Loro Piana put under court administration
LVMH
group's high-end Italian cashmere firm
Loro Piana
under judicial administration for a year after allegedly uncovering
worker abuse
inside its supply chain, in the latest in a string of cases that have tainted the image of Italy's
luxury brands
.
Loro Piana Spa is the fifth fashion company to be targeted by the same Milan court for similar labour issues since 2023, according to the 26-page ruling reviewed by Reuters on Monday.
Units of fashion brands Valentino, LVMH's Dior, Italy's Armani, and Italian handbag company Alviero Martini were also placed under administration.
The court found that Loro Piana, which makes cashmere clothing, subcontracted its production through two front firms with no actual manufacturing capacity to Chinese-owned workshops in Italy that it said exploited workers.
The Milan court found Loro Piana "culpably failed" to adequately oversee its suppliers in order to pursue higher profits, according to the ruling.
The court in its ruling also appointed an external administrator to verify the company meets all the judges' demands that it implement effective tools to control its supply chain.
Loro Piana declined to comment. LVMH was not immediately available for comment.
The administration will be lifted earlier if the unit brings its practices into line with legal requirements, as was the case with Dior, Armani and Alviero Martini previously targeted by the court.
LVMH, the world's biggest luxury group, acquired 80% of Loro Piana in July 2013, leaving 20% in the hands of the Italian family that founded the company.
In their ruling, the Milan judges wrote that despite the previous cases being widely reported "this production chain, headed by Loro Piana, has continued to operate until now".
In its ruling, the court also emphasises that this kept going even after representatives of Italy's fashion brands signed an accord in May with legal and political authorities to fight worker exploitation.
The owners of the contracting and subcontracting companies are under investigation by Milan prosecutors for exploiting workers and employing people off the books. Loro Piana Spa itself faces no criminal probe.
The prosecutors in the case said the violation of rules among fashion companies in Italy was "a generalised and consolidated manufacturing method".
Italy is home to thousands of small manufacturers that make up 50%-55% of global luxury goods production, consultancy Bain has calculated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC denies bail to key conspirator in 2011 murder of Bhandup eatery
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court has denied bail to Amit Madhukar Bhogle, alleged gang leader and key conspirator in the murder of Bhandup-based Chinese food stall owner Suraj Mehra, observing that there was material to show his active involvement in the 'well planned' murder, falling squarely under the provisions of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). (Shutterstock) Mehra, also known as 'Nepali', was attacked on October 4, 2021 by Sachin Dhananjay Kulkarni alias Chingya and Piyush Priyadarshan Naik while he was heading back home with his friend after closing his eatery. Though his friend survived the attack, Mehra succumbed to his injuries and was declared dead at Mulund General Hospital. The Bhandup police investigated the case initially before it was transferred to the Mumbai crime branch. The police alleged that Mehra and his friend were attacked by members of an organised crime syndicate and Bhogle, arrested on September 28, 2021, was the key conspirator. During the probe, the police found that Bhogle had planned Mehra's murder in collusion with other co-accused including Ramchandra Raut alias Kaka, who coordinated with assailants like Rahul Jadhav, Umesh Kadam and Sushil alias Sada Sawant. The police later invoked the MCOCA against Bhogle and the other co-accused, claiming that the gang led by him was involved in at least 34 criminal cases, among which he was named in 14 cases. Advocates Sana Raees Khan and Sumit Sharma, representing Bhogle, submitted that invocation of the MCOCA against him was legally untenable and unjustified, as there was a delay of nearly one year in granting approval for applying the law. They further contended that there was no material on record to substantiate the allegation of Bhogle being a 'gang leader' or his involvement in the conspiracy or execution of Mehra's murder. Additional public prosecutor Veera Shinde emphasised that Bhogle's conduct was established by a continued criminal tendency. He had long-standing enmity with Mehra and had planned the latter's murder to assert his dominance and control over the locality. There was sufficient prima facie evidence to indicate that Bhogle was not only a conspirator but also played a key role in orchestrating the offence through his gang members, the prosecution said. The material collected by the investigating agency revealed Bhogle's deep-rooted criminal background and his active participation in the offence, they added. The single judge bench of justice Amit Borkar rejected Bhogle's bail application, saying his involvement in the offence did not seem to be merely incidental or peripheral, but integral and connected to the planning and execution. Mehra's murder was meticulously planned and Bhogle had shared pictures of the deceased's mutilated body, the court noted. 'It is particularly disturbing that the accused allegedly shared a photograph of the deceased, showing grievous injuries with his intestines protruding, immediately after the incident, which indicates lack of remorse and a sense of impunity,' the court said. Bhogle was a habitual offender with a long-standing criminal background and the alleged murder fell squarely within the definition of 'continuing unlawful activity' under the MCOCA, the court held.
