India, Trump's Tariffs and the Future of BRICS
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute Now
The BRICS alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and the newly expanded BRICS Plus nations – Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE, Indonesia – stands as a formidable voice for the Global South, representing 31.5% of global GDP and over 40% of the world's population.
India's pivotal role in this coalition is not merely economic but a testament to its vision for a multipolar world order rooted in equity, sovereignty and mutual prosperity. Recent remarks by US President Donald Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick – threatening 100% tariffs on nations exploring alternatives to the US dollar and urging India to reconsider its BRICS membership – have ignited global discourse.
At this juncture, India need to remain steadfast, leveraging its strategic autonomy to balance global partnerships while advancing its economic ambitions.
Trump's tariff threats
Since November 2024, President Trump has cautioned BRICS nations against de-dollarisation, warning of crippling tariffs if they pursue a common currency or an alternative financial system. The US dollar's dominance in over 90% of global transactions underscores Washington's unease, particularly as Russia and Iran, constrained by SWIFT sanctions, advocate for local currency trade.
India's response, articulated by Union external affairs minister S. Jaishankar, reflects pragmatism. India is not leading de-dollarisation but seeks practical 'workarounds' to sustain trade with sanctioned partners, such as Russia for critical oil imports.
India's trade with the US is valued at $120 billion in 2024, with IT services, pharmaceuticals and textiles as key exports. Yet, BRICS offers a vital platform to diversify economic partnerships, reducing reliance on any single market and insulating India from external pressures. This strategic diversification is not a rejection of the US, but a calculated step toward resilience in a volatile global landscape.
The strategic imperative of staying in BRICS
India's commitment to BRICS embodies its pursuit of strategic autonomy in a multipolar world, prioritising economic diversification and global cooperation over geopolitical rivalries. The bloc's 2024-2025 expansion to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE and Indonesia amplifies India's economic diplomacy.
For instance, India's construction sector (7.4% growth in 2025) can drive infrastructure projects in Egypt, while its textile expertise can bolster Ethiopia's burgeoning garment industry. In the UAE, BRICS Chamber of Commerce & Industry's
(CCI's) trade corridors have catalysed regional fintech and renewable energy partnerships, leveraging India's leadership in UPI and green hydrogen ambitions. These collaborations not only diversify India's trade but also create a buffer against potential tariff disruptions from the US tariffs.
BRICS also serves as a platform to tackle pressing global challenges, from climate change to digital transformation. By championing local currency trade – such as India's rupee-based settlements with Russia since 2022 – BRICS CCI ensures trade continuity without directly challenging the dollar's dominance. This pragmatic approach underscores India's ability to navigate complex global dynamics while advancing its economic interests.
Navigating the challenge
India's response to US tariff threats must balance its deep economic ties with Washington while reinforcing its BRICS commitments. This delicate balancing act requires a multifaceted strategy:
Deepen US-India Economic Engagement: India should pursue reciprocal trade agreements, building on past negotiations for a limited trade deal. India can attract US investment in high-tech sectors like semiconductors and clean energy, fostering mutual trust and reducing tariff risks.
Amplify BRICS Trade Platforms: Initiatives like the BRICS Startup Forum and MSME Accelerator Program can drive transformative deals in renewables with the UAE, pharmaceuticals with South Africa, and agrotech with Brazil. These platforms showcase BRICS' economic value, fostering collaboration without escalating currency disputes.
Advance Pragmatic Currency Solutions: India's rupee-based trade mechanisms offer a blueprint for BRICS nations to ensure trade resilience. By scaling these systems, India can facilitate seamless commerce while sidestepping provocative moves toward a common BRICS currency.
Leverage BRICS Plus Opportunities: The expanded BRICS bloc unlocks new markets for India. Intensifying infrastructure deals with Egypt, textile exports to Ethiopia, and energy partnerships with Iran reduces India's dependence on traditional markets, enhancing its economic agility.
Strengthen Diplomatic Messaging: India's leadership must consistently emphasise that BRICS is a platform for cooperation, not confrontation. By positioning itself as a bridge between the Global South and North, India can defuse tensions while amplifying its global influence.
India's Path Forward
The US tariff threat highlights the complexities of a shifting global order, but it also underscores India's unique position as a global leader. With a $4.1 trillion economy in 2025, India's economic resilience is undeniable. Its diversified trade portfolio –spanning BRICS, ASEAN, and Western markets – equips it to withstand external pressures.
