Exclusive: US pitches role in EU regulatory surveillance in trade deal
The EU will never accept the idea however according to two of the sources.
On Saturday, Trump posted a new set of letters to his social media platform Truth Social, declaring 30% tariffs on the EU and Mexico starting 1 August, a move that could cause massive upheaval between the United States and two of its biggest trade partners.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen quickly responded by noting the bloc's 'commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership.'
On Sunday, she emphasised that reaching a negotiated solution remains the priority, but that the EU is ready to respond with countermeasures.
The DMA regulates the largest online platforms with a view to protecting the rights of consumers and curbing any abusive behaviour by dominant tech players.
Under the rules, companies face fines of up to 10% of their global annual turnover for non-compliance.
Peter Navarro, a senior Trump advisor, has openly accused the bloc of waging "lawfare" against US Big Tech through the DMA and its sister Digital Services Act (DSA) regulation. In response, the EU has said it will 'not make any concessions on its digital and technology rules' as part of any trade negotiations with the US.
The DMA already has an advisory board, which plays a consultative and strategic role in its implementation, supporting the Commission in oversight and enforcement.
The board is made up of independent experts and representatives from relevant national authorities and regulatory bodies, however, and is not supposed to be a body of representatives drawn from the enforced entities.
The sources did not expand on what form the advisory body touted by the US would take, beyond giving influence over the enforcement methods.
"The fact that the US proposed setting up an advisory board for the DMA, where those who might be affected would actually sit, that certainly won't happen, and there will be no exceptions for US companies under the DMA," one source said.
The Commission has repeatedly said that DMA probes are conducted strictly according to the regulation, which does not discriminate against companies on the basis of country of origin. But the fact that most of those under its scope are US tech giants means that the decisions are now seen through the lens of the brewing trade war.
On both sides of the Atlantic, EU digital legislation has become a red line in the negotiations over tariffs: the US considers the DMA and DSA – which covers illegal content online – as non-tariff barriers to their trade with the EU, while the EU refuses to amend these regulations, which were adopted in 2022.
Sovereignty
Commission Vice-President Teresa Ribera told Euronews on 27 June that it is impossible to for the EU to backtrack on its digital rules.
'We are going to defend our sovereignty. We will defend the way we implement our rules, we will defend a well functioning market and we will not allow anyone to tell us what to do,' she said.
Without changing the rules, the Commission could nonetheless finesse implementation of the DMA, according to Christophe Carugati, a Brussels-based tech consultant. Investigations and fines could become the exception in the DMA enforcement.
'To calm the US, the idea could be to settle disputes formally or informally through dialogue. That will implicitly 'pause' the investigations,' he told Euronews.
Non-compliance investigations launched over the past year under the DMA have resulted in relatively low fines compared to those imposed on Big Tech under the Commission's previous mandate. Apple has received a €500 million penalty and Meta was fined €200 million, the former for preventing developers from steering consumers to alternative offers, the latter for its 'Pay or Consent' advertising model.
In April, EU officials said that the lower fines reflected the short duration of the violations since the DMA implementation started in 2023 but also the Commission's current focus on achieving compliance rather than punishing breaches.
Simplification
US tech giants could also seek to benefit from the Commission's simplification agenda to secure some relief from regulatory enforcement. In May, Amazon, IBM, Google, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI called on the Commission to keep its upcoming Code of Practice on General-Purpose AI (GPAI) 'as simple as possible', as reported.
EU Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen is currently carrying out a digital fitness check, which will result in an 'omnibus' simplification package to be presented in December.
She aims to identify reporting obligations in existing digital legislation that can be cut to ease pressure on enterprises, particularly SMEs.
The question remains whether that simplification package will also cover the DMA, DSA and the AI Act.
Virkkunen has always said that despite facing criticism from former Trump advisor and X-owner Elon Musk, the laws are fair and equitable.
"Our rules are very fair, because they are the same rules for everybody who is operating and doing business in the European Union. So, we have the same rules for European companies, American companies, and Chinese companies," Virkkunen told Euronews in April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Meta won't sign EU's AI Code, but who will?
