&w=3840&q=100)
Punjab CM urges end to injustice, demands water rights at Niti Aayog meet
Participating in the meeting of 10th Governing Council of the Niti Aayog here, the chief minister raised the issues concerning the state while reiterating that Punjab has no surplus water for any state.
Amid the ongoing row over the sharing of water issue, the chief minister asserted that in wake of grim situation of water in the state a Yamuna-Sutlej-Link (YSL) canal should be considered for construction instead of the Satluj Yamuna Link (SYL) canal.
Mann said that Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej rivers are already in deficit and water should be diverted from surplus to deficit basins.
He said that Punjab has repeatedly requested to be included in negotiations for the allocation of Yamuna waters as a pact for Yamuna-Sutlej-Link Project was signed between the erstwhile Punjab and Uttar Pradesh on March 12, 1954, which entitled the erstwhile Punjab to two-thirds of the Yamuna waters.
The chief minister said that this agreement did not specify any particular area to be irrigated by Yamuna waters, adding that before the re-organization, the Yamuna River, like the Ravi and Beas, flowed through the erstwhile state of Punjab.
However, while apportioning the river waters between Punjab and Haryana, the Yamuna waters were not considered, whereas the waters of Ravi and Beas were duly taken into account, he lamented.
Citing 1972 report by the Irrigation Commission, constituted by the Government of India, Mann said that it states that Punjab (post-1966, after its reorganisation) falls within the Yamuna River Basin.
The chief minister said that if Haryana has a claim over the waters of Ravi and Beas rivers, Punjab should also have an equal claim on the Yamuna waters. He said that these requests have been ignored, adding that due to non-construction of storage structure on Yamuna River, water is going to waste.
Bhagwant Mann pleaded that Punjab's claim should be considered during the revision of this agreement, and Punjab should be given its due rights to Yamuna waters.
Raising the issue of "bias approach" of Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB), the chief minister said that the Board was constituted under the provisions of the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966, with the mandate to regulate the supply of water and power from the Bhakra, Nangal and Beas projects to the partner states of Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Chandigarh.
He said that in the past Punjab has been very liberal in sharing water with the partner states to meet their drinking water and other genuine requirements as Punjab was relying upon its groundwater reserves to meet its demand of water, particularly for the paddy crop.
Mann said that as a result, the groundwater level has depleted to a huge extent, so much so that 115 blocks out of 153 blocks of the state (76.10 per cent) are over-exploited, adding that this percentage is the highest amongst all the States in the country.
Noting that Punjab itself is running short of its water requirement and even its water share in the river waters is not sufficient to meet these requirements, he said despite our repeated request BBMB did not take any action to advise the other partner states to regulate the release of water to Haryana, and as a result, it exhausted its share by March 30, 2025.
Mann said that considering the request of the Government of Haryana on humanitarian grounds, the state decided to release 4,000 cusecs of water out of Punjab's share to meet its drinking water requirement, though Haryana has only a genuine demand of 1,700 cusecs of water.
The chief minister claimed that BBMB ignored the interest of Punjab and decided to release 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana despite serious objections raised by Punjab.
He said that this is against the spirit and provisions of the law as BBMB has taken this decision of taking Punjab's water against the consent of Punjab, adding that BBMB should be advised to restrain itself and act as per the provisions of law.
Highlighting the issue of deployment of CISF personnel at Bhakra Nangal Dam, the chief minister said the security of Bhakra and Nangal Dams has been the sole responsibility of the concerned states since their construction.
He said that the Ministry of Power (MoP) has taken the decision to depute CISF for the security of Bhakra Nangal Dams, which is an unnecessary and completely avoidable step as there is no need to disturb a well-established operational setup as it further degrades the right of Punjab with respect to these dams. In view of this, Mann requested that the decision to depute CISF may be revoked immediately.
Demanding adequate representation to Punjab officers and officials in the Chandigarh Administration in the ratio of 60:40, the chief minister said that Chandigarh is the capital of Punjab and there is a well-established and time honoured convention, since the reorganisation of the state of Punjab in 1966, to fill all civil posts in Chandigarh administration from personnel drawn from the Punjab and Haryana in the ratio of 60:40.
However, he said that in recent years this balance has been severely eroded with a systematic increase in deputations from the AGMUT and DANICs cadres, and added that key departments in the Chandigarh Administration hitherto managed by officers from Punjab have now been allocated to much junior officers from the AGMUT cadre.
He alleged that this increasing centralisation and declining representation to Punjab in the administration of its own capital is against the very spirit of cooperative federalism.