India must impress upon the US that BRICS is not a rejection of the West but a bold reaffirmation of a fair, multipolar world, where cooperation triumphs over coercion. By deepening BRICS partnerships, scaling innovative trade mechanisms, and maintaining robust dialogue with the US, India can navigate this challenge with strategic resolve. If India wants to emerge as a champion of the Global South, it need not merely respond to global shifts, it ought to shape them.
The author is Chairman of the BRICS Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BRICS CCI).
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ready to pay price to protect farmers, says Modi as Trump increases tariff rate
India would make no compromise with the interests of its farmers and the country is ready to pay any price for it, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday, remarks apparently made in response to President Donald Trump's decision to impose an effective tariff rate of 50% on exports to the US. Prime Minister Narendra Modi. (PTI) A day earlier, India fired back at Trump's move by calling it 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', vowing to protect national interests amid a growing fallout between the two countries that have long been strategic partners. 'The interests of our farmers are our topmost priority. India will never compromise the interests of its farmers, its cattle rearers and fisherfolk,' Modi said, addressing an event in New Delhi to commemorate the centenary birth anniversary of MS Swaminathan, the architect of the country's green revolution. 'I know I'll have to pay a big price for this personally, but I'm prepared. India today is prepared to protect its farming community at any cost.' The White House said on Wednesday that Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25% levy on Indian imports for the country's purchases of Russian oil, which comes on top of a 25% tariff he had announced last week. India and the US failed to hammer a bilateral trade pact after several rounds of negotiations, despite Trump's hint in the middle of the talks that a 'beautiful big deal' was imminent. India's refusal to open up its farm, fishery, and dairy sectors was one of the main sticking points. On Thursday, Modi made it clear that India would continue protecting the agriculture sector, which accounts for nearly 18% of the country's gross domestic product and employs millions of poor cultivators who mostly own tiny land parcels. 'The strength of our farmers and agriculture is the very basis for the development of our country. That's why our policies are not just aimed at helping our farmers, but to increase their confidence,' Modi said. Trump's taunt that India could buy oil from Pakistan did not sit well with New Delhi, and the country has also rejected repeated claims by Trump that he brokered a truce between India and Pakistan by using trade as a lever. The MS Swaminathan Foundation also conferred the first MS Swaminathan Prize for Food and Peace to Nigerian scientist Ademola A Adenle, the founder of Africa Sustainability Innovation-Academy. Modi released a commemorative ₹100 coin and a postage stamp in honour of Swaminathan, who collaborated with Norman Borlaug, a Nobel laureate, to customise for India a high-yielding wheat variety Borlaug developed for poverty-stricken Mexico in the 1950s. This wheat type paved the way for an Indian green revolution.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 minutes ago
- First Post
Free speech on trial: Stanford newspaper sues Trump administration over political targeting of students
Framing the policy as an 'ideological purge,' a Stanford lawsuit challenges Trump-era immigration powers that allegedly target noncitizens for engaging in protected political expression read more The Stanford Daily, Stanford University's student-run newspaper, has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging its use of federal immigration law to target pro-Palestinian Arab activists. The newspaper argues that the government's actions unlawfully curtail students' First Amendment rights, according to a report in Israel National News. The Stanford Daily and two former noncitizen college students brought the case, fearing that their pro-Palestinian Arab views or activism could make them vulnerable to deportation. As such, the lawsuit challenges the Trump administration's use of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to deport noncitizens based on their political views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Attorneys for the plaintiffs, from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), stated that international students on staff have been avoiding writing about the war in Gaza or have removed previously published articles out of fear. They noted that since March 2025, the administration began targeting lawfully present noncitizens for deportation based on protected speech, leading to self-censorship among students at The Stanford Daily due to fears of visa revocation, arrest, detention and deportation, according to CNN. The lawsuit focuses on two INA provisions. The first grants the Secretary of State the authority to remove a noncitizen whose views 'would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.' The second provision allows the Secretary to revoke a visa at any time, at their discretion. The lawsuit seeks a federal judge's order to bar the administration from using these provisions to deport noncitizens, particularly staff members of The Stanford Daily, based on their protected speech. The Stanford Daily stated in its lawsuit that the administration has caused its foreign writers to self-censor to avoid being targeted. The student newspaper brought the suit because of two anonymous members of the newspaper, who have had to 'self-censor' their published and. The newspaper argued that the government's effort has impermissibly chilled students' First Amendment rights. Stanford, along with other campuses across the US, experienced an increase in anti-Israel protests following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack and the subsequent war in Gaza. In June 2024, a committee analyzing antisemitism at Stanford found 'widespread and pernicious' antisemitism at the university. In April, 12 individuals were charged with felony vandalism related to a pro-Palestinian Arab demonstration at Stanford University, during which demonstrators occupied the university president's office and caused significant damage. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The lawsuit is a representation of a legal challenge to the Trump administration's so-called ideological deportation policy, which aims to deport noncitizens based on their political views.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 minutes ago
