logo
BJP targets Akhilesh Yadav over mosque meeting, questions wife Dimple's outfit

BJP targets Akhilesh Yadav over mosque meeting, questions wife Dimple's outfit

India Today23-07-2025
A political storm has erupted over Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav's recent visit to a mosque near Parliament, with BJP leaders accusing the party of holding a political meeting inside a religious space and alleging that SP MP Dimple Yadav was "inappropriately dressed" during the visit. The controversy escalated after photographs of the visit surfaced, showing SP leaders, including Dimple Yadav, seated inside the mosque.advertisementBJP Minority Morcha president Jamal Siddiqui led the charge, claiming that Akhilesh Yadav had turned a place of worship into "an unofficial SP officeHe said, "Akhilesh Yadav went to the mosque yesterday. That mosque is located in front of the Parliament building. SP MP Nadvi is the imam there. We condemn him as well - why was a political meeting held inside a mosque?"
Siddiqui went on to make sharp personal allegations against Dimple Yadav. "In the photo, Dimple Yadav is seen sitting in a blouse - her back and stomach are visible. Dimple Yadav did not have a dupatta on her head," he said."This goes against the code of conduct inside a mosque and hurts Islamic sentiments worldwide." He added, "We will file an FIR against them. If this is the way, we will also hold a meeting in the same mosque on July 25, starting with the National Song and ending with the National Anthem."The BJP leader accused the SP of turning the mosque into a venue for "fun and frolic", and went so far as to allege that "anti-national activities" were discussed during the visit.Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Brajesh Pathak also weighed in, accusing the SP of violating constitutional norms. "Samajwadi Party always violates the Constitution. The Indian Constitution says that we cannot use religious places for political purposes. They do not have faith in the Constitution," he said. The Samajwadi Party strongly denied the BJP's allegations, with both Akhilesh and Dimple Yadav rejecting claims of a political meeting and dismissing the controversy as an attempt to distract from pressing national issues."There is nothing like that," Dimple Yadav said, responding to the viral pictures. "Imam Nadvi ji, who is our MP, had invited us, so we went. BJP is spreading misinformation. We didn't go there for any meeting. The BJP is saying all this to divert attention from the real issues. The government doesn't want to talk about matters concerning the people." Stepping up her attack, the Mainpuri MP slammed the BJP for evading questions on key issues like the SIR in Bihar, the Pahalgam attack, and Operation Sindoor, calling them "very important matters."advertisementAkhilesh Yadav also hit back, accusing the BJP of weaponising religion for political gain. While speaking to reporters about the incident, he said, "I thank you, but you too have fallen into BJP's trap.""These are religious people standing beside me I only know one thing: faith connects people, regardless of the religion. Any faith that brings people together, we stand with it. That's exactly what troubles the BJP - they don't want unity, they want distance to remain."Other SP leaders also condemned the BJP's remarks, with SP MP Zia ur Rehman Barq calling the row baseless. "There were no political meetings held. Don't we have space in the Parliament or in the residences of MPs to hold meetings? Why would he have a meeting in a mosque?" he said.On the criticism of Dimple Yadav, he added, "Dimple ji had covered her head - it's possible her dupatta slipped when the photo was taken." SP leader Rajeev Rai, in a rather sarcastic tone, asked if the party leaders needed to obtain a licence to visit temples and mosques.Congress MP Imran Masood echoed similar views, calling BJP's comments "shameful". He said, "The mosque's imam is also a Member of Parliament. What's the issue if he sat in the mosque? BJP should be ashamed. Dimple Yadav was dressed according to Indian culture. BJP leaders have become mentally bankrupt. They are insulting women."- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bengal BJP ups ante against ‘fake' voters, accuses Trinamool of ‘threatening' BLOs
Bengal BJP ups ante against ‘fake' voters, accuses Trinamool of ‘threatening' BLOs

The Hindu

time2 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Bengal BJP ups ante against ‘fake' voters, accuses Trinamool of ‘threatening' BLOs

The Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have been engaged in a war of words over the possibility of a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists in West Bengal, with the saffron party amplifying its rhetoric against 'fake voters' and alleging that West Bengal's District Magistrates and booth-level officers (BLOs) are being 'threatened' by the Trinamool government. 'In booths 101, 102, 104, and 105 of the Baruipur East Assembly constituency, 100% of the residents are Hindus. Despite there being not a single person from the Muslim community residing there, the voter list suddenly shows the names of Muslim voters, none of whom are Indian citizens. All are Bangladeshis,' Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, said on Friday. On Thursday, he had said that in a 'closed-door meeting' at the State Secretariat, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had 'scolded' BLOs travelling to Delhi for training and had ordered that no steps should be taken without permission. He also accused West Bengal Chief Secretary Manoj Pant of having 'verbally instructed District Magistrates to replace the 1,000 BLOs who were trained in Delhi.' 'I want to tell the Chief Secretary that you cannot lawfully change BLOs appointed after July 5 without a valid reason and the consent of the Chief Electoral Officer. The Chief Minister cannot intervene in election-related matters… I am reassuring everyone that no BLO can be changed by the Chief Minister or Chief Secretary,' Mr. Adhikari said, addressing the press outside the West Bengal Assembly on Thursday. He also accused Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of 'threatening' BLOs and DMs in a meeting on Monday at Bolpur in Birbhum district, where she said she was not informed about 1,000 BLOs being taken to Delhi for training and that BLOs should not harass 'genuine' voters. 'Remember, the EC comes in during elections, but you all are employees of the State government. Do not harass people unreasonably… If you receive any instructions, inform the Chief Secretary first. You all are taking sudden decisions without informing us,' Ms. Banerjee said, addressing district officials during the administrative meeting. Meanwhile, Trinamool leaders have said that a 'covert exercise' towards a National Register of Citizens (NRC) is being conducted in the name of SIR. 'An NRC process is being initiated in the name of voter list revision… if anyone is dropped from the voters' list, protest. Demand to know from your BLO why you were removed as a genuine voter. This is your constitutional and democratic right,' the Chief Minister had said in a public address on Tuesday. The next day, Trinamool's national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee alleged that the Election Commission and the BJP were trying to suppress voters, because 'if people are allowed to vote freely, they will be defeated.' On Friday, Trinamool MPs stood outside Parliament and agitated against the SIR in Bihar, which they called 'silent invisible rigging.' According to the website of the Election Commission, SIRs are to be conducted across the country, requiring electors missing from the last SIR electoral roll to 'prove their eligibility' as a voter by submitting government-issued identification documents. However, this has incited a strong reaction from Opposition parties over the possible loss of voting rights for lakhs of voters who might not be able to submit documents on time. With training sessions being held for BLOs of West Bengal, and the electoral roll of the 2002 SIR in the State being made public recently, many in the political circles believe that an SIR could be conducted in West Bengal ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.

