Navigating inheritance: Know the difference between succession certificate and legal heir certificate
What is a succession certificate?
Asuccession certificate, issued by a civil court underthe Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Part X, Sections 370–390), authorises the holder to collect and managemovable financial assets like bank accounts, shares, or bonds when the deceased leaves no will or executor. It's vital for contested cases or high-value assets, offeringjudicially enforceable authority to settle debts and securities.
In a 2022 Madras high court case, P. Venkatachalam vs The Tahsildar (2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 265), petitioners challenged the authority of tahsildars to issue legal heir certificates for Class-II heirs (e.g., paternal relatives) in intestate succession. The court clarified that a legal heir certificate only confirms the relationship between the deceased and their heirs.
It cannot replace a succession certificate, which is mandatory for claiming debts or securities under the Indian Succession Act. The court also struck down a 2019 Tamil Nadu circular limiting legal heir certificates to Class-I heirs, calling it illogical, and ordered revised guidelines. This ruling highlights the critical role of a legal heir certificate in financial asset disputes.
What is a legal heir certificate?
Alegal heir certificate, issued by revenue authorities like tahsildars or municipal officers, identifies the deceased's legitimate heirs. Used inuncontested scenarios, it facilitates administrative tasks such as transferring property titles, claiming pensions, or updating utilities. Governed by state-specific rules, it's faster and cheaper but holdslimited legal weight in disputes compared to the Indian Succession Act.
A senior citizen's daughter once approached our office after her father's passing. He had no Will, but had left behind multiple fixed deposits and mutual funds. The bank refused to release the funds based on a legal heir certificate alone. They required a succession certificate, especially since another family member had also claimed entitlement. Without the correct certificate, she spent over five months in legal back-and-forth.
Choosing the wrong certificate can be costly. One client assumed a legal heir certificate would unlock her late spouse's demat account. Due to the portfolio's value and a minor objection from a relative, the registrar required a succession certificate. The process took six months, delaying funds and causing distress. Early consultation with an advisor could have streamlined the process.
Debunking myths
A common misconception, particularly in states like Karnataka, is that legal heir certificates are exclusively for families of government employees. While Karnataka's 2025 policy imposes restrictions on pension-related cases, most states permit broader use for private asset claims, such as property transfers or insurance, when uncontested.
Courts, as seen in P Venkatachalam vs The Tahsildar, have intervened to ensure revenue authorities issue legal heir certificates appropriately, reinforcing their utility in straightforward inheritance matters.
Practical guidance
Distinguishing between a succession certificate and a legal heir certificate is essential for seamless inheritance in India. Real-life cases like Venkatachalam and others highlight how the wrong choice can trigger delays or disputes. By selecting the appropriate documents, heirs can efficiently access assets, minimise legal hurdles, and honour the deceased's legacy in a hassle-free manner.
