
Punjab govt must take Centre into confidence on new anti-sacrilege bill
It might take about six months for the committee to send the bill back to the Assembly for clearing and then to the governor for approval.
The Aam Aadmi Party–led Punjab government has tabled the Punjab Prevention of Offences Against Holy Scripture(s) Bill, 2025 which was discussed in the Assembly on Tuesday amidst ruckus and then referred to a select committee.
A complex issue
The new anti-sacrilege bill is said to have taken note of the shortcomings of the earlier bills and is hence more comprehensive, secular, and sufficiently stringent to be a deterrence for sacrilege offences considered very serious in the state. Meanwhile, 42-year-old Gurjeet Singh Khalsa, supposedly a non-political activist, has been staging a protest on top of a BSNL mobile tower in Punjab's Samana since October 2024 demanding an anti-sacrilege law. Though not widely reported in the mainstream media, such protests should be handled deftly by the government, lest it rakes up discontents of the past.
In fact, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), under Sections 298, 299, and 300, already provides stringent punishments for religious offences. Punjab government as well as the activists who are protesting for a new law against sacrilege of religious texts are of the view that the provisions of the current Union laws are not stringent enough.
Incidentally, the bill inadvertently equates the Bhagavad Gita with the holy books of other faiths, which may trigger a controversy. The bill could be amended to also include other religious texts considered holy by a vast majority of Hindus and/or be worded appropriately to capture the essence of all holy books of all faiths without naming any of them. Needless to say, the issue is a complex one.
Going by the text of the present bill, albeit a short one, there are sufficient indications to suggest that adequate care has been taken to make the acts of sacrilege a serious offence inviting harsh punishments. But it is not clear why these provisions could not be added to the existing Sections of the BNS. After all, the BNS is an all-India law that applies equally to all states and all faiths. The AAP-led Punjab government appears to have not consulted the Union government or had any discussions with the Union Law Ministry on this issue.
What should be of concern are the possibilities of other states following suit and enacting separate laws to suit the political environment of respective states citing the Punjab bill as a precedent. In a federal setup, the Constitution allows states to enact sufficient laws to maintain law and order and preserve religious harmony through stringent punishments for offences involving religious practices, texts, icons, and symbols. There have been instances of religious books being vandalised, places of worship desecrated, and statues of widely revered socio-political leaders popular among certain communities damaged.
Also read: Stop telling South Indians to learn Hindi. In Hyderabad, languages coexist without imposition
Extra caution
Another aspect of concern should be the misuse of any law, however sincere the intentions of the lawmakers might be. The anti-sacrilege bill may have good intentions, but there is hardly any guarantee that such a law will not become a tool for miscreants wanting to drive a wedge between communities and followers of different faiths in the state.
In a politically volatile border state where religious fault lines have been exploited by extreme elements bent on hurting the unity and integrity of the country, the state government needs to be extra vigilant and take the Union government into confidence at every stage. The argument that such laws will strengthen the law and order machinery of the state government and act as an effective deterrence against crimes is understandable. But in a state which witnessed the nightmare of radicalisation on religious lines to the extent of separatism, violent uprising against the Union government, and misuse of the holiest of holy Sikh shrine, the Golden Temple, which was followed by the assasination of a former prime minister, the government needs to exercise extra caution in dealing with issues related to faith.
The state government also needs to be vigilant enough to frustrate insidious attempts by pro-Khalistan elements who could create socio-religious conflicts. Besides sacrilege of holy books, the bill could also include any attempt to vandalise national symbols like the flag and the Indian Constitution.
Religious issues are highly emotive and sensitive, and hence need extra careful handling especially in a state where the religion-politics mix is much stronger compared to other states.
