logo
India to forge own path in global energy transition: Senior UN climate official

India to forge own path in global energy transition: Senior UN climate official

Hindustan Times2 days ago
India will forge its own distinct pathway in the global energy transition, with the country emerging as a 'clean energy powerhouse' despite different challenges facing developing economies, a senior UN climate official said. Selwin Hart described India as 'extremely pivotal to multilateralism, sustainable development, and climate action,' noting that the country has traditionally been 'an extremely strong advocate for conveying the interests of the developing world.' (HT)
Selwin Hart, special adviser to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on climate change, told HT in an interview on Thursday that India's transition strategy would differ significantly from other nations, particularly given its status as a net importer of fossil fuels.
'One of the things that we've been repeatedly saying, especially for developing and emerging economies that are fossil fuel producing nations, is that their transition pathways are going to be different,' Hart said. 'If you're a large fossil fuel producing nation, your transition pathway is going to be different than the transition pathway of a country that's a net importer of fossil fuels.'
'It is not a one size fits all approach. That being said, India is a clean energy powerhouse,' Hart said, emphasising that developing and emerging economies face unique challenges in their climate strategies.
Hart highlighted how BRICS nations are stepping up climate action in the wake of the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. He noted that climate issues, previously absent from BRICS discussions, now feature prominently in the bloc's statements with 'extensive and very precise technical work' being undertaken.
The UN official's comments follow his team's recent analysis suggesting fossil fuels are nearing 'the end of the road,' which prompted Guterres to deliver a special address declaring this 'the moment of energy transition.'
India's renewable energy progress
Hart described India as 'extremely pivotal to multilateralism, sustainable development, and climate action,' noting that the country has traditionally been 'an extremely strong advocate for conveying the interests of the developing world.'
'It's also an extremely large economy that is still developing, and will require huge amounts of energy,' Hart said, praising India's momentum towards its climate goals.
He noted that 50% of the country's electricity capacity now comes from renewables. 'India is more than halfway to the 500 gigawatt goal set by PM Modi,' he said, expressing hope this progress would be reflected in India's nationally determined contribution (NDC) due before COP30.
'Because what we want to say, ambition cannot be imposed from outside. We will encourage as much as possible. We can't impose,' Hart said. 'But we hope that India, along with other major economies, put NDCs on the table that send the right signals to markets and to investors that the energy transition is unstoppable.'
'The potential for India to exploit its leadership on clean energy is absolutely enormous,' Hart said.
Financial challenges loom
However, Hart acknowledged that financing remains a critical challenge for developing countries preparing for COP30 in Brazil this November. Many nations face serious debt distress and lack fiscal space for adaptation and resilience investments.
The COP29 and COP30 presidencies have established a circle of finance ministers to address these challenges. 'The world needs to understand that there needs to be a serious discussion on how to address the financing needs of developing countries,' Hart said.
Despite US withdrawal from Paris Agreement, Hart said other major economies remain committed to multilateral climate action. He cited an April roundtable convened by Guterres and Brazilian President Lula, which included President Xi, European Commission President von der Leyen, and chairs of various regional groups including ASEAN, CARICOM, G20, and the African Union.
All participants 'expressed firm commitment to multilateralism, to the Paris Agreement,' Hart said.
The UN Secretary General has invited world leaders to announce new NDCs during an event on September 24, the second day of the General Assembly's high-level week. Hart said China and other countries have indicated they will present economy-wide NDCs covering all greenhouse gas emissions.
Hart emphasised that renewable energy costs have reached historic lows with record deployments worldwide, contributing to a 'decoupling of GDP growth from emissions' that marks a departure from two centuries of carbon-intensive economic growth.
On July 22, Guterres declared in a special address at UN headquarters: 'Fossil fuels are running out of road. The sun is rising in a clean energy age.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Explained: The rift in Western world over Gaza, and its possible impact
Explained: The rift in Western world over Gaza, and its possible impact

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Explained: The rift in Western world over Gaza, and its possible impact

