Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries
Many themes are on the minds of the political leaders attending the Brics Summit in Brazil, but one aspect that is certainly important for all is easing trade friction in this group. For the long-term sustainability of Brics, there must be a stronger economic ambition that ties the grouping together beyond its political and geopolitical alignments.
Across all Brics countries, researchers, policymakers and business people have been attempting to adapt and address the restrictions caused by the United States Liberation Day tariff. There remains profound uncertainty about the path ahead, as the 90-day pause comes to an end this coming week.
What the Brics countries have not reflected on is the prohibitive tariffs they place against each other, which limit intra-Brics trade.
The blame, while correct, cannot be placed solely on the US for its higher tariffs; the Brics countries should also consider taking a serious look inward and assess how they could deepen intra-trade and increase investments.
The ideas of this path have long been documented in the business arm of this grouping, the Brics Business Council Forum, in its various annual reports. Still, few of these ideas have made their way into the political groupings' resolutions in a manner that changes the economic engagement landscape among these countries. The current environment necessitates such a strong approach.
Consider the South African agricultural sector, which, because of the lack of a trade agreement, faces higher tariffs in Brics member countries. Take China as an example; South Africa's macadamias face a 12% import tariff and the wine industry tariffs of 14% to 20%. In addition to higher tariffs, exporters also face phytosanitary barriers. I am singling out China here, but the same can be said about India, another major agricultural importer in Brics.
For South Africa, agriculture is one of the key strategic industries for driving economic growth and revitalising rural communities. Notably, the sector cannot grow robustly without an expansion into new export markets. Already, the South African agricultural industry exports roughly half of its produce in value terms, amounting to about $13.7 billion in 2024.
But the Brics countries account for a small share of these exports. Roughly two-thirds of South Africa's agricultural exports go to the African continent and the European Union.
While China has signalled optimism and an intention to lower import tariffs for various goods from Africa, there is no demonstrable evidence of the actual path of implementing this, along with the timelines. Currently, it primarily serves as a political statement.
The Brics grouping should build on these political statements, and argue for a proper framework that technocrats and business can start refining, which can be launched at the next summit in India as the Brics trade agreement. This would encompass the agricultural sector, as this grouping is a big market, accounting for roughly half of global agricultural imports, but filled mainly by non-Brics members.
The US authorities' tough trade stance necessitates this approach to trade policy, which will allow Brics countries to expand the avenues for trade for their domestic businesses and alleviate the friction in this grouping.
This economic ambition of deepening trade is vital for the long-term sustainability of Brics.
Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
4 hours ago
- The Herald
Gift of the Givers strongly backs 'honourable' Mkhwanazi
As tensions build up ahead of President Cyril Ramaphosa's address on Sunday evening, organisations and individuals are speaking out on the conflict involving KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi and police minister Senzo Mchunu. Last Sunday Mkhwanazi made the shocking claim tha t the disbandment of the political killings task team was orchestrated to shield politically connected members of a criminal syndicate from prosecution, with the assistance of Mchunu. Now, as the country waits for Ramaphosa's promised response to the claims, voices are emerging, opinions are being aired and people are taking sides. One of these is the humanitarian aid organisation Gift of the Givers, which has come out firmly in Mkhwanazi's corner. ' SAPS is so often vilified, insulted, demeaned, maligned, accused of corruption, inaction and inefficiency. Yes, there are those within the SAPS, as in every institution, that have failed to perform, but to generalise and paint an entire institution with the same negativity is disingenuous, demoralising, unjust and unfair to those men and women in blue who put their lives on the line, who strive to serve with distinction, in spite of being under-resourced, unprotected, outgunned and unmatched by sophisticated criminal networks with the most advanced technology at their behest,' Gift of the Givers stated on its social media. 'Leadership, bravery, courage, intelligence, pragmatism, fairness and justice appears in the form of Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who challenges superiors, management, politicians, lawmakers and the system itself, in the interest of the citizens of our beloved country.' 'Gift of the Givers stands behind this honourable man totally,' said the disaster relief group's founder Dr Imtiaz Sooliman. 'He represents everything that is right in the SAPS confronting organised crime in the form of CIT heists, drug dealing, corrupt politicians and civil servants, tenderpreneurs, construction mafia, taxi gangsters, hijackers and those defeating the ends of justice within all facets of the criminal justice system,' said Sooliman. 