Big homes, small families: the Aussie housing mismatch
Couples without kids and people living alone make up 61 per cent of households, raising the question of how well a housing market focused on bigger families is serving real demand.
A comparison between the number of people in a household and data on housing by number of bedrooms shows a stark mismatch, according to the latest analysis from property research firm Cotality.
Research head Eliza Owen said a potential solution could lie in government housing reform.
Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than needed, and cheaper for those who opt to live in smaller properties.
Abolishing taxes such as stamp duty could make it cheaper for those to move across different housing and the introduction of a broad-based land tax would raise costs for those who owned more land.
"It's politically unpopular but has broad consensus among economists that it would help us achieve a more efficient housing market," she told AAP.
The data also highlights the high number of empty nester households of people aged 65 and over.
"There's a lot of scope for older Australians to leave their homes to free up homes for younger generations," Ms Owen added.
"But it's really hard to implement taxes to encourage people to downsize.
"Things like broad-based land taxes are an incentive for income-poor but asset-rich Australians to downsize."
Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in larger cities to accommodate smaller households, but shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these homes.
"It's a tough transition to make," Ms Owen said.
"But it's also a really hard ask to young families to pay a million dollars to own a house in one of our major cities."
Australian households are mostly one or two people but analysis shows the housing stock is dominated by three-and four-bedroom properties.
Couples without kids and people living alone make up 61 per cent of households, raising the question of how well a housing market focused on bigger families is serving real demand.
A comparison between the number of people in a household and data on housing by number of bedrooms shows a stark mismatch, according to the latest analysis from property research firm Cotality.
Research head Eliza Owen said a potential solution could lie in government housing reform.
Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than needed, and cheaper for those who opt to live in smaller properties.
Abolishing taxes such as stamp duty could make it cheaper for those to move across different housing and the introduction of a broad-based land tax would raise costs for those who owned more land.
"It's politically unpopular but has broad consensus among economists that it would help us achieve a more efficient housing market," she told AAP.
The data also highlights the high number of empty nester households of people aged 65 and over.
"There's a lot of scope for older Australians to leave their homes to free up homes for younger generations," Ms Owen added.
"But it's really hard to implement taxes to encourage people to downsize.
"Things like broad-based land taxes are an incentive for income-poor but asset-rich Australians to downsize."
Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in larger cities to accommodate smaller households, but shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these homes.
"It's a tough transition to make," Ms Owen said.
"But it's also a really hard ask to young families to pay a million dollars to own a house in one of our major cities."
Australian households are mostly one or two people but analysis shows the housing stock is dominated by three-and four-bedroom properties.
Couples without kids and people living alone make up 61 per cent of households, raising the question of how well a housing market focused on bigger families is serving real demand.
A comparison between the number of people in a household and data on housing by number of bedrooms shows a stark mismatch, according to the latest analysis from property research firm Cotality.
Research head Eliza Owen said a potential solution could lie in government housing reform.
Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than needed, and cheaper for those who opt to live in smaller properties.
Abolishing taxes such as stamp duty could make it cheaper for those to move across different housing and the introduction of a broad-based land tax would raise costs for those who owned more land.
"It's politically unpopular but has broad consensus among economists that it would help us achieve a more efficient housing market," she told AAP.
The data also highlights the high number of empty nester households of people aged 65 and over.
"There's a lot of scope for older Australians to leave their homes to free up homes for younger generations," Ms Owen added.
"But it's really hard to implement taxes to encourage people to downsize.
"Things like broad-based land taxes are an incentive for income-poor but asset-rich Australians to downsize."
Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in larger cities to accommodate smaller households, but shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these homes.
"It's a tough transition to make," Ms Owen said.
"But it's also a really hard ask to young families to pay a million dollars to own a house in one of our major cities."
Australian households are mostly one or two people but analysis shows the housing stock is dominated by three-and four-bedroom properties.
Couples without kids and people living alone make up 61 per cent of households, raising the question of how well a housing market focused on bigger families is serving real demand.
A comparison between the number of people in a household and data on housing by number of bedrooms shows a stark mismatch, according to the latest analysis from property research firm Cotality.
Research head Eliza Owen said a potential solution could lie in government housing reform.
Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than needed, and cheaper for those who opt to live in smaller properties.
Abolishing taxes such as stamp duty could make it cheaper for those to move across different housing and the introduction of a broad-based land tax would raise costs for those who owned more land.
"It's politically unpopular but has broad consensus among economists that it would help us achieve a more efficient housing market," she told AAP.
The data also highlights the high number of empty nester households of people aged 65 and over.
"There's a lot of scope for older Australians to leave their homes to free up homes for younger generations," Ms Owen added.
"But it's really hard to implement taxes to encourage people to downsize.
"Things like broad-based land taxes are an incentive for income-poor but asset-rich Australians to downsize."
Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in larger cities to accommodate smaller households, but shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these homes.
"It's a tough transition to make," Ms Owen said.