Shraddha Nileshwar, head – will & estate planning at 1 Finance. Views are personal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15-07-2025
- Mint
Navigating inheritance: Know the difference between succession certificate and legal heir certificate
Navigating inheritance in India often involves two critical documents: thesuccession certificate and thelegal heir certificate. Though both relate to a deceased person's estate, they serve distinct purposes, are issued by different authorities, and are applied in specific scenarios. Mistaking one for the other can lead to delays, financial setbacks, or legal disputes. This article clarifies their differences, backed by real-life examples, to help you make informed decisions. What is a succession certificate? Asuccession certificate, issued by a civil court underthe Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Part X, Sections 370–390), authorises the holder to collect and managemovable financial assets like bank accounts, shares, or bonds when the deceased leaves no will or executor. It's vital for contested cases or high-value assets, offeringjudicially enforceable authority to settle debts and securities. In a 2022 Madras high court case, P. Venkatachalam vs The Tahsildar (2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 265), petitioners challenged the authority of tahsildars to issue legal heir certificates for Class-II heirs (e.g., paternal relatives) in intestate succession. The court clarified that a legal heir certificate only confirms the relationship between the deceased and their heirs. It cannot replace a succession certificate, which is mandatory for claiming debts or securities under the Indian Succession Act. The court also struck down a 2019 Tamil Nadu circular limiting legal heir certificates to Class-I heirs, calling it illogical, and ordered revised guidelines. This ruling highlights the critical role of a legal heir certificate in financial asset disputes. What is a legal heir certificate? Alegal heir certificate, issued by revenue authorities like tahsildars or municipal officers, identifies the deceased's legitimate heirs. Used inuncontested scenarios, it facilitates administrative tasks such as transferring property titles, claiming pensions, or updating utilities. Governed by state-specific rules, it's faster and cheaper but holdslimited legal weight in disputes compared to the Indian Succession Act. A senior citizen's daughter once approached our office after her father's passing. He had no Will, but had left behind multiple fixed deposits and mutual funds. The bank refused to release the funds based on a legal heir certificate alone. They required a succession certificate, especially since another family member had also claimed entitlement. Without the correct certificate, she spent over five months in legal back-and-forth. Choosing the wrong certificate can be costly. One client assumed a legal heir certificate would unlock her late spouse's demat account. Due to the portfolio's value and a minor objection from a relative, the registrar required a succession certificate. The process took six months, delaying funds and causing distress. Early consultation with an advisor could have streamlined the process. Debunking myths A common misconception, particularly in states like Karnataka, is that legal heir certificates are exclusively for families of government employees. While Karnataka's 2025 policy imposes restrictions on pension-related cases, most states permit broader use for private asset claims, such as property transfers or insurance, when uncontested. Courts, as seen in P Venkatachalam vs The Tahsildar, have intervened to ensure revenue authorities issue legal heir certificates appropriately, reinforcing their utility in straightforward inheritance matters. Practical guidance Distinguishing between a succession certificate and a legal heir certificate is essential for seamless inheritance in India. Real-life cases like Venkatachalam and others highlight how the wrong choice can trigger delays or disputes. By selecting the appropriate documents, heirs can efficiently access assets, minimise legal hurdles, and honour the deceased's legacy in a hassle-free manner. Shraddha Nileshwar, head – will & estate planning at 1 Finance. Views are personal
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11-05-2025
- Business Standard
Consumer protection: Legal heir, not nominee, is beneficiary of policy
Kusum purchased 15 life insurance policies in the name of her unmarried daughter, Ranjeeta, and appointed herself as the nominee. Later, Ranjeeta married Anand Kumar and gave birth to a baby girl. Ranjeeta passed away when the child was just 11 months old. Following her daughter's death, Kusum claimed the insurance proceeds. However, before the claims could be settled, her son-in-law, Kumar, filed a civil suit under the Indian Succession Act, asserting that he and his minor daughter were entitled to the insurance benefits. Kusum was not even made a party to the suit. The matter was referred to the Lok Adalat, where it was decided that the policy claims would be paid to Anand Kumar. Upon learning of this decision, Kusum filed a writ petition challenging the order. The petition was dismissed on the ground that she had not first pursued the remedy of filing a civil revision before the Unnao court. Subsequently, Kusum filed a revision before the Unnao civil court, which directed her to deposit the claim amounts in fixed deposits in the name of her granddaughter until she attained majority at the age of 18 years. Unwilling to accept this, Kusum approached the Allahabad High Court, contending that she alone was entitled to the insurance proceeds by virtue of being the sole nominee. The court observed that there was no dispute over the fact that Ranjeeta had died intestate and that her daughter was one of the heirs entitled to her estate under the Indian Succession Act. The core issue was whether a nominee had a beneficial interest in the insurance claims or whether the legal heir, in this case, the granddaughter, was entitled to the proceeds. The court observed that, prior to the 2015 amendment to Section 39 of the Insurance Act, a nominee was considered merely a custodian of the insurance amount, responsible for distributing it to the legal heirs. This principle was laid down by the Supreme Court in Sarbati Devi vs Usha Devi. The 2015 amendment to Section 39 changed this position, granting the nominee a beneficial interest in the insurance claim. Emphasising that the rights of parties must be determined according to the legal provisions prevailing on the date the cause of action arises, the court acknowledged a conflict between the Insurance Act and the Succession Act. It distinguished between a 'beneficiary nominee' and a 'collector nominee', clarifying that only specific categories —namely, parents, spouse, children, or spouse and children — qualify as beneficial nominees. Siblings do not fall within this category. The court further held that an insurer is not competent to adjudicate disputes between legal heirs, nor is it responsible for ensuring that the rightful heirs under personal succession law ultimately receive the proceeds. The purpose of naming a nominee is to enable the insurer to discharge its obligations by making payment to the nominee. In its judgment dated April 30, 2025, delivered by Justice Pankaj Bhatia, .the high court concluded that the Insurance Act is a general law that governs insurance contracts, whereas the Succession Act is a special law that governs inheritance rights.