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump, Apple announce $100 billion US boost, total investment hits $600 billion
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Apple will invest an additional $100 billion in the United States, a move which will expand the company's domestic investment commitment and could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. The new pledge brings Apple's total investment commitment in the U.S. to $600 billion. Earlier this year, the company had announced it would invest $500 billion and hire 20,000 workers across the country over the next four years. The announcement centers on expanding Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing footprint in the U.S., but still falls short of Trump's demand that Apple begin making iPhones domestically. "Companies like Apple, they're coming home. They're all coming home," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, moments after Apple CEO Tim Cook gave him a U.S.-made souvenir with a 24-karat gold base. "This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in America also are made in America," Trump added. Asked if Apple could eventually build entire iPhones in the U.S., Cook noted that many components such as semiconductors, glass and Face ID modules are already made domestically, but said that final assembly will remain overseas "for a while." While the investment pledge is significant, analysts say the numbers align with Apple's typical spending patterns and echo commitments made during both the Biden administration and Trump's previous term. In May, Trump had threatened Apple with a 25% tariff on products manufactured overseas, a sharp reversal from earlier policy when his administration had exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from rounds of tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump's effort to reshape global trade through tariffs cost Apple $800 million in the June quarter. "Today is a good step in the right direction for Apple, and it helps get on Trump's good side after what appears to be a tension-filled few months in the eyes of the Street between the White House and Apple," said Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. Apple has a mixed track record when it comes to following through on investment promises. In 2019, for instance, Cook toured a Texas factory with Trump that was promoted as a new manufacturing site. But the facility had been producing Apple computers since 2013 and Apple has since moved that production to Thailand. Apple continues to manufacture most of its products, including iPhones and iPads, in Asia, primarily in China, although it has shifted some production to Vietnam, Thailand and India in recent years. Despite political pressure, analysts widely agree that building iPhones in the U.S. remains unrealistic due to labor costs and the complexity of the global supply chain. "The announcement is a savvy solution to the president's demand that Apple manufacture all iPhones in the U.S.," said Nancy Tengler, CEO and CIO of Laffer Tengler Investments, which holds Apple shares. Partners on Apple's latest U.S. investment effort include specialty glass maker Corning, semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials, and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries, and Broadcom. Apple shares closed up 5% on Wednesday. Shares of Corning rose nearly 4% in extended trading, while Applied Materials gained almost 2%.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
'It's only been 8 hours': Donald Trump threatens to impose 'secondary sanctions' on India; hints at possible ban on China
Hours after the US President slapped an additional 25 per cent on India, bringing the total to 50 percent, Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to impose secondary sanctions. During a press interaction, US President Donald Trump was questioned about why India was being singled out for purchasing oil from Russia when many other countries do the same. In response, Trump said, "It's only been 8 hours. So let's see what happens. You're going to see a lot more. You're going to see so much secondary sanctions." Amid deepening India-Russia oil ties, the US appears to be stepping up sanctions against New Delhi, signaling a broader strategy by President Trump to economically isolate Russia in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine. US imposed additional tariffs on India Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday announcing that India will face an extra 25% tariff over and above the 25% rate announced last week. While the 25% rate is effective from August 7, 2025, the newly announced additional tariff will come into place 21 days from now. Following this directive, Indian imports to the US, except for a limited exclusion list, will face a combined tariff of 50%." The ad valorem duty be in addition to any other duties, fees, taxes, exactions, and charges applicable to such imports...," the order said. "I find that the Government of India is currently directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil. Accordingly, and as consistent with applicable law, articles of India imported into the customs territory of the United States shall be subject to an additional ad valorem rate of duty of 25 percent," it said. India calls tariff increase '3Us- Unfair, unjustified and unreasonable' India's response was swift and firm, with the ministry of external affairs denouncing the tariff increase as "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable." The ministry emphasised that India's Russian oil imports are driven by market considerations and energy security requirements for its 1.4 billion population. The MEA statement further asserted India's commitment to protecting its national interests, describing the US decision as detrimental to their strategic partnership and mutual respect principles. "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India. It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest. We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests," the MEA said. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepares for his first Chinese visit in over seven years amidst deteriorating US relations, Trump has suggested similar tariff measures against China. Trump may impose sanctions on China When questioned about potential sanctions on China, Trump acknowledged the possibility, stating that additional secondary sanctions might be implemented to pressure Russia. He confirmed that after India's case, similar actions could be extended to other nations, potentially including China. "It may happen... I can't tell you yet," Trump said. "We did it with India. We're doing it probably with a couple of others. One of them could be China." Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays .
