logo
Perak grants RM720k to boost cooperative businesses in 2025

Perak grants RM720k to boost cooperative businesses in 2025

The Sun17-07-2025
KUALA KANGSAR: The Perak government has approved RM720,000 in financial aid for cooperatives under the GKOP Urus and GKOP Pulih assistance schemes.
The grants aim to strengthen cooperative businesses and revive inactive operations.
State Women, Family, Social Welfare, Cooperatives, and Entrepreneur Development Committee chairman Datuk Salbiah Mohamed said the funding would help cooperatives generate income through sustainable ventures.
'GKOP Urus supports new cooperatives with up to RM5,000, while GKOP Pulih offers up to RM30,000 for reviving inactive cooperatives,' she explained.
Salbiah highlighted the success of the initiative since its launch last year, noting its role in reinforcing cooperative growth.
She spoke at the Sejati MADANI Impian Jadi Realiti Wilayah Programme, part of National Cooperative Month 2025, organised by the Malaysia Co-operative Societies Commission Perak Branch.
The event also encouraged Village Development and Security Committee (JPKK) members to form cooperatives using federal allocations.
'Cooperatives provide a structured way to manage businesses, improve livelihoods, and uplift socio-economic conditions,' she added. - Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Property firm, directors charged with failure to pay service tax
Property firm, directors charged with failure to pay service tax

The Star

time5 minutes ago

  • The Star

Property firm, directors charged with failure to pay service tax

SEREMBAN: A property management firm and its two board directors have claimed trial in the Sessions Court here to two counts of failing to pay service tax on Thursday (Aug 14). Mat Sham Ahmad, who also represented another director Md Samlan Ahmad and the company Tanjung Tuan Properties Sdn Bhd, pleaded not guilty after the charges were read to them before judge Mohamad Kamil Nizam. For the first charge, the company and the duo were charged with failing to pay service tax for the taxable period from May 1 to June 30, 2024 as required under Section 26(4) of the Service Tax Act 2018. This was an offence under Section 26(8), read together with Section 78 (1) of the same legislation, which carries a penalty of up to RM50,000 fine or a jail term not exceeding three years or both upon conviction. For the second charge, they had allegedly failed to do the same for the taxable period from July 1 till Aug 31, 2024. Both offences were allegedly committed on July 31, 2024 at the Customs office in Port Dickson. Customs prosecuting officer Nur Nadia Mohd Rais then asked the court for a mention date for the submission of documents. The accused were unrepresented. Judge Mohamad Kamil fixed Oct 16 for mention.

Winding-up petition against Mah Sing withdrawn
Winding-up petition against Mah Sing withdrawn

New Straits Times

time15 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Winding-up petition against Mah Sing withdrawn

KUALA LUMPUR: Mah Sing Group Bhd said a winding-up petition against the company has been withdrawn by the petitioner without liberty to file afresh. In a filing with Bursa Malaysia, the property developer said the petition was related to a judgment dated Sept 13, 2024, obtained by One2Print Sdn Bhd in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court over a trespass case. Under the judgment, Mah Sing was ordered to pay RM61,770 in special damages, with interest at five per cent per annum from Jan 20, 2020, until full settlement, as well as RM21,000 in costs. The company had earlier said it strongly refuted the basis of the petition and had filed an appeal in the High Court against the Sessions Court decision. Mah Sing obtained an ad interim stay of execution on Feb 18 and deposited the judgment sum with a stakeholder pending its appeal, with further case management set for Aug 18. It added that the withdrawal of the petition is not expected to have any material financial or operational impact on the group, apart from legal fees and related disbursements.

Nike Is Suing Edison Chen For Over RM500k For Breach Of Contract
Nike Is Suing Edison Chen For Over RM500k For Breach Of Contract

Hype Malaysia

time19 hours ago

  • Hype Malaysia

Nike Is Suing Edison Chen For Over RM500k For Breach Of Contract

It's not uncommon for brands to take legal action against celebrities, typically for damaging their reputation or breaching a contract. Recently, it was reported that footwear and apparel company Nike is suing former collaborator and Hong Kong star Edison Chen (陈冠希). On 12th August 2025 (Tuesday), reports emerged online alleging that Nike is suing Edison Chen for breach of contract. In a photo, allegedly of the court record, the company is seeking damages of US$126,615,000 (approximately RM534 million). However, recent reports have updated this figure, saying it was a clerical error and that the lawsuit is actually for a little over US$126,000 (approximately RM531,000). According to reports, the lawsuit accuses Edison and his company, Juice Los Angeles, of owing Nike US$126,615 for 'goods and services that Nike provided to Juice'. Edison was named in the lawsuit because he is the personal guarantor on the Juice account with Nike. He's also a resident of Los Angeles, where his company is based. However, there are no additional details on the case. Both Nike and Edison Chen have yet to speak on the lawsuit. However, contrary to popular belief, it appears the lawsuit has nothing to do with Edison partnering with Nike's competitor, Adidas. Edison and Nike had a long-standing relationship, dating back to 2006. Edison's streetwear brand Clot and Nike's Jordan brand have collaborated on numerous sneaker projects. The partnership ended in 2023, and a year later, Clot launched its first collaboration with Adidas Originals. Given the nearly 20-year history between Edison Chen and Nike, their 'breakup' was a surprise to many in the streetwear industry. It's not known why the partnership ended, but insiders suggest that the deal had run its course and was going to expire anyway. Meanwhile, Edison and Adidas have had three launches in 2025 alone. Earlier this month, Edison also teased the launch of a Clot x Adidas Anthony Edwards 1 sneaker. It's worth noting that the Edison Chen lawsuit comes right after Nike settled their lawsuit with custom footwear maker, The Shoe Surgeon, for unauthorised use of the brand's trademarks. Only time will tell how this lawsuit will conclude, but we wish the best for both parties. Sources: WWD, Complex, Twitter

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store