Time of India
11-05-2025
- Time of India
Flowers, Cake & Gift of Knowing Inheritance Rights for Mom
Many mothers lose their rightful share in property and wealth because of sheer ignorance about succession laws for women. So, as you celebrate Mother's Day with flowers and gifts, make sure to inform her about her inheritance and legal rights. #Operation Sindoor India-Pakistan Clash Live Updates| Pak moving troops to border areas? All that's happening Why India chose to abstain instead of 'No Vote' against IMF billion-dollar funding to Pakistan How Pak's jihadi general Munir became trapped in his own vice As with men, women's inheritance rights are governed by succession and personal laws if the deceased does not leave a will. As per the Hindu Succession Act , 1956 (for Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs), the mother is classified as a Class I heir. 'This means that if a Hindu son dies intestate (without leaving a will), the mother is entitled to an equal share in his estate alongside the other surviving Class I heirs, if any,' said Raj Lakhotia, managing partner at professional services firm LABH & Associates. If an unmarried Hindu woman dies intestate, her mother is entitled to a share in her estate. 'Among Muslims, as per Sharia Law (subject to Sunni and Shia variations), mother is a primary heir and is entitled to a fixed share. If the deceased son has children (or grandchildren), she gets one-sixth share of the property, and if he has no kids (or grandkids), the mother's share increases to one-third of the estate,' said Neha Pathak, head of Trust & Estate Planning at Motilal Oswal Private Wealth. A Christian mother's right to inheritance is governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 'If the deceased is survived by a spouse and children, the entire estate is divided among them. The mother does not automatically receive a share,' said Sneha Makhija, head of Wealth Planning at Sanctum Wealth. If there are no surviving spouse or kids, the mother can inherit a large portion of the estate. Among Parsis, the mother is entitled to a share of the estate under Section 51 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 'If the deceased leaves a spouse and children, each parent receives a share equal to half of each child. In the absence of a spouse or kids, the parents, individually or jointly, inherit the entire estate,' said Lakhotia. A woman's property is passed on to her heirs depending on whether she has made a will or not. If she has made a will, her property, whether self-acquired or inherited, will be distributed according to the terms of the will. She can bequeath it to anyone she chooses, including individuals outside the family. If she hasn't made a will, intestate succession laws apply, and these vary based on her religion. For Hindus, it is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, wherein the estate is passed on to the legal heirs in order of preference, with the first being husband, children and children of predeceased children. Then comes the legal heirs of her husband; followed by her mother and father, then the legal heirs of her father and, finally, the legal heirs of her mother. 'The Act also ensures that daughters have the same rights of inheritance as sons, regardless of their marital status,' said Rajat Dutta, founder & initiator at Inheritance Needs Services. For Muslims, the devolution is governed by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, wherein legal heirs are divided into sharers and residuaries. While sharers get the first share, residuaries get the remaining portion. If she inherits property from a relative, be it husband, son or parent, she is the absolute owner and can dispose of at will. If she makes a will, she can't give away more than one-third of the property, and if the husband is the only heir, she can give two-thirds of her share.
