logo
Climate change is spoiling food faster, making hundreds of millions of people sick around the world

Climate change is spoiling food faster, making hundreds of millions of people sick around the world

Yahoo26-04-2025

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Global warming has made it easier for bacteria and other germs to contaminate the food supply, and this little-discussed danger of climate change is teaching painful and sometimes life-threatening lessons to hundreds of millions of people every year. One of them is Sumitra Sutar, 75, of Haroli village in India's Maharashtra state.
Five years ago Sutar was eating leftover rice and lentil curry, her staple food for more than five decades. This time, her routine meal caused her to start vomiting "at least 15 times a day," she recalled recently. Eventually, she learned the culprit was a foodborne bacteria that produces toxins that can lead to vomiting, eye inflammation, and respiratory tract infections. Global warming has made the world more welcoming for the pathogen, Bacillus cereus, to grow in food stored after cooking. One study found that domestic rice cooking can be insufficient to inactivate its spores.
Researchers and health workers are sounding the alarm: The food supply is vulnerable to greater spoilage due to more frequent extreme heat, floods and droughts, boosting the risk of contamination and outbreaks of foodborne diseases. Extreme heat can hasten food spoilage by allowing bacteria to multiply faster, experts say. Rising waters from severe floods can contaminate crops with sewage or other unwanted waste products, while higher humidity can promote growth of salmonella bacteria on lettuce and other produce eaten raw. The World Health Organization estimates that 600 million people fall sick every year from foodborne diseases, leading to 420,000 deaths. Children under five years old are at especially high risk, and every year 125,000 children lose their lives because of such largely preventable diseases.
Many factors including farming practices and global food supply chains have made such problems much more prevalent, and a growing body of research has highlighted how climate change also plays a big role.
A review study published in eBiomedicine this year found that for every 1.8 F (1 C) rise in temperature, the threat of non-typhoidal salmonella and campylobacter, bacteria that can make people sick, usually by causing food poisoning, increased by 5%.
Related: How does E. coli get into food?
Sutar's village has reported a severe rise in the temperature in the past decade, with summer heat that can top 109.4 F (43 C). Many people across the region have reported a rise in foodborne illnesses, says community health care worker Padmashri Sutar, also Sumitra Sutar's daughter-in-law.
A review article published in Climatic Change noted that higher temperatures and changing precipitation patterns lead to the proliferation of foodborne pathogens, including the most common: salmonella, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Campylobacter jejuni.
"Increased temperatures promote the growth of bacteria like listeria, campylobacter and salmonella in perishable foods like meat, dairy and seafood," said one of its authors, Ahmed Hamad, lecturer of food hygiene and control at Egypt's Benha University.
A study from northwestern Mexico examined how environmental factors influenced the outbreak of salmonella species, the bacteria responsible for many foodborne diseases globally. It found the maximum prevalence in areas with higher temperatures between 35 and 37 °C (95-98.6 F) and annual precipitation greater than 1,000 mm (39.4 inches).
Another paper published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology this year found climate change will increase the risk of foodborne diseases caused by Salmonella enterica, noting that high humidity boosts salmonella growth. This bacteria already affects 1.2 million people in the U.S. annually.
In extreme heat, ready-to-eat products pose a higher risk of causing foodborne illnesses, warns Hudaa Neetoo, associate professor in microbiology and food safety at the University of Mauritius.
"During heat waves, the level of pathogenic microorganisms in these products can increase considerably and attain a level sufficient to cause illness because they do not require any final heat-killing step."
Along with heat waves, she said, flooding can cause manure runoff from adjacent animal pastures to croplands, contaminating agricultural produce including salads, vegetables and leafy greens meant to be consumed raw.
"Animal manure can harbor human pathogens such as enteropathogenic E. coli, salmonella and campylobacter, and research has found that domestic washing alone is not sufficient to decontaminate produce and bring the levels of organisms down to a safe level," she said.
She also warned of systemic contamination of produce by pathogens that enter crops through the roots and become internalized and harder to get rid of.
Another direct impact of flooding, overflowing sewage systems, "can contaminate crops and water sources with harmful pathogens like salmonella, E. coli and norovirus. Flooding can also introduce pathogens into irrigation systems, increasing the risk of crop contamination," Hamad said.