"But it's also a really hard ask to young families to pay a million dollars to own a house in one of our major cities."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Americanisation of our culture': Tipping frequency, values on the rise in Australia
New research has shown Australians are tipping more and at higher amounts when they dine out, with one state leading the charge in the 'divisive' practice. Fresh data from Australian payment company Zeller has revealed Victorians are tipping higher amounts than any other state, with the value and frequency of tipping across the country increasing for the last three years. The frequency of tips recorded by the payment platform has increased 13 per cent year on year, while tipping values have risen 25 per cent. Zeller director of growth Josh McNicol said tipping is 'definitely a divisive issue because Australians can sometimes see it as the Americanisation of our culture'. 'Unlike in America where tipping really forms part of the server's wage, in Australia it's more about recognition of a great service or a great experience,' he said. 'It really comes down to the business owner, the restaurateur, to know how their customers would react to something like this and then decide (if) this (is) a feature in their payment terminal they want to switch on or off.' Though each state has seen a spike in tipping, it's less common in regional areas, where the behaviour has declined by 10 per cent. The controversial practice seems here to stay, with Aussies increasingly being prompted for tips when ordering food or drinks through a QR code, or paying on a rideshare app. While some venues have been criticised for adding gratuity to a bill automatically, Australian Restaurant & Cafe Association CEO Wes Lambert said it is completely legal and increasingly commonplace within the hospitality industry. 'The ACCC requires restaurants and cafes to inform diners and consumers about any mandatory fees, such as weekend and public holiday surcharges, on top of standard menu prices before they order,' Mr Lambert told 'Every business has a different revenue and cost structure, certainly when you go to hire a solicitor and the fee is $600-an-hour plus expenses, those expenses are variable but they let you know it exists. It's just like this and becoming more commonplace. 'So in practice, that is how it is supposed to work, but often times consumers might not read the fine print, and can certainly be surprised when it is added to the bill.' For those who do choose to pay on top of their bill, the nation's biggest tippers were Victorians at an average of $39.50 – more than double the average value of NSW residents' tips at $16.90. West Australians were the least generous state, tipping an average of $12.48. Mr McNicol attributed the disparity to 'Victoria, particularly Melbourne, has for a long time been recognised as the centre of Australia's dining and hospitality sector'. Restaurants that offer table service received the highest average tips of any individual sector. 'There's a cultural element there where Australians are happy to support the battlers and those people that are working to provide them a great service,' Mr McNicol said. 'Technology has really enabled the service industry to catch up and to allow tipping to become a little bit more a part of the natural flow. 'Whether Australians like it or hate it, it's something that we are steadily seeing more in our day-to-day lives.'
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Chalmers revs up road user tax as he cites quick wins from roundtable
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has revealed plans to slap EV drivers with road-user charges within months and to revamp environmental protection laws to accelerate the development of houses, mines and renewable energy projects, as he declared the tax system defective. At the end of the government's three-day economic roundtable, Chalmers confirmed a checklist of more than 30 areas – most of which had been known before the start of the discussions – that he and other ministers will move on, some within days. Since Tuesday, more than 30 hand-picked experts, including representatives from business groups, unions, academia and community organisations, have sat in the cabinet room discussing issues ranging from the state of the budget to the cost of small tariffs on imported goods. Chalmers, who declared the roundtable a success, said the government would move on several 'quick wins' to help lift the living standards of all Australians, improve the budget bottom line and make the economy more resilient. One of the first actions will be to get state and territory government agreement on road user charges to help make up for the looming collapse in fuel excise due to the rise of electric vehicles. Chalmers and NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey were working on options for the proposed charges that will go to a meeting of all the nation's treasurers on September 5. 'There was more than the usual amount of consensus in a conceptual way around road user charging, a lot of reform appetite in that area,' he said, but conceded there wasn't agreement on a final model. Another change expected quickly is the long-running overhaul of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, which both sides of politics have failed to improve over recent years.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia news LIVE: Wong condemns Israel in fresh statement; Chalmers reveals plan for EV charge
Latest posts Latest posts 6.58am O'Brien backs in roundtable stoush Daniel Lo Surdo Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien has doubled down on his heated exchange on government spending with Treasurer Jim Chalmers in yesterday's roundtable talks, which prompted guests to intervene to prevent the argument from further derailing discussion. O'Brien maintained that it was appropriate for him to raise his qualms during the talks, saying he was working to represent the interests of the Australians not represented at the roundtable. 'I think it was [appropriate], to be honest with you, because they had this meeting, 25 people handpicked by Jim Chalmers to come in and talk about the future of Australia's economy, meanwhile, there's 27 million Australians outside of that room,' O'Brien told Nine's Today moments ago. 'As far as I'm concerned, they're the ones I was fighting for because Jim Chalmers just can't stop spending money. And that was my message and he didn't like to hear it.' 6.49am Wong joins global rebuke on Israel By David Crowe Australia has joined a global statement that accuses Israel of violating international law with a major plan to divide Palestinian territories east of Jerusalem, amid Israeli claims it will 'erase' the prospect of a Palestinian state. Foreign Minister Penny Wong signed up to a statement from 20 nations to condemn the plan to build thousands of Israeli homes in the so-called E1 project in the West Bank, after it gained formal approval from authorities. The Australian move deepens a dispute with Israel over the war in Gaza and the recognition of Palestine despite a sharply personal attack from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this week. 6.47am What's making news today By Daniel Lo Surdo Hello and welcome to the national news blog. My name is Daniel Lo Surdo, and I'll be helming our live coverage this morning. Here's what is making news today: Foreign Minister Penny Wong has accused Israel of violating international law through a major plan to divide Palestinian territories east of Jerusalem in a fresh statement signed by close to two dozen aligned nations. It comes as the Israeli plan to build thousands of homes in the E1 area gained formal approval from authorities, prompting signatories to 'call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms'. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu extended his attack on Anthony Albanese in a Sky News interview last night, saying Albanese's record will be 'forever tarnished' by his imminent plans to recognise Palestine. Netanyahu did not repeat the remarks made on social media, in which he called Albanese a 'weak' politician, instead hitting out at most western leaders more generally and sharing his will to continue operations in Gaza. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has revealed plans to impose a road-user charge on EV drivers within months following the conclusion of the economic reform roundtable yesterday. Measures to accelerate building approvals as well as mines and renewable energy projects are also expected to be immediately progressed after the roundtable, as Chalmers pledged to move on several 'quick wins' to lift living standards in Australia.
