HC relief for CHRI, sets aside I-T dept notice to cancel NGO designation
The bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Vinod Kumar set aside the notice and allowed CHRI's petition. The I-T Department had cited the NGO's earlier FCRA cancellation by the Centre while issuing the notice. FCRA cancellation implies the organisation can't accept foreign contributions. Notably, the NGO's Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) registration was cancelled twice by the Centre through the MHA. It was first cancelled in April 2022, which was challenged by the NGO before the HC. The court had quashed the Centre's order on the ground it was not reasoned, directing it to reconsider the case. Following reconsideration, the Centre cancelled the FCRA registration a second time through an order in September 2024. This is now under challenge before the HC, and is due to be heard next on September 14.
Pending the challenge, the I-T Department on July 29 issued notice to CHRI under Section 12AB(4)(a), which deals with revocation of IT Act registration certificate granted in case of specified violations — that is, if the institution violates any other law. The Commissioner of I-T (Exemption), Delhi, issued a hearing notice to CHRI under Section 12AB(4)(a) proposing cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the IT Act — its designation as a charitable organisation — on the ground that FCRA registration cancellation is a 'specified violation' under Section 12AB(4)(f).
Senior advocate Arvind Datar, appearing with advocate Kabir Dixit, in their challenge to the I-T department's notice, highlighted that such a notice proposing cancellation of their IT Act registration at this stage is premature and legally untenable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Kaynes semiconductor row: Sridhar Babu accuses KTR of misleading public
Hyderabad: Telangana industries minister D Sridhar Babu has accused BRS working president KT Rama Rao (KTR) of deliberately spreading misinformation regarding the Kaynes Technology semiconductor project being shifted to Gujarat. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He called the claim that Telangana lost the project due to govt failure "an outrageous lie" and described KTR's remarks as a "cheap attempt to deflect blame and cover up his own shortcomings." In a statement issued on Tuesday, Sridhar clarified, "Kaynes did not 'flee' Telangana. The project was drawn to Gujarat because the Central govt and the BJP-led Gujarat govt offered massive subsidies. KTR is fully aware of this, yet he continues to mislead the people of Telangana with baseless allegations." He pointed out that the Centre approved a 50% subsidy under the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) for the Kaynes project in Sanand, Gujarat. The 76,000 crore ISM scheme was designed to promote semiconductor manufacturing in India, and once it became known that units in Gujarat would automatically qualify for a 50% subsidy, semiconductor firms naturally gravitated toward the state. For its 3,307 crore investment, Kaynes received an extraordinary 1,654.5 crore subsidy from the Centre. The Gujarat govt added another 40% of the central subsidy amounting to 661 crore, bringing the total subsidy package to approximately 2,314.9 crore, or nearly 70% of the project's cost, the minister said. He criticised the Centre for failing to extend similar support to other states, claiming that only Gujarat receives such "stepmotherly favoritism." He added, "Semiconductor companies are naturally drawn to Gujarat because of the clear message that the state will fully support central subsidies. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This blatant partiality is something the BJP must answer for." Sridhar Babu further criticized KTR for remaining silent on the Centre's bias, saying, "Instead of questioning the BJP's favoritism, KTR chooses to attack the Telangana govt. His silence on the Centre's role only highlights his lack of courage. MSID:: 123388303 413 |
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
HC relief for CHRI, sets aside I-T dept notice to cancel NGO designation
In a relief to the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), the Delhi High Court on Tuesday set aside a notice issued under the Income Tax Act that sought to cancel the NGO's registration as a charitable institution. The bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Vinod Kumar set aside the notice and allowed CHRI's petition. The I-T Department had cited the NGO's earlier FCRA cancellation by the Centre while issuing the notice. FCRA cancellation implies the organisation can't accept foreign contributions. Notably, the NGO's Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) registration was cancelled twice by the Centre through the MHA. It was first cancelled in April 2022, which was challenged by the NGO before the HC. The court had quashed the Centre's order on the ground it was not reasoned, directing it to reconsider the case. Following reconsideration, the Centre cancelled the FCRA registration a second time through an order in September 2024. This is now under challenge before the HC, and is due to be heard next on September 14. Pending the challenge, the I-T Department on July 29 issued notice to CHRI under Section 12AB(4)(a), which deals with revocation of IT Act registration certificate granted in case of specified violations — that is, if the institution violates any other law. The Commissioner of I-T (Exemption), Delhi, issued a hearing notice to CHRI under Section 12AB(4)(a) proposing cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the IT Act — its designation as a charitable organisation — on the ground that FCRA registration cancellation is a 'specified violation' under Section 12AB(4)(f). Senior advocate Arvind Datar, appearing with advocate Kabir Dixit, in their challenge to the I-T department's notice, highlighted that such a notice proposing cancellation of their IT Act registration at this stage is premature and legally untenable.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
GST rate rationalisation is welcome, but States' revenues must be protected: Karnataka Revenue Minister Byre Gowda
Reforms in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime with rate rate rationalisation is a welcome move, but State governments are concerned with the impact of the same on the revenues accruing to them, according to Karnataka Revenue Minister Krishna Byre Gowda. Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Gowda, who is also a member of the Group of Ministers (GoM) on rate rationalisation, said that the impact of the Centre's proposals have to be carefully assessed. A major overhaul of GST was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his independence day address, with a flat two rate structure of 18% and 5% proposed by the Centre. 'We are for rate rationalisation. The rate impact of the same is on the revenues of the state are of great concern. Since the Central Govt has carried out these deliberations and developed proposals outside the GST consultation forum, we are not in the knowledge of the full proposals including measures to protect State revenues, if any. We are looking forward to understand and discuss,' he said. While the Centre, he said, had various other revenue sources, i. e. Direct taxes, customs, dividends of monopoly PSUs, dividends from RBI, etc, the States have very limited sources. 'GST is the biggest source for the states. So, any major shock in GST will fundamentally affect the fiscal health of the states. So, we would like the rate rationalisation carried out along with protections for state revenues,' he added. Mr. Gowda added that his government had raised the consequential impact of GST on State's finances before the Finance Commission, but did not get much joy out of the response, which basically kept separate the GST and other financial issues. 'In my view, though, this is a structural issue. The GST, by moving from origin to destination principle, has fundamentally affected and altered long term revenue and fiscal trajectory of some states. Hence, it is a fiscal issue. Now, if the Finance Commission refuses to recognise this, then states like Karnataka and few others will get the wrong end of both worlds. GST council will only discuss GsT issues and will consider fiscal issues as extraneous and outside the mandate of the Council and hence not really to be debated in the Council. And, FC will refuse to discuss the fiscal impact of GST in state finances,' he said. 'With no redressal mechanism in the federal structure. I sincerely hope, for the sake of our federal unity, that these issues will be understood and adequately addressed. I hope these issues will not be brushed aside. Such a move will only harm the federal spirit,' he added. A meeting of the GoM on rate rationalisation will be addressed by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday (August 20, 2025).
