$16 million settlement done, Trump claims new CBS owner will gift him $20 million in airtime
This follows a $16 million legal settlement Trump reached with CBS's parent company, Paramount, over what he alleged was misleading editing of a pre-election interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 election.
While CBS had originally dismissed the lawsuit as 'completely without merit,' the settlement comes amid Paramount's $8 billion pending sale to Skydance Media, a deal that still requires regulatory approval.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote: 'Paramount/CBS/60 Minutes have today paid $16 Million Dollars in settlement, and we also anticipate receiving $20 Million Dollars more from the new Owners, in Advertising, PSAs [public service announcements], or similar Programming, for a total of over $36 Million Dollars.'
Neither CBS nor Skydance has publicly responded to Trump's claim. But, as per a report by Forbes, Paramount previously denied reports that the company could compensate Trump via advertising, telling The Washington Post it 'has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump.'
Colbert, a vocal critic of Trump, had previously called the $16 million settlement 'a big fat bribe.' While he's expected to remain on air until May 2026, Colbert warned viewers this week that 'the gloves are off.'
'I don't know if anything, anything will repair my trust in this company,' Colbert said last week on his show. 'But, just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.'
Responding to Trump's latest claim, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren posted on X: 'This reeks of corruption.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Is Harvard training officials from China's Xi Jinping's party?
Harvard University has come under scrutiny for its alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). A US House committee led by Republicans has reportedly shot off a letter to the varsity's president, Alan Garber, accusing Harvard Kennedy School of training high-level Chinese government officials. This comes amid the Trump administration's efforts to bar the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign students read more A view of Harvard campus on John F. Kennedy Street at Harvard University is pictured in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, December 7, 2023. File Photo/Reuters Harvard University, which is in the crosshairs of the Donald Trump administration in the United States, has come under scrutiny for its ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). A report has revealed that Harvard Kennedy School of the prestigious varsity has been accused of partnering with an organisation associated with Xi Jinping's party. The report comes at a time when Harvard University is embroiled in a dispute with the Trump administration, with the US government freezing billions of dollars in federal funds. The US president has also alleged that universities allowed antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests on campus last year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But does Harvard really have ties to China's CCP? We will explain. Harvard's ties to CCP A US House of Representatives committee led by Republicans has alleged that Harvard Kennedy School collaborated with an organisation linked to the Chinese Communist Party, as per The Harvard Crimson report. A House Select Committee on the CCP started investigating Harvard University's alleged links to groups affiliated with China's party in May. In a letter to Harvard University President Alan Garber last week, the panel accused Harvard Kennedy School of training high-level Chinese government officials through a 'formal partnership' with the Chinese Executive Leadership Academy Pudong (CELAP). 'Under that partnership, the rising CCP elite who are being prepared for senior Communist Party leadership positions participate in training at Harvard in the United States,' Committee chair John R Moolenaar wrote in the letter. The committee asked the university to submit any documents linking Harvard to the CCP and furnish details of any money or benefits received from the CCP. According to Moolenaar, whistleblowers revealed the alleged tie-up between the school and CELAP, a training institution in Shanghai's Pudong district managed and funded by the Chinese government. Feng Jun, executive vice president of CELAP, attended the Harvard Kennedy School's now-defunct programme for senior Chinese officials known as 'China's Leaders in Development", calling HKS a 'model' for the Chinese school, according to Harvard University's student newspaper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is Harvard CCP's 'party school'? Many US universities, particularly Harvard, have offered programmes to Chinese officials to study governance. A Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report in June found that thousands of mid-career and senior bureaucrats of the CCP have visited the US for executive training and postgraduate studies for decades. Harvard University has been described by some in China as the top 'party school' outside the country. 'If we were to rank the Chinese Communist Party's 'overseas party schools,' the one deserving top spot has to be Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government in the US,' said a 2014 commentary published by Shanghai Observer. Some key Chinese officials to have graduated from Harvard Kennedy School are an ex-vice president of China and a top trade negotiator. Li Yuanchao, China's vice president from 2013 to 2018, took part in a mid-career training programme at Harvard Kennedy School in 2002. Several top Chinese officials have attended Harvard Kennedy School. File Photo/AFP Liu He, a retired vice premier, has a master's degree in public administration from Harvard Kennedy School. He was Chinese President Xi Jinping's top trade negotiator during talks with the first Trump administration. Li Hongzhong, currently a Politburo member and senior legislator, attended a short-term programme at Harvard in 1999. Syracuse, Stanford, the University of Maryland and Rutgers have also offered executive training to Chinese officials, WSJ reported, citing publicity materials and other disclosures. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China began sending officials for mid-career training at Harvard Kennedy School in the 1990s. One such programme, launched in 1998, provided fellowships and executive training courses to around 20 senior officials each year. Harvard launched another programme, 'China's Leaders in Development,' in the early 2000s, under which Chinese officials attended a training course, with their time split between Harvard and Beijing's Tsinghua University. As per Harvard, the now-defunct programme was to 'help prepare senior local and central Chinese government officials to more effectively address the ongoing challenges of China's national reforms." Trump's attempts to ban foreign students at Harvard Amid the ongoing standoff, the Trump administration has tried to bar Harvard from enrolling international students and prevent foreigners from entering the US to study at the elite varsity. However, both efforts were temporarily blocked by a court. Last month, the US State Department said that it launched an investigation into Harvard University's compliance with the government-run visa programme for international students. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the State Department would analyse Harvard's sponsorship eligibility under the Exchange Visitor Program certification, or J-1 visa programme, reported NBC News. The secretary of state said in a statement that all sponsors of the programme 'must comply with all regulations, including conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students. The investigation will ensure that State Department programmes do not run contrary to our nation's interests,' Rubio said. A spokesperson for Harvard said that the Ivy League school 'is committed to continuing to comply with the applicable Exchange Visitor Program regulations.' 'This investigation is yet another retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment right. Harvard continues to enrol and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for US visas and travel to campus this fall,' the spokesperson added. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