With the humanitarian crisis in Gaza growing more alarming, Israel Sunday said it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and allow new aid corridors. Days before, Israel and the United States had withdrawn from ceasefire negotiations with Hamas, citing the Palestinian group's lack of 'good faith'. The following day, on Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced his country would declare its recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations in September, drawing criticism from both the US and Israel. On July 21, 25 countries including Italy, Canada, UK, Japan, France and the EU had asserted that 'the war in Gaza must end now'. In recent days, multiple Western leaders, including Macron, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Canadian PM Mark Carney, and Australian PM Anthony Albanese have strongly criticised Israel's actions in Gaza. These developments represent a global rift — including in the West — when it comes to Israel and Palestine. It is yet to be seen what this will mean on the ground. Israel's war on Gaza Over the past month, Israel's approach to Gaza has turned more decisive. With the US withdrawing from the ceasefire negotiations, Israel appears to have a carte blanche both for its maximalist military objective of eliminating Hamas and its maximalist political objective of a permanent occupation of Gaza. A chorus of Israeli ministers, like Itamar Ben-Gvir, continue to call for Palestinians to 'leave' Gaza. Defence Minister Israel Katz has laid out Israel's immediate plans for the Strip. This includes building a 'humanitarian city' on the ruins of Rafah where 600,000 Palestinians would initially be 'moved' and 'not be allowed to leave, except to go to other countries'. This plan, which will eventually include all of Gaza's population of roughly 2.1 million people, has been described as a potential concentration camp by several experts, including former Israeli PM Ehud Olmert. Israel's latest strategy of allegedly shooting unarmed Palestinians lining up for aid has triggered more pointed criticism from Western capitals outside the US. The July 21 joint statement stated that the 'Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity'. Aid into the besieged Palestinian enclave is currently being routed through the Israeli-American Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). There is growing evidence of starving Palestinians being slaughtered outside GHF centres; the UN reports that more than 1,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed by Israel since the GHF began operations on May 27. This comes even as more than a hundred humanitarian aid organisations have warned that a 'mass famine' is spreading in Gaza. The World Food Program, an arm of the UN, said recently that the hunger crisis in Gaza had reached 'new and astonishing levels of desperation, with a third of the population not eating for multiple days in a row.' Global positions on Palestine The French decision to recognise Palestinian statehood is representative of a growing rift in the global order vis-à-vis Israel and Palestine. * The US and Israel reject any push for a Palestinian state. The alliance of the two stakeholders with the greatest ability to affect changes on the ground has held firm even as global pressures on Israel increase. * Several Western states, such as Canada, UK, and Germany, however, are seemingly breaking from the US-Israel alliance. While they do back Israel's immediate objectives, they also remain committed to potentially implementing the two-state solution. Note, however, that these countries also retain their broader support for Israeli interests. Macron, for instance, called for a demilitarised Palestinian state — which would effectively deny Palestinians full sovereignty. * The Global South and Arab states seek an immediate end to Israel's current war in Gaza and an inclusive, negotiated two-state solution to the original dispute. However, most of these states have markedly limited abilities to actually shape events on the ground, and Arab states remain disinclined to undertake punitive economic or military measures against Israel. Status of two-state solution Broadly, despite the failure of the Oslo Accords of 1995, most states have stood by the two-state solution as the only achievable outcome — even as Israel progressively removes the physical contours of a future Palestinian state and has killed Palestinians at record rates each day since October 2023. A day before ceasefire talks broke down, the Israeli Knesset passed a non-binding resolution calling for Israel to annex the West Bank. Another Knesset resolution a year ago had rejected the possibility of allowing a sovereign Palestinian state. In June, Israel approved 22 new Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Most of Israel's West Bank settlements are deemed illegal by the UN and a majority of its member states, including India. That Israeli ministers also look to re-settle Homesh and Sa-Nur in the Northern West Bank, evacuated along with the settlements in Gaza in 2005, is indicative of Israel's concerted push to leverage the war to expand its illegal occupation of Palestinian territories. It is thus notable that France and Saudi Arabia are set to co-chair an international conference on the two-state solution at the UN from July 28. While a ministerial-level conference on the two-state solution was held at the UN in September 2024, Israel's war of attrition, combined with forced mass starvation, has sparked a renewed push to explore methods to advance the solution. However, unlike earlier global pushes for a Palestinian state alongside Israel according to pre-1967 borders, the current international effort arguably occurs with the US and Israel being the least amenable. Even as questions over the reform of the Palestinian Authority (restricted to the West Bank since 2007) can be addressed, the question of Hamas' future remains a dead-end. The upcoming international conference will bolster support for Palestinian statehood (recognised by 147 of the UN's 193 member states) but the degree to which participating states can influence Israeli actions remains unclear. It remains to be seen if the conference propels states to undertake punitive measures of any nature and scale against Israel, failing which Tel Aviv has little incentive to cease hostilities and territorial expansion, especially with continuing US support. Bashir Ali Abbas is a Senior Research Associate at the Council for Strategic and Defense Research, New Delhi

Bihar electors' number may dip for 1st time since 2005
Bihar electors' number may dip for 1st time since 2005

Hindustan Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Bihar electors' number may dip for 1st time since 2005

