
Wall Street's week of whiplash brought fear, relief and caution
A massive relief rally, however, comes with a caution sign.
Since announcing sweeping tariffs on April 2, the S&P 500 has done a near round-trip of historic proportions. The benchmark index extended its slide from its February high to the brink of confirming a bear market, as investors priced in dire scenarios for the economy after Trump announced tariffs that would raise U.S. trade barriers to the highest levels in over a century.
The Cboe Volatility index, Wall Street's "fear gauge," soared earlier this week to its highest closing level since the COVID-19 pandemic five years ago.
Then, in a stunning reversal on Wednesday, Trump said he would temporarily lower the hefty duties on dozens of countries while further ramping up pressure on China, prompting a massive relief rally, sending the S&P 500 up nearly 10%, its biggest one-day jump since October 2008.
The rapid policy changes translated into non-stop action, stress and drama on trading floors and investment houses.
"It's been a quite a wild ride," said Joe Tigay, portfolio manager for Rational Equity Armor Fund, who said it brought back memories of trading through massive swings during the pandemic. "Personally, honestly, this is what I live for."
The rapid pace of unfolding events in recent days prompted a deft juggling of priorities, including client calls, trading and making sense of markets, said Chris Murphy, co-head of derivative strategy at Susquehanna Financial Group, as the market drama surpassed the wild trading seen during the COVID-induced market crash of March 2020.
"This is more headline driven than what we saw in COVID," Murphy said. "There's just not enough time because you're going from one thing to the next."
Clients wanted frequent updates as market losses stacked up, advisers said.
"We reached out to as many clients as possible via a client letter and phone calls," said Gina Bolvin, president of Bolvin Wealth Management Group in Boston.
"Some of my nervous clients were comforted when they learned that as the market was declining I had been investing some of my own money."
But while some have embraced the volatility, others caution that the market remains fragile, U.S. policy remains unpredictable and that the U.S. is not out of the woods.
"It's definitely good news because it shows that the negotiations are in good enough shape that they think that they've accomplished what they needed to by this initial conversation," said Mark Hackett, chief market strategist, Nationwide Investment Management Group in Philadelphia.
"But I want to put a pretty big caveat out there because 8% rallies in 20 minutes in the Nasdaq aren't a heck of a lot healthier than 8% declines."
TRUMP PUT BACK ON?
After a week of concern that Trump was no longer worried about stock market losses, some investors speculated that markets had prompted Trump's decision, including a rout in the bond market that came to a head on Wednesday and led to a massive spike in Treasury yields.
Investors had previously relied on the theory of a Trump put, a reference to investor belief that Trump would reverse policy if markets ran into trouble.
"I think this is a reminder that Trump does not want a bear market in stocks, and he does not want a recession, so this is forcing a rethink of the approach," said Talley Leger, chief market strategist, The Wealth Consulting Group.
But many investors said persistent uncertainty around tariff policy could still have broad fallout, impeding the ability of companies to plan and influencing consumer behavior.
"They hit the pause button and the market rejoiced," said Alex Morris, chief investment officer at F/m Investments. "But of course, there is no promise that we'll manage to solve anything in 90 days."
Deutsche Bank said in a note that while the Trump put appears back on, the policy back-and-forth will cause lasting damage. "Even if the tariffs are permanently suspended, damage has been done to the economy via a permanent sense of unpredictability in policy."
Market volatility on Wednesday had been trained on the bond market, which saw a bruising selloff in U.S. Treasuries, with some market participants saying funds had been selling such liquid assets such as Treasuries to meet margin calls.
"There's definitely sensitivity to what happens in the Treasury market," said Matt Orton, chief market strategist at Raymond James Investment Management. "If something breaks in the Treasury market, that could be very, very bad."
Trump said on Wednesday the bond market had recovered well after investors became queasy about it in reaction to his tariffs.
"The bond market now is beautiful," he told reporters.
The White House said Trump's move to hike tariffs on China and pause tariffs on other countries came after receiving "good-faith commitments from a majority of our trading partners willing to strike favorable trade deals."