India's Operation Mahadev rattles Pakistan; Islamabad claims Home Minister Amit Shah is..., calls India's stance on Indus Water Treaty as...
India's Operation Mahadev rattles Pakistan; Islamabad claims Home Minister Amit Shah is..., calls India's stance on Indus Water Treaty as...

India.com

time2 minutes ago

  • India.com

India's Operation Mahadev rattles Pakistan; Islamabad claims Home Minister Amit Shah is..., calls India's stance on Indus Water Treaty as...

Home Minister Amit Shah told the Parliament that three terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam terror attack were killed during Operation Mahadev in Jammu and Kashmir. (File) Operation Mahadev: Operation Mahadev, a joint operation by the Indian Army and the state police, in which three Pakistan-linked terrorists who reportedly carried out the Pahalgam terror attack, were killed in Jammu and Kashmir, has rattled the neighbouring country with Islamabad now accusing Indian leaders, particularly the ruling BJP of leveling false allegations against the country without any credible evidence. What did Pakistan say? In a statement, the Pakistan Foreign Ministry termed the statements made in the Indian Parliament on Operation Mahadev during the discussion on Operation Sindoor, as 'irresponsible and provocative', which are aimed at 'distorting facts, justifying India's aggression and gaining public support for its military actions' against Pakistan. 'We completely reject the anti-Pakistan statements made by Indian leaders in their Parliament,' Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said in the statement. The spokesperson also claimed that Union Home Minister Amit Shah's comments on Operation Mahadev were completely 'non-factual' and lacked any shred of truth. 'India attacked Pakistan on the night of 6-7 May without any credible evidence or investigation, and its aggressive stance has not changed as it continues to make new allegations against Pakistan,' he alleged. Why Pakistan is accusing Home Minister Amit Shah? The Pakistan Foreign Office further claimed that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had offered to conduct an impartial international investigation into the Pahalgam attack, but the offer was declined by India, which is now making 'baseless' claims by linking the terrorists killed in Operation Mahadev to Pakistan. The spokesperson also brought up the Indus Waters Treaty, stating that India's remarks on the strategic water sharing agreement between the two countries are 'worrying'. Operation Mahadev On Tuesday, Home Minister Amit Shah informed the Lok Sabha that three Pakistan-linked terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam attack– Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Suleiman alias Faizal, Afghan, and Jibran– were killed during Operation Mahadev, a joint operation launched by the Indian Army and the Jammu and Kashmir Police on Monday.

HC dismisses BJP MLA's plea for gag order against BJD leader
HC dismisses BJP MLA's plea for gag order against BJD leader

Time of India

time10 minutes ago

  • Time of India

HC dismisses BJP MLA's plea for gag order against BJD leader

Cuttack: Orissa high court on Thursday dismissed a plea by BJP MLA and deputy chief minister Kanak Vardan Singh Deo seeking a gag order against BJD leader Saroj Kumar Meher from making media statements about an ongoing election petition related to the 2024 Patnagarh assembly polls. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera, delivering the order on July 31, observed that Meher, who lost to Singh Deo and later challenged the election result, cannot be restrained from giving accurate statements regarding court proceedings to the media. The judge said such reporting fosters transparency and public confidence in the judicial process. Meher had filed an election petition seeking to declare Singh Deo's election void, alleging improper acceptance of his nomination papers despite alleged procedural lapses. Singh Deo, in an interlocutory application, alleged that Meher made derogatory and misleading comments to the media. He claimed the remarks damaged his public image and sought a temporary injunction. In an unrelated case, the high court dismissed an election petition filed by BJP candidate Lalit Kumar Behera, who had challenged the 2024 re-election of BJD legislator Dhruba Charan Sahoo from Rajnagar. Justice Behera rejected the petition on July 28, when neither the election petitioner nor his counsel was present in the court during the hearing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Behera, who lost the election to Sahoo by a margin of 1,817 votes, had moved the court on July 19, 2024 alleging that Sahoo's nomination was improperly accepted by the returning officer in violation of statutory norms under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store