Dossier of WhatsApp chats shows how ad agencies aligned to fix prices in India
The attempt to woo the client violated the agencies' agreement, Omnicom Media's India CEO Kartik Sharma wrote in a WhatsApp group comprising a who's who of advertising, according to excerpts of the discussion documented by antitrust investigators.
"This kind of practice is not in the spirit of what we are collectively trying to achieve," Sharma wrote, without identifying the parties.
Shashi Sinha, then India CEO of New York-based IPG Mediabrands, suggested an industry group should "admonish the agency."
The exchanges form part of a confidential dossier compiled by India's antitrust watchdog that chronicles how global advertising companies, including leading U.S. and European firms, coordinated to rig prices in the world's most populous nation.
Evidence from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) investigation includes a 10-page document with messages and records of meetings between top advertising executives, and two industry agreements are under scrutiny for antitrust violations. Two people familiar with the probe have spoken about it.
The key details, which haven't been previously reported, center on WhatsApp interactions involving 11 industry executives. They include the top India or South Asia executives of WPP's GroupM; U.S.-based Omnicom Media and Interpublic's IPG Mediabrands; France's Publicis and Havas Media; Japan's Dentsu and India's Madison World.
Over WhatsApp and in meetings, the executives coordinated responses to clients, which "resulted in alignment of competing advertising agencies," CCI officials said in the Aug. 9 dossier, determining on an initial basis that the conduct contravened competition law.
The firms agreed to cooperate on pricing, including not to undercut each other; colluded with broadcasters to deny business to agencies that didn't comply; and discussed financial terms involving at least four Indian clients over conference calls, according to the investigation documents.
The documents don't indicate whether the agencies' foreign headquarters were aware of the executives' actions.
A spokesperson for WPP Media, which until May was known as GroupM, said it was aware of the investigation but declined to comment further. A Dentsu India spokesperson confirmed reporting that it had disclosed industry practices to the CCI in February 2024 under the regulator's leniency program, which enables lesser penalties for firms that share evidence of malpractice. The spokesperson didn't address specific evidence raised in the dossier but said the firm had implemented stricter audits and controls.
The other agencies and their executives didn't respond to questions about the antitrust probe and information in the dossier. The regulator also didn't respond to queries.
In March, as part of the continuing investigation, the regulator raided the Indian offices of many advertising firms and an industry group that represents broadcasters, including the Reliance-Disney venture and Sony.
CCI investigations typically take several months. The regulator can't press criminal charges, but can impose financial penalties on the media agencies of up to three times their profit or 10% of an Indian entity's global turnover, whichever is higher, for each year of wrongdoing.
Secret pacts
WPP Media, the world's largest media-buying agency, last year — when it was still known as GroupM — won new India business worth $447 million, followed by Omnicom's $183 million, according to research firm COMvergence.
But India's near-$30 billion media and entertainment sector is grappling with weak consumer sentiment. Ad spending will rise 7% to $19 billion in 2025, the slowest growth in three years, according to GroupM estimates.
The CCI is investigating the role of two industry bodies, the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI) and the Indian Broadcasting & Digital Foundation (IBDF), in orchestrating the suspected cartel.
The former group is led by WPP Media India head Prasanth Kumar, while the broadcasting body's president is Kevin Vaz, a top Reliance-Disney venture executive. Neither industry group responded to requests for comment.
The dossier shows the AAAI circulated guidelines to ad agencies in August 2023: They must charge clients whose annual spending exceeds $29 million a minimum 3% commission for digital ads and 2.5% for traditional media. Lower-spending clients would pay higher minimum commissions of up to 8%.
A month later, the industry associations entered a joint pact, agreeing no agency would "unilaterally offer any discount" on rates while pitching for business. The pact declared its aim was to eliminate "lower pricing as a reason to award a pitch."
The advertising firms began coordinating their activities at least as early as August 2023, according to the CCI documents.
Ad executives who met on Dec. 1 that year hailed their collaboration as a "great success" and resolved to continue, according to meeting minutes cited in the CCI's evidence.
'All aligned'
In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission this month sought information from advertising agencies as part of a probe into whether they coordinated boycotts of certain sites.
The Justice Department in 2016 probed agencies it suspected of rigging bids to favor in-house units, but eventually closed the case without bringing charges.
