Dalit activist targeted with casteist slurs
Rajkot: A Dalit social worker from Amreli district was allegedly subjected to casteist slurs on Instagram, after he participated in a protest against the movement of heavy vehicles for wind turbine construction on village roads in Lathi taluka.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Naresh Vala, the complainant, lodged a case at
station against an Instagram user named Raol Vanrajsinh Chavda.
Police booked the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Information Technology Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The alleged offence can be traced back to Dec, when the sarpanch of Shekhpipariya village alerted Vala about the unlawful use of village roads by vehicles carrying wind turbine construction material.
Despite requests from the panchayat for an alternative route to be used, the transporters continued to use the village roads.
Vala visited the village to take up the matter with those involved in the construction. This escalated into a confrontation that required police intervention. He later spoke about the matter on a Facebook Live session.
After this, Vala began receiving abusive comments on his Instagram posts from the said account. His efforts to engage with the account holder went unanswered.
On April 25, Vala received a particularly offensive comment containing casteist abuse and derogatory remarks about Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar and the Constitution. He alleged that these posts defamed him and incited communal disharmony.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Bengaluru Stampede Victim Files FIR Against RCB, Karnataka Cricket Body, DNA Firm
Last Updated: The FIR, which has been filed at the Cubbon Park Police Station, has also named Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and event organiser DNA, responsible for the stampede. In mounting legal woes for Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) over its IPL 2025 victory celebrations that led to a fatal stampede in Bengaluru, a man, claiming to be a victim of the incident, has filed First Information Report (FIR) holding the entities responsible for the deadly incident. The FIR, which has been filed at the Cubbon Park Police Station, has also named Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and event organiser DNA agency, responsible for the M Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede which claimed 11 lives and left several others injured. In the FIR, the stampede survivor, identified as 25-year-old Rolan Gomes, who reportedly got fractured his right shoulder joint after getting caught in the stampede, accused the three entities of negligence, saying that they 'failed to make proper arrangements and facilities." The complainant further pointed out that the announcement of the celebration was disseminated widely across RCB's social media platforms. These posts, he noted, specified that entry would be complimentary, with tickets to be distributed at the venue, particularly in the vicinity of Gate No 17, as reported by NDTV. He added that some posts also suggested unofficial ticket sales. Gomes further recounted arriving at one of the stadium gates around 2:15 PM to find a massive crowd of RCB fans. He stated that police officers opened the gate around 3:10 PM, leading to 'thousands of people rushing simultaneously through the narrow gate and the stampede occurred. 'I slipped and fell, and people behind me trampled over those who had fallen. I saw several others lose consciousness due to the crush," the 25-year-old said. 'Their irresponsibility resulted in a tragic situation with loss of life and injuries. Therefore, I am giving this statement requesting that appropriate legal action be taken against them," he added. The second FIR against RCB, the event management firm DNA, and KSCA came a day after the first FIR was registered against them on various charges, including culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The FIR was filed following a complaint by a police inspector at the Cubbon Park Police Station. The charges listed in the FIR include voluntarily causing hurt (Section 115), causing hurt or grievous hurt by using dangerous weapons or means (Section 118), causing hurt or grievous hurt to deter a public servant from duty (Section 121), and unlawful assembly (Section 190) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Legal Action Against Entities On Thursday, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had instructed the DGP and IGP of the state to immediately arrest the representatives of RCB and DNA event managers and Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) in connection with the stampede, as prima facie there was 'irresponsibility" and 'carelessness" on their part. Earlier today, four officials of RCB and the event management firm DNA Entertainment Private Limited were taken into custody . Hours later, the Karnataka High Court granted interim protection from coercive action against KSCA after they approached the high court. In its writ petition, the KSCA argued that the government is attempting to shift blame onto the association to deflect public outrage over the stampede. The association further claimed that crowd management was not its responsibility and that the FIR was unjustified. What Happened At Chinnaswamy Stadium? A massive crowd gathered to celebrate Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB) first Indian Premier League (IPL) title turned tragic on Wednesday evening when a stampede near M Chinnaswamy Stadium left 11 dead and over 30 injured. Authorities said most of the victims were young men and women, including several students. RCB ended an 18-year wait for the IPL trophy after defeating Punjab Kings at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Bengaluru. Post their win, the team arrived in Bengaluru for a felicitation ceremony. Fans had arrived in large numbers to catch a glimpse of their champion team. News india Bengaluru Stampede Victim Files FIR Against RCB, Karnataka Cricket Body, DNA Firm
