Man sentenced to 20-year RI for sexually assaulting minor
Judge P.M. Suresh pronounced the verdict on Thursday (July 17) under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the SC-ST Atrocities Prevention Act.
The incident occurred on July 4, 2023. The accused, B. Adarsh, lured the girl with chocolates into a shed near her home and sexually assaulted her. Investigation revealed that Adarsh had been stalking the girl pretending to be in love with her.
The convict was also slapped with a fine of ₹5,000. Failure to pay the fine will result in an additional three months in jail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
20 years imprisonment for sexual assault
The Special Court for Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Cases has awarded 20 years imprisonment to a youth for sexually assaulting a minor girl. According to prosecution, M. Shanmugaiah, 36, of Therkku Konarkottai sexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl in a place under the jurisdiction of All Women Police, Kovilpatti in 2019. The All Women Police subsequently arrested Shanmugaiah under the POCSO Act. Special Court for POCSO cases judge Preetha awarded 20 year imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10,000 on Tuesday. The Judge also ordered the government to give a compensation of ₹5 lakh to the victim.
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
SC organisations in Tiruppur float a joint front for retrieval of Panchami land
A joint front has been formed by Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) and fraternal Scheduled Castes (SC) organisations in Tiruppur district for retrieval of Panchami land. For the first time, the joint front that also consists of Adhi Tamizhar Peravai, Tamilpuligal Katchi, Dravida Tamizhar Katchi, Adhitamizhar Munnetra Kazhagam, Adhhithamizhar Katchi, Makkal Adhigaram, Puratchi Bharatham, Bahujan Samaj Katchi, Samuga Needhi Makkal Katchi, Dravida Chiruthaigal Katchi, Desiya Thazhthappattor Makkal Nala Iyakkam, Viduthaigal Vengaigal Katchi, Tamil Nadu Thazhthappattor Nila Urimai Iyakkam, and Samuga Viduthalai Katchi have joined hands to retrieve about 10 acres of Panchami land in Tiruppur city and surroundings that were now under the ownership of non-SCs. The land registered by other community members must be rendered invalid, the joint front emphasised in a petition submitted to Tiruppur Collector Manish S Narnaware at the Collectorate on Monday at the end of a rally by its members from the Kalaignar M. Karunanidhi Bus Stand. The registration of the Panchami land in the name of non-SCs must be scrapped as per the earlier government orders and the rulings of the Madras High Court, A. Tamilvendan State Coordinator, Panchami Nila Meetpu Kootiyakkam, VCK, said. As per the High Court ruling on August 12, 2015, the patta, chitta, adangal and ayan patta registrations of Panchami land in the names of non-SCs will have to be made invalid, Mr. Tamilvendan pointed out. The joint front has submitted the details of the survey numbers of Panchami land under 'illegal occupation' at Pudhupalayam in Avinashi Taluk, 15 Velampalayam village in Tiruppur North Taluk, Tiruppur Town and Nallur village in Tiruppur South Taluk. The petition called for prosecution of Revenue Department officials who were responsible for registration of Panchami lands in the names of non-SCs under Tamil Nadu Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1973, Section 21.3 (11). After submission of the petition, the joint front sat for a meeting to chart out the next course of action. 'After decades of struggle, all like-minded entities have decided to put up a joint fight specifically for retrieval of the land that rightfully belongs to us in pursuit of a tangible outcome, Karthik, Tiruppur district unit secretary of Tamil Puligal, said, adding: 'We are collating information on the Panchami land in Dharapuram, Udumalpet, and Madathukulam. The total extent of Panchami land under illegal occupation and the prospective SC beneficiaries will be determined.'
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress, VCK question Stalin's stand that special law to deal with ‘honour' killing is not required
The ruling DMK's allies including the Congress, VCK and CPI-M along with activists working for the uplift of the Scheduled Castes/Tribes have renewed their call for enacting an exclusive legislation to deal with caste-hatred induced murders that are passed off as 'honour' crimes. Against the backdrop of the murder of Kavin Selvaganesh, a young engineer from Tirunelveli working in a leading IT firm, who belonged to the Scheduled Caste, they have questioned Chief Minister M K Stalin's stand in the Assembly contending such a special law was not required. Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president, K. Selvaperunthagai, on Tuesday said he does not share the Chief Minister's opinion. 'A separate law against 'honour-related crimes' has to be enacted. The Chief Minister had said in the Assembly that he would use an iron hand to end such murders and there is no need for a separate we don't agree with that opinion. A separate law is in place in few other states. It needs to be passed [in Tamil Nadu]. The laws already in place have not been enough to curtail [such] violence,' he told The Hindu. Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader Thol. Thirumavalavan, who had positioned himself as the DMK's 'ideological ally' in 'the fight against Sanathana Dharma', in a statement said he was worried to learn of the caste-violence and murders continuing 'unabated' in Tirunelveli and Thoothukudi districts. He underscored his repeated demands to create an intelligence unit within the police force to tackle caste-related crimes have not been heeded to by the State government. 'The Law Commission of India has already create a draft law which has not been passed for several years now,' he said. His party general secretary D. Ravikumar, said the Supreme Court itself in the Shakti Vahini Vs Union Of India case (2018) had batted for such a legislation. 'While directing the Union Government to enact the law, the SC had said what the State Governments should do in the interim. Guidelines were framed and sent to all the Chief Secretaries of the States. SC has given the Law Commission's draft law to the Union Government. Since 2018, we have urged the Union Government to enact a law. State governments have not implemented the SC order. Why?,' he asked. CPI(M) state secretary P Shanmugam on Tuesday demanded the arrest of the Sub-Inspector parents of the alleged murderer Surjith. 'The continuing spate of violence reiterates the need for a separate law and undercuts the State Government's argument that existing criminal laws are enough to tackle such crimes,' he said. A. Kathir of Evidence, a civil rights organisation, said, 'If existing criminal laws were enough, then why do we need a SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? Why do we need a separate law against harassment of women? A special law brings attention to crimes against the marginalised. We need a broad law to deal with 'honour' related crimes. If, for instance, a backward caste family murders the young woman in their family instead of the Scheduled Caste youth who she falls in love with, will SC/ST Act apply? What if she is killed for falling in love with another BC man,' he asked.
