Family resistance to adult woman's marriage choice ‘despicable': HC
Condemning family resistance to an adult woman's decision to marry a person of her choice, the Allahabad high court termed such objections 'despicable' and underscored that the right to marry a person of one's choice is protected under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of India.
While making these observations, a division bench comprising justices JJ Munir and Praveen Kumar Giri provided protection to a 27-year-old woman, who feared abduction by her father and brother because she wanted to marry a person of her choice.
The bench was hearing a petition filed by the woman's father and brother, who sought the quashing of the FIR lodged against them under sections 140(3), 62, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) at the Chilh police station in Mirzapur district.
Though the court stayed the arrest of the petitioners in connection with the FIR, it also restrained them from interfering in the woman's life or from assaulting, threatening or contacting her or the man she intends to marry or live with.
'The petitioners shall not contact the fourth respondent (woman) over telephone or any other electronic device or using the internet or through friends or associates. It is despicable that the petitioners should object to the decision of an adult member of the family, a woman 27 years of age, from marrying a man of her choice. At least that is the right which every adult has under the Constitution by virtue of Article 21,' the court said in an order dated June 13.
While the court clarified that it did not know whether the petitioners, the woman's father and brother, 'really intend to abduct' her, it noted that the matter reflected a larger societal issue -- the 'value gap' between constitutional and social norms.
'The fact that there is social and familial resistance to the exercise of such right is a glaring depiction of the 'value gap' between the constitutional and social norms. So long as there is a gap between the values fostered by the Constitution and those cherished by the society, these kinds of incidents would continue to happen,' the court said.
'The police are also restrained from interfering with the fourth respondent's freedom and liberty in any manner whatsoever,' the court added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
'Despicable': Allahabad HC slams family's objection to woman marrying person of choice
Providing protection to the 27-year-old woman who feared abduction, a bench of Justices J J Munir and Praveen Kumar Giri said the right to marry a person of one's choice is protected under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of India.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Uber, Rapido booked for offering bike taxi service sans permission
MUMBAI: The Azad Maidan police station has registered a case against ride hailing apps Uber and Rapido for allegedly running bike taxi services in the state without any permission or license. The two firms have been booked for cheating and operating bike taxis without valid licenses and registration under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Information Technology Act, 200, and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 'Though the state government has not given any permission to operate bike taxis, Uber and Rapido were found offering rides on bike taxis through their online platforms,' said an officer from the Azad Maidan police station. 'The companies are illegally transporting passengers and earning profits from the same by cheating the state government.' The Maharashtra cabinet had, on April 1, approved the introduction of electric-bike taxis in cities with a population of at least 100,000, aiming to create over 10,000 jobs in the Mumbai metropolitan region (MMR) and another 10,000 jobs in the rest of the state. The state government subsequently issued draft rules for e-bike taxis, and sought suggestions and objections within June 5. The final rules are slated to be tabled in July. The police said RTO officials booked dummy rides on both Uber and Rapido and found private two-wheelers with white number plates were being used to run commercial services. 'Bike taxis may help beat the traffic but requisite permissions are still not in place,' said the police officer quoted earlier.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Without addressing inequalities, no nation can be democratic: CJI Gavai
Without addressing the structural inequalities that marginalise large sections of society, no nation can claim to be truly progressive or democratic, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai said on Wednesday while emphasising that socio-economic justice is a practical necessity for achieving long-term stability, social cohesion, and sustainable development. Speaking at a function in Milan on the topic of "Role of Constitution in Delivering Socio-Economic Justice in a Country: Reflections from 75 Years of Indian Constitution", the CJI said that justice is not an abstract ideal and it must take root in social structures, in the distribution of opportunity, and in the conditions under which people live. "Without addressing the structural inequalities that marginalise large sections of society, no nation can claim to be truly progressive or democratic. Socio-economic justice, in other words, a practical necessity for achieving long-term stability, social cohesion, and sustainable development," he said. The CJI said that it is not merely a matter of redistribution or welfare but it is also about enabling every person to live with dignity, to realise their full human potential, and to participate as equals in the social, economic, and political life of the country. "Thus, for any country, socio-economic justice is a crucial aspect of national progress. It ensures that development is inclusive, that opportunities are equitably distributed, and that all individuals, regardless of their social or economic background, can live with dignity and freedom," he said. Thanking the Chamber of International Lawyers for inviting him to deliver a speech on the topic, CJI Gavai said the journey of the Indian Constitution over the past seventy-five years in delivering socio-economic justice is a story of great ambition and important successes. "As Chief Justice of India, I take pride in stating that the framers of the Indian Constitution were deeply conscious of the imperative of socio-economic justice while drafting its provisions. Its drafting took place in the aftermath of a long and hard-fought struggle for independence from colonial rule," he said. He said affirmative action policies in education, which sought to correct historical injustices and ensure representation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and socially and educationally backward classes, have been a concrete expression of the Constitution's commitment to substantive equality and socio-economic justice. "I have often said, and I reiterate here today, that it is because of this constitutional vision of inclusion and transformation that I am standing before you as the Chief Justice of India. Coming from a historically marginalised background, I am a product of the very constitutional ideals that sought to democratise opportunity and dismantle the barriers of caste and exclusion," he said. Elaborating further, the CJI said the Constitution has given people the vision, the tools, and the moral guidance and it has shown that law can indeed be a tool for social change, a force for empowerment, and a protector of the vulnerable. CJI Gavai added that the Indian Constitution, which was adopted on January 26, 1950, is not just a political document for governance, but is a promise to society, a revolutionary statement, and a ray of hope for a country coming out of long years of colonial rule, suffering from poverty, inequality, and social divisions. "It was a promise of a new beginning where social and economic justice would be the main goal of our country. At its core, the Indian Constitution upholds the ideals of freedom and equality for all," he said. He said that over the past 75 years, India's Constitution has played a major role in advancing socio-economic justice for its citizens and in fact, the earliest and most significant steps toward this goal were initiated by the Indian Parliament. "The tension between Parliament and the judiciary, particularly concerning the scope of Parliament's power to amend the Constitution, revolved around a fundamental question: how far could constitutional amendments go? While this episode is often remembered as an institutional rivalry between the judiciary and Parliament, it is important to recognise that it unfolded against the backdrop of efforts to realise socio-economic rights, he said, while recalling the backdrop of the 1973 landmark verdict in the Kesavananda Bharati case. He added that efforts to reduce poverty, enhance job creation and provide basic services like food, housing, and healthcare have also been critical to India's social policy landscape in the recent decades. "I can say that both Parliament and the judiciary have expanded the scope of socio-economic rights in the 21st century," he underscored. CJI Gavai referred to the recent verdict on the issue of demolition of structures where the court examined the decisions of the state authorities to demolish homes and properties of an accused, as a punishment even before they were convicted by a court of law. "Here, the Court held that such arbitrary demolitions, which bypass legal processes, violate the rule of law and the fundamental right to shelter under Article 21. The executive cannot become judge, jury, and executioner all at once," he said, adding that the decision reaffirmed that constitutional guarantees must not only protect civil liberties but must also uphold the dignity, security, and material well-being of every individual, especially the vulnerable.
