logo
In Expanding Trade War, Trump Digs U.S. into a Geopolitical Hole

In Expanding Trade War, Trump Digs U.S. into a Geopolitical Hole

Yomiuri Shimbun10-07-2025
On Monday, the White House launched new salvos in its widening trade wars. President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs of between 25 percent and 40 percent on imports from 14 countries, including Japan, South Korea, Thailand and Bangladesh, unless they address his concerns over perceived bilateral trade imbalances.
The renewed tariff threats went down like a lead balloon in capitals across the world, including among some of the U.S.'s closest allies. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba described the developments as 'deeply regrettable.'
His colleague, Itsunori Onodera, policy chief for Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, said Trump's decision 'to notify a key ally with nothing more than a single letter is extremely disrespectful, and I feel a strong sense of indignation.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio's decision to drop stops this week in Tokyo and Seoul during a quick Asia trip underscored the fresh tensions.
Various governments fitfully tried to hash out new understandings with the Trump administration to stave off the threatened tariffs. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said that the 30 percent tariff Trump sought to impose on his country as a 'reciprocal' measure was 'not an accurate representation of available trade data.' Thailand's acting prime minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, bemoaned the 'contradiction' as Trump's latest edict seemed to undo the progress made amid trade talks just last week.
Over the weekend, Trump also lashed out at the BRICS grouping of non-Western powers, threatening its 10 members and other partner states with additional tariffs because of the bloc being supposedly 'anti-American.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was hosting a BRICS leaders' summit in Rio de Janeiro, rebuffed Trump's bullying. 'The world has changed. We don't want an emperor,' Lula said, adding: 'This is a set of countries that wants to find another way of organizing the world from the economic perspective. I think that's why the BRICS are making people uncomfortable.'
Trump had threatened 100 percent tariffs on the BRICS countries – which include putative Washington adversaries in Russia, China, and Iran, but also close partners such as India – if the bloc pursued attempts to break the global influence of the U.S. dollar. Some members had offered vague proposals for a new common currency to undercut dollar dominance, but the project has not got off the ground amid frictions within the bloc and wariness of courting Washington's wrath. Nonetheless, Celso Amorim, Lula's chief foreign policy adviser, said Trump's new threat 'reinforces the willingness of [BRICS] members and associated partners to chart our path and seek greater independence.'
That's a calculation other U.S. allies are making as well. On a visit to Britain, French President Emmanuel Macron warned of Europe's overreliance on the United States and China. 'If we want to build a sustainable future for all children [we have] to de-risk our economies and our societies from these dual dependencies,' he said. France wants 'an open world,' Macron added, gesturing to the 'strategic autonomy' for the continent that he has long championed. 'We want to cooperate, but not to depend.'
The frustrations and concerns being aired by world leaders are borne out by public sentiment. A Pew poll published Tuesday found that a significant proportion of citizens of U.S. allies see Trump's America in a gloomy light. Majorities in Canada and Mexico view their neighbor as the 'greatest threat' facing their country, marking significant increases since a similarly worded survey in 2019. Further afield, more than a third of South Africans, 40 percent of Indonesians, 30 percent of all Turks, and almost a fifth of respondents in Japan – a treaty ally protected by U.S. forces – also singled the United States out for the singular threat it posed.
Trump and his allies cast their trade wars as a necessary effort to restructure global trade and bring more manufacturing home. Whatever the merits of their case, analysts see their approach as potentially damaging to the geopolitical interests of the United States. 'The president is determined to light a fire under those trading partners who he thinks are not moving fast enough,' Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and a former U.S. trade negotiator, told my colleagues. 'But to hit two of our closest allies [Japan and South Korea] with high tariffs – particularly when we have benefited from cooperation with them on semiconductors and energy and chip building, and when their companies invest a lot in the United States – it is hard for me to circle the square here.'
'Many in Asia are going to ask, 'Is this how the U.S. treats its friends?'' Manu Bhaskaran, chief executive of Centennial Asia Advisors, a research firm, told the New York Times. 'Will there be permanent damage to American standing and interests in Asia and elsewhere through these crude threats and unpleasant language?'
Oliver Stuenkel, an associate professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo, said Trump's broadsides against the BRICS shook up a rather sleepy summit that various heads of state, including the Russian and Chinese presidents, had chosen to skip. The bloc had put out a careful joint statement that expressed disapproval of Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza and concern over the strikes on Iran, but did not call out U.S. involvement in either instance.
'Trump's attack was counterproductive,' Stuenkel told me. 'If his intention was to make countries move away from BRICS, I think that's probably not going to work out.'
Instead, Trump's antagonism might provide more impetus for the bloc's diverse membership to find genuine common cause. 'The rank unilateralism and casual abandonment of international law when it comes to regions such as the Middle East and arenas such as global trade call for a stabilizing countercurrent that can strengthen norms of cooperation,' wrote Sarang Shidore, director of the Global South program at the Quincy Institute, a Washington think tank. 'Global South states, as weaker actors, rely even more on international cooperation in their attempts to achieve security and prosperity for their people.'
During the Cold War and its initial aftermath, the United States worked with a host of partners to strengthen 'a community of shared values, compatible political ideals, international institutions and mutual support within those institutions,' wrote Andrea Oelsner, a professor of international relations at San Andrés University in Argentina.
'In recent months, the Trump administration has sharply eroded the country's credibility with these friends,' she added. 'And credibility and trust are much more easily destroyed than built … never mind rebuilt.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Various tactics to force Ishiba out of power emerge within the LDP
Various tactics to force Ishiba out of power emerge within the LDP

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Various tactics to force Ishiba out of power emerge within the LDP

Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers — fuming over Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba staying on despite losing a majority in the Upper House election — are coming up with various tactics to force him out of his post as soon as possible. The party has been thrown into a political power game between those who want Ishiba ousted immediately and those supporting the prime minister, who denied reports Wednesday that he will resign. One of the two tactics under discussion is to hold an official decision-making meeting of party lawmakers that requires the support of a third of them or more to be held. Currently, the party is expected to hold a less formal meeting of party lawmakers on Monday to discuss the outcome of the Upper House election. If Monday's meeting becomes an official one, it could give further momentum to the anti-Ishiba camp and a petition to hold an LDP leadership race could be submitted, among other options. On Friday, LDP lawmaker Hiroyoshi Sasagawa told reporters that he was able to gather enough signatures to hold an official meeting. The anti-Ishiba camp hopes that getting at least a third of the party lawmakers on board for the official meeting will pressure Ishiba to step down. A petition to hold the meeting has reportedly been signed by former members of the now-defunct factions that were led by party heavyweights Shinzo Abe and Toshimitsu Motegi, as well as those in the existing faction led by former Prime Minister Taro Aso. Meanwhile, some LDP lawmakers are going door to door in the political center of Nagatacho, collecting their colleagues' signatures for a petition to move the date for the party's presidential election forward from September 2027, when Ishiba's three-year term ends. Often described as the "recall provision,' a presidential race can be held if more than half of the combined number of LDP lawmakers and one representative from each local chapter asks for one. The provision, however, has never been invoked since it was introduced in 2002. The key would be how widely anti-Ishiba sentiment is spread within the party across the nation. Calls for Ishiba to resign, however, are already spreading among younger LDP lawmakers. The LDP's youth bureau submitted a letter to LDP Secretary-General Hiroshi Moriyama on Friday demanding that Ishiba and the party's executive members take responsibility for the Upper House election results, effectively urging them to resign. The letter was submitted after 46 out of 47 LDP prefectural chapters participated in an online meeting with the party's youth bureau on Wednesday, in which the majority of participants agreed to submit a joint statement to party headquarters demanding the 'immediate' resignation and replacement of Ishiba and other party executives. Ishiba is set to make a decision on what to do once key events in August are over, including a commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the anniversary of the end of World War II on Aug. 15 and an international conference on African development in Yokohama from Aug. 20 to 22. On Friday, Ishiba met with ruling and opposition party leaders to update them on the tariff deal with the United States. But the meeting was overshadowed by a flood of news reports and speculation on what might happen to Ishiba. Yoshihiko Noda, leader of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, told reporters that Ishiba did not mention anything about his current standing in the Friday meeting. On Wednesday, Ishiba denied reports that he would resign at the end of August after an unusual meeting at party headquarters with three former prime ministers — Aso, Yoshihide Suga and Fumio Kishida — hours after Japan and the United States reached the surprise trade agreement . Ishiba said the party heavyweights did not discuss his resignation, but one of the former prime ministers at the meeting revealed that none of them were supportive of Ishiba's continued leadership. Information from Jiji added

Who will save the Liberal Democratic Party?
Who will save the Liberal Democratic Party?

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Who will save the Liberal Democratic Party?

The Upper House election was a disaster for the Liberal Democratic Party. For the first time since its founding in 1955, the party must run a government with minority control of both houses of parliament, suffering back-to-back electoral defeats. The party is fragmented, its base is cracking and the old mechanisms used for staying in power are insufficient in the modern era. There is no denying that the LDP's ship is sinking and the crew needs saving. The party is now faced with two fundamental questions: what tasks must it accomplish to restore its political dominance and who is actually capable of accomplishing them? The LDP also has numerous tasks ahead: The first is to regain its base. While the LDP is a big tent party with politicians representing a range of center-left to right-wing ideas, the median policy platform has almost always been on the conservative side. But when the time came to pick a successor to Shinzo Abe, the LDP opted first for Yoshihide Suga, then for Fumio Kishida, neither of whom are from the party's conservative camps. Kishida further alienated the LDP's conservative base with the punishments he meted out in 2024 in response to the factions' money scandal. When public opinion worsened under Kishida, the party decided to go with a reform-minded candidate and picked Shigeru Ishiba. The moves failed to garner support from the public and they alienated many supporters. As a result, the LDP will need to regain its conservative base, many of whom have looked instead to the Democratic Party for the People, Sanseito and Nippon Ishin no Kai. The LDP must now woo them back. Success in this effort does not mean embracing populist dog whistling; rather, it means rallying behind a conservative leader who can outshine the likes of DPP's Yuichiro Tamaki and Sanseito's Sohei Kamiya. The second task for the LDP will be capturing the attention of the public. The old method of stump speeches and loudspeaker vans on the streets will not cut it anymore. With more voters turning to social media and video-sharing sites for political content, the LDP must fundamentally rethink its practices. Additionally, the standard for male-dominated LDP candidate lineups will not work, as there was a marked rise in the number of women who won in this recent election. The LDP must look for improved ways of recruiting strong female candidates and subsequently giving them meaningful opportunities to elevate their political stature. But these efforts will not mean anything if the LDP cannot accomplish the third task: formulating coherent policies that actually work to improve the lives of the average Japanese resident. The only thing that has saved the LDP up to this point is that none of the opposition parties have presented a viable alternative with coherent policy platforms. However, the public has now shown that they are increasingly willing to assume risk in backing the opposition. The LDP will not only need to create actionable policies, the various factions within the party must rally behind them. This leads to the last task: restructuring the party from within. When Kishida unilaterally upended the LDP's factional system, he did so without a substitute system ready to implement. Absent another mechanism for corralling the few hundred lawmakers, the decision fueled in-fighting and made the party less effective at a time when it needed to regain the public's trust. The situation has not improved under Ishiba. To rectify this, the party will need someone capable of managing internal politics and driving the reestablishment of a functional policy and power structure. The party's leader will not be able to do this by himself or herself; rather, it will take a trusted right hand who can manage that effort. So, who is capable of accomplishing these tasks for the LDP? Let's take a look at the prominent names in the debate. Taro Aso Former Prime Minister Taro Aso's name will continue to come up in discourse because of his long-standing prominence in the LDP. The grandson of famed postwar Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida and the richest politician in parliament, Aso has significant influence inside the party and among the business community. Some LDP members may now look to Aso to use whatever influence he has left in the twilight of his career to pull things back together. While Aso may still have power to wield, it will only be useful within the party architecture. Aso's connections to old guard politics may be helpful in