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
'We Suspect Kidnapping': Family Of Indore Woman Missing In Meghalaya During Honeymoon
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. A newly married woman, Sonam, went missing during her honeymoon in Meghalaya. Her husband, Raja, was found murdered. Her family suspects kidnapping and urges police to intensify the search. They request the CBI's involvement as hope dwindles. Guwahati: The brother of a newly married woman who went missing during her honeymoon in Meghalaya has told the police their family suspects she has been kidnapped. Rescuers have made no headway in the search for Sonam, a tourist from Indore whose husband, Raja Raghuvanshi, was found murdered in a gorge in Meghalaya's East Khasi Hills district. The missing woman's brother, Govind Raghuvanshi, said they believe she is alive and have no reason to think otherwise. The family also asked the case to be taken up by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). "It has been so many days and the search team has not got any clue. The rescuers have not yet found her phone or bag. So, this is kidnapping. We appeal to the police and the rescuers not to give up hope and change their tack to find her alive," Govind Raghuvanshi said. "Some 200 metres below the place where Raja's body was found, there were tonnes of garbage. If this place is isolated, then who is dumping garbage? It must be the locals. Who would know that a body had to be dumped on that pile of garbage?" he said. The Indore couple's phones showed the tower location of Nongriat before they went missing. However, the last post on Instagram by Raja was from Weisawdong - all places near the popular tourist hotspot Cherrapunji or Sohra. Sonam last spoke to her mother-in-law on May 23 afternoon. The couple's phones got switched off after that. The police have recovered a stained weapon which they believed was used in the murder of Raja, while a raincoat was also found in Mawkma village, a few kilometres from the gorge where Raja's body was found. Mawkma is located between the crime scene and Sohrarim, where a scooter used by the couple was found abandoned on May 23. Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma expressed grief and called it a very unfortunate incident. He told the family the state government and the police are working at every level to investigate the incident and punish whoever is found guilty. The Indore couple got married on May 11 and left for Meghalaya on May 20.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie review: Asif Ali film claims to spotlight ‘issues faced by men'; but is that its true intent?
Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie review: At a crucial moment in debutant director Sethunath Padmakumar's Abhyanthara Kuttavali, Sahadevan (Asif Ali) breaks the fourth wall and tells the audience directly, 'Don't bother reacting; after all, it's a man who died.' He also, during a court hearing, comments on the rising number of suicide cases among men in the country, particularly owing to 'marriage-related problems'. While the well-being of every person, regardless of caste, gender, race or creed, is equally important, and many experts have pointed out that patriarchy harms everyone, including men, Abhyanthara Kuttavali positions itself as an attempt to spotlight issues faced by men. Particularly focusing on how 'fake cases' are slapped on them without humane consideration. However, in all honesty, the film ends up being a brazen attempt to overlook and invisibilise the harassment and crimes women have faced for centuries, mostly at the hands of men, by reducing it all to three cases (including two subplots) told through a masculinist lens, by completely villainising the female characters. Although his marriage to Nayana (Thulasi) was a joyous occasion for Sahadevan, his happiness was short-lived. He soon ends up at the Anthikad police station after she files a complaint accusing him of demanding more dowry and physically abusing her. As a result, the police register a case against him under Section 498A of the IPC (now Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). As Sahadevan narrates to the police the 'truths' behind the incidents mentioned in the complaint, Abhyanthara Kuttavali cuts to flashbacks, in which we are shown that Nayana, though seemingly happy, has been keeping a distance from Sahadevan since day one. They barely even communicate, let alone have physical intimacy. Nayana soon tells Sahadevan that she wishes to pursue higher studies in the Netherlands, which would help settle there too, and suggests selling the gold ornaments her parents gifted her to fund it. When he objects, she is shown injuring herself. Her parents soon arrive and take her back home, following which she files the complaint. Once the case reaches the court, Sahadevan meets two other men — Peter (Sidharth Bharathan) and Makkar (Harisree Ashokan) — who are also dealing with unfair cases filed against them by their wife and daughter-in-law, respectively, as the system 'only favours the women'. The remainder of the film follows Sahadevan's efforts to prove his innocence. Although Abhyanthara Kuttavali mentions at the start that it is a 'work of fiction', the movie leaves no opportunity to generalise things and give good conduct certificates to men. This is achieved by cleverly portraying the male characters as noble and good-natured, albeit with some flaws like occasional drinking, while most of the women are