Seshadri Chari is the former editor of 'Organiser'. He tweets @seshadrichari. Views are personal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
RSS Chief Dr Mohan Bhagwat attends Chintan Baithak in Kerala
Kochi, July 25 (UNI) RSS Sarsanghchalak Dr Mohan Bhagwat who arrived yesterday evening, is attending a three-day 'National Chintan Baithak and Education Conference' being held at Piravom today. Around 80 prominent educationists working at the national level are participating in the Baithak in which the RSS Chief is attending as chief guest. Discussions will include topics such as Bharatiya knowledge traditions, Bharatiya languages, modern education systems that foster self-reliance among the youth, life values, civic awareness, environment education. The Baithak on July 25, 26 and 27 will outline a roadmap in education for a Viksit Bharat, said A. Vinod, National Co-ordinator of Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas. The Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas, which has been actively working for the last 20 years in the field of education to promote and integrate Bharatiya perspectives and indigenous content, will organize the event at the Adi Shankara Nilayam, the birthplace of Adi Shankaracharya and center of Chinmaya International Foundation. Along with the organisational achievements, the meeting will evaluate the initiatives of Nyas, like 'Jñānotsavs' and the 'Jñāna Mahakumbh,' which have been organized over the past five years to bring together various educational institutions working towards reinstating Bharatiya values in the education sector. A separate Education Conference (Jñāna Sabha) will be held on July 27 and 28 at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, with participation from universities, central and state educational institutions, educational agencies, and private educational entrepreneurs who are contributing uniquely for the Bharatiya in education. Vice Chancellors and Directors from around 200 institutions across Bharat will attend this gathering. The central theme of this Jñāna Sabha is 'Education for a Viksit Bharat'. Distinguished personalities including Mata Amritanandamayi Devi (spiritual leader), Sri Sri Ravishankar(Acharya of Jeevan Kala), Dr. H. Nagendra (Chancellor of Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana), Shri M (spiritual leader), and Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev will grace the occasion. The conference aims to deliberate on how collective efforts in education can pave the way for a developed Bharat. It will emphasize how upcoming generations can be prepared to face global challenges by integrating life values, civic consciousness, social harmony, and simple environmentally sustainable living as core elements of education. The follow up of Sankalpa Patras resolved at the Jñāna Maha Kumbh held in Prayagraj, and the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) especially on evaluation and research will also be discussed. To ensure the successful conduct of the conference, a meeting of workers will be held on June 27 at BTH in Ernakulam, he said. UNI DS RKM

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Consensual sex between adolocents aged 16 to 18 years must not be treated as abuse: amicus curiae to SC
Supreme Court-appointed amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising has argued that consensual sexual acts by teenagers, aged between 16 and 18, in voluntary relationships cannot be classified as 'abuse' or prosecuted as a crime. The written submissions filed by Ms. Jaising in the apex court is part of a petition filed by advocate Nipun Saxena dating back to 2012. The amicus's brief has challenged the age of pegged at 18 years by the enactment of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) to the extent that it works to criminalise 'consensual sexual activity between children between the age of 16-18'. 'The only solution lies in declaring that sex between consenting adolescents between the age of 16, an almost universal age of sexual maturity, and 18 is not a form of 'abuse',' Ms. Jaising's submissions said. The senior advocate, who was India's first woman Additional Solicitor General of India, said the exemption for consensual sexual acts between individuals in this age group must be read into the POCSO Act and also Section 375 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code and its corresponding provision, Section 63, of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Definition of 'child' She submitted that the word 'child' in Section 2(d) of POCSO should not include individuals aged between 16 and 18 who engage in consensual sexual activity. 'Without reading down the statutory age of consent set at 18, it is prayed that the Supreme Court read into the impugned provisions a 'close-in-age exception', applicable when both parties to the sexual act are adolescents between the ages of 16 and 18 and the sexual act is consensual. Such an exception would preserve the protective intent of the statute while preventing its misuse against adolescent relationships that are not exploitative in nature,' Ms. Jaising reasoned in her submissions prepared with the assistance of advocates Paras Nath Singh, S. Sherwani, Rohin Bhat and R. Sinha. 'No reason to increase age for consent to 18 years' The case in question contains a challenge against the increase of age of consent from 16 yeats to 18 years through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013. 'The age of consent was static at 16 for 80 years. No rational reason has been indicated for the increase, nor is there any data to suggest that the age of consent required any increase. The BNS has also kept a legislative scheme similar to the one in the Criminal Law Amendment Act,' the amicus curiae submitted. She argued that the increase in the age of consent violated the right to autonomy of children between the ages of 16 and 18 who have the ability to give mature consent to sexual activity, having regard to the fact that they have attained puberty giving rise to sexual awareness. 'Scientific research indicates that adolescents are attaining puberty sooner than they did several years ago and puberty as we know, is the age of awakening of sexual awareness. It is the age during which there is a natural attraction between the sexes and the development of sexual relationships of choice. Hence, to criminalise such an activity rather than addressing the issue of sex education, is arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the best interests of children as defined in law,' the submissions contended.


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Mayawati welcomes assurance on Constitution, hails commitment to secularism
Lucknow, July 25 (UNI) Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati today welcomed the Union government's assurance that there would be no changes to the Constitution, especially the removal of the word "secularism" from its Preamble. In a post on social media platform X, the former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister commended the statement made in Parliament by the Union Law Minister, who clarified that the government has no plans to alter or remove the term "secularism" and that such proposals are not under consideration. Calling the statement 'appropriate and commendable,' Mayawati said it offers a sense of relief and assurance to all those, both in India and globally, who strongly oppose any tampering with the Constitution authored by Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar. She said the BSP, along with many others, was concerned about demands being raised to alter the Constitution, and this clarification has helped ease those worries. Highlighting India's diverse religious fabric, Mayawati reiterated that the Constitution reflects the principle of 'unity in diversity,' providing equal respect and rights to all communities, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, and Parsis. She emphasized that Dr. Ambedkar envisioned an egalitarian society where every citizen is treated with dignity and equality, values deeply embedded in the Constitution. Mayawati concluded by expressing hope that the central government would remain firm on its commitment to uphold the Constitution's secular and inclusive values, regardless of external pressures or political agendas. UNI PRI RKM