Indirect effects of climate change can also lead to outbreaks of foodborne diseases. A paper published in the Journal of Health Monitoring mentioned that as fresh water becomes scarcer, treated wastewater may be used to irrigate crops, potentially carrying pathogens from animal or human feces. This can heighten the risk of contamination.
"When communities rely entirely on wastewater reuse, the primary objective must be to treat this water to a level of safety that poses no risk to consumers," said Martin Richter, head of a food safety unit at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment and one of the paper's authors. "Sometimes one copy of the pathogen is enough to cause disease," so wastewater must be thoroughly treated. He suggested prioritizing fresh water to irrigate foods typically consumed raw while using treated wastewater on crops that are generally cooked.
"Cooking food at 70 degrees Celsius [158 F] for at least two minutes destroys most of the pathogens that may be present on its surface," he said.
Community health care worker Padmashri Sutar says that people in her village have stopped cooking with river water and rely entirely on groundwater.
"In the past, many people in the village fell sick after drinking river water, so they completely avoid it now."
She said many people need education on the connection between climate change and foodborne illnesses.
"To make people aware of this, I give simple examples, such as the rise in frequency of food spoilage."
She also urges people to clean their water containers after floods or heavy rainfall, and she discusses how pathogens and bacteria can now contaminate vegetables and milk much more easily.
People who have participated in awareness sessions now eat fewer leftovers.
"They prefer cooking fresh food now and buying only the required number of vegetables," she said.
Health care workers need more long-term data on climate change and foodborne illnesses, Neetoo said.
"Universities should conduct long-term surveillance studies and trend analysis to allow better prediction of the impact of climate change on food systems."
She also advocates researching new ways to decontaminate warehouses, containers and food products affected by floodwater.
Hamad called for improving surveillance and monitoring to detect potential outbreaks early. He added that infrastructure should be improved to ensure food processing and distribution systems can withstand extreme weather events and sanitation infrastructure is robust, especially in flood-prone areas.
Experts stressed the need to educate people about the role of climate change in foodborne illnesses.
"Many people see climate change as purely an environmental issue, without recognizing its profound effects on public health, including the increased risks of foodborne diseases," Hamad said.
A prominent misconception is that cold weather kills all pathogens.
"Certain bacteria, like listeria, can still grow at cold temperatures, posing risks even in cooler climates," he explained.
Sutar said people often interrupt her when she talks about the reasons behind the rise in foodborne illnesses. They repeat the common belief that poor food handling is the sole reason behind these diseases. She patiently explains how climate change exacerbates the growth of pathogens in the environment and water sources.
RELATED STORIES
—E. coli in the gut may fuel a 'chain reaction' leading to Parkinson's, early study suggests
—The deadliest viruses in history
–Nearly 3 million extra deaths by 2030 could result from HIV funding cuts, study suggests
"People don't want to accept that even climate change can lead to foodborne illness," Sutar said, adding that many in her region don't report such illnesses because they don't take them seriously and think they're an isolated case that does not warrant public attention. Meanwhile, many other people in the area also suffer from vomiting, fever, gastrointestinal problems and several other issues because of eating contaminated food.
Sutar said she has become an evangelist spreading the word about climate and the food supply.
"I ask people not only to observe the changing climatic patterns but also carefully consider what's on their plate."
