DEX Trading Share Climbs to Record High
Trading platforms operating without intermediaries have attracted a growing user base. The surge is primarily driven by rapid token listings, enhanced accessibility, and traders seeking autonomy over assets.
Crypto‑analytics firm CryptoRank reports the 27.92% figure as of 27 June 2025. On the same date, CoinStats and Cointelegraph confirmed that DEX activity has surpassed one quarter of combined CEX volumes.
ADVERTISEMENT
Market analysts say this shift reflects a fundamental change in how users approach crypto. DEXs often offer immediate listing for new tokens, while CEXs enforce extensive vetting, delaying token debut. This gives DEXs an edge for traders looking to seize early opportunities.
Industry professionals highlight improved user interfaces, multi‑chain support, and deep wallet integration—such as MetaMask and Coinbase Wallet—as key enablers reducing friction for users.
At the same time, spot volume on CEXs has declined, reverting to levels last seen in 2020, according to CryptoQuant data. This drop has fed into the rising share of DEXs even if total trading volumes remain flat.
Numerous industry insiders emphasise that long‑term holders, or 'HODLers', are withdrawing assets from centralised platforms to personal wallets. This trend has further depressed CEX volumes and benefited decentralized trading.
Beyond token listings, privacy and transparency concerns have played a role. Faced with heightened scrutiny of centralised platforms and regulatory pressures, users often gravitate towards DEXs that allow control over private keys and transaction traceability.
The market has witnessed high‑value token offerings, including memecoins and Web3 project tokens, debuting exclusively on DEXs where speculative interest is strong. These listings typically bypass CEX vetting procedures, reinforcing DEX popularity among investors seeking first‑mover advantage.
Despite DEX progress, CEXs still dominate overall trading: the remaining 72.08% of spot volume remains on centralised systems. Their robust liquidity, institutional investor access, and features like leverage trading continue to appeal to many investors.
Analysts caution that DEX market share gains may plateau unless total trading activity grows or CEX volume drops further. However, if DEX share surpasses 30%—a threshold some industry observers regard as a tipping point—it could reshape how trading infrastructure evolves.
Technological strides are helping drive DEX adoption. Layer‑2 rollout, smart-contract efficiency, and multisignature governance have reduced fees and slippage. Cross‑chain bridges further improve functionality, with networks like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon enabling seamless movement across blockchains.
Security remains a concern, however. DEX platforms, while reducing risks associated with central custodians, expose users to smart‑contract vulnerabilities. High‑profile exploits continue to underscore these weaknesses. That said, liquidity protocols such as Uniswap v3 and LayerZero have incorporated rigorous audits, bug‑bounty programmes, and verifiable codebases to bolster confidence.
Regulation continues to loom over both exchange types. Centralised platforms must comply with KYC/AML rules and are vigilant following recent regulatory crackdowns. DEXs operate in a more decentralised fashion but may face scrutiny for permitting unvetted tokens. Some global jurisdictions are investigating DEX platforms for facilitating illicit finance.
Emerging market participants – from speculative traders to institutional investors – are now evaluating DEXs as viable alternatives. These platforms support algorithmic trading bots, liquidity pools, yield‑farming incentives, and governance staking. Both market segments are adapting to a blended ecosystem.
Looking ahead, analysts are watching developments in decentralised autonomous organisations and algorithmic market‑making, which may reshape trading dynamics. Advances in privacy protocols, like zero‑knowledge rollups, could further catalyse DEX appeal by enhancing user confidentiality.
Institutional adoption remains cautious. Regulatory clarity, custody solutions, and conventional compliance standards are still being developed. Yet a growing cohort of fintech firms are exploring hybrid DEX‑CEX offerings, combining institutional-grade services with decentralised execution.
