Back-to-school spending persists despite economic pressure, consumer survey says
Families are not holding back on back-to-school spending this year, despite growing economic pressure, according to a new PwC consumer survey.
Nearly three-quarters of back-to-school shoppers expect to spend the same amount or more this year than they did in 2024, according to PwC's survey of nearly 2,000 parents. In fact, more than 1 in 3 parents anticipate spending more than they did last year.
"A lot of it is necessities. It's people knowing that they're going to have to get this specific book, or these specific supplies for school or they require technology for their kids," said Kelly Pedersen, PwC's U.S. retail leader.
The results indicate a value-oriented consumer, Pedersen said, but at the same time, back-to-school spending is insulated because "this is just necessary spend every year."
The results come as consumers grapple with an uncertain economic environment due to global trade dynamics. While consumer confidence for May was stronger than expected, spending for the month pulled back sharply.
The temporary pauses on some of President Donald Trump's tariffs have been viewed as a positive indicator for consumers, although the long-term path forward for tariffs remains unclear, especially as some retailers have said they will raise prices.
Among the back-to-school shopping destinations, Walmart and Target said they plan to hike some prices, while Best Buy is among the retailers that said it has already raised some prices.
"A lot of the average consumers in the U.S. sort of feel this cloud hanging above of, when are the tariffs going to hit, and what are those going to do to prices," Pedersen said.
He said value will be important moving forward, as he has seen consumers shifting toward more discount retailers over the past couple of months.
Indeed, buying items only on discount and reusing items from previous years are among the top ways consumers plan on saving during back-to-school season, according to the survey.
For those who are cutting back on back-to-school spending, technology and clothing are the top two categories where they're planning to pull back, according to PwC, while essentials like books and school supplies are more insulated.
On back-to-school technology, 25% of parents plan to spend more than $500, while 42% expect to pay under $50.
While the amount of back-to-school spending has stayed relatively constant overall, parents are changing the ways they shop.
Artificial intelligence in particular is impacting how parents handle the back-to-school season. One in 5 shoppers plan to use AI tools to find online deals, according to the survey.
When it comes to physical retail, Gen Z is leading the way. Gen Z parents surveyed were more likely than millennials or Gen X parents to shop exclusively in store, suggesting the younger generation could be contributing to brick-and-mortar resilience, PwC said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How Leaders Can Choose The Right AI Auditing Services
AI related law concept shown by robot hand using lawyer working tools in lawyers office with legal ... More astute icons depicting artificial intelligence law and online technology of legal law regulationsNow that the 'big four' accounting firms— Deloitte, PwC, Ernst & Young, and KPMG— are beginning to offer AI audit services, what do leaders need to know about choosing the right AI audit services and about responsible AI (RAI)? The first step would be understanding key vulnerabilities from implementing AI systems, and how to mitigate such risks. It is important to understand the unintended consequences from black box AI systems and lack of transparency in deployment of such AI. In consumer facing industries, unintended consequences of deploying black box AI systems without due attention to how such systems are trained and what data is being used to train such systems can result in harm to consumers, such as price discrimination or quality discrimination. Disparate impact laws allow individuals to sue for such unintentional discrimination. Next, leaders need to understand frameworks to manage such risks. The National Institute of Standards and Technology offers an AI risk management framework, which outlines a comprehensive risks. Management frameworks help leaders to better manage risks to individuals, organizations, and society associated with AI, like standards in other industries that mandate transparency. When rightly used, AI audits can be effective in examining whether an AI system is lawful, ethical, and technically robust. However, there are vast gaps in how companies understand these principles and integrate them into their organizational goals and values. A 2022 study by the Boston Consulting Group and the Sloan Management Review found that RAI programs typically neglect three dimensions—fairness and equity, social and environmental impact mitigation, and human plus AI—because they are difficult to address. Responsible AI principles cannot be in a vacuum but need to be tied to a company's broader goals for being a responsible business. For example, is top management intentionally connecting RAI with its governance, methods, and processes?Have Clear Goals For AI Audits Standard frameworks used in procurement of technology typically focus on performance, cost, and quality considerations. However, evaluating tools also requires values such as equity, fairness, and transparency. Leaders need to envision values such as trustworthiness and alignment with organizational mission, human-AI teaming, explainability and interpretability in deploying AI. A study by researchers Yueqi Li and Sanjay Goel found significant knowledge gaps around AI audits. These gaps stem from immature AI governance implementation and insufficient operationalization of AI governance processes. A cohesive approach to AI audits requires a foundation of ethical principles integrated into AI governance. To take one example, a financial institution could explicitly mandate fairness as a criterion in AI-enabled decision-making models. For that we would first need a clear and consistent criterion of fairness, and one that can be supported by the principle of law and by a settled body