A week before the new rules on general purpose artificial intelligence (GPAI) enter into force – affecting tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini – a clearer picture is emerging on where companies stand when it comes to signing up to the EU's voluntary Code of Practice on GPAI. US Big Tech giant Meta said last week that it will not sign, having slammed the rules for stifling innovation. The Code, which the European Commission released last week, is a voluntary set of rules that touches on transparency, copyright, and safety and security issues, aiming to help providers of GPAI models comply with the AI Act. Those providers who sign up are expected to be compliant with the AI Act and can anticipate more legal certainty, others will face more inspections. Here's who's in and who's out. Those that will sign US AI provider Anthropic, which developed AI assistant Claude as a competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini, is the latest company that said it intends to sign the Code. 'We believe the Code advances the principles of transparency, safety and accountability—values that have long been championed by Anthropic for frontier AI development,' the company said in a statement. 'If thoughtfully implemented, the EU AI Act and Code will enable Europe to harness the most significant technology of our time to power innovation and competitiveness,' the statement added. OpenAI said earlier last week that it will sign up too, claiming that Europe should now 'use this moment to empower [its] innovators to innovate and builders to build for Europe's future.' The drafting process of the Code, which began last September after the Commission selected a group of experts, was heavily criticised, mainly by rightsholders who feared violations of copyright law would increase, while US tech giants claimed the rules stifle innovation. Microsoft President Brad Smith told Reuters last week that his company will likely sign too. Smith said earlier this year that Microsoft wants to be 'a voice of reason' as geopolitical tensions rise. Those that will not sign US tech giant Meta was the first, and so far remains the only company to say it will not sign the Code. Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan said in a statement last Friday that 'Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI.' After 'carefully reviewing' the Code, Meta will not sign because the document 'introduces a number of legal uncertainties for model developers, as well as measures which go far beyond the scope of the AI Act,' Kaplan said. Gry Hasselbalch, a scholar working on data and AI ethics and contributor to the EU's AI ethics guidelines, told Euronews that the Code did not bring real change on how companies can implement general purpose AI in the EU. 'The companies, like Meta, that decide not to sign the code will still need to comply with the AI Act. Signing the code is therefore just a formality. They would still have to read it and follow it to understand when an AI system is considered a general purpose AI system and what transparency, copyright and security means in the AI Act,' Hasselbalch said. She added that the AI Act itself – rules that regulate AI systems and tools according to the risk they pose to society – 'has become a token in a geo-political battle.' 'The law was developed in a carefully designed and performed democratic process to create legal certainty for AI developers and adopters in the EU. In fact, most AI systems can be developed and used subject to existing legislation without additional legal obligations of the AI Act,' she said. Meta will still need to be compliant with the AI Act's obligations that will start applying on 2 August. Other Big Tech companies, including Amazon, Google, did not want to comment yet on whether they will sign. Providers that already have a GPAI model on the market will have to sign before 1 August, others can sign up at a later time, the Commission said. On that same day, the EU executive will publish a list of signatories. The Code requires approval by EU member states, which are represented in a subgroup of the AI Board, as well as by the Commission's own AI Office.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Bean vs. cup: Where is the most expensive takeaway coffee in Europe?
