Iran may fire its deadliest missile at Israel in the end, it will rattle even US due to..., it has range of..., name is...
Khorramshahr missile: Iran has fired more than 400 missiles at Israel since the Israel-Iran war erupted a week ago after the Jewish nation launched deadly airstrikes on Iranian cities, including the Tehran, targeting the countries nuclear facilities, as well as top military brass and nuclear scientists under its Operation Rising Lion.
Following the attacks, Tehran initiated Operation True Promise III, launching waves of missiles and drones at Israel, scores of which penetrated Israel's multi-layered air defense system, including the famed Iron Dome, causing widespread destruction and loss of lives.
According to experts, Iran has used a mix of its older missiles like Gadar and Imad as well as more modern advanced ballistic missiles such as the Kheibar Shekan, the Sejjil-2 heavy missile, and the its latest Fattah-1 hypersonic missile, which travels at Mach 15 speeds (15 times the speed of sound), making interception extremely difficult. Iran yet to fire its deadliest missile?
However, its believed that Iran may not fire its deadliest missile– the highly-classified Khorramshahr missile– at Israel until the very end. According to various reports, the Khorramshahr missile, has a range of over 2,000 kilometers, and a carry a 1,500-kilogram conventional or warhead.
Earlier, the media arms of Iran's elite Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had shared videos, purportedly showing the Khorramshahr-4 missile being launched by Iranian forces. However, it remains unclear whether Iran has used the liquid-fueled missile in the ongoing conflict, because no official statement has been made by Tehran confirming its deployment.
Many experts believe that Iran will not use the Khorramshahr missile until the very end, or at least until United States jumps into the war, and the missile is being kept secure at a strategically safe location till Tehran decides to use it. Iran missile arsenal
Iran's missile arsenal one of the largest in the world, consisting of more than 2,000 ballistic missiles, many of which can carry warheads weighing up to 900 kilos. Iran has already fired some of its most advanced and lethal missiles, at Israel, such as the Sejjil-2 and the Fattah-1 hypersonic missile, but it has even more deadlier options in its arsenal, including weapons like Fateh-2 hypersonic missile and Arash suicide drone, which its hasn't used so far during the current conflict. Israel-Iran war
The Israel-Iran war erupted on June 13 when Israel unleashed a wave of pre-dawn air strikes on Iranian cities, including capital Tehran, under Operation Rising Lion, in which several top Iranian nuclear scientists and military commanders, including IRGC chief Hossein Salami, commander Ghulam-Ali Rashid, nuclear scientist Dr. Mohammad Tehranchi, nuclear scientist Dr. Fereydoon Abbasi and Iran's Armed Forces Chief of Staff Major General Mohammad Bagheri.
Hours later, Iran, under Operation True Promise III, responded with a barrage of missiles and drones that struck several Israeli cities and major population centers, including Tel Aviv. Both sides have launched devastating strikes on each other, causing significant damage to infrastructure and loss of civilian lives, even as world powers and global agencies, including the United Nations, have urged the two bitter enemies to exercise utmost restraint.
According to various media reports, more than 240 people, including about top Iranian military officers and nuclear scientists, have been killed in Israeli airstrikes, while Iranian missile attacks have resulted in the deaths of more than 28 Israelis. Israeli air defense depleting rapidly
According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, Israel is running out of interceptors to intercept short-range missiles, and at the current rate, its ability to intercept and neutralize short-range ballistic missiles (SRMs) could last for around 10-12 days at best.
Citing US officials, the report said that Israel may soon have to choose which missile to intercept and which one let through if Iran continues its ballistic missile attack at the current pace.