The Election Commission of India on Sunday said that 72.4 million enumeration forms were collected during the enumeration phase of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in Bihar. This number is 6.5 million (8%) short of the number of registered electors in the state on June 24, the day before the SIR exercise began in the state; 4.8 million (6.2%) short of the number during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections; and 1.2 million (1.6%) short of the number during the 2020 state assembly election. Data on registered electors in Bihar for assembly and Lok Sabha elections shows that it generally increases. (File Photo) The apparent decline in the number of electors in Bihar – the final electoral roll is scheduled to be published only on September 30 – is the first between two consecutive elections in the state since the two assembly elections held in 2005. This trend holds true whether one is looking at two consecutive assembly elections or assembly elections and Lok Sabha elections taken together. Data on registered electors in Bihar for assembly and Lok Sabha elections shows that it generally increases. HT checked this number for all assembly elections held in the state since 1977 (after removing the assembly constituencies that became part of Jharkhand in 2000), the first election after the third delimitation exercise; and all Lok Sabha elections held since 2004, the first Lok Sabha election after the creation of Jharkhand. Registered electors increased in the state between all consecutive elections analysed in this period except between the February and October 2005 assembly elections. Between the two 2005 elections, the number of electors declined from 52.7 million to 51.3 million (2.5%). The trend in 2005 shows that it is not impossible for registered electors to decline in Bihar. However, it would still be a rare occurrence in the state if the final electoral roll shows the number of registered electors lower than in the 2020 assembly election (73.6 million) or the 2024 Lok Sabha election (77.3 million). In fact, the 8% decline from 78.9 million electors on June 24 to 72.4 million electors on July 27 is also a bigger proportional decline in a period shorter than a year than the 2.5% decline between February and October 2005 elections. To be sure, a decline in the number of registered electors in a state with a high fertility rate like Bihar is puzzling even in 2005 (two years and one Lok Sabha election after the last SIR in 2003). Given its high fertility rate, the number of adults in the state increased by 28.5% between the 2001 and 2011 census, although the rate of migration from the state is also expected to have accelerated in this period, as HT reported on July 7. The decline seen in the SIR exercise in 2025 so far, however, still has some time for correction. The ECI's press note on July 27 says that genuine electors can still be added back to the elector rolls in the claims and objections period from August 1 to September 1. Young electors, who attain the age of 18 years on or before October 1, can also be added to the electoral roll in this period. One possible reason for the decline in electors in 2005 could be that that the ECI had launched a new campaign for issuing Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC) between the two elections in the year. 'Under this campaign, permanent online EPIC centres are being set up in the offices of all Electoral Registration Officers and additional teams are being mobilized to cover maximum number of electors in rural areas. The endeavour of the Commission is to maximize the coverage under EPIC programme so that there is no necessity to prescribe alternative documents for voter identification at the time of poll,' an ECI press note from July 23, 2005 says. Between the start of the campaign and the announcement of the schedule of the elections on September 3, EPIC coverage increased from 57% to 67%.

They Preach Peace, Profit From Blood: How 28 Nations Condemn Israel's War But Keep Its Billions Flowing
They Preach Peace, Profit From Blood: How 28 Nations Condemn Israel's War But Keep Its Billions Flowing

India.com

time2 hours ago

  • India.com

They Preach Peace, Profit From Blood: How 28 Nations Condemn Israel's War But Keep Its Billions Flowing

Cairo (Egypt): They gathered signatures and drafted words. Foreign ministers from 28 countries stood behind a statement that called for an end to Israel's war in Gaza. The ink dried. The bombs did not stop. Nearly 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the war began. That is the official toll. More than 144,000 wounded. Many of them are children. A siege turned into starvation, which is now being documented death by death. Despite global outrage, the war drags on. And while their governments call for ceasefires and humanitarian pauses, a darker truth of trade hides beneath the headlines. These same nations that have signed letters and statements, taken podiums at the UN and spoken of peace are shaking hands with Israel in the marketplace. From Europe to Asia and beyond, billions in imports and exports flow back and forth. Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom did over a billion dollars in trade with Israel in 2023 alone, according to global trade data. Cars, microchips, vaccines and perfumes. The shipments have not stopped. Ireland, which recognised Palestine this year, continues to buy integrated circuits from Israel, $3.58 billion worth. That is nearly the entirety of Ireland's imports from Tel Aviv. Italy, the loudest exporter among the signatories, sold Israel $3.49 billion in goods last year. That included over $100 million in cars. So what happened to standing with Palestine? Ireland and Spain have taken bold diplomatic steps. Both countries recognised the Palestinian state in 2024. Norway and Slovenia followed suit. France said it will join them in September when the UN General Assembly meets. Seven other nations, including Cyprus and Poland, had recognised Palestine decades earlier, some as early as 1988. But as of July 2025, not one of them has frozen trade with Israel. None have imposed economic sanctions. None have taken steps that go beyond symbolic declarations. They condemn Israel's assault but still fuel its economy. These are the 28 signatories – Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. All of them continue to engage in trade relations with Israel. None have opted out. Even voices once loyal to Israel are starting to speak up. Once an unflinching supporter, Hillary Clinton has raised concerns about the humanitarian catastrophe. France, Germany and the United Kingdom recently held an emergency call. They asked for an 'immediate ceasefire'. They urged the 'unconditional release of all hostages'. They warned of famine. But they did not call for sanctions. They did not stop their business. So the war grinds on. With statements made in capitals, and deals signed in silence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store