depicted as apathetic, manipulative and often 'gold diggers'. From Sahadevan, his father Menon (Balachandran Chullikkad), and his friends Yudas (Anand Manmadhan) and Deshavasi (Azees Nedumangad) to Peter and Makkar, all the men are portrayed with sympathy, their moral grey areas conveniently omitted. Even Viswanathan (Jagadeesh), Nayana's lawyer, is ultimately shown in a positive light. In contrast, nearly all the female characters, except for elderly women who conform to the patriarchal norms of the 'ideal mother', are presented as greedy and lacking compassion. To reinforce this, the film even includes a scene where a woman is shown asking Yudas about his financial assets in detail during a pennukaanal (matchmaking visit), prompting him to give a lecture on how women should fend for themselves. In another instance, one of the few self-reliant women in the film, Anila (Shreya Rukmini), an assistant to Sahadevan's advocate, is shown sitting silently in court during the only time she appears on her senior's behalf without speaking up for her client. Although the scene suggests that she is too inexperienced and intimidated to argue in front of Viswanathan, prompting Sahadevan to represent himself, it inadvertently implies that even women who do have a voice choose not to speak up when men are the victims, leaving the latter to fight for themselves. The film is, in fact, packed with similar stereotypical and misogynistic narrative devices that reduce the complex topic of 'issues faced by men' to 'women are misusing the laws (and the freedom they have been 'given')'. It fails to even acknowledge the structural and systemic challenges men face within a patriarchal and elitist society, where only the rich and affluent wield real power. Towards the end, seemingly in an attempt to suggest that the film isn't anti-women, Abhyanthara Kuttavali shows Nayana and one of her friends briefly addressing their life struggles. 'Interestingly', this is one of the few occasions wherein the movie gives the women the chance to narrate their stories. Almost all other times, we are only shown the men's versions. While Nayana's friend shares how she lost a hand due to violence inflicted by her father, Nayana herself recounts how harassment by a teacher made her detest men and marriage altogether, prompting the two to decide to move abroad together and live in freedom. Nayana mentions this as the reason why she agreed to marry Sahadevan, as it would give her complete ownership of the gold gifted by her parents, which would help them fund their dream. However, their stories appear only as passing references, quickly dropped after five minutes. Just a (rhetorical) question to the makers: what about the heinous crimes faced by these women? It is certain that these were only the tip of the iceberg of the torments they faced in life, including many forms of daily sexual harassment. Were their sufferings not as important as Sahadevan's to get more screentime and a bit of empathy? While the film addresses the issue of false cases being filed against men, which in no way should be encouraged, it conveniently overlooks the many, many, many instances of women facing physical and emotional abuse within their own homes, the vast majority of which go unreported. A low conviction rate in such cases does not automatically imply that all cases are fabricated. It's high time we acknowledged that reality. By presenting a one-sided narrative, writer-director Sethunath Padmakumar ensures that Abhyanthara Kuttavali caters to a male audience, particularly those who blindly believe that men's victimhood exists solely because there are legal protections for the oppressed. The film offers these viewers enough 'goosebumps-inducing' moments, especially through quite a few dialogues that denounce alimony. Had men opened their mouths and moved their fingers as diligently and ferociously as they did following the Bengaluru techie suicide of December 2024, the world might have been a better place for all by now. Although Asif Ali delivers a neat performance as Sahadevan, it can't be called impactful, largely because the film relies heavily on dialogues to convey his emotions rather than allowing his acting to speak for itself. Nonetheless, there are moments in Abhyanthara Kuttavali where Asif's strength as a performer in communicating intense emotions through restrained acting shines. Despite limited screen time, Harisree Ashokan makes a strong impression as Makkar. Azees Nedumangad and Anand Manmadhan provide some comic relief, though not all the jokes land consistently. Thulasi, as Nayana, is unfortunately underwhelming. There are several moments in the movie, especially those meant to depict her anger or sorrow, where her portrayal comes across as caricatured. Rahul Raj's background score, however, does manage to elevate Abhyanthara Kuttavali to some extent and prevents it from slipping entirely into preachy territory. Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie cast: Asif Ali, Jagadeesh, Harisree Ashokan, Sidharth Bharathan, Thulasi, Shreya Rukmini Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie director: Sethunath Padmakumar Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie rating: 1.5 stars Anandu Suresh is a Senior sub-editor at Indian Express Online. He specialises in Malayalam cinema, but doesn't limit himself to it and explores various aspects of the art form. He also pens a column titled Cinema Anatomy, where he delves extensively into the diverse layers and dimensions of cinema, aiming to uncover deeper meanings and foster continuous discourse. Anandu previously worked with The New Indian Express' news desk in Hyderabad, Telangana. You can follow him on Twitter @anandu_suresh_ and write (or send movie recommendations) to him at ... Read More