of trade and commerce practice. Second, we need clear standards that can establish if norms of fairness are violated, which could be used as a stress test to determine whether AI based models are indeed fair. Auditing predictions of automated business decisions using fairness criteria will allow companies to establish if their policies are disadvantageous to some groups more than the others. If a bank is interested in predicting who to lend to, adding fairness as a criterion does not mean that the bank would have to stop screening borrowers altogether. It would necessitate that the bank does avoid metrics that would constitute a more stringent burden on some groups of borrowers (holding different groups of people to different standards). Business person holding AI box for technology and Artificial Intelligence concept. Internet of ... More Thinking and data analysis. Algorithmic stress tests before deploying black box AI models allow us to visualize different scenarios that not only help in establishing the goals of the fairness audit. It may also allow decision makers to specify different performance criteria (both from a technical perspective but also from a business objective performance). Such stress tests would allow vendors to quantify legal and operational constraints in the business, history of practices in the industry, and policies to protect confidential data, to name a few. Companies such as Microsoft and Google have used AI 'red teams' to stress test their Cross-functional Leadership Can Leverage With AI The above-mentioned BCG/SMR survey identified a key role for leaders, with most organizations that are in the leading stage of RAI maturity have both an individual and a committee guiding their RAI strategy. Increasingly, practitioners are also calling for Institutional Review Boards for the use of AI. Low frequency, but high business impact decisions, such as the choice of credit rating models, needs a systematic process to build consensus. An RAI champion, working with a cross-departmental team, could be entrusted with such a responsibility. The institutional review board needs to map algorithmic harms into an organization's risk framework. Smaller organizations can rely on best practice checklists developed by auditing bodies and industry standards organizations. Recognizing when a human decision maker is needed and when automated decisions can be employed will be increasingly important as we learn to navigate the algorithmic era. It is equally important to understand how business processes demarcate the boundaries between judgement exercised by a human actor and what is automated. The IRB can consider questions such as who should set these boundaries, is it the responsibility of division heads or mid-level managers. The AI ethics team and the legal team need to consider what are the policy implications of such boundaries and the legal implications of such a Foundation for AI Audits Three key aspects need to be understood before leaders embark on AI audits: Define goals: Understand AI audit is not about the technology itself, but how AI is intertwined with organizational values Establish AI governance: Before undertaking AI audits, we need a comprehensive AI governance framework in place. Establish cross-functional teams: Algorithmic risks need to be understood in the context of the organization's own risk profile. Cross-functional teams are key to build this understanding AI is increasingly intertwined with almost every aspect of business. Leaders should be cognizant of the algorithmic harms from the lack of transparency and oversight in AI, alongside the considerable benefits of digital transformation. Establishing the right governance frameworks and auditing AI will ensure transparency in AI model development, deployment, and use.
Skift
an hour ago
- Skift
China's Outbound Travel Is Now Being Driven by These Five Categories
Chinese travellers are coming back, albeit differently. The way they plan, what they care about, and what they expect has shifted. And that means destinations, hotels, and retailers need to shift with them. China's outbound tourism is back in full swing, but the real shift is in why people are travelling and how they're deciding where to go, what to book, and what to buy. According to China Trading Desk's second quarter survey, releasing this Wednesday, traditional marketing categories like age and income are no longer the main drivers. Instead, China Trading Desk has developed what it calls the Five Economies Framework, a way to understand what travelers are seeking from their trips: Confidence Economy: First-timers who need clarity and support Value Economy: People spending carefully but still wanting comfort She Economy: Young female Gen Z travelers shaping trends Emotional Economy: Travelers looking for meaning and memories Silver Economy: Older, confident travelers with time and money Source: China Trading Desk First-Timers Want Guidance, Not Guesswork A record 44% of Chinese travelers are going abroad for the first time, up from 38% just last quarter. Many are under 30, and women are especially well represented. These travelers are cautious but curious. While they might be new to international travel, they're far from clueless. These first-time travelers are heavy users of social media platforms, Douyin and Xiaohongshu. They rely on short videos, visual guides, and peer reviews, Subramania Bhatt, CEO of China Trading Desk told Skift. They want simplicity, structure, and reassurance, according to the survey. While first-timers are booking mostly 3- to 4-star hotels, they're also more likely to plan their shopping before booking flights. Travelers Want 'Luxury With Logic' Many Chinese travelers, especially those from Tier 1 cities, are travelling with what Bhatt calls a 'luxury with logic' mindset. They're not throwing money around, but they're willing to spend if the value is clear. 'Gen Z and Tier 1 travelers are selective spenders,' he said. 