'Here is a servant of the law who inspires his own teams to be fearless, courageous and decisive in confronting everything that is rotten to the core in our society. We call on President Cyril Ramaphosa to personally give this servant of the state a hearing on the allegations and on how to improve the crime-fighting capability of the state and fully support him as the president has done so previously by calling for the establishment of a task team to deal with political killings so rife in KZN.' R amaphosa was attending the Brics Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, last Sunday when Mkhwanazi made his astounding accusations. Mchunu has hit back, describing the claims as 'baseless' and 'wild allegations'. However, he later admitted to knowing one of the suspects named by Mkhwanazi, businessman Brown Mgotsi — dismissing their links as 'just a comrade'. Ramaphosa's office says he has 'been seized with this matter ... and will, following various consultations, take the nation into his confidence' at 7pm on Sunday'. TimesLIVE
Mail & Guardian
6 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
G20: South Africa needs the weight of the continent for progressive outcomes
South Africa's G20 faces unprecedented diplomatic tensions, as the geo-political situation with the United States adds a new layer of complexity. With South Africa at the helm of the G20 and the African Union seated at the table, this year's G20 processes represent a defining moment for African diplomacy. The AU must act with unity, urgency and strategic clarity to ensure that both its agenda and South Africa's deliverables translate into meaningful outcomes. The AU was admitted as a permanent member of the G20 in 2023; it has held observer status since its inception in 1999. Since then, the agenda at the annual G20 summit has aligned with the AU's priorities, providing a significant platform to champion causes relevant to the African continent. It is for this reason that South Africa's G20 presidency is a powerful moment for Africa, as African issues are at the forefront of the world's leaders' minds. Historically, the AU has seen diplomatic success through its instrumental role in launching the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty, endorsing the Principles for Just and Inclusive Energy Transitions, and reaffirming its support for the G20 Compact with Africa. South Africa's G20 faces unprecedented diplomatic tensions, as the geo-political situation with the United States adds a new layer of complexity. Experts in international relations suggest the situation demands an AU-wide response, as it concerns Africa's rightful place at the table where global economic rules are written. The AU has an opportunity to engage diplomatically with the incoming US G20 presidency while standing firm on Africa's right to full participation. To support South Africa and maximise Africa's influence, the AU should leverage its seat proactively. It should assertively promote its strategic priorities by aligning them with G20 priorities. A unified African position From the perspective of international development, South Africa's representation at the G20 is not merely national but continental. When properly backed by AU consensus positions, South Africa can transform from a middle-power voice to the representative of a continent with 1.3 billion people and tremendous economic potential. The AU must establish formalised pre-G20 consultation mechanisms to ensure South Africa enters negotiations carrying the collective weight of the continent's aspirations. Mahamoud Ali Youssouf, the chairperson of the AU Commission, has an opportunity to emphasise that fragmentation diminishes Africa's influence in global forums. The AU Commission could work to consolidate Africa's diplomatic capital through structured consultations that produce clear mandates for the continent's G20 representative. The AU must work with the agility and coordination of other blocs such as the European Union by advocating for the reduction of tariffs between African countries and pushing for policy harmonisation. These steps will strengthen trade between member states, boost development, increase GDP, and present Africa as a competitive global player. Climate justice and finance The AU must empower South Africa to demand climate justice and significant adaptation financing from G20 nations that bear historical responsibility. According to environmental policy experts, Africa contributes less than 4% of global carbon emissions, yet suffers disproportionately from climate change. South Africa needs continental backing to push for reforms to the development finance architecture. The current systems often perpetuate inequalities rather than addressing them which can be challenged through a unified African position. Additionally, the AU can position itself as a leader among Global South countries in the G20 by spearheading discussions on debt sustainability and global financial reform. It should take the lead in advocating reforms that prioritise borrowers' needs and pushing for a more inclusive and equitable global financial system, an outcome that would benefit Africa and other developing countries alike. Africa's greatest untapped advantage lies beyond the halls of government, in the energy of our civil society, the innovation of our private sector and the vision of our youth. To maximise our G20 influence, the AU should institutionalise structured consultations with cooperatives, women's business associations, climate activists and tech entrepreneurs. These voices bring legitimacy