While DEX market share has reached unprecedented levels, it remains uncertain whether this marks a permanent realignment. The next pivotal indicator will be whether DEXs can sustain growth in a stable or expanding market, rather than merely displace CEX volume amid stagnation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
a day ago
- Crypto Insight
Firedancer will speed up Solana, but it won't reach full potential
Solana's next-generation validator client, Firedancer, may not reach full speed on the network it was built for as technical limits push developers to test it elsewhere. One of those developers is Douglas Colkitt, a former high-frequency trader who's testing a hybrid validator setup called Frankendancer on Fogo, a Solana-compatible chain built to remove the constraints that currently prevent Firedancer from reaching its full potential on Solana. Colkitt, a founding contributor at Fogo, said the new blockchain isn't trying to replace Solana but does discard some of Solana's core assumptions, such as globally distributed validator sets, to showcase how far Firedancer can go when speed takes priority over decentralization. The push to run Firedancer outside Solana highlights a deeper split in blockchain infrastructure: the tension between decentralization and speed. These two have long been trade-offs, but more builders are now choosing to prioritize speed. Why Firedancer can't go full speed on Solana yet Jump Trading developed Firedancer, a high-performance validator client aimed at boosting Solana's throughput and reducing latency. But according to Colkitt, Solana's architecture includes technical constraints that limit how fast Firedancer can operate in practice. 'If you have two clients running on the same network, you can only go as fast as the slowest client because otherwise the network risks halting,' he told Cointelegraph. 'It's like driving a Ferrari in city traffic — no matter how fast the car is, you're limited by the speed of the other vehicles around you.' Solana currently supports two main validator client implementations: Agave and Firedancer. Agave is running on about 90% of validators as of Friday. Meanwhile, Firedancer is still in a transitional phase as Frankendancer, a hybrid combining Agave and Firedancer. It accounts for about 10% of validators, up from 7% in April. Frankendancer's hybrid approach allows for a gradual adoption of Firedancer's improvements without risking network stability. Solana's network relies on a globally distributed set of validators. This geographic decentralization strengthens security by preventing any single party or region from gaining excessive control. It also enhances censorship resistance and resilience against localized outages or attacks. This also means that decentralization comes with performance trade-offs. Data and consensus messages must travel long distances, resulting in unavoidable network latency. Even with optimized software like Frankendancer and the fastest hardware, Solana's block time remains around 400 milliseconds. 'Trading firms absolutely need something faster than 400 milliseconds. If you have events like a [Federal Reserve] announcement or nonfarm payrolls, you want to be closer to that data to trade off of it,' Colkitt said. Solana is also working to reduce latency. On Thursday, the Solana Foundation unveiled a roadmap aiming to establish the 'Internet Capital Market' by 2027, targeting millisecond-level control over transaction ordering in smart contracts. Firedancer's real-world test outside Solana Colkitt traces his entry into crypto back to 'DeFi Summer.' He was working on an automated market maker project on Ethereum and its emerging rollups. 'The Ethereum chains weren't sufficient for what we wanted to do,' Colkitt said, explaining why he left the Ethereum ecosystem in search of alternatives better suited for high-frequency trading. 'We spent a lot more time playing politics — which L2 do we go to? How do we get L2 support? — that kind of distracted from building the core products.' This fragmentation held back innovation compared to the simplicity and unified liquidity of early Ethereum, Colkitt said, which was more apparent in Solana. However, Solana is still relatively young. It produced its first block in March 2020. Traditional financial institutions are slower in embracing newer blockchain platforms like Solana, Colkitt said, adding that banks still remain comfortable primarily within Ethereum-compatible ecosystems. On the demand side, Colkitt pointed to projects like Hyperliquid, which push the limits of current blockchain infrastructure. 'Hyperliquid owns 90% plus of the market in decentralized perpetuals trading,' he noted. 