'They crave value, story, and social capital.' That means flash sales, first-timer bundles, and travel perks that are easy to understand. Limited-time product drops, sustainability labels, and collaborations with Xiaohongshu creators could help brands connect with these travelers, according to Bhatt. Nearly half of all surveyed travelers plan to spend more than 25,000 RMB per trip (not including flights and hotels), and spending on luxury items is growing, especially among Gen Z and Tier 3 travelers. Young Women Are Leading the Shift Young, urban women, many of them Gen Z, are at the forefront of China's outbound travel recovery. According to the survey, they're tech-savvy, often travelling independently, and influenced heavily by social media. They rely on Xiaohongshu not just for travel inspiration but for social proof and tips they can trust. These women aren't passively scrolling; they're comparing, researching, and actively shaping travel trends. Most book less than a month in advance, some within just two weeks, but they start researching much earlier. 'The booking window is short, but the consideration window starts much earlier,' said Bhatt. Travel Is About Meaning While budgets matter, travelers are also seeking emotional returns. Around 22% of survey respondents named food, nature, and culture as equal motivations, showing a preference for rich, meaningful experiences over just sightseeing. These travelers value curated experiences, and small-groups. Bhatt advises travel companies to think less about mass-market tours and more about memory-building activities that help people feel connected. Older Travelers Want Safety and Comfort Older Chinese travelers are travelling more confidently in 2025. They tend to book longer trips, prioritize safety and comfort, and prefer destinations with good health infrastructure and reliable service. China Trading Desk suggests offering accessible travel, bilingual support, guided activities, and wellness packages. This group is less impulsive, as they prefer safety, comfort, and clarity over spontaneity. Same Platforms, Different Needs Though Xiaohongshu, Douyin, and Ctrip are used widely across age groups, their role in the travel journey varies. 'Xiaohongshu builds trust, Douyin drives impulse, and Ctrip closes the sale,' Bhatt said. This platform split helps explain why brands can't take a one-size-fits-all approach. A shopping guide that works on Xiaohongshu may fall flat on Douyin, and vice versa. Singapore, Japan, and Korea Stay on Top While Chinese travelers have changed significantly, the top-visited destinations remain the same: Singapore, Japan, and South Korea. But what keeps them on top isn't just culture or food, it's digital visibility and ease of travel. Source: China Trading Desk 'Their enduring appeal is a mix of perceived safety, travel ease, and constant digital visibility,' said Bhatt. While breaking down the popularity of these destinations, Bhatt said that for instance, Singapore is known for cashless payments, strong airport services, and high compatibility with digital payment services like Alipay. Japan benefits from viral content like '7-Eleven must buys' and cultural dept, while South Korea rides the wave of K-pop, K-drama, and shopping infrastructure. Faster immigration clearance is also on top of the airport services wishlist for Chinese travelers. and Dragon Trail Executives at the Skift Asia Forum
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pastor slams his own church for accepting Target donation amid boycott
A Georgia pastor has called out his own church for accepting a $300,000 donation from Target following the retailer's decision to phase out Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives. Rev. Jamal Bryant, pastor of the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church just outside of Atlanta, is one of the driving forces behind a boycott of Target after the company scaled back its DEI commitments. In a sermon, Bryant accused the National Baptist Convention of 'selling out' after the denomination accepted the donation from Target and accused the company of bypassing him in an effort to win back the support of Black consumers. Target previously said the boycotts had done some damage to sales during a quarter call with analysts in May. 'You thought you were going to go around me and go to the National Baptist Convention and sell out for $300,000?' he said at his sermon Sunday. 'Are you crazy to think that we gonna' sell out for chump change? You must not know who we are!' Bryant added in his sermon that he called the President of the National Baptist Convention, Rev. Boise Kimber, and demanded the organization stand with him and the boycott. In a statement, Kimber said the church is 'working on a three-year plan' with Target that will 'be very beneficial to the Black community.' 'With the federal government making deep cuts in education, health care, and other essential services, we know the Black Church will be called upon to stand in the gap,' Kimber said. 'Our outreach programs serving both our congregants and the broader community must be fully resourced to respond to the need. I am proud to say we will answer the call.' 'Target's generous donation will help us provide scholarships, support senior citizens, and invest in entrepreneurship programs that uplift our people and the future,' he added. In response to Bryant and other criticism, Target said it was 'proud' to be partnering with the church 'to make a meaningful impact in communities across the country by supporting access to education, economic development initiatives and entrepreneurship programs.' The boycott was initially slated to last 40 days, but will continue until Target agrees to four demands put forward by the pastor. The demands call for Target to fully commit to DEI at every level of the company, honor its previous pledge to invest $2 billion in the Black business community, deposit $250 million in 23 Black-owned banks, and partner with business programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities to support young entrepreneurs. 'Target is working hard to divide our community rather than stand on the principles of dignity and decency,' Bryant said in a follow up post on Instagram. 'We are working hard with the heads of the denominations to find resolve that shows solidarity. Stay out of target because we are standing on business. Together there's nothing we can't accomplish and we will fight on until victory is won!'