and ground truth that no diplomat alone can muster. The G20's engagement groups offer critical platforms that South Africa can ensure includes robust African representation, translating continental priorities into actionable global agendas. With South Africa at the helm of the G20 and the AU seated at the table, the 2025 G20 processes represent a defining moment for African diplomacy. When Africa speaks with one voice, the world has no choice but to listen. Measuring success For Africa's G20 engagement to move beyond symbolic presence to strategic influence, the AU should, in tandem with South Africa's vision of the G20, establish clear metrics for success. Each summit should be evaluated against specific continental priorities, from debt restructuring to digital economy governance. Without measurable outcomes, participation remains performative rather than transformative. Africa's greatest untapped advantage lies beyond the halls of government, but in the energy of our civil society, the innovation of our private sector, and the vision of our youth. To maximise our G20 influence, the AU must institutionalise structured consultations with cooperatives, women's business associations, climate activists and tech entrepreneurs. These voices bring legitimacy and ground truth that no diplomat alone can muster. The G20's engagement groups offer critical platforms we've underused. South Africans should ensure these forums include robust African representation, translating continental priorities into actionable global agendas. African governance and development advocates emphasise that the future of global governance must include meaningful African participation, beginning with strategic coordination between the AU and Africa's G20 representatives. When Africa speaks with one voice, the world has no choice but to listen. Munjodzi Mutandiri is a senior programme adviser at the .
Mail & Guardian
9 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Mining's revival must also deal with its legacy
New social contract due: Mining's harms are mainly to the environment – water, air, and soil, for example – but these have consequences for mining affected communities' health and their land. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy Mining is still central to the South African economy. It employs roughly 480 000 people directly. With an estimated dependency ratio of 10 to one, the industry essentially supports close to five million people. That's a twelfth of the country's population. Demand for minerals and metals is not slowing down. But our gold mining sector will close down at some stage — even current high gold prices cannot sustain going deeper because of safety risks and the associated expense. There will come a point where marginal cost exceeds marginal benefit. Outside of gold, South Africa should be a global mining powerhouse. For the past 20 years, however, there has been very little exploration or production expansion investment. In partnership with Mining Dialogues 360°, Good Governance Africa set out to explore what it would take to revive the mining industry and ensure that it becomes the catalyst for broad-based development. It became clear that the country needs a new vision for mining that will reconcile conflicting interests that seem to perennially be at loggerheads with each other. Any new vision needs to begin with the end in mind; what do we want mining to do for the country? We can all wax lyrical about that, but there's an obstacle that must be dealt with first. Mining has an awful history in South Africa of imposing severe negative externalities onto both society and the environment. These are the divergences between private returns and social costs. In other words, companies mine and sell gold, reporting profits in the process, but they pollute rivers, create sinkholes, precipitate acid mine drainage, exploit labour and damage the social fabric of society in the process. None of these ecological and social costs are recorded in company financial statements. This speaks to a broader global problem, but it's particularly acute in mining, especially here at home. It's often mine-adjacent communities that bear the brunt of this malaise. In South Africa, migrant labour exacerbates the social costs on two fronts. First, many workers who migrate to the mines end up supporting two families; HIV proliferation has been extensive as a result. Second, many workers end up retiring to the former homelands and dying soon thereafter of silicosis or some other mining-related illness. The social costs of mining are clearly immeasurable and significant. At our most recent dialogue, civil society representatives expressed the view that the industry seems to be geared towards short-term production targets and immediate profitability at the expense of long-term (ecologically sound) thinking and optimal wealth generation for all stakeholders. Strategies to attain consensus — and then execute on — a new vision need to be informed by meaningful discussions, not mere consultation as some kind of box-ticking exercise. Moreover, free, prior and informed consent should be continually sought, underwritten by an acknowledgement that 'no' to mining is also a legitimate response from mine-affected or potentially affected communities. They are often left without solutions to the problems created by mining, and this needs to be addressed through purposeful discussions, not cursory consultations that amount to people being told what is going to happen to them. Many of the harms mining causes are environmental. Regulations exist to prevent such harm, but enforcement is