
Aamir Khan reveals his old fashioned secret to being fit and fab at 60: 'Diet is...'
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Nuclear Power! How India and Pakistan's arsenals stack up
Does America have a plan to capture Pakistan's nuclear weapons?
Airspace blockade: India plots a flight path to skip Pakistan
Recalling his experience, Khan told
Bollywood Hungama
, 'I allotted myself five months to reach the required fitness level. Nutrition was the key factor. Many believe that exercise alone is enough. But the truth is, without correct eating habits, physical training won't be effective. Your diet carries the most weight. I'd say 50% of the effort comes from what you eat, 25% from working out, and the remaining 25% from proper rest. Sleep for a solid eight hours—without that, your body won't respond the way you expect.'
Breaking Myths Around Dieting
Khan also spoke about the widespread confusion surrounding dieting methods. He addressed how people tend to skip meals, cut out rice at night, or drastically reduce food intake, hoping for fast results. However, he personally avoids such extreme or trendy diets. Instead, Aamir adheres to a classic and scientifically grounded method: maintaining a
calorie deficit
.
He explained, 'Let's say your body burns 2,000 calories a day. If you consume 2,000, your weight won't change. If you consume 1,500 calories daily, that's a 500-calorie shortfall. Over a week, this builds up to a 3,500-calorie gap, roughly equivalent to a pound of weight loss. If you also walk around 7 kilometers daily, it pushes the deficit further. But your meals must be well-rounded—with carbohydrates, proteins, healthy fats, dietary fiber, and essential salts like sodium.'
Understanding the Calorie Deficit Principle
The calorie deficit approach has become a widely accepted and reliable strategy to shed excess fat. Simply defined, it involves eating fewer calories than the body needs to maintain its current weight. This forces the body to utilize stored fat for energy, which eventually results in weight reduction.
Nutritionist Rashi Chahal from La Femme told Indian Express, 'Our bodies have a baseline energy requirement to carry out essential activities—like breathing, digestion, thinking, and movement. If we take in more energy than needed, the excess is saved as fat. But when intake falls short of usage, especially in individuals struggling with extra weight, the body begins to break down fat stores to bridge the energy gap.'
Safe and Sustainable Weight Management
Chahal emphasized that this process, when managed properly, can lead to slow but steady progress. 'By gradually lowering your food intake and boosting your activity levels, you encourage your system to tap into fat reserves. Over time, this helps reduce overall body mass. It also educates your metabolism to function efficiently with balanced portions,' she added.
A Word of Caution
Still, the calorie deficit model isn't universally suitable. 'Individuals with chronic illnesses, professional athletes, or those with past eating disorders should proceed cautiously. Severe restriction can result in muscle breakdown, lack of vital nutrients, and potential health complications. The key is moderation—creating a gap between intake and expenditure while still nourishing the body adequately,' Chahal concluded.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
Coolie and Empuraan: The problem with excessive fan theories and online film culture
In today's hyperconnected film culture, the movie often exists long before it ever hits the screen. Weeks, even months ahead of release, online theories and fan-made narratives begin shaping the public's perception of a film, often creating expectations no filmmaker can realistically satisfy. Social media has turned cinema into a constant guessing game, where every teaser frame, poster detail, and offhand quote becomes raw material for elaborate speculation. But when these carefully constructed fantasies collide with the reality of the final product, the backlash is swift, loud, and unforgiving. Few recent films illustrate this growing chasm between what audiences expect and what filmmakers deliver better than Empuraan and Coolie, two tentpole releases whose pre-release hype became both their greatest weapon and their biggest liability. Over the years, Lucifer had built a steadily burgeoning fanbase, and Empuraan, its long-awaited sequel, sparked a dedicated wave of buzz. Fans eagerly speculated about potential new additions to the cast, fresh story developments, and possible franchise connections leading into the already promised third installment. This heightened anticipation reflects a 'Reddit-pilled' film generation, one that has grown up immersed in a swirl of misinformation, exaggerated hype, and endless behind-the-scenes speculation. With daily doses of casting 'scoops' and production updates from so-called film journalists, often unreliable and misleading, audience expectations were inflated to unmatchable levels. In the case of Empuraan, this became especially apparent when the team released a deliberately low-key, tactful poster featuring the main villain with his back turned and face concealed. Within hours, the internet erupted into a guessing frenzy, with names like Aamir Khan, Fahadh Faasil, Basil Joseph, and many others being thrown into the mix as the possible 'mystery casting.' It is worth noting that neither the makers nor the cast of the film revealed anything about this character, intentionally choosing to build on the intrigue created by the long-kept secret. However, as anticipation grew, so did the restlessness of an enthusiastic fanbase whose expectations