‘This happens in a banana republic': Trump's Greece and China-like reaction to job data draws flak
History shows that when political leaders manipulate or interfere with economic statistics, the results are often disastrous. read more US property mogul Donald Trump leads a media event on the sand dunes of the Menie estate, the site for Trump's proposed golf resort, near Aberdeen, north east Scotland, May 27, 2010. File Image/Reuters When President Donald Trump received disappointing jobs numbers on Friday (August 1), his response was swift and alarming: he fired Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This unprecedented move has raised concerns among economists and experts, who warn that meddling with government data can have far-reaching consequences. History shows that when political leaders manipulate or interfere with economic statistics, the results are often disastrous. Why is Labor Department's independence critical? The BLS, though officially part of the Labor Department, operates independently to produce nonpartisan data on critical metrics like employment, prices, and wages. This impartiality is vital, as reliable statistics help make sound decisions in both the public and private sectors. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For instance, the Federal Reserve relies on BLS data on inflation and unemployment to set interest rates, which directly impact the cost of mortgages and car loans for millions of Americans. As Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell recently stressed at a news conference, 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector.' He added, 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years, and we really need to continue that in my view.' Trump's decision to dismiss McEntarfer has drawn sharp criticism, with many seeing it as a step toward undermining the integrity of economic data. Former Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve Chair Janet L. Yellen called the move deeply troubling, stating, 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic.' Lessons from history History offers stark warnings about the dangers of manipulating government data. In the early 2000s, Chinese local authorities fudged economic figures to meet Beijing's growth targets, rendering official data unreliable. Analysts and policymakers were forced to turn to alternative measures to understand the true state of China's economy. Similarly, Greece's government falsified deficit numbers for years, a deception that fueled a crippling debt crisis requiring multiple international bailouts. When the head of Greece's statistical agency insisted on reporting accurate figures, he faced criminal prosecution. Perhaps most notoriously, Argentina systematically understated inflation rates during the 2000s and 2010s, leading the international community to dismiss its data entirely. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These examples show the chaos that ensues when political pressures compromise data integrity. Economists warn that Trump's firing of McEntarfer risks setting the US on a similar path, eroding trust in the numbers that guide critical economic decisions.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
European bank stocks surge to highest level since 2008 global financial crisis. What's behind the bull run?
European banking stocks, which have been on the back foot for over a decade and a half, have made a remarkable turnaround, rallying to their highest levels since September 2008, when the global financial crisis hit the world markets. The STOXX 600 Europe Banks index has been in an uptrend during five of the last six trading sessions, buoyed by improved profits and resilience amid the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump. Shares of HSBC, Barclays and Santander hit their 2008 highs while Italy's UniCredit rose to its highest level since 2011, according to a Financial Times report. The gains were bolstered by a latest report from the European Banking Authority (EBA) on Friday as it presented the outcome of its latest health check of the sector. The STOXX 600 Europe Banks index rallied nearly 2% at the open today, August 4. Banks across the European Union are well-positioned to withstand a major economic shock stemming from geopolitical and trade tensions, according to a report by Reuters, citing the EBA. The EBA conducted stress tests on 64 European banks, including 51 based in the eurozone, simulating the impact of a prolonged recession across the EU and other advanced economies. The results showed that none of the banks would fall below their core capital requirements, and only one institution would breach its leverage ratio requirement. However, under the adverse scenario, in case escalating geopolitical tensions and rising protectionist trade policies push up energy and commodity prices, disrupt supply chains, and dampen both consumption and investment - it would lead to a combined losses of €547 billion for the banks included in the stress test — higher than the €496 billion projected in the 2023 exercise. The latest earnings from European banks show that the sector remains largely insulated from the tariff shocks. Case in point is Barclays Plc. Its traders turned in their best second-quarter performance in three years as the volatility wrought by Trump's trade war helped them deliver revenue that topped analyst expectations. According to a Bloomberg report, the fixed-income business brought in £1.45 billion ($1.9 billion), a rise of 26% compared with a year ago, while the equities desk made £870 million, an increase of 25% year-on-year. Measured in dollars, the increase in revenue from the entire global markets business was up 35%. Barclays, one of Europe's biggest investment banks with a large Wall Street presence, generates the biggest portion of its revenue from dealmaking and trading. Meanwhile, another European lender - Germany's Deutsche Bank - reported better-than-expected trading results, driving its stock to the highest level in a decade. The stock has gained over 70% this year. French lender BNP Paribas also posted better-than-expected earnings as it got a boost from its fixed-income traders while equities slumped in the volatility triggered by the US tariff announcements. The stock has crossed its September lows and jumped 31% this year, in line with the index for European banks. (With inputs from agencies) Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