inconsistent. Even when the legal framework is strong, communities often lack the knowledge and tools to hold companies accountable. This asymmetry fosters moral hazard: companies externalise harm while reporting profit. Bridging these gaps requires education, in local languages, to empower rights-based action. Beyond legal compliance, mining companies frequently bypass meaningful engagement. Social and labour plans (SLPs), meant to channel mining benefits into development, are often drawn up with minimal community involvement. The process is top-down, consultative in name only, and poorly documented. The SLPs are frequently geographically misaligned, excluding communities downstream of operations who still suffer the effects of pollution. They also rarely prepare labour for life after mining. The result is development that is poorly targeted, unaccountable and unsustainable. Some companies worsen these dynamics by co-opting local activists or working through pliant intermediaries, fuelling internal divisions. This divide-and-rule approach minimises risk for companies but leaves communities fragmented and disempowered. The SLPs then become tools of corporate image management rather than genuine vehicles for transformation. Often, they fund short-lived projects that decline and often collapse once the mine closes, unlinked to local integrated development plans (IDPs). Even where integration is attempted, weak municipal IDPs render it ineffective. Greenwashing is common. Companies promote their environmental, social and governance credentials, but scrutiny reveals minimal ecological remediation, long-term plans for restoration and socio-economic upliftment. Executives typically stay removed from community realities, unwilling to talk to residents and local authorities. This maintains a status quo in which firms pursue reputational insulation over authentic partnership. For communities, this entrenches an adversarial stance. Trust is absent where engagement is asymmetric. In the absence of viable livelihood alternatives, some residents resort to informal mining. Labelling them 'illegal' dehumanises people who are often driven by survival or coerced into impossible positions by organised crime bosses. The official response, including recent commentary after the Stilfontein disaster, has lacked empathy and insight. It's no surprise that resentment festers where people are treated as expendable. A political culture defined by patronage and corruption fails to meet the complexity of this problem. Land dispossession remains largely unresolved. Many mine-affected communities still have no title deeds, decades after democracy. That dispossession underpins the call for resource nationalism, especially among the young and disillusioned. There are strong veins of resentment here into which unscrupulous politicians can tap. While social grants may suppress open rebellion — some dialogue members mused whether welfare hadn't placated revolution — frustration simmers. Without structural change based on policy reform, the call for redress will grow louder. Efforts to build unified community responses face further obstacles. Activists expressed disillusionment with NGOs that impose external agendas. Some community gatekeepers, meanwhile, have been accused of colluding with mining firms or of blocking access to resources. Mining companies often work with whoever shouts the loudest, further muddying accountability. These dynamics prevent the emergence of a coherent response voice. Communities are not homogeneous, nor should we expect them to be, but this should not hinder the expression of a heterogeneous set of voices. The solution requires recognising that power is layered. Without coordination and organisation, communities remain vulnerable to fragmentation, as they struggle to build countervailing power. Yet unity is hard to achieve when trust is scarce and gatekeepers act in their own interest. Still, any serious vision for the sector must support such coordination as the basis for accountability and equitable negotiation. Two distinct imperatives shape mining's future. On one highway, government and industry seek investment-friendly conditions. On the other, communities seek restitution and opportunity. These paths need not be in conflict, but reconciliation demands a vision centred on shared prosperity. Capital must not be prioritised over labour and land. Community benefit must become a measure of mining's success. That shift requires credible, trackable metrics. One proposal is a national indicator for 'community well-being', with mining firms accountable for positive movement in that measure. This would reframe profitability to include social return, not just shareholder value. Others suggest revenue-sharing mechanisms such as Australia's 'royalties for regions' scheme. But concerns about corruption, especially in community trusts, remain valid. Without institutional reform, even well-designed systems can be subverted. A new social contract is overdue. Mining cannot continue to operate in enclaves of profit surrounded by poverty. It must embrace a model of co-determination with affected communities and acknowledge its historical legacy. That demands not just consultation but free, prior, informed and continued consent. It demands not just compliance, but transformation. Without these shifts, mining will remain a source of conflict instead of development. Ross Harvey is the chief research officer at Good Governance Africa (GGA)-SARO. Mining Dialogues 360° and GGA are hosting a plenary dialogue for all mining industry stakeholders on 29 July. To attend, please email