This article was originally published by Yale Climate Connections. This article by Yale Climate Connections is published here as part of the global journalism collaboration Covering Climate Now.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The NHS teams mopping up sloppy foreign surgery
The NHS teams mopping up sloppy foreign surgery

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The NHS teams mopping up sloppy foreign surgery

As consultant plastic surgeon at Manchester's busy Wythenshawe Hospital, a typical day for Dr Fouzia Choukairi involves spending hours in the operating theatre reconstructing someone's limbs following a terrible traffic accident. But every few weeks, she or an on-call colleague will be buzzed to the A&E department where, among the melee of broken bones, bleeding gashes and limping children, she will face a different challenge: performing sometimes life-saving treatment on a patient who has returned from overseas having had cosmetic surgery. 'They may have had tummy tucks [abdominoplasty] or breast implants,' she explains. 'But then they will have got a wound or implant infection after flying home, and they may be very, very sick. They can need life-saving treatment, and it can involve a huge team – not just the A&E staff but surgeons, microbiologists, intensive care specialists, anaesthetists, nurses, wound care and rehabilitation staff. 'The patients are often very grateful, and sometimes verbally regret having had the surgery,' she adds. 'I guess you're not going to stop people from going abroad for surgery, but we do feel patients are not well-informed or well-equipped to deal with any complications.' For years, NHS staff have voiced concern at having to 'mop up the mess' caused by foreign cosmetic procedures mostly undertaken in Turkey, considered the medical tourism capital of the world. All too often, they say, the promise of cheap liposuction, BBLs (Brazilian butt lifts), facelifts and hair transplants promoted online and sold as part of 'luxury holiday packages' can result instead in infections, blood clots, sepsis, deformities and even death. Now, however, they are warning of a new issue – that of antibiotic-resistant superbugs being brought back from overseas into UK hospitals by these patients. 'Turkey is a gateway between East and West,' explains Dr Choukairi, who also works at Hale Private Clinic in Manchester. 'You have a huge mixture of people from all over the world flowing through these hospitals, airports and hotels. The patient would have travelled back on a plane, perhaps with open wounds or dressings, and they can pick up multi-resistant bugs at any of these steps. 'Usually, antibiotics can target infections very efficiently but if you're faced with a multi-resistant bug or an unusual bug, you have to throw broad-spectrum antibiotics at it, which are not as efficient and may take longer to clear it. 'If the person is very sick and requires intensive care, this is the worst-case scenario. And, of course, there is a small risk these bugs can be passed onto the person in the next bed if, say, they are immunosuppressed or also have open wounds.' Her concern over antibiotic-resistant bugs being brought into the NHS is not in isolation. At the recent Royal College of Nursing annual conference in Liverpool, NHS nurses spoke of 'horrific' wounds and infections seen in patients following overseas surgery. Nykoma Hamilton, an infection control nurse in Fife, Scotland, said patients were increasingly infected with bacteria resistant to even the strongest antibiotics – a group of drugs called carbapenems, which are used as a last resort when all other antibiotics have proved ineffective. Describing the superbugs as the 'absolute granddaddy of resistance', she told the conference that NHS hospitals and clinics in her area had recorded a 'near 30 per cent' increase in carbapenem-resistant bacteria in recent years. 'Our concerns relate to the fact that a lot of people are colonised with a lot of extensively drug-resistant organisms,' she said. It is an alarming development. The World Health Organisation has previously warned that the world is heading for a 'post-antibiotic' era, with figures from the UK Health Security Agency showing the number of antibiotic-resistant infections across the UK has grown by seven per cent in recent years, up from around 62,000 in 2019 to nearly 67,000 in 2023. Doctors are also warning the risk of such infections is only likely to grow due to the numbers having foreign cosmetic surgery rising each year. Last year, an estimated 150,000 Brits travelled to Turkey for beauty tweaks – with some saying the rise of NHS weight loss drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro have fuelled the trend. 'Massive weight loss can result in loose skin on the face, tummy, arms and thighs,' says Dr Mo Akhavani, consultant plastic surgeon at the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead, London, who regularly deals with post-operative complications. 'People understandably don't want to live with this, but the NHS has finite resources and, although the health benefits are well known, the procedure is deemed low priority, so people go overseas for cheap surgery. He adds: 'The surgeons in Turkey are often very good and the vast majority of operations go right, but the aftercare can be a problem.' Dr Akhavani, who also works at London's Plastic Surgery Group, says he has helped a 'growing' number of patients, especially since Covid. In 2023, figures from the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) also showed a 94 per cent rise in three years of people needing corrective surgery on the NHS – with the total cost to the taxpayer being around £4.8 million. 