For many of us, a cup of coffee — or maybe a few — is an essential ritual that powers us through the working day. In 2023-24, approximately 10.62 billion kilograms of coffee were consumed worldwide, a slight increase from about 10.38bn kg in the previous year, according to Statista. While for some, a cheap cup of instant coffee made in the work kitchenette will suffice, others have developed a taste for 'a posh coffee' — often made by a hipster in a work apron. But how much is a cup of this sweet nectar costing us, are we being ripped off, and how does pricing vary across Europe? How much coffee is Europe buying? Of the 27 EU countries and the UK, surveyed in Pressat's workplace coffee survey between January and March 2025, workers in the UK are buying the most takeaway coffees, at an average of 1.96 cups per day. This was closely followed by Belgium (1.79 cups), Poland (1.77 cups), France (1.76 cups) and Romania (1.68 cups). At the other end of the scale, the most frugal with their coffee buying are workers in Luxembourg, buying an average of 0.82 cups per day. Also controlling their takeaway coffee expenditure are workers in Hungary (0.83 cups), the Czech Republic (0.84 cups) and Sweden (0.9 cups). It then may be surprising to discover that as the fourth biggest buyer of takeaway coffees in Europe, France is paying the most per cup, at an average price of €3.42. Stereotypes usually lead us to believe that the French like their coffee short, dark and strong. However, of the workers surveyed, just 8.94% of them were buying an espresso to take away. In fact, the most popular takeaway coffee choice was a caffe latte (17.02%), followed by a caffe macchiato (16.17%). The second most expensive takeaway coffees can be found in Lithuania, where the average cup price is €3.39 and the most popular style of drink is split between a cappuccino and a cortado (both are preferred by 14.87% of respondents). The cheapest cup can be found, perhaps surprisingly, in Denmark, with an average price of €1.89. The Danes have a medium coffee addiction, with average workers buying 1.32 cups of takeaway coffee per day — and preferring to sip an Americano. In fact, Denmark was the only country where the average cup price was under €2, with their closest competitors being Slovakia (€2.08) and Cyprus (€2.09). Cappuccino index A slightly different picture emerges from data on the average price of a cappuccino in Europe's capital cities, collected by It turns out that the highest price in Europe for the milky coffee is paid in Copenhagen. In the Danish capital, a cappuccino costs an average of €5.81 — considerably higher than the average price of an unspecified type of coffee in Denmark. Only in two other countries does a cappuccino cost more than €5: that's Iceland, with a price of €5.33 per cup, and Switzerland with a price of €5.27. More than €4 per cappuccino is paid in Scandinavia, the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, France and Austria. At the other end of the scale are the countries of Eastern Europe, the Balkan Peninsula and Italy. In its homeland, a cup of cappuccino costs only €1.53 — but the cheapest cup can be found in Kosovo (€1.27) and Ukraine (€1.36). Poles, who often complain about the high prices of coffee in cafes, are somewhere in the middle of the European scale, with a cup of cappuccino in Warsaw sold for €3.64. This does not mean, however, that Polish grievances are completely unjustified. Apart from Germany, all of Poland's neighbouring countries have lower coffee prices. 'A cappuccino in Warsaw costs 18 zlotys (€4.24), while in Bari it costs €1.50. We can see that Warsaw prices, which have spread across the country, are definitely higher than elsewhere. And it doesn't have to be that way at all,' Janusz Piechocinski, an economist and former Polish economy minister, told Euronews. 'Poland is the fifth largest producer and exporter of coffee in Europe. Polish companies import more than 200,000 tons of beans, roast and then export also in the modern e-commerce channel. So we have an efficient production chain created, and yet prices for the customer are high. Why? It may come from higher real estate prices and taxes than elsewhere, which raise the cost of maintaining restaurants and cafes.' Are we overpaying for our coffee? It takes around 7 to 9g of coffee to make a single espresso which equates to €0.00009 worth of coffee at current arabica bean trading prices (for a 9g serving). That seems like a huge markup, but of course, that would be a huge oversimplification. Coffee shops also need to factor in the cost of staffing, as well as, takeaway cups, energy to power the venue, and coffee additions like milks, syrups and chocolate. Though it's hard to compare exactly how much businesses are paying for their energy, the average cost of electricity for non-household, medium-sized consumers in the EU is €155.80/MWh. That's according to Eurostat data from 2024. The data showed that Ireland paid the most for electricity in the EU, at €254.30/MWh. Only three other countries tipped over the €200 mark: Croatia (€216.90), Hungary (€205.50) and Luxembourg (€204.10). Among the EU's big four economies, the prices varied dramatically: France (€163.90), Spain, (€121.70), Italy (€151.50) and Germany (€197.60). The cheapest energy in the EU could be found in Norway (€79.10) Do coffee prices in Europe align with incomes? If we take a look at takeaway coffee pricing versus salaries across the continent, who is getting the best value for money? France, which has the highest cup price, had an average take-home pay for a single person without children just above the EU average, with French singles taking home €32,354 per year, according to Eurostat 2024 data. This means the average coffee is about 0.0106% of take-home pay. Meanwhile in Denmark, where net pay is €43,913, coffee is proportionately even cheaper, at just 0.004% of a salary. And home to the second-most-expensive coffee in Europe, consumers in Lithuania are getting particularly bad value. Citizens' average net salary is €15,909, meaning a cup of coffee costs around 0.021% of their annual take-home pay. The higher-earning countries appear to be getting better value for money. Workers in Luxembourg on average take home €50,410 per year and pay around €3 per coffee. That's just 0.005% of their salary. Cappuccino index by salary Using the data on the average monthly salary after taxes in European cities, we can take a closer look at how many cups of cappuccino the residents can buy. In terms of cappuccino affordability, Italy ranked highest. In Rome, the average monthly salary can buy 1,399 cups of this type of coffee, while Switzerland's Bern (1378 cups) and Luxembourg (1347 cups) fared marginally worse. The cappuccino index also clearly divides the continent in half. In Western European countries (with the exception of Portugal), a salary is enough for at least 750 cups of cappuccino, while in Eastern Europe, takeaway coffee is more unaffordable.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Meta ran ads to fundraise for Israeli Defence Forces, analysis shows
Ads run on Meta to fundraise for the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) bypassed EU legislation, according to a new analysis. Global advocacy group Ekō said it identified at least 117 ads run on Meta platforms by two parallel funding groups from March 2025 to June 2025 that explicitly raised money for Israeli military units. Ekō claims both groups targeted users in the United Kingdom and the European Union, raising roughly $2.4 million (€2.05 million) for the IDF from ads on their landing pages. Euronews Next is working to independently verify this number. A previous Ekō analysis into Meta IDF fundraising found similar ads last year. The platform removed the ads when they were reported but 'did nothing to stop the same publishers from launching new campaigns for the same military equipment,' the rights group said in a statement. 'Meta's actions reveal a clear pattern: its advertising platform is not just failing to block these fundraising efforts — it is actively enabling them,' Ekō said in a statement sent to Euronews Next. What did the ads say? One of the ads run by US-registered charity Vaad Hatzedaka used the story of a rabbi to solicit donations for thermal drones that could 'detect and eliminate deadly threats from Hamas,' to keep their fighters 'one step ahead'. The donation page includes information to donate generators, underwater drones, or thermal drones to the Israeli soldiers. Another ad campaign reported by Ekō shows a repost by an Israeli singer where unit snipers in Jabalia, northern Gaza, are asking for shooting tripods. The embedded link redirects users to the Chesed Fund, a US-registered charity that lets users send bulletproof vests, thermal drones or tactical helmets to the IDF on the frontlines. Ekō said the ad was flagged to Meta, who eventually took it down. The Chelsed Fund ad violated Meta's ad policy about social issues, elections or politics, the advocacy group said. Anyone who wants to post ads in the EU about political values and government or security and foreign affairs has to go through an 'authorisation process' before being published on Meta platforms, according to the tech company's guidelines. The authorisation process requires ad posters to send in a piece of government-issued ID along with the page they run to Meta for review. The ads also have to have a 'paid by' disclaimer to show who is funding it. Anyone who violates Meta's ad policies several times by running these ads without authorisation could face 'permanent restrictions,' the company said, but it doesn't expand on what these might be. Euronews Next reached out to Meta but did not receive an immediate reply at the time of publication. How did these ads get past European laws? The European Commission's Digital Services Act (DSA) requires large online platforms with a reach of more than 45 million EU citizens a month to maintain a public ad repository and assess how their systems are manipulated or could contribute to societal risks. Meta has a monthly user base of roughly 259 million in the EU, according to Commission estimates. Platforms with these large user bases, such as Meta, have to disclose more information about ads they are seeing online, including why a user could be targeted by a specific campaign over others. Maen Hammad, a researcher at Ekō, argues that the DSA also comes with obligations for Meta to 'swiftly remove illegal content,' especially if it could break national charity laws. 'Ads fundraising for military gear, including drones allegedly used by a military under investigation for genocide to enforce a 'kill zone' in Gaza, likely break charity laws in several EU countries,' he said. Hammad said Eko will be bringing these findings to the European Commission to see whether it breaches the act. If the Commission decides to go ahead with an investigation, it could first request more information from Meta about its ad policies, conduct interviews with the company or inspect the company premises. Penalties for a DSA infringement could go up to six per cent of a company's global turnover. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to see whether it had received the Ekō report or a request for an investigation but did not receive an immediate reply.