"The only interest guiding President Trump's decision making is the best interest of the American people," White House spokesman Kush Desai said. "The Trump administration remains committed to using every tool at our disposal to address the national emergency posed by chronic trade deficits – including both tariffs and negotiations.'
'STRESSFUL WEEK'
Some investors felt the relentless string of bad news for markets and wild gyrations were impossible to maintain.
"We had assumed that some form of capitulation would be forthcoming," said Christopher Hodge, chief economist for the US at Natixis in New York, citing the financial carnage and expectation of economic pain.
Since Trump unveiled his tariff plan on April 2, the stock market has undergone some record-breaking gyrations. It notched an 8.1% intra-day price swing in the benchmark S&P 500 index on Monday, while Tuesday's market saw one of the biggest reversals for the benchmark index in at least the last 50 years.
Wednesday's market about-face was even more stark, with the day's 10.7% range stacking up as the fifth largest in at least the last fifty years.
Bolvin said this had been "a stressful week."
"When my 3 year old woke up and asked if the market was down, I knew we were close to the bottom," Bolvin said.
(Additional reporting by Lewis Krauskopf, Laura Matthews, Chuck Mikolajczak, Carolina Mandl, Davide Barbuscia; editing by Megan Davies and Deepa Babington)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
34 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
How To Take Forward The Latest Improvement In India-China Bilateral Relations?
By Nitya Chakraborty India-China political relations have started improving giving all the indications that the leaderships of the two countries with the largest population in the world, are ready for building stable relationship after an uneasy period of five years since the Galwan killings on the border in 2020 in which 20 Indian soldiers lost their lives. The process of healing began from last year itself but the course has intensified since US President Donald Trump started his tariff war and imposed 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the USA and announced additional tariff of 25 per cent as a penalty for buying Russian oil to be effective from August 27 this year. The initial 25 per cent tariff has already taken effect. President Trump's personal relations with the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi worsened since the ceasefire of the four day India Pakistan war announced on May 10 at 5 PM. Trump claimed credit for compelling both the warring governments to opt for the ceasefire which Modi consistently opposed. The India-US political relations got a further jolt with the sudden improvement in Pak-US relations. Trump hosted lunch in his Oval office for the Pak General Asim Munir who during his stay in USA threatened of a nuclear strike against India. It was in this deteriorating state of India-US relationship, Chinese foreign minister paid a three day visit from August 18 to 20 and met Prime Minister Narendra Modi as also external affairs minister Dr. S Jaishankar and the National Security Adviser Ajit Modi told the Chinese foreign minister that the stable, predictable and constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global prosperity. PM is visiting Tianjin in China to attend the summit of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) to be hosted by the Chinese President Xi Jinping on August 31 and September 1 next. Indian Prime Minister will have bilateral talks with both President XI Jinping as also the Russian President Vladimir Putin who will be attending. The question is what is the basic imperative of the Prime Minister's sudden hobnobbing with both China and Russia just after getting the snub from President Trump on both political and trade tariff issues? Is it a jerk reaction to the US attitude to India or it is a part of a deliberate calibrated strategy to build India's strategic autonomy to look after India's national interests without being dependent on any of the big three powers USA, China and Russia. This issue is of crucial importance as Indian PM will be attending Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit this month where he will discuss India's global strategy with both President Xi and President Putin. This will be followed by the US dominated QUAD meet in India hosted by Narendra Modi by the end of this year. The QUAD schedule is still on. It has not been postponed. In 2026, Prime Minister will host the BRICS summit in India. President XI and even President Putin might be attending. In any case, President Putin is scheduled to arrive in India by year end as a part of his bilateral visit. As regards China, the official Chinese view regarding India-China relations has undergone changes in the last one year and more so in the last two months in the context of the deterioration of India-US relations. The Chinese commentators have taken note of the recent moves by both sides in normalizing relations. For instance both governments are expediting visa facilitation; talks on resuming direct flights are reportedly underway; the two sides are discussing resuming border trade of domestic goods. Further multiple friction points along the Line of Actual Control have seen disengagement with reinforced buffer arrangements; and both the Working Mechanism for Consultation & Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) and the Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question have become regularized. Together, these steps show that both countries are prioritizing stability and embracing a practical approach of 'managing differences while expanding common ground.' According to Global Times, the official English daily of the Chinese Government, several factors explain why relations are improving now. First, profound shifts in the international landscape have heightened the shared desire for multipolarity and strategic autonomy, particularly regarding BRICS cooperation. With supply chains being reconfigured and geopolitical flashpoints multiplying, major Asian economies are seeking to reduce bloc-based risks and preserve policy flexibility. Second, structural complementarities and mutual security concerns create intrinsic momentum. As two large economies with complementary markets, China and India have significant opportunities to collaborate in manufacturing ecosystems, the digital economy, green transition, public health and poverty reduction. Third, regional and multilateral platforms provide responsibility and traction. Frameworks such as BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the G20 enable the two countries to coordinate on development priorities. Practical collaboration amplifies the voice of the Global South and prevents differences from diluting broader cooperation. As the Chinese official media sees it, a stable border is foundational for regional development; any escalation raises costs and constrains cooperation. Wang Yi's visit for boundary talks to India at this juncture carries substantive weight. The boundary question is central to the relationship and underpins further progress. This comment was made by GT on August 19 issue the day the Chinese foreign minister met the Indian PM Narendra Modi. Together, China and India account for roughly 2.8 billion people. Expanding cooperation in lower-sensitivity areas of supply chains, cross-border e-commerce, healthcare, clean energy and connectivity can boost jobs and investment while enhancing regional supply-chain resilience and efficiency. In the fields of technological and green transition synergy, complementarities in digital infrastructure, renewables, energy storage and electric mobility offer practical avenues for aligning projects. Chinese government wants to channelize more investments in India. New Delhi is careful about the sectors where national security is involved. But in the latest economic survey, the finance ministry has favored increased investments from China. Both governments can discuss the sectors and clear concerns about national security. Once the process starts and other areas open up, there will be more trust between the two governments and the delicate border disputes can be tackled more effectively for arriving at an understanding. The Chinese official media also underlines that, the gradual improvement of bilateral relations is conducive to increasing mutual trust. From a broader perspective, the bilateral relations have to be seen as a part of a long term strategy by India. Only then the border issues can be solved amicably. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to give a relook at the contours of Indian foreign policy and reset the priorities on the basis of strategic autonomy and multipolarity. India will be able to talk to all three big powers USA, China and Russia with strength and conviction. Just as India should not be a part of Trump's global strategy,, similarly, India can't align with China and Russia in their respective strategies to further their national interests. India is the country with the largest population in the world and it will soon become the fourth largest economy globally. This nation of 1.44 billion with more than 5000 years of rich civilization behind it has the capacity to move on its own with flexibility to deal with all including the big powers. It is to be seen whether Narendra Modi imparts a dynamic shift in his foreign policy in that direction or goes back to his old ways after a small gap due to some political compulsions. .Indian Prime Minister is on test. (IPA Service)


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Fed minutes: Inflation outweighs employment concerns in divided decision
Federal Reserve officials were concerned in July about the effect that tariffs would have on inflation and unemployment, although minutes released from the meeting showed on Wednesday that a large majority found it too soon to begin cutting interest rates. The minutes underscored the division within the central bank, which voted to maintain its target interest rate range at 4.25 to 4.50 per cent despite two Fed officials voting to reduce the rate. The UAE Central Bank, which follows the Fed's decisions due to the dollar peg, also maintained rates after the announcement on July 30. The July meeting minutes showed 'almost all' Fed officials supported the decision. US President Donald Trump's tariff agenda has weighed heavily on the Fed this year. Officials entered last month's meeting debating whether tariffs would have a greater impact on inflation, which still remains above the Fed's 2 per cent target, or on its employment mandate. The minutes appeared to suggested that Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman – two Trump appointments reported to be in consideration as the next Fed chief – were alone in their dissent. 'A majority of participants judged the upside risk to inflation as the greater of these two risks, while several participants viewed the two risks as roughly balanced, and a couple of participants considered downside risk to employment the more salient risk,' the minutes read. Fed chairman Jerome Powell delivered a hawkish sentiment when speaking to reporters after the decision, suggesting that the Fed could continue to delay cutting rates as it awaited further clarity on how tariffs would affect inflation. 'When we have risks to both goals, and one of them is farther away from goal than the other, and that's inflation, that means policy should be tight, because tight policy is what brings inflation down,' Mr Powell said at the time. A dismal jobs report released two days after the meeting drastically changed the rate-cut calculus expected to play out later this year. The report showed that not only had employers added fewer jobs than expected in July, but significant downwards revisions from previous months pointed to signs of a weakening labour market. Adding to the mixed messages the Fed has received, underlying inflation data has also come in hotter than expected since July. The report from the Bureau of Labour and Statistics showed that prices for imported items such as household furnishing, apparel and recreational goods all increased last month, while medical care services and airfare prices were also higher than previous. Wholesale inflation data also saw its biggest increase in three years in July, in another sign that companies are raising their prices to offset higher costs. Those reports have done little to dent expectations of a September rate cut, however. About 83 per cent of traders believe the Fed will resuming cutting rates next month, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool, before reducing policy again in December. 'The labour market will be the swing factor on whether the Fed cuts interest rates in September or not,' Oxford Economics chief US economist Ryan Sweet wrote to clients. The minutes come at a crucial time for Mr Powell, who is due to deliver a keynote address at the annual Jackson Hole symposium in Wyoming on Friday. Mr Powell will deliver the highly anticipated speech under pressure on several fronts from Mr Trump, the two dissenting Fed governors and the looming arrival of a key Trump ally to the Federal Reserve board. Friday's address during the annual gathering, attended by central bankers from around the world, is expected to include Mr Powell's short-term and long-term views on monetary policy. Earlier on Wednesday, Mr Trump opened a new line of attack on the US central bank, calling for the resignation of Fed governor Lisa Cook after one of his allies accused her of mortgage fraud. Ms Cook's term as Fed governor expires in 2038. Together they, along with a rotating group of regional fed bank presidents, make up the Federal Open Market Committee that sets its interest rates. The move follows a pattern of attempts by Mr Trump to exert control of the Fed, whose independence is generally considered sacrosanct among economists and policymakers


Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
Trump calls on Fed Governor Cook to resign
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday called on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign, intensifying his effort to gain influence over the central bank on the basis of allegations made by one of his allies about mortgages Cook holds in Michigan and Georgia. U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte alleged in a post on X earlier on Wednesday that Cook had designated a condo in Atlanta as her primary residence after taking a loan on her home in Michigan, which she also declared as a primary residence. Loans for a primary residence can carry easier terms than for second homes or investment properties. Pulte said the loans date to mid-2021, before Cook was appointed to the Fed by former President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate the following year. She is a native of Georgia and at the time was an economics professor at Michigan State University. Pulte asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate, and Trump quickly amplified the allegation. The Justice Department was taking the matter very seriously, a department official told Reuters. Spokespersons for the Fed and for Cook did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform, his latest remarks aimed at reshaping the make-up of the U.S. central bank, a body designed to set benchmark interest rates independent of White House influence. Cook is one of three Biden appointees to the Fed whose terms extend beyond Trump's time in office, complicating the president's efforts to get more control by appointing a majority of its seven-member board. Currently two of the Fed's remaining six board members were appointed by Trump, Governor Christopher Waller and Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman. Trump has repeatedly blasted Fed Chair Jerome Powell over benchmark rates that he wants sharply reduced, calling for his resignation while acknowledging that the Fed's unique status in U.S. governance prevents him from firing Fed board members over monetary policy disputes. Trump can name a new chair when Powell's term ends in May, but claiming a majority on the board may take more time. Powell could continue serving as a governor until 2028, near the end of Trump's term, should he buck convention and continue sitting on the board under a new chair. Until Powell's departure, Trump at this point has only one other seat to fill, vacated recently by the surprise resignation of former Governor Adriana Kugler. Earlier this month Trump nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to serve out the rest of her term. (Reporting by Susan Heavey and Howard Schneider; Additional reporting by Dan Burns and Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Andrea Ricci)