and imaginations ran wild. When their personal 'dream casting' failed to match the reality, frustration inevitably followed. The much-anticipated reveal turned out to be Rick Yune, best known for his memorable villainous roles in Hollywood productions like The Fast and the Furious (2001) and Die Another Day (2002). The unexpected choice left many fans confused and conflicted, as the countless hours they had spent speculating, analyzing posters, and dissecting online theories suddenly felt futile. Empuraan director Prithviraj Sukumaran's decision to go with an out-of-left-field casting defied conventional fan expectations and, for a section of franchise loyalists, caused visible disappointment. They had imagined an entirely different antagonist in their heads, only to be presented with an original, creatively inspired sequel that deliberately refused to cater to fan fiction or safe, predictable tropes. There were also numerous speculative story ideas and sequences circulating online, many of which carried misguided assumptions about Empraan's budget and actual content. The overactive imagination of hypersensitive viewers, deeply invested in the 'cinematic universe' possibilities of the franchise, ultimately backfired. Instead of the sprawling crossover event many expected, the resulting film delivered a straightforward continuation of the original's core story beats, albeit presented on a much grander, global scale. Also Read | Coolie feels like 1992 Mammootty film rip-off; Lokesh Kanagaraj missed Rajinism 101, Rajinikanth shines best with OG fan-directors As the months leading up to the release unfolded, rumors fueled unrealistic expectations that Empuraan could never hope to meet on its own terms, leaving a lingering sense of disappointment for some viewers. Consequently, discussions around the movie became dominated less by its production quality, ambitious scale, and world-building and more by endless debates about 'what could have been if my favorite fan prediction had come true.' This discourse continued to overshadow the film long after its release—and, in some circles, it still does. Similarly, with Coolie, the makers faced an endless barrage of online theories about the film's plot from the moment the teaser dropped. With every new update from the team, speculation intensified, as anticipation for the film to be part of the Lokesh Cinematic Universe (LCU) kept growing. Fans eagerly discussed potential star cameos, drawing elaborate charts, mapping character connections, and predicting hidden Easter eggs. Iconic characters from Lokesh Kanagaraj's previous films—Vikram, Leo, Rolex, and Dhilli—were all expected to make appearances in the Rajinikanth starrer. Even before the trailer was released, audiences were determined to connect the dots and place the film firmly under the umbrella of the larger LCU world. Every fleeting line of dialogue, blink-and-miss frame, and micro-cut from the teaser and trailer was scrutinized in obsessive detail, spawning countless YouTube breakdowns, fan theories, and podcast analyses. Complex narratives involving time travel, alternate timelines, and sci-fi twists were expounded endlessly—long before the film ever saw the light of day. This heightened level of audience investment in blockbuster cinema has made it increasingly difficult for filmmakers to trust their creative instincts. Instead, they find themselves constantly second-guessing their choices, looking over their shoulders to ensure that the carefully cultivated momentum of pre-release campaigns isn't derailed by angry viewers with rigid, preconceived notions of what the film should be and how the story must unfold. Audiences today often attempt to 'do the work' of filmmakers even before a film's release—crafting elaborate theories, charting imagined plotlines, and setting sky-high expectations. When the final product inevitably fails to align with these personal narratives, the backlash is swift and unforgiving, manifesting as merciless trolling, online outrage, and prolonged rants. The simple joy of experiencing a film on its own terms is slowly being eroded by an impatient, attention-deficit-driven generation of viewers who engage less with the story being told and more with the story they wanted to see. For many, any deviation from their imagined version isn't just disappointing—it's intolerable. Criticisms of Coolie for not meeting the standards of the LCU or falling short as a Rajinikanth-led star vehicle are entirely valid. However, when negative reactions are driven primarily by the absence of expected cameos, predetermined storylines, cinematic crossovers, or direct connections to a director's previous work, that speaks less to the film's quality and more to the influence of an overwrought, hyper-online film culture. Similarly, Empuraan was almost destined to disappoint a section of viewers who failed to engage with its tonal experimentation, bold narrative swings, and deliberate deviation from the easy pleasures of its predecessor. Instead of appreciating its risks, many were consumed by pearl-clutching discourse and inflated expectations that left little room to experience the film on its own terms. Also Read | Coolie box office collection Day 6: Rajinikanth-Lokesh Kanagaraj's pan-Indian entertainer dips further, passes Rs 400 crore worldwide The greater danger lies beyond these individual films. When studios and directors internalize such backlash, they may be tempted to appease online theories and unrealistic fan expectations, leading to compromised storytelling, safe reiterations of familiar tropes and recycled ideas that ultimately benefit no one, neither the creators nor the audience.


