‘Misleading': DGP rejects Akhilesh's charge of caste-based police posting
A day after Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav alleged caste discrimination in police posting in Uttar Pradesh and claimed that officers from backward and minority communities were underrepresented in police, particularly at the level of station house officers (SHOs), the state DGP in a sharp reaction rebutted the former CM's statement, calling it 'misleading' and 'rumour'.
Stating that those holding responsible posts should stay away from making such misleading comments, DGP Prashant Kumar said: 'Such information is baseless… It is our responsibility to present factual data and maintain public trust. We appeal to all to stay away from rumours and not raise unwarranted questions on the police system.'
Referring to the data released by several district police on Monday to counter the claims made by Akhilesh Yadav, the DGP said: '…the concerned districts too have contradicted the same and have released the actual data in this regard. If any such information is circulated in the coming future, they will bring out the truth.'
'The claims being circulated on social media about caste-based postings are baseless… All postings across Uttar Pradesh are being done strictly as per established norms and guidelines,' he added.
Speaking to mediapersons in Prayagraj on Sunday, Akhilesh Yadav had given specific numbers of SHOs and their castes in certain districts, alleging most of them belong to Thakur community and that there were negligible number of those belonging to PDA (Pichhda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak or minorities) in police postings, particularly at the level of station house officers (SHOs).
'In Agra, out of 48 police stations, only 15 SHOs are from the PDA (Backward, Dalit, and Minority) communities. The rest are all from the 'Singh bhai log',' Yadav had said, using a colloquial term to refer to the Thakur community.
He had cited similar examples from Mainpuri, Chitrakoot, and Mahoba districts and accused the BJP government of following a 'divide and rule' policy by dividing society along caste and religious lines.
On Monday, several district police across the state released statements highlighting caste break-up of policemen.
Agra police, in a statement, claimed that 39 per cent of policemen belong to the OBCs, and 18 per cent to the Scheduled Caste, 'while the set standard for the OBC posting is 27 per cent'.
Akhilesh, on the other hand, had claimed that out of 48 police stations in Agra, only 15 SHOs belong to PDA communities and the remaining are from the Thakur community.
He had also mentioned the districts of Mainpuri, Chitrakoot, and Mahoba.
In Mainpuri, Akhilesh had claimed that out of 15, there are 3 SHOs from PDA and 10 Thakurs.
Mainpuri police on Monday claimed that there are 31 per cent OBCs and 19 per cent SC policemen posted in the district.
Chitrakoot police claimed that out of 12 police stations, three OBC SHOs, two SC/STs and seven belonging to other classes are posted.
Prayagraj police said the SHOs are appointed based on devotion to duty, honesty, a sense of social harmony, and sensitivity towards public complaints. The Commissionerate claimed that there are 40 per cent OBC and SC/ST policemen posted as SHOs in Prayagraj.
Meanwhile, calling for restraint, DGP Prashant Kumar urged political leaders and the public to avoid drawing hasty conclusions based on incomplete or inaccurate information.
However, Akhilesh Yadav on Monday remained steadfast in his statement. In a post on X, he said, '90 per cent PDA has only 25 per cent representation in Prayagraj Police. This is 'proportional injustice' being done to PDA.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Karnataka govt to recount castes to assuage ‘fears', Congress cites ‘old data' for move
THE CONGRESS has told the Karnataka government to hold re-enumeration of various communities while giving 'in-principle' approval to a report on a survey done on castes in the state. Speaking to reporters after a meeting of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy CM D K Shivakumar with the high command in Delhi, Congress general secretary K C Venugopal acknowledged 'apprehensions' among some groups regarding the survey report. The report, submitted by the Karnataka State Commission for Backward Classes on the basis of a Socio-Economic and Education Survey carried out in 2015, has seen protests by the Lingayats and Vokkaligas over its finding that the two dominant communities do not hold as big a share of the population as once presumed, and that around 70% of the state's population comprises Other Backward Classes (OBCs). While the report was submitted in April, the Siddaramaiah government is yet to take action on the issue for fear of a backlash. However, any delay is a tricky issue for the Congress, given its commitment to a caste census and its focus on OBCs, underlined at the AICC Session this year. Venugopal said: 'On the issue of caste census, the Congress party is (of the view) that whatever the Karnataka government has done on caste census has to be agreed to in principle. But, there are apprehensions from some sections of society about the counting of castes. Since the census was done 10 years earlier, the data is a little bit old. So, we suggested to the CM that re-enumeration be done within a stipulated time.' Siddaramaiah said the re-enumeration exercise will be completed within 90 days. He also said that this was needed as the data collected by the 2015 survey was old, though 'we have to accept the report in principle'. Incidentally, the 2015 survey had been carried out under Siddaramaiah's first tenure as CM. Siddaramaiah also said that the enumeration will be along the lines of the survey being carried out for Scheduled Castes in the state, which is being done ahead of provision of internal reservation among SCs. The directions by the high command come two days ahead of a special Cabinet meeting scheduled by Siddaramaiah to discuss the caste report. A previous such meeting, held soon after the report was submitted in April, had ended with Siddaramaiah directing his Cabinet colleagues to submit 'written opinions' on the report. Recently, after a Cabinet meeting, the CM said that the opinion of all the ministers is yet to be received. With the Karnataka CM and his deputy meeting the high command days after the Bengaluru stampede that left 11 dead, and which has been blamed by the Opposition on the two, the issue was expected to figure high in the talks. Venugopal said the issue did come up for discussion. 'Certainly, we are concerned about every life. The Karnataka government has ordered a judicial inquiry into the unfortunate incident. The party clearly believes there should be a pro-people attitude regarding the issue,' he said. The Congress leader also accused the Narendra Modi-led Central government of 'completely neglecting' Karnataka in terms of allocations for various schemes. 'They are marginalising Karnataka. The Modi government is doing this type of injustice… it is not at all acceptable,' he said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