Brewer Anheuser-Busch InBev used CCI's leniency program to blow the whistle on an industry cartel in India in 2017.
In the case of the ad industry, Dentsu India said it filed its leniency application with the CCI not as a reaction to external pressure but out of a decision to "support reform from within."
Two people with knowledge of the matter said the evidence Dentsu submitted included a transcript of the WhatsApp group. The group, formed in August 2023, was named "AAAI media agencies" and contained scores of chat messages.
Participants included Kumar of WPP's media company, Sharma of Omnicom Media, IPG Mediabrands' Sinha, Havas Media India CEO Mohit Joshi, Dentsu South Asia CEO Harsha Razdan and then-media business CEO Anita Kotwani, Publicis South Asia chief Anupriya Acharya and Madison boss Sam Balsara, the investigators' evidence shows.
Members of the group discussed advertising pitches and coordinated on interactions with clients such as food delivery giant Swiggy, drugmaker Cipla, SoftBank-backed e-commerce firm Meesho, and Kshema Insurance.
In Swiggy's case, the AAAI arranged a Zoom call with media agency heads to discuss the company's advertising pitch. Later, GroupM's Kumar, as AAAI president, suggested an email response to Swiggy explaining the industry's agreed position on rebates.
"Ok all aligned thanks," he wrote after a consensus emerged.
Kshema said the insurer was unaware of the matter. The other clients didn't respond to questions.
During another discussion on client rebates, an unspecified Dentsu executive told rivals over WhatsApp that "the lowest we go to is retain 30% and 70% we pass back to the client," according to the CCI dossier.
CCI officials noted in the document that advertisers and the broadcasters' group had sought to penalize enterprises that didn't comply with the pricing pacts.
In an email to Walt Disney in August 2023, Kumar wrote that broadcasters should refrain from granting business to a firm that had breached the pacts, ITW Consulting, though he said it had later agreed not to approach clients directly.
ITW didn't respond to questions.
Tensions heated up again over WhatsApp three months later.
Sharma, of Omnicom Media, learned that ITW had done another "direct deal with a client of ours" for advertising on streaming platform Hotstar, which was run by Disney.
This irked Sharma, as Hotstar had the rights for the cricket World Cup held in India at the time.
"This nuisance has to stop," he wrote in the group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
The AI talent war is the stuff of Steve Jobs' nightmares
You wouldn't have exactly called the late Steve Jobs a "man of letters,' but he certainly loved a searing email. One of Apple's co-founder's most famous writings is this 2005 memo to Bruce Chizen, Adobe's chief executive officer at the time. Bruce: Adobe is recruiting from Apple. They have hired one person already and are calling lots more. I have a standing policy with our recruiters that we don't recruit from Adobe. It seems you have a different policy. One of us must change our policy. Please let me know who. Steve The email, along with many others, was submitted as evidence in a fascinating legal saga between the Department of Justice's antitrust unit, eight Silicon Valley companies and tens of thousands of tech employees who contended their earnings were repressed because of this collusion between company bosses. The companies — Apple, Adobe, Google, Intel, Intuit, eBay, Pixar and Lucasfilm — were ultimately forced to pay almost $500 million in settlements. Thanks to his way with words, Jobs made himself the center of attention in what is surely one of the most caught-red-handed cases in the history of the U.S. tech industry. "I would be very pleased if your recruiting department would stop doing this,' he wrote to Google President Eric Schmidt in 2007, forwarding a cold email from Google's recruiting team. The recruiter was promptly fired. In a separate incident, Google co-founder Sergey Brin told colleagues he had an "irate' call from Jobs who had threatened "war' if Google continued to try to recruit talent from Apple's web browser team. Offers to any more people should stop until they "get permission from Apple,' Brin instructed. "There was no question they were colluding,' recalled economist Orley Ashenfelter, who testified as a witness in one of the civil cases. The legal fallout "sent a lesson to the human resources people in the various companies as to what is really appropriate to do. The question is: How long does that lesson last?' Today, as some of the same players become locked in AI talent wars, we're starting to get a sense of what Jobs was so afraid of: A no-holds-barred fight for the best people, with employees holding all the cards. Top engineers are being courted like starting pitchers and star quarterbacks. Meta Platforms, for instance, is going after talent with "pay packages of up to $300 million over four years,' reported Wired, citing internal sources. (Meta disputes the framing.) Whatever the size of the packages, the aggression is causing considerable anguish among company leaders. "I feel a visceral feeling right now, as if someone has broken into our home and stolen something,' wrote OpenAI's chief research officer, Mark