Indian Express
15 hours ago
- Indian Express
Akshay Kumar, Arshad Warsi summoned by Pune court over portrayal of lawyers in ‘Jolly LLB 3'
A civil court in Pune Monday issued summons to the director and actors of the upcoming Bollywood movie Jolly LLB 3, starring Akshay Kumar, following a complaint filed by Pune-based advocate Wajed Khan that the film may defame judges and lawyers. The summons dated August 18, issued by Junior Division Civil Judge J G Pawar, asked director Subhash Kapoor, actors Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi to appear in the court on October 28. The movie is scheduled for release on September 19. Khan said the recently out teaser of the movie contained objectionable language about judges and lawyers under the guise of cinematic liberty. Khan said he filed the civil suit with fellow advocate Ganesh Mhaske. The summons asks the makers of the movie to appear in the court in person to 'answer the claim' and produce all documents upon which they intend to rely in support of their defence. 'Take notice that, in default of your appearance on the day before mentioned, the suit will be heard and determined in your absence,' it stated. The summons, however, wrongly names Akshay Kumar as Arun Bhatia instead of his birth name, Rajiv Bhatia. 'I will file a correction application in the court for changing the name Arun Bhatia on a summons. It should be Rajiv Bhatia alias Akshay Kumar, who is a lead actor of the movie Jolly LLB 3,' said Khan. Khan said the summons has been dispatched to Kumar, Kapoor, and Warsi by post to their respective addresses in Mumbai. Jolly LLB 3 is the third instalment in the legal comedy franchise. The first part starring Warsi was released in 2013. The sequel, starring Akshay Kumar in the lead, became a superhit, earning over Rs 200 crore worldwide. Alok Jain and Ajit Andhare produce the third part of the franchise under the banner of Star Studio 18.


Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Ravi Chhabriya FINALLY reveals what DELETED scene from Salman Khan's 'Bharat' featuring Varun Dhawan was about: 'Dono…'
Ravi Chhabriya worked as an assistant director for Salman Khan 's film ' Bharat ,' which was released in 2019. Before the movie was released in theaters, reports suggested that Varun Dhawan would be making a special appearance in the film. However, later, it was reported that the scene has been dropped from the movie. And in a recent interview, the filmmaker opened up about the same. Let's read in detail what Ravi Chhabriya has to say about Varun Dhawan's cameo in 'Bharat' Ravi Chhabriya shares what the deleted scene from 'Bharat' featuring Varun Dhawan was about In an interview with Bollywood Hungama, Ravi Chhabriya was asked if the scene will be out on a public platform like YouTube. To which the filmmaker shared that it's up to producer Atul Agnihotri, and he has no idea if it will be out or not. He revealed that they shot a scene with Varun; however, during the final edit, they decided to chop it off. Ravi Chhabriya then revealed what the scene was. He told the publication that the scene was incorporated in the movie when Bharat (Salman) is working in the oil field in the Middle East. He shared, "There was a scene where Salman Sir's character and Varun's character came together. It was a fun scene. Dono panja ladate hai." More about 'Bharat' The film was directed by Ali Abbas Zafar and also starred Katrina Kaif, Sunil Grover, Disha Patani , and Jackie Shroff. The film was an adaptation of the South Korean movie, 'An Ode To My Father'. Released in June 2019, the film went on to earn over Rs 300 crore at the box office. More About Ravi Chhabriya Ravi Chhabriya worked as an assistant director in Salman Khan's 'Sultan' (2016), 'Tiger Zinda Hai' (2017), Arjun Kapoor's 'Aurgangzeb' and the Ranveer Singh and Govinda starrer 'Kill Dil'. He marked his debut as a full-fledged director with the Diljit Dosanjh-starrer 'Detective Sherdil'. "Get the latest updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie Coolie and War 2 ."