- First Post
From deterrence to danger: How Trump policy is fuelling global nuclear risks
With a slew of decisions over many years, US President Donald Trump has raised the risk of a nuclear catastrophe to the highest level in years, undoing decades of nuclear arms reduction and non-proliferation efforts. read more A Dongfeng-41 intercontinental strategic nuclear missiles group formation marches to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China in Beijing, on October 1, 2019 (Photo: Shen Shi/Imagine China/Reuters) In the latest episode of dangerous nuclear sabre-rattling, Russia on Monday ended the moratorium on the deployment of nuclear-capable intermediate range missiles. The development came days after US President Donald Trump deployed nuclear submarines near Russian waters in response to threats of war from Dmitry Medvedev, a top ally of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. With such back and forth actions over the past years, often triggered by impulsive decision-making of Trump, decades of nuclear arms reduction and nuclear non-proliferation efforts are being undone and the world is now closest that it has been to a nuclear catastrophe in decades. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It's not just that nuclear powers like the United States, Russia, and China, that are building more nuclear weapons and modernising delivery platforms. But more countries, such as those traditionally under the US security umbrella in Europe and East Asia, are considering developing own nuclear weapons as well. While every country, whether Poland in Europe or South Korea in Asia, has its own rationale, the reason underpinning all such pursuits is Trump's disruption of the international world order that he began in his first term. As a result, the likes of Poland, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and even Japan, conversations around the development of a nuclear weapon are no longer taboo. His mistaken strategy of 'maximum pressure' had already put Iran on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon, necessitating the three-war earlier this year. Trump & Putin flex nuclear muscles Over the past two weeks, the war of words between the United States and Russia finally led to real-world consequences. Since the launch of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin and his top allies like Medvedev had frequently invoked nuclear weapons. Medvedev frequently threatened Western capitals with nuclear strikes over their support of Ukraine. Last month, Medvedev finally overstepped with his personal feud with Putin on X. After he threatened the United States with a direct war, Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines near Russia. Days later, Russia responded by withdrawing from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Trump had already withdrawn the United States from the INF in his first term in 2019. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under the treaty, which was originally signed in 1987 between the United States and Soviet Union, the two countries had agreed to ban and gradually dismantle intermediate- and short-range nuclear missiles between the range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres. Trump kills arms control treaties The INF is not the only arms control treaty that Trump has quit. In 2020, Trump withdrew the United States from the Open Skies Treaty with Russia, which allowed the two countries to fly over each other's territories with sensor equipment to assure that none of them were preparing for conflict. In his usual hubris, Trump had said that he would make new treaties with Russia for INF and Open Skies. Those deals, of course, never happened. Instead, in 2023, Russia quit the New START treaty, which was the last remaining arms control agreement with the United States. Under the New START treaty signed in 2010, which succeeded the Moscow Treaty of 2002, the two countries agreed to 1,550 strategic nuclear warheads and up to 800 delivery platforms of various types. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump nudges friends & foes alike towards nukes With his actions, Trump has consistently nudged allies and adversaries alike towards nuclear weapons since his first term. In the first term, Trump withdrew the United Stats from the Iran nuclear deal of 2015 and applied the 'maximum pressure' strategy. While his idea was to pressure Iran into negotiating a new deal that purportedly favoured the United States, it turned out to be a spectacular failure and pushed Iran towards the brink of developing a nuclear weapon. Israel used Iran's near-nuclear weapons status as a pretext for war earlier this year that eventually dragged the United States into the conflict as well. As Trump has virtually withdrawn the longstanding security commitment to Europe under Nato's collective defence principle out of his friendship with Putin and has threatened to abandon Asian allies like Japan and South Korea as well, there is anxiety in these countries that their adversaries —Russia in Europe and China and North Korea in Asia— could use the US abandonment as an encouragement for a more muscular policy or even pursue outright attacks and invasions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Such concerns have led to real conversations in countries like Poland, South Korea, and Japan about developing nuclear weapons as ultimate deterrence. In West Asia, Saudi Arabia is believed to have similar discussions as well.
