accepted behaviour in a society where the stakes for independent thinking or open discourse could not be higher. It is worth recalling that prior to the coronavirus outbreak, an estimated 300,000 Chinese nationals frequented North Korea annually and accounted for around 90% of inbound tourists. That said, communist China's decision to fling its doors open to foreigners from 75 countries over the past couple of years has seen several predominantly Apec nations respond in kind. Beyond recurrent calls by certain EU member states to bar Vladimir Putin's subjects from the Schengen Area, some Russian tourists now routinely overstay their welcome, exude a false sense of entitlement in Kremlin-friendly Global South destinations, from Indonesia to Sri Lanka to Uzbekistan. The fact that they have begun flocking in record numbers to heavily embargoed jurisdictions such as Cuba and Iran speaks volumes about the unprecedented mobility constraints ordinary Russians currently face. Mindful of this, Chairman Kim is stepping up efforts to ensure North Korea ticks all the right boxes for the "brotherly" people of Russia. In February 2024, a group of 98 Russian journalists, students, social media influencers and travel bloggers were the first non-nationals to be granted access to the DPRK "under special circumstances" following a four-year Covid-inspired lockdown. Yet unlike that batch from Vladivostok, which, to their credit, made no bones about the suffocating restrictions they were subjected to or North Korea's untold internal deficiencies, the 15 Muscovites who headed there this time around were on a myth-busting mission to normalise and whitewash Mr Kim's gross mismanagement of his personal fiefdom. Aside from singing the praises of Pyongyang's ultra-modern architecture, Wonsan's pristine beaches and the mouth-watering local cuisine they were treated to, perhaps most telling was Anastasiya Samsonova's testimony to Sky News on witnessing "nothing terrible" in North Korea and feeling "absolutely free". That the 33-year-old HR manager and her fellow compatriots did not consider having a state-appointed minder leading them by the nose to pre-approved sites of interest and policing who they interacted with a violation of their freedom reflects how low a bar Russian tourists set for themselves when venturing abroad. Among the reasons why Russians are supplanting their Chinese counterparts as the primary target audience of North Korea's nascent tourism industry is thanks to increasingly strained ties between Moscow and Washington. Whereas Donald Trump's unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and subsequent "maximum pressure campaign," vis-à-vis Iran, garnered a great deal of attention during his first term in office, he adopted an equally hardline and hawkish approach towards North Korea with the exception of the 2018-19 period when diplomacy was given a chance by both parties to little avail. Needless to say, the Hermit Kingdom is still a US-designated "state sponsor of terrorism" and also features on the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF's) blacklist, meaning that any individual or entity caught bankrolling Bureau 39 -- the Kim family dictatorship's unofficial slush fund -- remains fair game for secondary sanctions. The rationale behind Nordwind Airlines operating charter flights to Pyongyang rather than Aeroflot was down to fears of the latter being denied US landing rights, as the Russian and American negotiating teams earlier pushed for a resumption of the pre-war direct Moscow-New York service.
Bangkok Post
3 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Flash touts tech as key to sustainability
Resilience, technology-driven operations and hands-on leadership will be key to Flash Group ensuring sustainability during its post-unicorn era, according to the group's executives. The Thai e-commerce logistics service provider also promotes a flat organisational structure and a persistent "never give up" mindset as being among its core values. Komsan Lee, chief executive of Flash Group, said becoming a unicorn (a startup with a value of more than US$1 billion) does not eliminate challenges, as failures are a constant part of the business journey. Mr Komsan and Weijie Di, co-founder and chief operations officer of Flash Express, shared their insights regarding business success at Techsauce Global Summit 2025 on Wednesday. LUCK PLAYS A PART Flash Group attributes a large part of its growth and achievements to luck, specifically being in the right country, industry, and with the right team. "Luck plays a significant role in success, particularly being in the right place at the right time, with the right people," said Mr Komsan. When Mr Komsan was just 29 years old, he reshaped Thailand's startup landscape. Born into a humble family of Chinese descent in the mountainous village of Doi Wawee in Chiang Rai, Mr Komsan journeyed from rural hardship to tech stardom. While at university, Mr Komsan entered into several business ventures that subsequently flourished over the following years. In 2018, with a personal investment of 400 million baht, Mr Komsan set up Flash Express, a subsidiary of Flash Group. Three years later, Flash Express became the first Thai unicorn startup after raising US$150 million in Series D+ and E funding. Flash Group has since expanded across Southeast Asia, cementing its role as a regional logistics leader. Despite facing turbulent times, including a 2.1-billion-baht loss in 2022, Flash rebounded to post 24.7 billion baht in revenue last year and nearly 1 billion baht in profit, marking its most successful year. Mr Komsan's entrepreneurial journey caught the attention of Thai film studio GDH 559, which produced the series Mad Unicorn, comprising seven episodes. The series streams on Netflix. He said his spirit of resilience, innovation and ambition proved the most unlikely beginnings can lead to extraordinary success. Mr Weijie said technology, especially self-developed software and algorithms, is fundamental to managing the workforce of a large operation efficiently and reducing costs. "We eliminated inefficiency in human resources [HR] prior to digitalisation. This included issues such as overselling or over-recruiting, as well as difficulties in managing employee attendance, overtime claims, and leave requests, leading to substantial cost overruns," he said. Implementing an electronic HR and organisational agility system helped reduce HR costs by half. "We embrace tech in every company process," said Mr Weijie. Flash relies heavily on science and technology, specifically large amounts of self-developed software and algorithms, to manage the group's 54,000 employees. This approach has increased efficiency, particularly in managing remote or new markets, he said. The company designed in-house software and algorithms based on the Southeast Asian market context, as Chinese software was unsuitable, said Mr Weijie. Mr Komsan said effective enterprise management hinges on mastering rhythm, ensuring that business development speed, personnel quality, financial resources and capital flow are aligned and keep pace with growth and new ventures. Moreover, a "never give up" mindset is crucial for overcoming challenges, he said. "Although the company continues to grow, we maintain a flat organisational structure and require managers to be hands-on to improve efficiency and avoid the bureaucratic pitfalls of large traditional companies," said Mr Komsan. He said core values such as putting the customer first, teamwork, integrity, and dedication, must remain consistent even as the company scales. POWER OF AI Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a significant opportunity and a priority for most businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises in countries like Thailand, said Mr Komsan, adding the focus should be on how to utilise AI tools to enhance capabilities, rather than solely on creativity. "AI will amplify the strong and weaken the weak, widening the gap. Therefore, the immediate focus should be on practical applications to boost business capabilities and competitiveness," he said. Working teams that use AI tools will achieve better results than those that do not, said Mr Komsan. AI democratises entrepreneurship by breaking down knowledge barriers and significantly lowering the cost of realising ideas. Previously launching initiatives often required extensive development teams and a large company in terms of scale, but AI now means such endeavours are accessible even to small teams with limited resources, he said. Mr Komsan said the entrepreneurial environment offers significant opportunities for small businesses leveraging AI, making success less dependent on wealth or having a large team. He said there are significant growth opportunities in terms of consumption for local brands with potential internationally, as well as in deep-tech biomedicine in Southeast Asia, particularly in countries like Thailand, due to strong local markets, service quality and medical excellence.
