The U.S. Marches Toward State Capitalism With American Characteristics

Hindustan Times

2 days ago

A generation ago conventional wisdom held that as China liberalized, its economy would come to resemble America's. Instead, capitalism in America is starting to look like China.
Recent examples include President Trump's demand that Intel's CEO resign; the 'golden share' Washington will get in U.S. Steel as a condition of Nippon Steel's takeover; and the $1.5 trillion of promised investment from trading partners Trump plans to personally direct.
This isn't socialism, in which the state owns the means of production. It is more like state capitalism, a hybrid between socialism and capitalism in which the state guides the decisions of nominally private enterprises.
China calls its hybrid 'socialism with Chinese characteristics.' The U.S. hasn't gone as far as China or even milder practitioners of state capitalism such as Russia, Brazil and, at times, France. So call this variant 'state capitalism with American characteristics.' It is still a sea change from the free market ethos the U.S. once embodied.
How we learned to love state capitalism
We wouldn't be dabbling with state capitalism if not for the public's and both parties' belief that free-market capitalism wasn't working. That system encouraged profit-maximizing chief executives to move production abroad. The result was a shrunken manufacturing workforce, dependence on China for vital products such as critical minerals, and underinvestment in the industries of the future such as clean energy and semiconductors.
The federal government has often waded into the corporate world. It commandeered production during World War II and, under the Defense Production Act, emergencies such as the Covid pandemic. It bailed out banks and car companies during the 2007-09 financial crisis. Those were temporary expedients.
Former president Joe Biden went further, seeking to shape the actual structure of industry. His Inflation Reduction Act authorized $400 billion in clean energy loans. The Chips and Science Act earmarked $39 billion in subsidies for domestic semiconductor manufacturing. Of that, $8.5 billion went to Intel, giving Trump leverage to demand the removal of its chief executive over past ties to China. (Intel so far has refused.)
Biden overrode U.S. Steel's management and shareholders to block Nippon Steel's takeover, though his staff saw no national security risk. Trump reversed that veto while extracting the 'golden share' that he can use to influence the company's decisions. In design and name it mimics the golden shares that private Chinese companies must issue to the CCP.
Biden officials had mulled a sovereign-wealth fund to finance strategically important but commercially risky projects such as in critical minerals, which China dominates. Last month Trump's Department of Defense announced that it would take a 15% stake in MP Materials, a miner of critical minerals.
Many in the West admire China for its ability to turbo charge growth through massive feats of infrastructure building, scientific advance, and promotion of favored industries. American efforts are often bogged down amid the checks, balances and compromises of pluralistic democracy.
In his forthcoming book, 'Breakneck: China's Quest to Engineer the Future,' author Dan Wang writes: 'China is an engineering state, building big at breakneck speed, in contrast to the United States' lawyerly society, blocking everything it can, good and bad.'
To admirers, Trump's appeal is his willingness to bulldoze those lawyerly obstacles. He has imposed tariffs on a broad array of countries and sectors, seizing authority that is supposed to belong to Congress. He extracted $1.5 trillion in investment pledges from Japan, the European Union and South Korea that he claims he will personally direct, though no legal mechanism for doing so appears to exist. (Those pledges are already in dispute.)
The trouble with state capitalism
There are reasons state capitalism never caught on before. The state cannot allocate capital more efficiently than private markets. Distortions, waste and cronyism typically follow. Russia, Brazil and France have grown much more slowly than the U.S.
Chinese state capitalism isn't the success story it seems. Barry Naughton of the University of California, San Diego has documented how China's rapid growth since 1979 has come from market sources not the state. As President Xi Jinping has reimposed state control, growth has slowed. China is awash with savings, but the state wastes much of it. From steel to vehicles, excess capacity leads to plummeting prices and profits.
The U.S. hasn't fared any better. Interventions made in the name of national security or kick-starting infant industries lead to boondoggles like Foxconn's promised factory in Wisconsin or Tesla's solar panel factory in Buffalo, N.Y.
State capitalism is an all-of-society affair in China, directed from Beijing via millions of cadres in local governments and company boardrooms. In the U.S., it consists largely of Oval Office announcements lacking any policy or institutional framework. 'The core characteristic of China's state capitalism is discipline, and Trump is the complete opposite of that,' Wang said in an interview.
A means of control
State capitalism is a means of political, not just economic, control. Xi ruthlessly deploys economic levers to crush any challenge to party primacy. In 2020 Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma, arguably the country' most famous business leader, criticized Chinese regulators for stifling financial innovation. Retaliation was swift. Regulators canceled the initial public offering of Ma's financial company, Ant Group, and eventually fined it $2.8 billion for anticompetitive behavior. Ma briefly disappeared from public view.
Trump has similarly deployed executive orders and regulatory powers against media companies, banks, law firms and other companies he believes oppose him, while rewarding executives who align themselves with his priorities.
In Trump's first term, CEOs routinely spoke out when they disagreed with his policies such as on immigration and trade. Now, they shower him with donations and praise, or are mostly silent.
Trump is also seeking political control over agencies that have long operated at arm's length from the White House, such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Federal Reserve. That, too, has echoes of China where the bureaucracy is fully subordinate to the ruling party.
Trump has long admired the control Xi exercises over his country, but there are, in theory, limits to how far he can emulate him.
American democracy constrains the state through an independent judiciary, free speech, due process and the diffusion of power among multiple levels and branches of government. How far state capitalism ultimately displaces free-market capitalism in the U.S. depends on how well those checks and balances hold up.
Write to Greg Ip at [e-mail]