'But that kind of ultra-low latency, high-throughput trading experience just doesn't reliably work on Solana today because of block times and network stability.' Fogo, which launched its testnet on Tuesday, uses Solana-based technology to compete with chains like Hyperliquid. Built on the Solana Virtual Machine, it is compatible with projects currently running on Solana. Fogo currently runs on Frankendancer, with plans to transition fully to Firedancer when ready, unlocking the validator client's full potential. When asked about the timeline, Colkitt gave a 'very rough guess' of the end of this year. Fogo is targeting its mainnet launch in September. Firedancer's true potential outside Solana Next-generation low-latency networks like Fogo and Hyperliquid are pushing the boundaries to match the speed demands of modern trading. Projects like MegaETH also promise near-instant transactions, targeting emerging sectors such as decentralized physical infrastructure nextworks that require real-time execution. What unites these chains is a willingness to make trade-offs, dialing back decentralization to scale. Fogo intentionally reduces the geographic distribution of validators to gain this speed advantage. 'What we're doing with Fogo is spinning up validator nodes in a few key global locations — Tokyo, London and New York — to reduce latency between them,' he said. 'By co-locating validators closer together geographically, we can push Firedancer to achieve much faster block times than Solana's globally distributed validator set allows.' This trade-off sets the stage for an important experiment. Firedancer's true potential will likely never be fully unlocked on Solana itself, a network that remains constrained by its global validator set and commitment to decentralization. Instead, the testbed for what ultra-fast, high-performance blockchain infrastructure can truly achieve comes at the cost of decentralization. However, Solana is not standing still. Its recently unveiled 2027 roadmap aims to bring the blockchain closer to traditional finance standards. Source:
Crypto Insight
5 days ago
- Crypto Insight
Bitcoin's quantum countdown has already begun, Naoris CEO says
A hacker-turned-defender warns that most of the industry is asleep on crypto's existential threat: quantum computing. David Carvalho, CEO of post-quantum infrastructure firm Naoris Protocol, began hacking at the age of 13, experimenting with spam emails to attract job offers and gain attention from employers. Eventually, that curiosity shifted into formal cybersecurity work, where he used the same skills to defend systems instead of probing them. Today, he builds quantum-resilient systems for decentralized networks and claims that the cryptographic foundations of blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum are dangerously outdated. 'The cryptography behind nearly every chain is as weak as the rest of the world's cryptography,' Carvalho told Cointelegraph. 'Quantum is coming for it all, like meteors came for the dinosaurs.' Though Bitcoin and other blockchain developers often claim there's still plenty of time to adapt, the window may be closing fast. Efforts to implement quantum-resistant signatures are underway, but Carvalho said they're far from widespread or treated with the urgency the threat demands. The quantum threats harvesting Bitcoin data today For years, the idea that quantum computers could threaten Bitcoin felt like science fiction. But real-world developments suggest the threat is shifting from theory to early practice. Governments and tech giants are already preparing for what's known as the 'harvest now, decrypt later' model. US federal agencies, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology, have warned since 2022 about the urgency of adopting quantum-resistant algorithms, while a White House memorandum prompted the NSA to advise government contractors to migrate to post-quantum cryptography by 2035. Today's quantum technology still falls short of cracking Bitcoin's SHA-256 hash function or the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) that secures crypto keys. But researchers like Carvalho argue that exponential breakthroughs — especially when paired with AI — could arrive abruptly. State-sponsored actors and cybercriminal groups are already collecting encrypted blockchain data now, hoping to decrypt it once quantum hardware catches up. 'The adversaries collecting encrypted blockchain data right now aren't waiting to attack today,' Carvalho said. 'They're building data sets for tomorrow. When the tech catches up, they'll unlock a decade of secrets in minutes.' Despite these warnings, most of the Bitcoin community doesn't see quantum computing as an immediate threat, and there's no widespread sense of panic. Bitcoin's current cryptography is still considered robust against existing quantum machines, and developers have begun exploring defenses like BIP-360, which proposes quantum-resistant addresses. Projects like Carvalho's Naoris Protocol are also working to help blockchains transition to post-quantum cryptographic standards. Quantum laced with AI is Bitcoin's real apocalypse While most conversations about quantum threats focus on brute-force attacks on cryptographic keys, Carvalho believes the true danger lies in the convergence of quantum computing and artificial intelligence. Together, he argues, they could enable stealthy, asymmetric attacks that don't overwhelm crypto systems with power but dismantle them with precision. 