piecing together elements of a fragmented party and rekindling some support from the LDP's traditional base, but it will not capture the attention of the broader public. Aso has not shown a willingness to evolve to match present-day sensibilities and it is unlikely that he is prepared to do so now. Shinjiro Koizumi Koizumi's name has floated around the LDP as the potential next-generation leader since he first came onto the political scene in 2009. Son of the popular and effective former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, the 44-year-old politician has benefited from his polished looks and political legacy in staying relevant. This is partly why Ishiba turned to Koizumi to take over the agriculture minister role in May as a last-ditch effort to address soaring rice prices. But despite all of Koizumi's energy and effort in his Cabinet and subcabinet postings, he has no meaningful achievements to show for it. The public has continued to lose confidence that Koizumi can develop and implement effective policies, meaning that even if the party decided to throw its weight behind him, it would be for naught. Koizumi's inability to tackle important issues and to manage intraparty politics stand to exacerbate the LDP's woes further. Takayuki Kobayashi Nicknamed 'Kobahawk' as a play on words based on his name and political leanings, the former economic security minister has shown potential for taking on the LDP's dire situation. As a former finance ministry official, he has practical policy experience and he is popular among the LDP's conservative base. Further, his relative youth and nonpolitical family background positions him to rebrand the party in ways that other LDP politicians cannot. The lingering question for Kobayashi is whether he even wants to take the helm of a sinking ship. He is still young for a politician and can afford to wait for another opportunity when the circumstances are more favorable; after all, he may prefer to pursue his own desired policy agenda rather than being forced to manage the messy problems that already exist. Instead of attempting to seize the opportunity now, he may throw his weight behind another conservative party leader and earn a Cabinet posting to continue building his credentials. Sanae Takaichi Former economic security minister Sanae Takaichi appears to be the LDP's most viable option. She was already close to winning the last LDP leadership race and she has not hidden her ambitions for the country's top job. Other boons for her is that she was a protege of Shinzo Abe and that she is a staunch conservative who cites Margaret Thatcher (the U.K.'s 'Iron Lady') as a role model. Further, she does not carry any of the baggage associated with the LDP's former factions as she operated as an independent within the party. As a bonus for the LDP, if the party selects Takaichi to be its next leader, they will have the distinction of elevating the first woman to become prime minister of Japan. While Takaichi can potentially accomplish the first two tasks needed to save the LDP, the second two will be more difficult. Takaichi is well-positioned to regain the LDP's conservative base and to capture the attention of the public, but will she be able to implement an effective policy agenda and restructure the party at the same time? She has not had to manage in-fighting among the party heavyweights and former factions, and she will need a trusted second-in-command to help her do so. Her biggest question is who that may be. Michael MacArthur Bosack is the special adviser for government relations at the Yokosuka Council on Asia-Pacific Studies. He previously served in the Japanese government as a Mansfield fellow.

Foreign residents in Japan fret over immigration backlash
Foreign residents in Japan fret over immigration backlash

Nikkei Asia

time2 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Foreign residents in Japan fret over immigration backlash

The leader of Sanseito, Sohei Kamiya, speaks at a rally in Tokyo on July 21, one day after the Japanese political party won 14 seats in the upper house parliamentary election. © Reuters Nikkei staff writers TOKYO -- The rapid ascent of the right-wing Sanseito party in Japan has shone a spotlight on public attitudes to immigration, unnerving some non-Japanese residents. Sanseito, founded in 2020, won 14 seats in Sunday's upper house election on its "Japanese First" platform advocating stricter rules on immigration and foreign capital, along with proposing tax cuts and welfare spending. The party had held only one seat in the 248-member chamber of parliament prior to the vote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store