Chen, in a memo obtained by Wired. Few will have much sympathy for those at the top, I suppose, but other risks affect the rank-and-file. Such outlandish packages upend the compensation scales that give some semblance of fairness across a company, Ashenfelter said. Deedy Das, an AI investor with Menlo Ventures, told Business Insider there's a "sense of jealousy, envy and helplessness.' But OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, while fiercely competitive, knows better than to try to do what Jobs did and stop companies from poaching his talent with quiet backroom deals. For one thing, the main players seem to have a growing contempt for one another. And more significant, the option for talented AI engineers isn't limited to the largest companies. "Compared to the past,' points out Firas Sozan, CEO of tech recruitment group Harrison Clarke, "you don't need as many engineers to build a product. I think partly why Mark Zuckerberg is doing this is because an amazing engineer will just end up speaking to Intel Capital or Andreessen Horowitz and get term sheets to start their own company.' Maybe, as a result of all this, we'll start to see a swing back to tech companies trying to convince workers that their role isn't a job but a calling that's greater than the number of commas in their paychecks. "Are we seeing the reasons for joining companies less about the compensation and more about what's actually being built? 100%,' Sozan says. OpenAI's pitch to prevent its workers from leaving is to make the case that artificial general intelligence is the company's one and only true goal, and every part of its work is dedicated to achieving it, whereas those working on Meta's AI will spend at least some of their time thinking about how it can be used to better serve up shoddy viral videos to your grandmother. "Missionaries will beat mercenaries,' Altman said to staff in a memo. Ilya Sutskever, an OpenAI co-founder who left to launch his own startup, Safe Superintelligence, reassured employees that he would not be entertaining efforts to sell the company amid rumors Meta tried to buy the entire team. "We have the compute, we have the team and we know what to do,' he wrote. "Together we will keep building safe superintelligence.' Nevertheless, he appears to have lost his CEO, Daniel Gross, to Meta. The bring-your-whole-self talk went a little out of fashion in the post-pandemic layoff era — which for those outside AI teams is still happening — but I wouldn't be surprised to see a new variant. AI companies can't rely on the bully tactics employed by Jobs to keep employees from seeking better and more lucrative opportunities. Instead, leaders must convince employees that their AI work is the one that will matter most in the history books. Whether employees will buy it is another thing. Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion's U.S. technology columnist.
Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
Listed Japan firms log 11% quarterly profit drop
Publicly traded companies in Japan logged an 11.7% decrease in combined net profit for April-June from a year before as tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump weighed heavily on automakers. A tally by SMBC Nikko Securities showed that 1,143 firms in the Topix stock price index posted a combined net profit of ¥12,740.2 billion in the fiscal first quarter. Transportation machinery makers saw a 42.1% decrease in net profit. Nissan Motor and Mazda Motor swung to losses, while Toyota Motor marked a double-digit profit decline. Electricity and city gas suppliers were also in the red, affected by Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, which booked huge charges related to the decommissioning of nuclear reactors. Information and telecommunications service operators posted a 72.9% profit increase thanks to SoftBank Group, which had strong performance in its investment operations. Insurance firms reported a 35.8% profit rise. For the full year ending in March 2026, publicly traded companies are expected to post a 7.5% decrease in net profit, to ¥49,891 billion, the first decline in six years. Hikaru Yasuda, chief equity strategist at SMBC Nikko, said that attention should be paid to how well companies can absorb tariff impacts by passing on costs to customers or cutting costs.
Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
PayPay takes step for U.S. listing
Japanese mobile payment service provider PayPay has taken a step for its public listing in the United States. The company said Friday that it has submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a draft registration statement relating to the listing of American depositary shares representing its common shares on a U.S. stock exchange. The exact schedule, size and price for the public listing have yet to be determined, said PayPay, a joint venture between major mobile phone carrier SoftBank and LY, which operates messaging app Line and internet portal Yahoo. SoftBank and LY expect PayPay will remain under their aegis after the completion of its U.S. listing procedures. At a news conference in May to announce earnings results, LY President Takeshi Idezawa said that preparations have been launched for PayPay's possible public listing in the United States.