Raising the issue of immediate release of pending arrears under the Post-Matric Scholarship Scheme for Scheduled Caste Students for Academic Sessions 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20, the chief minister said that Punjab has the highest percentage of Scheduled Caste population (31.94 per cent) in the country and the Post Matric Scholarship scheme for SC Students for pursuing Higher Education was implemented as a 100 per cent centrally-sponsored scheme.
He said that this scheme with a 'Committed Liability' of the state of Rs 60.79 crore proved to be highly beneficial for the Scheduled Caste students in Punjab adding that the Government of India changed the criteria of 'Committed liability' in 2018 and made it equivalent to "the total demand of the state as well as Centre" in the terminal year of the previous plan period/ Finance Commission.
Speaking on the issue of Desilting of Harike Head works, the chief minister said that it is located at the confluence point of rivers Sutlej and Beas and is the main control point for supply of water to South west Punjab, Rajasthan and also controlling flow into Pakistan.
Mann said that there is an urgent need for carrying out de-silting of the reservoir at a cost Rs 600 crore approximately, adding that as reservoir area has been declared a Ramsar Convention site and is of national importance, the central government and Rajasthan must share the cost of project.
Meanwhile, affirming Punjab's full alignment with the vision of Viksit Bharat @2047, the chief minister said that Punjab is committed to build a Rangla Punjab' -- a vibrant, inclusive, and progressive state.
He said that Punjab Vision 2047 launched in 2023 aligns with Viksit Bharat goals with an ambitious target of 8 per cent-plus annual GDP growth through industrial and service-led development, adding that structural reforms are underway to boost business environment along with infrastructure and innovation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
HC relief for CHRI, sets aside I-T dept notice to cancel NGO designation
In a relief to the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), the Delhi High Court on Tuesday set aside a notice issued under the Income Tax Act that sought to cancel the NGO's registration as a charitable institution. The bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Vinod Kumar set aside the notice and allowed CHRI's petition. The I-T Department had cited the NGO's earlier FCRA cancellation by the Centre while issuing the notice. FCRA cancellation implies the organisation can't accept foreign contributions. Notably, the NGO's Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) registration was cancelled twice by the Centre through the MHA. It was first cancelled in April 2022, which was challenged by the NGO before the HC. The court had quashed the Centre's order on the ground it was not reasoned, directing it to reconsider the case. Following reconsideration, the Centre cancelled the FCRA registration a second time through an order in September 2024. This is now under challenge before the HC, and is due to be heard next on September 14. Pending the challenge, the I-T Department on July 29 issued notice to CHRI under Section 12AB(4)(a), which deals with revocation of IT Act registration certificate granted in case of specified violations — that is, if the institution violates any other law. The Commissioner of I-T (Exemption), Delhi, issued a hearing notice to CHRI under Section 12AB(4)(a) proposing cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the IT Act — its designation as a charitable organisation — on the ground that FCRA registration cancellation is a 'specified violation' under Section 12AB(4)(f). Senior advocate Arvind Datar, appearing with advocate Kabir Dixit, in their challenge to the I-T department's notice, highlighted that such a notice proposing cancellation of their IT Act registration at this stage is premature and legally untenable.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
GST rate rationalisation is welcome, but States' revenues must be protected: Karnataka Revenue Minister Byre Gowda
Reforms in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime with rate rate rationalisation is a welcome move, but State governments are concerned with the impact of the same on the revenues accruing to them, according to Karnataka Revenue Minister Krishna Byre Gowda. Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Gowda, who is also a member of the Group of Ministers (GoM) on rate rationalisation, said that the impact of the Centre's proposals have to be carefully assessed. A major overhaul of GST was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his independence day address, with a flat two rate structure of 18% and 5% proposed by the Centre. 'We are for rate rationalisation. The rate impact of the same is on the revenues of the state are of great concern. Since the Central Govt has carried out these deliberations and developed proposals outside the GST consultation forum, we are not in the knowledge of the full proposals including measures to protect State revenues, if any. We are looking forward to understand and discuss,' he said. While the Centre, he said, had various other revenue sources, i. e. Direct taxes, customs, dividends of monopoly PSUs, dividends from RBI, etc, the States have very limited sources. 'GST is the biggest source for the states. So, any major shock in GST will fundamentally affect the fiscal health of the states. So, we would like the rate rationalisation carried out along with protections for state revenues,' he added. Mr. Gowda added that his government had raised the consequential impact of GST on State's finances before the Finance Commission, but did not get much joy out of the response, which basically kept separate the GST and other financial issues. 'In my view, though, this is a structural issue. The GST, by moving from origin to destination principle, has fundamentally affected and altered long term revenue and fiscal trajectory of some states. Hence, it is a fiscal issue. Now, if the Finance Commission refuses to recognise this, then states like Karnataka and few others will get the wrong end of both worlds. GST council will only discuss GsT issues and will consider fiscal issues as extraneous and outside the mandate of the Council and hence not really to be debated in the Council. And, FC will refuse to discuss the fiscal impact of GST in state finances,' he said. 'With no redressal mechanism in the federal structure. I sincerely hope, for the sake of our federal unity, that these issues will be understood and adequately addressed. I hope these issues will not be brushed aside. Such a move will only harm the federal spirit,' he added. A meeting of the GoM on rate rationalisation will be addressed by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday (August 20, 2025).