'Everyone's waiting for a countdown that won't come. You won't get a warning that a 10-year-old Bitcoin wallet has been cracked. You'll just see funds moved, and no one will be able to prove how or by whom,' he said. AI is already embedded in cybersecurity — used for intrusion detection, smart contract auditing and anomaly detection. But in the wrong hands, the same tools could be flipped. An AI attacker could automatically scan open-source wallets for edge-case bugs, simulate validator responses and adapt in real time to network behavior. If paired with a quantum computer capable of breaking elliptic-curve private keys, the result wouldn't be a loud breach, but what Carvalho calls a 'silent collapse.' 'This isn't just about stealing coins,' he said. 'It's about eroding trust invisibly. Entire blockchains could be compromised, governance systems spoofed, and no one would know who did it or how.' AI-driven tests have found vulnerabilities in cryptographic libraries that traditional tools overlook. Combine that with adversaries stockpiling encrypted data under the 'harvest now, decrypt later' model, and the groundwork for a systemic breach may already be in place. Carvalho warned that this could mark Bitcoin's true apocalypse if left unaddressed — not a dramatic livestreamed cracking of SHA-256 but a slow, silent erosion of the trust layers that hold the system together. Bitcoin can't defend against weak links For all the talk of Bitcoin's decentralization, its real-world infrastructure remains deeply centralized. Cloud platforms, mining pools and validator networks all present vulnerable chokepoints that quantum-capable adversaries could exploit. If a single cloud provider hosting hundreds of full nodes is compromised, the damage could ripple across the entire network, regardless of how decentralized the protocol itself claims to be. 'Decentralization is great on paper, but if everyone's routing through the same few backbones or trusting a handful of third-party APIs, the game's already lost.' The quantum threat could exploit the blind spots in the systems around it: centralized infrastructure, aging technology and trust assumptions. Some projects are already being prepared. Carvalho's Naoris, for example, draws on national security frameworks to build decentralized systems designed for a post-quantum world. Others are developing quantum-resistant rollups, new key formats and protocol upgrades through Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) or leveraging inherently secure technologies like StarkWare's STARKs. The threat is approaching, but the response is also growing. What remains is whether the crypto ecosystem will act before it's too late. Source:
Crypto Insight
20-07-2025
- Crypto Insight
Ether preps record short squeeze as analysis sees $4K ETH price ‘soon'
Key points: Ether is currently forging a short squeeze that stands out in crypto history, says analysis. A 10% price increase would see another $1 billion in liquidated shorts. Shorts should now fuel a $4,000 ETH price rebound. Ether is 'making history' as ETH price gains spark a short squeeze for the record books. Fresh analysis from trading resource The Kobeissi Letter issued Friday now sees ETH/USD hitting $4,000 'soon.' Ether shorts risk punishment as ETH eyes 2025 highs Ether price strength has become one of July's crypto market standouts as altcoins slowly begin following Bitcoin higher. As the largest altcoin by market cap, Ether is punishing short positions at a rate rarely seen before, Kobeissi reports. 'Ethereum is making HISTORY: We are currently witnessing one of the LARGEST short squeezes in crypto history,' it summarized in a dedicated thread on X. 'Ethereum has added +$150 BILLION in market cap since July 1st, days after net SHORT exposure hit record highs.' Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView confirms that ETH/USD gained 20% over the past week alone. Local highs of $3,610 on Bitstamp almost match the year-to-date record seen in early January. Compared to its 2025 low, the pair is up over 150%. Now, Kobeissi not only sees $4,000 coming next, but also continuation of the short squeeze. 'If Ethereum rises another 10%, another $1 billion of shorts will be liquidated,' it calculated alongside data from monitoring resource CoinGlass. 'Furthermore, the fact that many of these shorts are leveraged is adding even more pressure. Ethereum could see $4,000 soon.' Bitcoin dominance drops to March lows Bitcoin meanwhile continues to consolidate below the psychologically significant $120,000 mark. At the same time, capital has been reported as flowing into altcoins as traders eye the potential for quicker returns. Bitcoin's dominance of the overall crypto market cap has halted a multi-year uptrend, falling to 61.4% this week — its lowest value since March. '$BTC.D Has only dropped 4.5% from the local highs and we can already see its impact on alts and ALT/BTC pairs,' popular trader Daan crypto Trades observed on X Friday. Daan Crypto Trades pinned the dominance drop on 'outperformance' from ETH and XRP in particular. 'When the market is eventually looking extremely overheated or shaky, capital will flee back into $BTC & Cash/Stables,' he warned, drawing a comparison to late 2024. Source:
