
Changes in tax on lumpsum and premature withdrawals under UPS and NPS in the latest version of Income Tax Bill
FM Nirmala Sitharaman, in today's Lok Sabha session, introduced the Taxation Law (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which is further set to amend the Finance Act, 2025 and the Income Tax Act, 1961. Most of the changes herein focus on bringing UPS on par with NPS in terms of tax treatment . Here are some major changes that have been presented in the Taxation Law (Amendment) Bill.As per the bill, any payments from the NPS Trust to a UPS (United Pension Scheme) subscriber, which do not exceed 60% of the individual's corpus at the time of superannuation, voluntary retirement or retirement, shall be exempt from income tax..According to the bill, 'any payment from the National Pension System Trust to an assessee, who is a subscriber to the Unified Pension Scheme , to the extent that it does not exceed sixty per cent of the individual corpus, as specified in notification number FX-1/3/2024-PR, dated the 24th January, 2025 of the Department of Financial Services, made at the time of his superannuation or voluntary retirement or retirement under clause (j) of rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules [which is not treated as penalty under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rule.'Furthermore, the bill states that, 'any sum received as a lump sum amount as per clause (vi) of paragraph 2 of the notification number FX-1/3/2024-PR, dated the 24th January, 2025, of the Department of Financial Services, by an assessee being a subscriber to the Unified Pension Scheme will also be tax exempt.As per law, a lump sum payment will be allowed on superannuation at the rate of 10% of monthly emoluments (basic pay + Dearness Allowance) for every completed six months of qualifying service. Moreover, this lump sum payment will not affect the quantum of assured payout.The bill further adds that, 'where any amount standing to the credit of the assessee, being a subscriber to the Unified Pension Scheme, in his account referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (1B), in respect of which a deduction has been allowed under those sub-sections or sub-section (2), together with the amount accrued thereon, if any, is received by the assessee or his nominee, in whole or in part, in any previous year on account of his superannuation or voluntary retirement or retirement under clause (j) of rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules [which is not treated as penalty under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965], as may be applicable, the whole of the amount shall be deemed to be the income of the assessee or his nominee, as the case may be, in the previous year in which such amount is received, and shall accordingly be charged to tax as income of that previous year.'Simply put, if the UPS subscriber or their nominee receives any amount from the scheme before their superannuation, retirement or voluntary retirement, the same will be treated as income in the hands of the individual and taxed accordingly.As CA Ashish Niraj, Partner, A S N & Company Chartered Accountants explains, this subsection has been inserted to clarify that in case the assesee closes the account or opt out of pension scheme referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (1B) then such amount will be deemed to be his income in that previous year and will be taxed.Adds CA Mohit Gupta, 'if an assessee (subscriber to the Unified Pension Scheme) receives any amount (including accrued income) from their pension account—where deductions were claimed earlier under Section 80CCD(1), (1B), or (2)—on superannuation, voluntary retirement, or retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules (not treated as penalty), the entire amount will be treated as taxable income in the year of receipt'.According to CA Gaurav Makjhiani, tax lead at Roedl & Partner, this clarification is introduced to ensure complete parity in tax treatment between the two schemes. For relevant employees, this removes a major barrier to adopting UPS, as the same deductions for contributions and exemptions on withdrawals are now assured.Furthermore, according to the bill, if the balance outstanding in the individual corpus is transferred to the pool corpus on his superannuation, voluntary retirement or retirement, the same will not be treated as income of the assessee in that year. As per CA Ashish Niraj, Partner, A S N & Company Chartered Accountants, this is merely shifting funds from individual corpus to pool corpus for annuity purposes, and hence, does not invite taxes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
In opposing land-pooling policy, Punjab BJP took the opportunity to mend fences with farmers
1 2 Chandigarh: Having faced massive backlash over the three controversial farm laws, which were eventually repealed by the BJP-led central govt, the Punjab BJP leadership saw an opportunity in the controversial land pooling policy of the AAP-led govt in Punjab to mend fences with farmers by opposing the policy tooth and nail. The anger against the BJP leaders over the three farm laws could be gauged from the fact that alleged activists of farm unions protested by chasing and tearing the clothes of then BJP MLA from Abohar, Arun Narang, in Malout town of Muktsar district in March 2021, around eight months before the Centre announced the repeal of the farm laws. In October 2020, the vehicle of Punjab BJP working president Ashwani Sharma (who was Punjab BJP chief at that time) was attacked at a toll plaza in Hoshiarpur, where farmers were holding a protest. The anger against the BJP did not subside even after the laws were repealed, and BJP candidates in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls continued to face protests, particularly in rural areas. The party failed to win a single seat in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, and at the receiving end in rural areas were its candidates, such as famous singer Hans Raj Hans, (now a union minister of state) Ravneet Singh Bittu, and former IAS officer Parampal Kaur Sidhu, among others. It was no surprise then that the BJP saw the controversy over the land pooling policy as a platform to strike a chord with the farmers by opposing it tooth and nail, and an opportunity to find its feet in rural Punjab ahead of the 2027 assembly elections. After its over two-decades long alliance with the SAD broke over the farm laws in 2020, the BJP, predominantly a party with support base from urban areas, has been eyeing to make inroads into the rural areas as well. On August 6, the Punjab Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) announced a state-wide yatra, "Save Land, Save Farmers," from August 17 to September 5 against the policy, under the leadership of its working president Ashwani Sharma. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Facing farmers' flak, Punjab govt scraps land pooling policy
CHANDIGARH: In the face of mounting criticism from farmers' groups and dissent within AAP ranks, Punjab government Monday withdrew its controversial Land Pooling Policy, 2025. The development comes four days after Punjab and Haryana high court stayed the policy, flagging several concerns, including absence of a rehabilitation policy for landless farm labourers, lack of impact assessment studies on society and environment, and the fact that fertile land was shortlisted for pooling. It may affect the social milieu, high court had said Thursday. On Monday, thousands of farmers held motorcycle rallies across the state to protest the land-pooling bid. In the evening, department of housing and urban development issued a short press note: "government hereby withdraws the Land Pooling Policy, 2025, and its subsequent amendments. Consequently, all actions like LOIs issued, registrations done or any other action taken thereunder shall be reversed henceforth. " It is learnt AAP's top leadership grew increasingly concerned the policy could be politically damaging and undermine govt's other achievements over the past three years. Several AAP functionaries had resigned over the issue, and dissent within the ranks was growing louder. Less than three weeks ago CM Bhagwant Mann assert that farmers would not suffer any losses and that they "actually like the policy as it would transform them into stakeholders in govt's development schemes". "The policy was introduced in the interest of farmers. AAP always stands with farmers. If farmers do not like this policy, why should we impose it? Therefore, respecting the voice of farmers we are withdrawing this policy," AAP spokesman Neel Garg posted on X.


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Zero tolerance for students who violate U.S. laws, says Consul General Laura Williams
To be an international student is a privilege and that comes with responsibilities. Qualifying for a U.S. student visa includes demonstrating an intent to comply with U.S. laws, newly-arrived Consul General Laura Williams stressed on Monday. Inaugurating the 2025-EducationUSA universities fair here, she expressed happiness at the student turnout, their interest in varied disciplines and to study in the U.S. 'The institutions in this room here today offer world-class programs across every field — from STEM and business to humanities and the arts. Studying in the U.S. is a major commitment, an investment of time, money and effort,' she said. 'Qualifying for a U.S. student visa includes demonstrating an intent to comply with U.S. laws. The United States has zero tolerance for people, including students, who violate the law,' Ms. Williams added. The EducationUSA fair series began on August 9, covering Chennai and Bengaluru. Concluding on August 17, the fairs are scheduled to take place in New Delhi, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Mumbai and Pune. The fair on Monday drew diverse groups of students with interests in undergraduate, graduate and doctoral programmes in the U.S. The fair had at least 30 accredited U.S. universities and colleges offering various programmes and schemes. Ms. Williams noted that EducationUSA provides accurate, comprehensive and unbiased information to help students choose the right university and navigate the application process with confidence. All services by EducationUSA advisers and U.S. Consulate officials are offered free of cost.