Iran has an estimated stockpile of about 2,000 missiles, and while the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) have claimed to have destroyed several Iranian missile sites and launchers, its believed that a majority of Iran's missiles are kept in classified underground installations that are extremely difficult to reach.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
UN debates future withdrawal of Lebanon peacekeeping force
AP photo UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations Security Council began to debate Monday a resolution drafted by France to extend the UN peacekeeping force in south Lebanon for a year with the ultimate aim to withdraw it. Israel and the United States have reportedly opposed the renewal of the force's mandate, and it was unclear if the draft text has backing from Washington, which wields a veto on the Council. A US State Department spokesman said "we don't comment on ongoing UN Security Council negotiations," as talks continued on the fate of the UN Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL), deployed since 1978 to separate Lebanon and Israel. The text, first reported by Reuters, would "extend the mandate of UNIFIL until August 31, 2026" but "indicates its intention to work on a withdrawal of UNIFIL." That would be on the condition that Lebanon's government was the "sole provider of security in southern Lebanon... and that the parties agree on a comprehensive political arrangement." Under a truce that ended a recent war between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah, Beirut's army has been deploying in south Lebanon and dismantling the militant group's infrastructure there. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like +80 Free Trading Bots for MT4/MT5 Titan FX Register Undo Lebanon has been grappling with the thorny issue of disarming Hezbollah, with the cabinet this month tasking the army with developing a plan to do so by the end of the year. The Iran-backed group has pushed back. Under the truce, Israel was meant to completely withdraw from Lebanon, though it has kept forces in several areas it deems strategic and continues to administer strikes across Lebanon. Israel's forces have also had tense encounters with the UN blue helmets. The draft resolution under discussion also "calls for enhanced diplomatic efforts to resolve any dispute or reservation pertaining to the international border between Lebanon and Israel." Council members were debating the draft resolution seen by AFP Monday ahead of a vote of the 15-member council on August 25 before the expiration of the force's mandate at the end of the month.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
Donald Trump claims he's ended six wars: What is the truth?
Donald Trump has declared that he resolved 'six wars in six months', citing conflicts from Israel-Iran to India-Pakistan and Congo-Rwanda. While he presents himself as a global peacemaker, many of these agreements were fragile ceasefires, disputed by the governments involved, or remain unresolved French President Emmanuel Macron looks at US President Donald Trump during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (not pictured) and European leaders amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, August 18, 2025. File Image/Reuters Just hours before he hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office on Monday along with other European leaders, United States President Donald Trump asserted that he has brought an end to six separate wars within just six months of his presidency. The claim, repeated across speeches, social media posts, and interviews is aimed at Trump positioning himself as a global mediator. 'I've settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster… Despite all of my lightweight and very jealous critics, I'll get it done — I always do!!!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account ahead of the meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump is attempting to broker an end to the war in Ukraine, which has stretched into its fourth year. By placing his previous peace initiatives at the forefront, the US president has sought to project himself as a 'peacemaker-in-chief' and even hinted at aspirations for the Nobel Peace Prize. Do Trump's claims match reality? Trump and his administration have consistently referenced numerous conflicts that he says his leadership helped bring to an end. These could be: Israel and Iran The Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda Cambodia and Thailand India and Pakistan Armenia and Azerbaijan Serbia and Kosovo (first term) Egypt and Ethiopia (first term) Iran and Russia opposed the Armenia-Azerbaijan deal signed earlier this month at the White House, fearing a shift in regional influence. Israel and Iran One of the most dramatic episodes cited by Trump was the 12-day war in June between Israel and Iran. The US itself was directly involved, carrying out strikes with bunker-buster bombs against Iranian nuclear and military sites. Afterwards, Trump announced a ceasefire between the two countries, framing it as a breakthrough that had prevented further escalation. The White House described the outcome as a success that diminished Iran's nuclear capacity and reduced the likelihood of a wider conflict. Still, many analysts have noted that Washington's direct military role makes the claim of 'ending a war' more complicated. Israel has since warned that it retains the right to strike Iran again if the nuclear programme is rebuilt, leaving the ceasefire fragile. On social media, Trump presented it as a clear victory: 'It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE.' However, no permanent peace framework has been established, and nuclear talks with Iran have not moved forward. Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda In June, Trump hosted leaders of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda at the White House, where a peace agreement was signed under US mediation. The two nations have been embroiled in years of hostilities, with cross-border violence displacing millions and fuelling one of the world's largest humanitarian crises. At the signing ceremony, Trump proclaimed: 'Today, the violence and destruction comes to an end, and the entire region begins a new chapter of hope and opportunity, harmony, prosperity and peace.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite the ceremony, violations emerged soon afterwards. The Congolese army and the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group accused each other of fresh attacks and military buildups. International observers have cautioned that while the agreement represented progress, stability in the region remains uncertain. Cambodia and Thailand Another instance frequently cited by the Trump administration is the five-day border conflict between Cambodia and Thailand in July, which led to dozens of deaths and displaced thousands. The US president personally phoned leaders from both nations to press for a ceasefire, later noting on social media: 'The call with Cambodia has ended, but expect to call back regarding War stoppage and Ceasefire based on what Thailand has to say. I am trying to simplify a complex situation!' Eventually, the two countries signed a truce in Malaysia, following pressure from Washington. However, reports of violations soon surfaced as both governments accused each other of further skirmishes. Regional powers, including China, urged the neighbours to maintain calm. India and Pakistan Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated in May when India retaliated against Pakistan after the April Pahalgam terror attack. India struck Pakistani targets inside Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Pakistan itself. The confrontation marked the most serious flare-up since 2019. Following days of cross-border firing and assault, Trump announced a resolution, stating: 'After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE. Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump claimed to have leveraged trade relationships to press both sides into de-escalation, the Indian government has repeatedly dismissed the idea that Washington mediated the ceasefire. New Delhi has historically resisted external involvement in the Kashmir issue, and this denial has only fuelled scepticism about Trump's role. Serbia and Kosovo (First Term) The Serbia-Kosovo dispute, dating back to Kosovo's 2008 declaration of independence, has long remained a point of tension in the Balkans. In 2020, during Trump's first term, his administration oversaw the Washington Agreement, which focused on short-term economic normalisation. While Trump has since cited this as a conflict he resolved, the agreement did not address the underlying territorial and political disputes. As of 2025, tensions remain, with Nato urging renewed dialogue between the two sides. Egypt and Ethiopia (First Term) Another conflict Trump references is the standoff between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Nile River. Egypt fears the dam will threaten its water supply, while Ethiopia insists it is essential for its energy needs. During his first term, Trump attempted to mediate negotiations but failed to secure a final deal. Ethiopia later walked away from US-brokered talks, and Trump controversially suggested Egypt might eventually 'blow up the dam,' leading to accusations from Ethiopia that he was inciting war. Nevertheless, Trump and his aides continue to count the situation among his resolved conflicts, arguing that his involvement prevented escalation. In reality, negotiations remain ongoing, and the dispute is far from settled. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine talks: Another war Trump will 'end'? While Trump has cited six conflicts as victories, he has also suggested that Ukraine could represent his seventh major peace deal. Negotiations remain ongoing, with Trump attempting to arrange direct talks between Zelenskyy and Putin. Trump has often insisted that his agreements are more than temporary pauses in fighting. 'If you look at the six deals that I settled this year, they were all at war. I didn't do any ceasefires,' he told Zelenskyy during their Oval Office meeting. At his Alaska meeting with the Russian leader, Trump rolled back his push for a ceasefire, instead echoing Putin's position that borders and territory should be decided before guns fall silent. Zelenskyy, on the other hand, has insisted that a ceasefire must precede any discussion of territorial arrangements. Trump told the Ukrainian president, 'I don't think you need a ceasefire.' He also pledged US backing for European-led security guarantees, saying: 'European countries want to give protection and they feel very strongly about it and we'll help them out with that.' Zelenskyy welcomed the assurance, calling it 'such (a) strong signal.' US Vice President JD Vance, present during the talks, remained silent. Observers noted a stark contrast with earlier meetings in February, when Trump and Vance criticised Zelenskyy for insufficient gratitude for American support. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By his own count, Trump has resolved six wars within months of taking office for a second term. In practice, the record is more mixed. Some of the conflicts he references were already de-escalating, others saw only temporary ceasefires, and several continue to see violence despite the deals announced. In a few cases, such as Ethiopia and Egypt, no war existed, only a protracted diplomatic dispute. Trump's approach has nonetheless produced moments of visible progress, including high-profile White House signings and temporary halts to fighting. But long-term stability remains elusive in nearly every case. With inputs from agencies
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
The View From India newsletter: Our colleagues are dropping dead in Gaza