'There are factors leading to this increased risk,' he tells The Telegraph. 'First, if a patient has had huge weight loss, they may well have had other conditions such as diabetes and high blood pressure, which can cause complications. 'Then they may have multi-site surgery, which UK doctors wouldn't advise doing, where loose or fat skin is removed from several areas, and perhaps combined with breast implants or other procedures, meaning longer on the operating table and an increased risk of blood clots and even death. 'Thirdly, patients must also refrain from getting on a flight for six weeks post-surgery but they often fly straight home, which can lead to wound-healing problems.' Dr Akhavani adds, 'We see them in A&E sometimes with gaping wounds and pus pouring out. They need antibiotic drips, then can be taken into theatre to wash out the infection, and may end up in intensive care for weeks. Often we are giving life-saving treatment but we will not correct deformities, such as removed implants, from the emergency surgery. This is the NHS and that ultimately means taxpayers' money needs to be protected.' In previous years, both the BAAPS and the British Medical Association (BMA) have highlighted the risks involved with the $4.5 billion (£3.5 billion) global industry. These include the lack of proper consultations and risk assessments, paperwork in a foreign language, and a financial commitment to the surgery prior to travel. With surgery tied to luxury packages, patients may often have top hotels and transport, but no health monitoring post-surgery. One doctor told The Telegraph in graphic detail of a patient who had had a BBL, but then flew home, with the fat seeping out of the wound while on the plane. The patient needed three separate surgeries to repair it and was left 'traumatised'. A second nurse at the recent RCN conference recounted a young woman who had skin removal in Turkey, then returned to the UK with a large thigh wound only loosely held together with stitches. She also had dying tissue and sepsis. 'All she told me about was how fantastic the hotel was after she'd had her surgery and that they took her back to a posh car,' she said. 'But there was no blood pressure testing, no aftercare for this woman at all. In fact, I'm surprised she made it back on the flight. It's really scary.' In 2022, a mother from Berkshire, known only as Carrie, contracted a flesh-eating virus after having a £4,500 tummy tuck in Istanbul. Four days after returning to the UK, she was rushed to hospital and treated for sepsis and organ failure. The same year, Pinky Jolley required treatment in two Liverpool hospitals following botched £2,100 gastric sleeve surgery abroad that left her with multiple infections, sepsis and a permanently damaged oesophagus and stomach. She was left needing a feeding tube and largely bed bound. The growing probability of superbugs has also been highlighted, with the BAAPS saying: 'Some people are returning with multi-resistant bacteria that are hard to treat and may infect other people.' In November 2024, following a spate of deaths of women who had flown to Turkey for BBLs, these concerns reached the top of government, with Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, urging people to 'think very carefully' before going overseas for surgery. Back on the NHS front line, however, doctors see little chance of this happening. Dr Amer Hussain is a plastic surgeon at Leeds Teaching Hospitals. His work involves reconstructing breasts for women who have had mastectomies following cancer. But at times he has to postpone such operations due to hospital bed shortages caused by beds occupied by those in need of urgent care. 'Patients come in following Turkey operations with infected breast implants,' he says. 'They have redness, fever or discharge from the wound and the implant needs to be removed. We are also seeing bad infections – with the bugs not even necessarily endemic to Turkey, meaning they are coming from elsewhere in the world.' Like all doctors, he is aware of the strain on the NHS. 'I do major breast reconstruction, often for cancer patients, and the backlog of these operations due to Covid has still not been reduced,' he explains. 'So doing these emergency surgeries does have an impact on waiting times, beds and theatre time. 'The problem is that this is high-volume surgery abroad, without checks and balances, and the NHS is being forced to step in. But it is frustrating, because at the end of the day, where resources are precious, they should be for patients who need them the most.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

The Milky Way may not collide with neighboring galaxy Andromeda after all: 'From near-certainty to a coin flip'
The Milky Way may not collide with neighboring galaxy Andromeda after all: 'From near-certainty to a coin flip'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Milky Way may not collide with neighboring galaxy Andromeda after all: 'From near-certainty to a coin flip'

