logo
Opinion - The Democrats' hypocritical constitutional crisis

Opinion - The Democrats' hypocritical constitutional crisis

Yahoo26-02-2025
The U.S. Court of Appeals just averted a constitutional crisis — Democrats should be relieved.
That it came from blocking yet another attempt by former President Joe Biden to shift billions in debt from college students to the general taxpayer should make no difference to those with such acute constitutional concerns. Right?
On Feb. 18, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Biden's Education Department had exceeded its authority in attempting to shift college debt on a scale similar to that provided by Biden's initial 2022 massive college debt shift. In 2023, the Supreme Court had ruled against Biden's effort to permanently cancel up to $430 billion in loan debt for as many as 43 million borrowers under the HEROES Act.
Undeterred, Biden sought multiple times to stretch other laws to shift college debt. By the time he left the White House, he was trying to cancel $184 billion in debt owed to taxpayers by approximately 5 million borrowers.
So to recap, there was a definitive Supreme Court ruling followed by repeated attempts by a president to circumvent it. The judicial branch determined and the executive branch ignored it. Were the Biden-Harris administration still in office, there's no reason to believe — based on repeated prior attempts — that the executive branch would not still be ignoring the judicial branch.
If ever there were the makings of constitutional crisis, this would seem to have it.
For weeks, Democrats have been echoing the mantra of 'constitutional crisis' over the Trump administration's DOGE efforts to cut spending, personnel, and regulations. However, there is no Democrat roar of approval here. In fact, the silence is deafening.
Democrats could also be cheering the avoidance of fiscal and economic crises with the appeals court ruling. Biden's debt shift from college borrowers to general taxpayers would have meant adding billions more to a burgeoning budget deficit.
And had that debt been shifted, it would have amounted to a windfall to borrowers who assuredly would have spent some or all it, further adding to price pressures that have been sizzling since Biden took office in 2021.
Strangely, Democrats are not cheering the avoiding of these crises, either.
When Biden first announced his mammoth college debt shift, Democrats cheered.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called it 'one of the biggest acts of consumer debt relief in American history.' In April 2024, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) applauded Biden's attempts to circumvent the judicial decision through executive action, saying 'the president is heeding Congress's call and Democrats will continue to be relentless in doing everything we can to lower costs and make college more affordable.'
That the president was using executive action — not seeking legislation from Congress — then, despite the nation's highest court having blocked the executive branch's earlier attempt did not bother Democrats.
That the president's attempted circumvention of the judicial decision and legislation to shift debt to the general taxpayer from college borrowers also did not bother Democrats — despite only 38 percent of Americans having earned a college degree.
This at a time when the Biden administration was running up $7.5 trillion in deficits over fiscal 2021 through 2024. Yet they decry as fiscal calamity the extension of Republicans' 2017 tax cuts that are simply an extension of current policy.
Democrats were unbothered by the president's unilateral executive action to provide a financial windfall to borrowers, even as the withering inflation of the Biden-Harris era was savaging taxpayers.
For years, the left's overarching talking point on the subject of President Trump has been 'crisis.' Today, they declare that he is producing a constitutional crisis. They said he was 'an existential threat to our democracy' and a 'fascist' in 2024.
The truth is that Democrats can see no crisis unless they can attribute it to Trump. They see no crisis in trying to increase government, federal spending, federal deficits, and federal debt — only in Trump's attempts to decrease them.
Amazingly, Democrats missed all the crises — constitutional, fiscal and economic — that Biden created by attempting to circumvent the judiciary with his college debt chicanery.
Democrats' copious tears over the Constitution are strictly crocodilian. They are blatantly partisan, utterly hypocritical and thoroughly exhausted of efficacy from years of overuse.
The real crisis that Democrats understand all too well is their own lack of an agenda outside of opposition to Trump and a defense of the unsustainable status quo of big government, big spending, high taxes, and more deficits and debt.
J.T. Young is the author of 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left.' He has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management, and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. What's happening? The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. Why would Trump do this? In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. Didn't Trump want Intel's CEO to quit? That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' Why would Intel do a deal? The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Would this deal be unusual? Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. Would the government run Intel? U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. What government grants does Intel receive? Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.' Michael Liedtke, The Associated Press

California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says
California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says

USA Today

time12 minutes ago

  • USA Today

California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says

Newsom has called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. WASHINGTON ― California Gov. Gavin Newsom's redistricting proposal aimed at creating five new Democratic congressional seats begins with overwhelming support ahead of a planned November referendum when voters would decide its fate, according to a survey conducted by his longtime pollster. The proposal is backed by 57% of California voters and opposed by 35%, the poll taken by Democratic pollster David Binder found, according to a report by Axios. Another 8% of voters in the heavily Democratic state said they were undecided. Newsom has portrayed his mid-term redistricting push as necessary to offset Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's pursuit to create five new Republican congressional districts in Texas. President Donald Trump has publicly lobbied for the gerrymandering in Texas to boost Republican chances in the 2026 midterm elections. Newsom last week called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. The poll found 84% of California's Democratic voters support the redistricting plan while 79% of the state's Republicans oppose it. The 57% in overall support for the redistricting plan is a jump from the 51% who said they backed redrawing California's congressional maps in a July poll. California currently has 43 congressional seats held by Democrats and nine by Republicans. The creation of five new Democratic-friendly districts could sway California's delegation to a 48-5 advantage for Democrats. Yet the move comes with risk for Democrats because it might create several competitive seats that Republicans could target. "I know they say, 'Don't mess with Texas,'" Newsom, widely considered a potential presidential candidate in 2028, quipped at a Democratic rally kicking off the redistricting campaign last week. "Well, don't mess with the great Golden State." California has an independent redistricting commission that is designed to limit partisan influence on the map-drawing process, but Newsom said the measure would allow a new process to draw maps that would go into effect for House elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030, before ceding power back to the commission to draw maps ahead of 2032. Redistricting in all states is required by federal law every 10 years following the release of new U.S. Census Bureau figures; however, Trump pushed Texas Republicans to jumpstart the process in the middle of the decade, setting off a cross-country redistricting fight. Redistricting efforts are also ongoing in Florida and Ohio that could benefit Republicans, while Republican-controlled Indiana and Missouri are also discussing redrawing their maps. Control of the U.S. House of Representatives at stake, with Republicans currently holding a 219-212 majority. Contributing: Erin Mansfield of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

Burger King® Introduces the Latest 'Whopper® by You' With a Crispy Onion Twist on the Classic
Burger King® Introduces the Latest 'Whopper® by You' With a Crispy Onion Twist on the Classic

Business Wire

time12 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Burger King® Introduces the Latest 'Whopper® by You' With a Crispy Onion Twist on the Classic

MIAMI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Following the BBQ Brisket Whopper – the first innovation in the newly launched 'Whopper by You' platform – Burger King is giving Guests an all-new take on the flame-grilled classic inspired by their cravings, and it's a bacon and onion lover's dream. With layers on layers of flavor, the Crispy Onion Whopper is the ultimate mix of sweet, savory and crunch that BK fans have been asking for. The Crispy Onion Whopper features more than ¼ lb.** of beef flame-grilled to perfection topped with crisp lettuce, juicy tomatoes, creamy mayo, melty American cheese, bacon and crunchy pickles with golden onion rings, crispy onions and a sweet & smoky BBQ sauce. For a smaller taste of crunchy, onion-y deliciousness, BK is also offering the latest Whopper innovation as a Whopper Jr. – similar to the BBQ Brisket Whopper. 'Burger King Guests have been loving the recently launched BBQ Brisket Whopper, so we're excited to bring another Guest-inspired creation to our menus,' said Joel Yashinsky, Chief Marketing Officer, Burger King US&C. 'Like the BBQ Brisket Whopper, the Crispy Onion Whopper is a result of listening to our Guests, and we can't wait to see what else they come up with that could make its way to BK restaurants in the future.' Guests can continue to share their next great Whopper innovations via the 'Whopper by You' platform by visiting With each qualifying submission, Guests can redeem one of several special Royal Perks rewards assigned at random, including $0.01 Whopper sandwich each week for a year, free hamburgers, cheeseburgers, or Whopper Jr. sandwiches with purchase, and more.*** To find your nearest Burger King restaurant or to learn more about the new BBQ Brisket Whopper and 'Whopper by You' platform, visit *Limited time at participating US restaurants, while supplies last. **Weight based on pre-cooked patty ***Royal Perks account registration required. Must be 18+. U.S. only. Terms apply. See ABOUT BURGER KING ® Founded in 1954, the Burger King ® brand is a global quick service hamburger chain known for food quality and value and as the only place guests can get the iconic flame-grilled Whopper ® sandwich. The Burger King system operates more than 19,000 locations in more than 120 countries and U.S. territories. Nearly all Burger King® restaurants are owned and operated by independent franchisees, many of them family-owned operations that have been in business for decades. To learn more about the Burger King brand, please visit the official brand website at or the newsroom at and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, X and TikTok.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store