In Bahraich, Adityanath slams 'glorification' of Salar Masood
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Tuesday opposed the glorification of Salar Masood , revered as a warrior-saint from 11th century, saying the punishment given to the "foreign invader" after being captured "guaranteed him a place in hell according to Islam". He was speaking on the occasion of the inauguration of a statue of Maharaja Suheldev and the launching of 384 development projects worth Rs 1,243 crore in Bahraich . Maharaja Suheldev, an icon of the Rajbhar community, had defeated and killed Ghaznavid general Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masood in a battle on the banks of the Chittora Lake in Bahraich in 1033 AD. "I had said on the soil of Bahraich that glorification of foreign invaders should be stopped and that the national heroes must be honoured. And 1,000 years ago, such a tale of courage and bravery was written by Maharaja Suheldev on this very soil of Bahraich," he said. Adityanath said that it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's instruction that national heroes should be honoured. Live Events "History may have done injustice to him (Maharaja Suheldev), but this double-engine government will not allow it," he said. Referring to the battle in Chittora, Adityanath said, "To stop the barbaric foreign invader who moved from Ghazni along with his 3-lakh-strong army to loot India, Maharaja Suheldev led the resistance from Mathura to Bahraich... By the time the invader reached (here), half of his army had already perished." "When he (Masood) reached Chittora, Maharaja Suheldev had 20,000 to 25,000 bravehearts while there were 1.5 lakh warriors with Salar Masood. "But, these 20,000 to 25,000 bravehearts killed them ruthlessly. Evil Salar Masood was caught alive and he was given such punishment that it guaranteed him a place in hell according to Islam ('Dusht Salar Masood yehaan zindaa pakra liya gayaa, aur ussko sazaa bhi aisee hui ki jo Islam ke anusaar jahannum mein jaane kee guarantee deta hai')." The remarks come in the backdrop of the controversy over the Bahraich district administration denying permission for the annual 'Jeth Mela', which was traditionally held at the dargah of Salar Masood from May 15 to June 15 and drew lakhs of pilgrims. In an official statement, the administration on May 3 cited the prevailing atmosphere of public anger following incidents like the Pahalgam attack and Sambhal violence and concerns surrounding the amended Waqf Act as the reasons. The Allahabad High Court had on May 17 declined to grant permission for organising the annual fair at the dargah. However, in its order, the court's Lucknow bench allowed rituals and other related routine activities at the dargah. "There should be no events in the name of foreign invaders... If the main event of Bahraich is organised, it will be in the name of Maharaja Suheldev ji, it will be in the name of Balark Rishi, it will be in the name of Adishakti Maa Pateshwari Devi," Adityanath said on Tuesday. Attacking the previous governments led by the Samajwadi Party and others, the chief minister questioned why Suheldev was "not honoured" after independence. "They were afraid to anger their Muslim vote bank and were worried that their appeasement politics would fail. That is why they did not speak a word against the foreign invaders," Adityanath said. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
SC/ST/OBC quotas for FYJC: 4 Jain institutions move Bombay HC
Bombay high court (File photo) MUMBAI: Two separate petitions were filed by four Jain minority institutions before Bombay high court, including its Nagpur bench, challenging the inclusion of SC, ST, and OBC reservations in their non-minority FYJC seats. Additionally, the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions, along with three Mumbai colleges, will file a joint petition in HC on Tuesday. The Mumbai-based petitioners will also be adding the incorrect calculation of management and in-house quota seats in the petition, which they say has slashed their seat share by half. The institutions have termed the state's decision 'unjust' and 'unconstitutional', but govt officials remained firm that the reservations have not been applied to the minority seats and that affirmative action would help students from the backward classes to study in leading minority colleges. While J C High School and Junior College (Karanja Education Society-Washim), Sitabai Sangai High School and Junior College (Sitabai Sangai Education Society-Amravati), and J D Chawre Vidya Mandir (Shri Mahaveer Shikshan Prasarak Mandal) filed a petition before the Nagpur bench to be heard on Wednesday, Solapur's Walchand College of Arts and Science (APD Jain Pathashala) filed a plea before the principal bench to be heard on Tuesday. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Christian minority institutions from Nagpur are also likely to join the petition or file a separate one, said a principal. Many of these colleges realised the change in the equation of FYJC seats after govt put out their seat matrices on the centralised admission portal - Until last year, social reservations did not apply to minority institutions for FYJC admissions. TOI first highlighted the issue on June 4. An institute's official said the school education department cited a govt resolution (GR) from May 6, which speaks only about the application of social and parallel reservations to vacant seats in minority quota. The order also mentions that surrendering of minority seats is not mandatory, he said, adding that GR does not mention non-minority seats in their institutes. Petitioners have sought the GR be quashed, modified, and revised, and permission to hold admissions as per the old policy.