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A titanic cosmic collision between the Milky Way and its closest large galactic neighbor, Andromeda, may not be as sure a thing as scientists thought. Previously, it had been proposed that there was a good chance that Andromeda and our galactic home, which are moving together, would meet in around 5 billion years and merge to form a daughter galaxy dubbed "Milkomeda." New research has revealed that there is a much smaller chance that these two spiral galaxies will slam into each other and merge over the next 10 billion years than was believed. In fact, it's about 50/50. "Our main finding is that the merger between the Milky Way and Andromeda, which had been predicted to occur in around 4.5 billion years, is actually much less certain. We found only about a 50% chance that this merger will happen during the next 10 billion years," team leader and University of Helsinki researcher Til Sawala told "In short, the probability went from near-certainty to a coin flip. "I was prepared to find something different, but yes, the fact that there is only around a 50/50 chance of a merger was very surprising." Sawala and colleagues reached this conclusion by simulating the next 10 billion years of the Milky Way's journey through the new simulation was based on updated astronomical data from the Hubble Space Telescope and from the European Space Agency (ESA) star tracking mission Gaia. The team also factored in new estimates of the masses of smaller dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way, which, via their gravitational influence, impact the cosmic passage of the Milky Way. "The main difference between our research and previous studies is that we benefited from newer and more precise data, and that we considered a more complete system, including the effect of the Large Magellanic Cloud, the Milky Way's largest satellite galaxy," Sawala said. The team was able to present different scenarios of what could become of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies as they gradually move together."A head-on collision is very unlikely, we found a less than 2% chance for that. In most of the cases that lead to a merger, the two galaxies will indeed fly past each other at first, which will lead to a loss of orbital energy, and subsequently to a merger," Sawala said. "How close they come on their first passage is very uncertain, however, and if they don't come very close, meaning if their distance is more than around 500,000 light-years, they might not merge at all." The researchers found that if the orbits of the Milky Way and Andromeda come close enough for the two galaxies to gravitationally influence each other, then a merger is an eventuality. "But it's almost equally likely that they stay well separated, in which case they won't merge, and also continue to evolve mostly in isolation," The team found that while the odds of a merger with Andromeda drop when the Large Magellanic Cloud's influence is considered, with this adjustment, the Milky Way becomes more likely to cannibalize this satellite dwarf to this research, our galaxy is almost certain to merge with the Large Magellanic Cloud over the next 2 billion years. Related Stories: — Why do dwarf galaxies line up? 'Zippers' and 'twisters' in the early universe may solve a galactic mystery — Scientists calculate when the universe will end — it's sooner than expected — Amateur astrophotographer captures a stunning galaxy 24 million light-years from Earth (photo) "Of course, now we really want to find out whether the Milky Way and Andromeda will collide or not," Sawala said. "That will not only need more observational data, but also more complete modelling of their interaction, as well as of the effect of the environment in which they evolve. "Luckily, there will be more observational data coming very soon, next year, from the Gaia Space Telescope, and perhaps also from the Hubble Space Telescope." The team's research was published on Monday (June 2) in the journal Nature Astronomy.

Turning the Red Planet green? It's time to take terraforming Mars seriously, scientists say
Turning the Red Planet green? It's time to take terraforming Mars seriously, scientists say

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Turning the Red Planet green? It's time to take terraforming Mars seriously, scientists say

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The concept of terraforming Mars — transforming the planet's climate to support life as we know it — has long belonged to the realm of science fiction. But a new study argues that it's time to take the idea seriously. "Thirty years ago, terraforming Mars wasn't just hard — it was impossible," said Erika DeBenedictis, CEO of Pioneer Labs and lead author of the new paper. "But new technology like [SpaceX's] Starship and synthetic biology have now made it a real possibility." The paper debates the complex ethical questions that must be considered if we're to terraform Mars and lays the blueprint for a potential path forward. "Advocates argue that more life is better than less, and terraforming Mars could mark humanity's first act of planetary stewardship with a net positive environmental impact," said DeBenedictis. Put succinctly, "living planets are better than dead ones," said study co-author Edwin Kite, an associate professor at the University of Chicago. "We now know that Mars was habitable in the past, from data returned by the Mars rovers, so greening Mars could be viewed as the ultimate environmental restoration challenge." Though full terraforming may take centuries, if not millennia, the long-term goal would be a Mars with stable liquid water, breathable oxygen and a thriving ecosystem. In the short term, this might mean only small patches of microbial life; in the distant future, there could perhaps be human cities on the planet. And if we reach the scale of cities, perhaps that's a stepping stone to even more significant exploration for our species. "As we move out into the galaxy, we will need base camps, and a base camp on the scale of the galaxy is a habitable planet," said Kite. For co-author Robin Wordsworth, a professor of environmental and planetary science at Harvard, the argument for terraforming Mars goes beyond human colonization to the propagation of life in general. "I see humanity as part of the biosphere, not separate from it," he said. "Life is precious — we know of nowhere else in the universe where it exists — and we have a duty to conserve it on Earth, but also to consider how we could begin to propagate it to other worlds." It's not all about looking beyond the bounds of Earth; terraforming Mars could also help us solve climate and sustainability challenges at home, advocates say. Nina Lanza, a planetary scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory and a co-author on the paper, sees Mars as a prime testbed for planetary engineering. "If we want to learn how to modify our environment here on Earth, to keep it in a configuration that suits us and other life forms, maybe it would be better to experiment on Mars and say, 'Look, does this work?'" she said. "I personally would like to be a little more conservative with our home planet. This is the only place we can live." There are technological lessons to be learned, too. "Concretely, developing and adopting green technology on Earth often falters because it must compete with dirtier alternatives that benefit from decades of infrastructure investment and entrenched interests," said DeBenedictis. "Mars is a unique target market because it has no oil, no existing infrastructure and no status quo. For this reason, developing green technologies for space is a powerful strategy for maturing it for use on Earth." But we should take a few lessons from "Jurassic Park" when thinking about terraforming, some scientists say: Before asking, "Could we?" we need to ask, "Should we?" "If we decide to terraform Mars, then we will really change it in ways that may or may not be reversible," said Lanza. "Mars is its own planet and has its own history. When we terraform, then we effectively don't have the opportunity to study that anymore, and we may lose knowledge about how planets form and evolve." Most dramatically, we may destroy potential evidence of ancient Martian life, if such evidence exists. "If we modify the environment on Mars, we're going to change the chemistry of the surface and of the subsurface, eventually," said Lanza, pointing out that such actions might erase any traces of life on Mars. "I can't say for certain. It's very complicated, but it's a risk." Terraforming Mars would require massive changes, namely the warming of the planet to support both oxygen-producing microbes and liquid water. While all the technologies to terraform Mars are not yet available, the authors of the paper propose three phases of development. First, scientists would use abiotic climate engineering techniques — such as deploying reflective solar sails, dispersing nanoparticles, or laying aerogel tiles — to warm the surface by at least 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit), enough to melt subsurface ice and release trapped carbon dioxide. This warming would thicken the Martian atmosphere and potentially support the presence of stable liquid water. The second phase would introduce extremophile microbes — likely anaerobic and genetically engineered ones — capable of surviving in Mars' harsh conditions and kickstarting ecological succession. These organisms would begin producing oxygen and organic matter, slowly altering planetary chemistry. The third and longest phase would focus on building a complex biosphere, increasing atmospheric pressure and oxygen content to eventually support more advanced plant life, and, in the very long term, potentially allow humans to breathe unassisted. Related stories: — Could we really terraform Mars? — New Mars terraforming idea: engineered, heat-absorbing dust nanoparticles — Bad news for terraforming: Mars' atmosphere is lost in space The study's authors agree: If we're to have any chance of terraforming Mars, we must move forward on multiple fronts simultaneously. "Answering the question of when and how to start making other worlds habitable requires a clear understanding of the costs and benefits, which can only be adequately assessed based on a combination of theory and experiments, with input from diverse fields including physics, chemistry, materials science and biology," said Kite. Right now, we need to continue to study Mars. Lanza advocates for the Mars Sample Return mission, a NASA-European Space Agency campaign to bring home material collected on the Red Planet by the Perseverance rover. "The samples are incredibly well documented and analyzed to the best of our ability on Mars," she said. "Now we need to bring those back, because that's going to help us answer some of these fundamental questions. What is Mars made out of? Are there traces of life?" And, as we continue to visit the Red Planet, we can put terraforming concepts into practice. "Upcoming Mars surface missions in 2028 or 2031 should include small-scale experiments to de-risk terraforming strategies, such as warming localized regions," said DeBenedictis. Then, of course, we need to continue to innovate new technologies that will allow us to terraform Mars in the future. All this is to say, while fully terraforming Mars might take generations, the decisions start now. "This is how we get from the imagination and the concept to some reality that has totally changed our world," said Lanza. "We should really keep doing science — it's transformational." The new study was published last month in the journal Nature Astronomy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store