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
A urea crisis in Telangana
Urea, a soil nutrient essential for plant growth, has become a political flashpoint between the Central government and the Telangana government. Given short supply, farmers are standing in queues outside fertilizer shops for hours, hoping to secure urea for their crops. While the ruling Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are blaming each other for the situation, the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) is blaming both. In February, the Ministry of Agriculture had allotted five types of fertilizers (urea, di-ammonium phosphate, muriate of potash, complex fertilizers, and single super phosphate) to Telangana. This included 9.8 lakh tonnes of urea for the Kharif season. While there has been little difference between demand and supply of other fertilizers, the gap regarding urea has become an issue. In an official communication, the Central government informed Telangana that it would receive 8.3 lakh tonnes of urea in the April-August period. However, the State received only 5.32 lakh tonnes till August 17. The Minister for Agriculture, Tummala Nageswara Rao, has blamed the Centre for the crisis, stating that it has failed to ensure supply. 'I have written separately to the Union Ministers for Agriculture and Chemicals and Fertilizers to supply the allotted quantity of urea. Officials of the Agriculture Department have also addressed letters to the Union Secretaries of Agriculture and Chemicals and Fertilizers, but in vain,' he said. Mr. Nageswara Rao accused the Centre of misleading Parliament by stating that an ample quantity of urea had been allotted to the State, claiming that it did not provide the supply numbers. Meanwhile the State unit president of the BJP, N. Ramchander Rao, alleged that the State government mismanaged supply. He claimed that the Centre had supplied Telangana more than the required amount. He accused the State administration of diversion, inefficiency, and black marketing. Mr. Ramchander Rao also demanded to know why the problem had cropped up only in Telangana. Mr. Nageswara Rao countered him saying Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Haryana, and Punjab were also facing urea scarcity due to the short supply of both indigenous and imported urea. The Congress also raised the issue in Parliament. While the Congress and the BJP are engaged in a war of words, the BRS has been meeting farmers at fertilizer shops and reminding them that they did not face such hassles during its regime. With the crisis escalating, Mr. Nageswara Rao wrote to the Union Minister for Chemicals and Fertilizers, requesting him to supply at least 3 lakh tonnes of urea in August in addition to the 0.68 lakh tonnes supplied so far this month. Telangana, like many other States, has not received the required supplies of either the indigenous variety of urea or of the imported variety. Issues in domestic production are due to hurdles in imports of key raw materials and the rise in consumption of the soil nutrient. Issues in imports are due to export restrictions imposed by China. India also imports urea from Oman, Russia, the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Algeria, Egypt and Nigeria, besides China. Imports vary from 15% to 30% of the total based on the local production in a year. India had aimed to end imports of urea by 2025 by enhancing local production. In 2022, the Union Minister for Chemicals and Fertilizers said that new plants would be established. However, the goal remains a mirage. The estimated consumption of urea in 2025-26 is about 410 lakh tonnes, with an increase expected due to a rise in Kharif cultivation. Telangana's woes are compounded with problems in the operation of the Ramagundam Fertilizers and Chemicals, where there was no production for 78 days from April due to technical glitches. Of the urea produced in India, Telangana gets most of its supply from the plant, which has a production capacity of 12.7 lakh tonnes per annum. Production of nano urea (liquid) is also yet to be scaled up in the country. Farmers have also not embraced nano urea yet, as it involves additional costs. With reports of China easing restrictions on exports to India, officials are hopeful that there will be no scarcity in the Rabi season. During the Kharif season, however, there is little hope of getting additional supply from overseas or increasing domestic capacity immediately.
