World Bank restores funding to Uganda despite controversial anti-gay law
The World Bank has resumed funding to Uganda after a two-year suspension instigated by the Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA).
The Bank justified resumption through effective mitigation measures within ongoing Ugandan projects to limit potential adverse impacts.
While Uganda's AHA remains unchanged, the decision signals shifting geopolitical dynamics by international financial institutions.
The World bank in 2023, suspended funding to Uganda after the country's parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA), saying the law contradicted its values.
The legislation sparked international condemnation for imposing severe penalties on LGBTQ+ individuals, including life imprisonment and, in some cases, the death penalty.
According to Reuters, the World Bank said it had developed a working relationship with Ugandan authorities to implement strong measures aimed at mitigating potential harm resulting from the law.
" We have now determined the mitigation measures rolled out over the last several months in all ongoing projects in Uganda to be satisfactory,"
" Consequently, the Bank has prepared three new projects in sectors with significant development needs – social protection, education, and forced displacement/refugees, which have been approved by the Board." said a Bank spokesperson, who requested anonymity.
The decision to resume funding signals a shift in the Bank's engagement strategy with Uganda and raises broader questions about how global institutions navigate the tension between promoting human rights and maintaining development partnerships.
While there has been no indication of changes to Uganda's legal position on LGBTQ+ rights, the World Bank's renewed support may reflect wider geopolitical and economic considerations in the region.
How the world reacted to Uganda's Anti-Gay Law
Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA), signed into law in May 2023, imposed sweeping criminal penalties for same-sex relationships, including life imprisonment and, in cases of so-called 'aggravated homosexuality,' the death penalty.
The law drew swift and widespread condemnation from Western governments, human rights organizations, and international institutions, and was widely regarded as one of the harshest anti-LGBTQ+ laws in the world.
Beyond the World Bank's suspension of funding, several Western governments issued strong rebukes and implemented measures affecting Uganda's international standing.
The United States led the diplomatic response, with the Biden administration describing the law as 'a tragic violation of universal human rights.' In turn, Washington imposed travel restrictions on Ugandan officials believed to be involved in the legislation and initiated a review of its financial assistance to the country.
The European Union also condemned the law, emphasizing its incompatibility with international human rights norms and warning that it would reassess its relationship with Uganda.
Similarly, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called the legislation 'shocking' and 'discriminatory,' urging its immediate repeal.
Outside of official government action, Western-based human rights organizations, NGOs, and civil society groups amplified the global outcry.
Advocacy campaigns were launched to pressure the Ugandan government, while some multinational corporations voiced concern about the law's potential impact on employees and business operations in the country.
Despite this international backlash, Ugandan officials have welcomed the recent restoration of World Bank funding, portraying it as an endorsement of the country's sovereignty and development agenda.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Sanders backs Trump plan to take stake in Intel
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) voiced support Wednesday for the Trump administration's plan to potentially take a stake in Intel, suggesting it aligned with an earlier effort to secure returns from CHIPS and Science Act investments. 'I am glad the Trump administration is in agreement with the amendment I offered three years ago to the CHIPS Act,' Sanders said in a statement. 'No. Taxpayers should not be providing billions of dollars in corporate welfare to large, profitable corporations like Intel without getting anything in return.' 'If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,' he added, arguing the government should also ensure firms do not engage in illegal union busting, outsourcing or stock buybacks. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed Tuesday the administration is considering taking a stake in the struggling U.S. chipmaker, with funding coming from previously allocated Biden-era grants. Reports have suggested the U.S. government is looking at using CHIPS funding for a 10 percent equity stake in Intel. SoftBank also announced late Monday that it is investing $2 billion in the semiconductor firm. It represents a remarkable change of fate for the company, whose chief executive faced President Trump's ire just two weeks ago. Trump called on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign earlier this month, suggesting he was 'highly conflicted' amid concerns about his ties to China. However, the president struck a more positive tone after meeting with Tan last week, suggesting the CEO and his Cabinet were 'going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week.'


Miami Herald
30 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Can you prove to Trump you're not anti-American? An (absurd) immigration checklist
The Trump administration's announcement Wednesday that immigrants applying for U.S. citizenship and other benefits will be screened to determine whether they have displayed anti-American ideas or behavior is problematic to say the least. Who gets to decide what exactly is anti-American? And that got us thinking. If U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents are the ones deciding whether you stay or go, what will they be considering? Is the applicant's social media free of rainbows? Come on in. Do they have preferred pronouns? The exit is that way. What about the person's car — is it (more or less) American made? A positive sign. Yes, this is a serious matter. But measuring anti-American-ness? That's a joke. U.S. immigration officers have always used their discretion to award citizenship and other benefits to people born outside the country. It's unclear what will actually change under the updated immigration policy manual, though 'Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis,' U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services wrote in a Tuesday news release. The guidelines target 'anti-American ideologies' but don't describe what they are, which is the problem. That will be in the eyes of the beholder — and the beholder being the Trump administration, we can imagine how that might turn out. Given that the new guidance also includes 'social media vetting,' we encourage officers to print out the following checklist, which we're sure will please the president and his top aide/anti-immigration zealot Stephen Miller: Does this future patriot drive a truck that does no more than 5 mpg of beautiful fossil fuel? Approve. Did the wannabe American show up to the immigration interview in a Prius or electrical vehicle? (Please consult your supervisor regarding the status of Tesla, as the president and Elon Musk may still patch things up.) Deny. Send applicants straight to Alligator Alcatraz if they rode a bike, because this is America, not the future model citizen spotted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021? Approve. Has this ungrateful person posted anything complaining about the cost of groceries since Jan. 20, 2025 — because 'inflation is down to a perfect, beautiful number,' the president has to constantly remind us? Deny. Does this soon-to-be great American thank the president every day for protecting us from mail ballots, windmills, foreign invaders and paper straws? Approve — immediately. With this list, USCIS officers will be sure to ensure that whoever is allowed in the country has pledged their allegiance not only to America but to a particular ideology that the president has decided is the only one acceptable. Whoever disagrees should not be granted the privilege of American citizenship, does not belong in the Smithsonian museums or in the federal government, especially if they will produce any jobs reports that make Trump's economy look bad. And if you find the above list absurd, it's because it is meant to be. These are, in fact, absurd times.

Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
$50K bonuses, reduced age minimums and Superman: How ICE will fill its ranks
'This is the first time ICE has ever had a major plus up. So the beauty of that is that we can learn from the best practices of other agencies,' Sheahan said. 'That huge presence that we're seeing from former military and former federal law enforcement — those are people that have been vetted their entire career and have done great work for this country their entire career. And so having them a part of our ranks is really going to be helpful when it comes to a lot of the criticism that we're getting right now.' The speed at which the agency executes the plus up — from 20,000 to 30,000 agents — is a delicate balance. Moving too quickly could amplify concerns that the agency didn't thoroughly vet and train new agents at a time when ICE faces mounting scrutiny. But moving too slowly could delay the agency's efforts to meet the White House's goal of 3,000 daily arrests and 1 million annual deportations. 'We have an opportunity to do this throughout the president's entire term, and we'll continue to do that until our ranks are filled,' Sheahan said. 'Obviously, the pressure is on nationwide for us to serve the American people, and so we want to make sure we deliver for them.' ICE's human resources department is sorting through the 110,000 applications, which include candidates interested in deportation officer roles, as well as for jobs as criminal investigators under Homeland Security Investigations and for attorneys and personnel in the agency's Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Sheahan said. As of July, the agency had issued over 1,000 offers to former ICE agents and officers who had left under the Biden administration — a number that has since grown, according to an ICE spokesperson.