(This article is part of the View From India newsletter curated by The Hindu's foreign affairs experts. To get the newsletter in your inbox every Monday, subscribe here.) An Israeli strike on August 10, 2025, targeting Al Jazeera staff in a tent near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City killed six journalists, four of whom were Al Jazeera staff, including Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh, and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal. The two other journalists killed were Moamen Aliwa and Mohammad al-Khaldi. Israel accused Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif of 'terrorist affiliation.' — unsurprising in a world where state and deep state actors target messengers who put out information that causes them discomfort or brings greater scrutiny. The line between the state's proportionate and strategic response to terror, and the state's own brand of terror, unleashed on ordinary citizens of another country or one's own, must never blur. To start with, there aren't enough of us in the world telling the Gaza story. Western legacy media, especially in the U.S., stand exposed for their deep, shameful prejudices and worse, silences. Meanwhile, some of our colleagues in Gaza are dropping dead, while bringing to light this brazen carnage. A whole generation is being 'wiped out' in Gaza, as the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees observed recently. Over 60,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces until now in Gaza since October 2023. Among them are more than 200 journalists. Our colleague Sambavi Parthasarathy in The Hindu's data team combs through the statistics and shows us how Israel, while continuing to pound one of Palestine's non-contiguous regions — Gaza — is slowly asserting 'sovereignty' over the other — West Bank. The UN has said that displacement of Palestinians in West Bank has hit levels not seen since the start of Israel's occupation. With no respite in sight yet, it is distressing to see so many, including journalists, embracing the official narrative without the slightest scepticism. The Palestinian issue did not begin in October 2023. In this valuable explainer, which traces the history of Israel-Palestine relations from the end of the Second World War, Stanly Johny tells us why several peace agreements lie in tatters, and why there is no Palestinian state till date. In another timely analysis, Stanly Johny writes: When the world pushes for a two-state solution, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to push for a no-state solution — no sovereignty for the Palestinians, no state for the Palestinians and no rights for the Palestinians. Why is that so, when Israel's closest allies are beginning to recognise Palestinian sovereignty and subjectivity? Blinded by their shared ethno-nationalist ideology and drunk with hard power, Mr. Nentanyahu and his far-right allies Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir are programmatically incapable of grasping the shifts unfolding around them, he writes. More theatrics, no deal The much-watched summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska, did not yield a breakthrough on the Ukraine war. 'We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to, there are just a very few that are left,' Mr. Trump said. 'We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' Mr. Putin, on the other hand, said: 'We see the desire of the U.S. administration and President Trump personally to facilitate the resolution of the Ukrainian conflict, his desire to delve into the essence and understand its origins.' Read together, it'll seem like the leaders are on the brink of announcing a ceasefire. But it was a 'no ceasefire, no deal' meeting, as many global headlines put it. Statements and optics mean little in the absence of real outcomes. Theatrics don't automatically spawn solutions. Serious political engagement that reconciles short-term and long-term interests, while prioritising the safety of scores of ordinary people, does. Also, you can't steadfastly back one deadly war and claim to be able to stop another swiftly. 'The challenge before Mr. Trump is to sustain the talks aimed at narrowing the differences further to reach a workable compromise. While it makes perfect sense to end the war on practical terms, Mr. Trump should not impose an agreement on Kyiv. Peace would prevail in Eastern Europe only if Ukraine's security concerns are addressed and it is provided with credible assurances that Russia would not invade it again,' The Hindu noted in its editorial. And now, global media is tracking the next big meeting between Mr. Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Follow The Hindu's live updates here. Mr. Zelenskyy has also made a pitch for India to play a role in resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict, writes Suhasini Haidar. Top 5 stories this week: 1. India hit out at the Pakistani leadership for 'reckless warmongering and hateful comments' as well as The Hague-based Court of Arbitration (CoA) for questioning India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) after the Pahalgam terror attack – Suhasini Haidar reports 2. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to visit India amidst uncertainties in India-U.S. trade ties, Kallol Bhattacherjee reports. 3. Jeremy Corbyn | The British Left's second act – Srinivasan Ramani on how the former Labour leader is trying to mobilise left-wing voters under his new party, as Labour under Keir Starmer struggles to maintain public support 4. Alaska | Chilling past, warm present: Sruthi Darbhamulla writes on the former Russian region sold to the U.S. in 1867, which still bears traces of Russian cultural influence, that hosted Trump and Putin for a historic summit 5. Honour India's legacy, defend its democracy: Independence Day this year is a stark reminder of the state India is in; it is a reminder of how Indians should resist any moves to undermine the country's constitutional principles, writes Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.
